
School smartphone bans reflect growing concern over youth mental health, academic performance
Notably, a majority of Republican, Democratic and independent voters all support bans during class time. More broadly, parent-led movements to limit children's use of smartphones, social media and the internet have sprung up around the country. For example, the Phone-Free Schools Movement in Pennsylvania was launched in 2023, and Mothers Against Media Addiction started in New York in March 2024. These organizations, which empower parents to advocate in their local communities, follow in the footsteps of organizations such as Wait Until 8th in Texas and Screen Time Action Network at Fairplay in Massachusetts, which were formed in 2017. The concerns of these parent-led organizations were reflected in the best-selling book 'The Anxious Generation,' which paints a bleak picture of modern childhood as dominated by depression and anxiety brought on by smartphone addiction. Phone-free schools are one of the four actions the book's author, Jonathan Haidt, recommended to change course. The other three are no smartphones for children before high school, waiting until 16 for social media access, and allowing more childhood independence in the real world. Haidt's research team collaborated with The Harris Poll to survey Gen Z.
They found that almost half of those age 18-27 wish social media had never been invented, and 21% wish smartphones had never been invented. About 40% of Gen Z respondents supported phone-free schools. The Pew Research Center found that almost 40% of kids age 8-12 use social media, and almost 95% of kids age 13-17 use it, with nearly half of teens reporting that they use social media almost constantly. Phone-free schools are also part of the larger trend of states and nations resisting Big Tech, the large technology companies that play a significant role in global commerce. In May 2025, two U.S. senators introduced the Stop the Scroll Act, which would require mental health warnings on social media. New laws that ban smartphones or social media for youth are being introduced across several Western nations.
Australia has banned all social media for those under 16. After a fatal stabbing at a middle school in eastern France on June 10, French President Emmanuel Macron announced the same day that he wants the European Union to set the minimum age for social media at 15. He argued that social media is a factor in teen violence. If the EU doesn't act within a few months, Macron has pledged to enact a ban in France as soon as possible. Although this trend of restricting use of phones in school is new, more states may adopt smartphone bans in the future. Bell-to-bell bans are viewed as especially powerful in improving academic performance. Some research has suggested that when children have access to a smartphone, even if they do not use it, they find it harder to focus in class. Initial research has found that academic performance improves after the bans go into effect.
Test scores fell across the U.S. during the pandemic lockdown and have not returned to prepandemic levels. Some states, such as Maine and Oregon, are almost a full year behind grade level in reading. Not a single state has recovered in both math and reading. Statewide bans free local school districts from having to create their own technology bans, which can lead to heated debates. Although a majority of adults approve of banning smartphones in class, 24% oppose it for reasons such as wanting to be able to contact their kids throughout the day and wanting parents to set the boundaries. However, 72% of high school teachers say that phones are a major distraction. Anecdotally, schools report that students like the bans after getting used to the change. (By Margaret Murray University of Michigan - AP)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arab Times
7 hours ago
- Arab Times
US airlines oppose new limits on facial recognition at airport checkpoints
WASHINGTON, July 29: Leading U.S. airlines, travel companies, and airport groups have urged the Senate to reject a proposed bill that would restrict the Transportation Security Administration's (TSA) use of facial recognition technology at airport security checkpoints. In a letter viewed by Reuters, the industry groups — including Airlines for America (which represents carriers such as American Airlines, United Airlines, Delta Air Lines, and Southwest Airlines), U.S. Travel, and two major airport associations—warned that the bill could significantly slow identity verification processes, leading to increased wait times at airports nationwide. The bipartisan bill, which the Senate Commerce Committee is set to consider on Wednesday, aims to protect travelers' privacy rights by ensuring they can opt out of TSA facial recognition screenings and by placing guardrails on the use and potential abuse of passenger biometric data. One of the bill's sponsors, Republican Senator John Kennedy, criticized the current use of facial recognition in May, saying the TSA 'subjects countless law-abiding Americans to excessive facial recognition screenings,' adding that it invades passenger privacy without clearly informing them of their right to opt out. Democratic Senator Jeff Merkley, another co-sponsor, echoed those concerns, stating that the unchecked expansion of TSA facial recognition programs risks pushing the country toward 'a national surveillance state.' If passed, the legislation would require TSA to offer passengers a clear, non-biometric alternative for identity verification. It would also prohibit discriminatory treatment or harsher screening conditions for travelers who choose not to have their faces scanned. However, airline and travel industry groups strongly oppose the measure. In their letter, they described the proposed restrictions as a step backward for national security, arguing that the limitations would prevent TSA from modernizing its operations through automation. This, they said, would force the agency to continue relying on manual, officer-based processes and keep approximately 75% of its budget tied to staffing instead of advancing technology. The groups further warned that the bill could hinder innovation in airport systems, such as automated e-gates and TSA PreCheck Touchless ID, and lead to 'overwhelming and chaotic' conditions at security checkpoints across the country. Senators Kennedy and Merkley did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Monday.


