
Robert Rosenkranz
Private equity investor Robert Rosenkranz calls himself a 'selfish philanthropist.' He even devoted a whole chapter of his new book, The Stoic Capitalist, to this concept. 'The best form of philanthropy, to me, is when you use your talents, skills, and strategic insights to bring into being something that you feel society needs and could benefit from,' he says.
That ambition led Rosenkranz, chairman of Delphi Capital Management, via his Rosenkranz Foundation to found his most well-known philanthropic endeavour: Open to Debate. Appetite for the program's nonpartisan high-profile debates surged last year, with more than six million people watching former Israeli spokesperson Eylon Levy and journalist Mehdi Hasan answer the question: 'Were Israel's Actions in the Gaza War Justified?' The platform also took on the presidential debates, working with Princeton University on a series of recommendations (read more than three million times so far) to strengthen the format.
Other recent initiatives include founding Canyon, a cultural institution planned for New York City's Lower East Side that will showcase immersive works of visual art, music, and technology. Partnering with Saudi Arabia's Hevolution Foundation, Rosenkranz also provided $5 million of a total $10 million in grants for research on aging and longevity, which helped fund a study of worms that resulted in a significant extension of the organism's lifespan. 'If we can push off the diseases of old age, the reduction in physical strength or mental acuity that occurs, by 10 or 15 years, that seems to me the greatest gift to human flourishing that science can bestow,' Rosenkranz says.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
These are the top-ranked New Jersey colleges
While college-bound students often seek to spread their wings, tens of thousands choose to remain in New Jersey each year to take advantage of in-state tuition and highly ranked programs. Students who enroll in one of New Jersey's four-year public colleges and universities benefit from in-state tuition, which can reduce the cost by more than 50%. At Rutgers – New Brunswick, for example, the tuition for state residents in 2024-25 was $17,929 while out-of-state students paid $37,441. Academically, Rutgers – New Brunswick ranks No. 15 of the Top Public National Universities, according to U.S. News & World Report, ahead of such notable institutions as University of Maryland, Purdue University, University of Georgia, and Virgina Tech. Substantial in-state discounts are likewise in place at The College of New Jersey (TCNJ), New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT), Rowan University, Ramapo College of New Jersey, Montclair State University, Kean University, and more. More: Researching college majors pays future dividends | College Connection Fortunately, local students are not sacrificing educational rigor as many New Jersey schools, both public and private, offer impressive, highly ranked programs. Princeton University, ranked No. 1 Best National University by U.S. News & World Report, has an extremely low acceptance rate of 4%. However, according to the University's newspaper, The Daily Princetonian, nearly 17% of the incoming Class of 2025 hails from New Jersey. While excelling in all fields, Princeton's most popular majors are Social Sciences, Engineering, and Computer & Information Sciences. Another private Garden State institution, Stevens Institute of Technology, is particularly renown for its programs in Engineering which enroll 53% of the student body. Graduates, overall, move onto successful careers earning a median salary of $90,326 six years after graduation. More: Private consulting firms help set college costs | College Connection New Jersey Institute of Technology, ranked in the Top 50 Public Universities Nationwide, is particularly noted for its programs in Engineering and Computer and Information Sciences. According to its website, the average starting salary for NJIT graduates is $82,232. The College of New Jersey, ranked No. 1 Top Public Regional University – North, is best known for its programs in Business and Teaching. It also hosts a highly competitive seven-year direct entry medical program with Rutgers' New Jersey Medical School. Seton Hall, a Catholic university, is particularly attractive to local students pursuing health-related careers due to its five and six year dual-degree programs. Students can earn their bachelor's and master's degree in Athletic Training in five years, and their bachelor's and advanced degree in Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physician Assistant, and Speech-Language Pathology in six years. New Jersey's college-bound students would do well to research the opportunities within their state before contributing to the 'brain drain' of those leaving the Garden State. Susan Alaimo is the founder & director of Collegebound Review, offering PSAT/SAT® preparation & private college advising by Ivy League educated instructors. Visit or call 908-369-5362 This article originally appeared on These are the top-ranked New Jersey colleges | Opinion
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive-US mulls giving millions to controversial Gaza aid foundation, sources say
By Jonathan Landay WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The State Department is weighing giving $500 million to the new foundation providing aid to war-shattered Gaza, according to two knowledgeable sources and two former U.S. officials, a move that would involve the U.S. more deeply in a controversial aid effort that has been beset by violence and chaos. The sources and former U.S. officials, all of whom requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, said that money for Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) would come from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which is being folded into the U.S. State Department. The plan has met resistance from some U.S. officials concerned with the deadly shootings of Palestinians near aid distribution sites and the competence of the GHF, the two sources said. The GHF, which has been fiercely criticized by humanitarian organizations, including the United Nations, for an alleged lack of neutrality, began distributing aid last week amid warnings that most of Gaza's 2.3 million population is at risk of famine after an 11-week Israeli aid blockade, which was lifted on May 19 when limited deliveries were allowed to resume. The foundation has seen senior personnel quit and had to pause handouts twice this week after crowds overwhelmed its distribution hubs. The State Department and GHF did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Reuters has been unable