Arab Times
8 hours ago
- Arab Times
Trump says he ended friendship with Epstein because he 'stole people that worked for me'
WASHINGTON, July 29, (AP): US President Donald Trump said Monday that he ended his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein and threw the now-disgraced financier out of his private club in Florida after Epstein betrayed him more than once by hiring people who had worked for him. Trump did not say what his employees did or where they worked, and the White House declined further comment. But the White House had previously offered a different explanation for the falling-out. Steven Cheung, the White House communications director, said in a statement last week: "The fact is that the President kicked him out of his club for being a creep.' Epstein killed himself, authorities say, in a New York jail cell in 2019 as he awaited trial on trafficking charges. Trump and his top allies stoked conspiracy theories about Epstein's death before Trump returned to power. They are now struggling to manage the fallout after the Justice Department said Epstein did, in fact, die by suicide and that it would not release additional documents about the case. The president and his allies, some of whom are now in the administration, had promised to release the files. The case has dogged Trump at home and abroad and even followed Vice President JD Vance during an appearance in his home state of Ohio on Monday. A small group of protesters assembled outside a factory in Canton that Vance toured, holding signs. The Republican president spoke at his golf property in Turnberry, Scotland, as he sat with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer after the leaders had met and were answering questions from US and UK journalists. Asked to explain why the relationship had faltered, Trump said, "That's such old history, very easy to explain, but I don't want to waste your time by explaining it.' He then explained, saying he stopped talking to Epstein after "he did something that was inappropriate.' "He hired help and I said, 'Don't ever do that again,'' Trump said. "He stole people that worked for me. I said, 'Don't ever do that again.' He did it again, and I threw him out of the place, persona non grata.' "I threw him out and that was it. I'm glad I did, if you want to know the truth,' Trump added. Trump recently directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek the public release of sealed grand jury transcripts in the case. One federal judge has denied that request; a second judge has yet to rule.

Kuwait Times
10 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
EU accuses Temu over sale of ‘illegal' products
BRUSSELS: The European Union accused Chinese-founded online shopping giant Temu on Monday of breaking the bloc's digital rules by not 'properly' assessing the risks of illegal products. EU regulators believe Temu is not doing enough to protect European consumers from dangerous products and that it may not be acting sufficiently to mitigate risks to users. 'Evidence showed that there is a high risk for consumers in the EU to encounter illegal products on the platform,' the European Commission said in its preliminary finding. It pointed to a mystery shopping exercise that found consumers were 'very likely to find non-compliant products among the offer, such as baby toys and small electronics'. Wildly popular in the European Union despite only having entered the continent's market in 2023, Temu has 93.7 million average monthly active users in the 27-country bloc. The EU said Temu's October 2024 risk assessment was 'inaccurate and relying on general industry information rather than on specific details about its own marketplace'. Temu is under investigation as part of a mammoth law known as the Digital Services Act (DSA) that forces the world's largest tech firms to do more to protect European consumers online and better police content online. Temu will now be able to respond to the EU regulators' findings and defend itself, but there is no time limit on how long an investigation may last. If confirmed to be in breach, the EU can slap a fine on Temu. Fines under the DSA can go as high as six percent of a company's total worldwide annual turnover and force it to make changes to address violations. Launched in October, the EU probe continues to investigate other suspected breaches including the use of addictive design features that could hurt users' physical and mental well-being and how Temu's systems recommend content and products. The DSA is part of the EU's reinforced legal weaponry to curb the excesses of Big Tech, with stricter rules for the world's biggest platforms. It has faced criticism from the US administration under President Donald Trump. The Republican-dominated judiciary committee of the US House of Representatives described the DSA in a scathing report as a 'foreign censorship threat' on Friday. Staunch President Donald Trump ally Jim Jordan, committee chair, will meet EU tech sovereignty chief Henna Virkkunen in Brussels on Monday. There are currently other DSA probes into Chinese online retailer AliExpress, social media platforms Facebook and Instagram and X as well as TikTok. The EU also wants to crack down on cheap packages that flood into the bloc each year, with a proposal under discussion for a two-euro flat fee per parcel. Last year, 4.6 billion such packages entered the EU — more than 145 per second — with 91 percent originating in China. The EU expects the numbers to increase. — AFP