to establish who is currently funding the GHF operations, which began in Gaza last week. The GHF uses private U.S. security and logistics companies to transport aid into Gaza for distribution at so-called secure distribution sites. On Thursday, Reuters reported that a Chicago-based private equity firm, McNally Capital, has an "economic interest" in the for-profit U.S. contractor overseeing the logistics and security of GHF's aid distribution hubs in the enclave. While U.S. President Donald Trump's administration and Israel say they don't finance the GHF operation, both have been pressing the United Nations and international aid groups to work with it. The U.S. and Israel argue that aid distributed by a long-established U.N. aid network was diverted to Hamas. Hamas has denied that. USAID has been all but dismantled. Some 80 percent of its programs have been canceled and its staff face termination as part of President Donald Trump's drive to align U.S. foreign policy with his "America First" agenda. One source with knowledge of the matter and one former senior official said the proposal to give the $500 million to GHF has been championed by acting deputy USAID Administrator Ken Jackson, who has helped oversee the agency's dismemberment. The source said that Israel requested the funds to underwrite GHF's operations for 180 days. The Israeli government did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The two sources said that some U.S. officials have concerns with the plan because of the overcrowding that has affected the aid distribution hubs run by GHF's contractor, and violence nearby. Those officials also want well-established non-governmental organizations experienced in running aid operations in Gaza and elsewhere to be involved in the operation if the State Department approves the funds for GHF, a position that Israel likely will oppose, the sources said. Gaza hospital officials have said more than 80 people had been shot dead and hundreds wounded near GHF's distribution points between June 1-3. Since launching its operation, the GHF has opened three hubs, but over the past two days, only two of them have been functioning. Witnesses blamed Israeli soldiers for the killings. The Israeli military said it fired warning shots on two days, while on Tuesday it said soldiers had fired at Palestinian "suspects" advancing towards their positions.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
CHARLEBOIS: Where's the beef? Priced out of the Canadian grill
With summer weather finally settling in, Canadians are returning to a familiar ritual — firing up the barbecue. But as they approach the meat counter in search of steaks and burgers, many are encountering a far less familiar reality: Shockingly high prices. This year, the meat aisle has become a case study in supply-side economics and market dysfunction. Since January, according to Statistics Canada, beef prices have surged at an alarming pace. Striploin is up 34.2%, top sirloin 33.7%, and rib cuts nearly 12%. Pork rib cuts and chicken breasts have each risen 5.9%, and even meatless burger patties are 6.8% more expensive. While all proteins in the so-called 'meat trifecta' have climbed, beef leads the charge — by a wide margin. Behind these increases lies a sobering trend. Canada's beef cow inventory has dropped to just 3.38 million head — the lowest since 1989. That's a 1.2% decrease from last year, signalling more than just cyclical decline. Many cattle producers are exiting the industry while prices are favourable, opting to reinvest in less volatile sectors or shift entirely to crop production. In short, the Canadian beef industry is retreating and becoming increasingly risk-averse. South of the border, the U.S. is seeing a similar trend — but far less severe. According to the United States Department of Agriculture, the American beef cow herd declined just 0.5% to 27.9 million head. And that gap shows up in retail prices. Over the past year, U.S. boneless sirloin steak rose just 5.7%, compared to a staggering 22% in Canada. Ground beef increased 10.8% in the U.S., but by 23% here at home. Beef inflation is simply hitting Canadians harder. KINSELLA: Complaint filed after Ontario farm accused of refusing to hire Israeli LILLEY: Draft trade deal with U.S. hammered out amid 'intensive discussions' GOLDSTEIN: Tax Freedom Day is June 8, when Canadians finally start working for themselves Other than a shrinking herd, there are several other contributing factors: Canada's expansive geography, higher transportation costs, a limited number of federally licensed beef processors, carbon pricing, and higher labour costs all compound the problem. Regulations and logistical inefficiencies are more burdensome in Canada, driving up prices for retailers — and ultimately consumers. But there's another possibility we can't afford to ignore: Potential collusion within the industry. In the United States, the federal government has shown little tolerance for anti-competitive behaviour in the meat sector. Under President Joe Biden, the White House launched a 2022 investigation into price fixing among major meat packers — JBS, Tyson Foods, Cargill, and National Beef. That investigation has since resulted in several high-profile settlements, including a US$83.5-million payout by JBS in February. The Canadian Competition Bureau, by contrast, has remained largely silent on similar concerns. Perhaps it's time for that to change. The consequences are already visible. According to industry researcher IBISWorld, Canadian per capita beef consumption fell by 7.1% in 2023 and another 2.1% in 2024. This is no longer just a matter of shifting dietary preferences — it's a structural shift in consumer behaviour. Beef is increasingly seen as a luxury item, with ground beef becoming the primary choice for budget-conscious households still committed to red meat. That's unfortunate. Beef remains one of the most natural, authentic and sustainable sources of protein available to Canadians. Canadian ranchers and processors have made significant strides in improving environmental stewardship and animal welfare, often without fanfare. As a whole, beef delivers exceptional nutritional value, supports rural economies, and offers a level of traceability and food safety few protein alternatives can match. For many Canadian families, a summer steak on the grill is starting to feel more like a splurge than a staple. Consumers will continue to enjoy beef — but with moderation, and on occasions that justify the cost. Barbecue season hasn't disappeared. But for many, it's starting to look a little different: More sausages, more chicken, and less striploin. A shame, really — for a product that offers so much more than just taste.