logo
From summer school to language class, Education Department freezes leave students bereft of learning lifelines

From summer school to language class, Education Department freezes leave students bereft of learning lifelines

CNN16-07-2025
Desperation crept into Sylvia's voice as she rattled off all the ways her life would become more difficult if a free learning program that her son attends during the summer shuts its doors.
A single mother, Sylvia works as a janitor and is the sole breadwinner for her family which includes her 10-year-old as well as her ailing mother.
'I cannot sleep at night,' said Sylvia, who spoke to CNN through a translator as she picked up her son, Gabriel, at the end of a long shift. 'Gabriel is asking, 'Mom, why you are crying? Why are you crying, mom?''
She has been crying, she said, because she knows that the glue that keeps it all together — a nonprofit program that allows her son to have a safe place to stay, warm meals and a chance to learn English — is being targeted by the Trump administration. She declined to give her last name, citing privacy concerns amid the current political climate.
Aspire Afterschool Learning, where Gabriel spends his days during the summer school break in Arlington, Virginia, is one of more than 10,000 summer and after-school programs across the country that has been pushed into a state of perilous uncertainty after the Department of Education abruptly paused the grant it depends on to keep things running.
The fund, called 21st Century Community Learning Centers (21st CCLC), is a federal program that was among a huge swath of nearly $7 billion of education grants that the department suddenly froze this month, with little notice.
The halt came amid a review that alleged the money was being used to promote 'leftwing' ideologies. It comes as the Trump administration is seeking to dismantle the Department of Education, with mass layoffs underway and severe funding cuts under consideration.
Much of the money goes towards programs that serve some of the US' poorest children.
On Monday, some two dozen Democratic-led states sued the Department of Education in federal court to release the funds, which had already been approved by Congress and were supposed to have been disbursed to the states on July 1st.
But the squeeze is already forcing many summer programs to scramble to stay open, even as schools and educational schemes are bracing for deeper impacts in the fall.
The paused funding for K-12 programs included money for teacher education and recruitment, English language programs, student enrichment and nonprofit learning centers that partner with schools, among other initiatives.
They are delivered through grant programs like 21st CCLC, with state education agencies distributing the money to grantees, including school districts and nonprofits that run free enrichment programs or work with schools to put on programming throughout the year.
One day prior to the date the funds were to be released, the Department of Education instead sent a letter saying that money is not coming, pending a review.
'The Department will not be issuing Grant Award Notifications obligating funds for these programs on July 1 prior to completing that review,' it said. 'The Department remains committed to ensuring taxpayer resources are spent in accordance with the President's priorities and the Department's statutory responsibilities.'
The impact of the freeze is already being felt as it has caused many programs to question whether they will be able to stay open this summer.
'It feels like we're punishing a whole lot of students,' said Paula Fynboh, who runs Aspire, which provides programming throughout the year.
She is cobbling together money to keep the summer school running through student-run lemonade stands and other fundraising efforts. But if the money continues to be withheld come the fall, she will have to tell 25 families now in the program that their children will not be able to return.
Many nonprofits are facing similar odds. 'They can try and keep their doors open an extra few days and extra few weeks and maybe if they're lucky they have rainy day fund but you know that's a Band-Aid that isn't going to last forever,' said Jodi Grant, executive director of the Afterschool Alliance, a national nonprofit advocacy organization.
'If these funds are blocked, the fallout will be swift and devastating,' said Jim Clark, president and CEO of the Boys & Girls Club of America, the nation's largest after-school youth program. Many sites are also in the midst of running their summer camps and programs, and nearly a fifth (17%) of the Boys and Girls Club network is funded by the 21st CCLC grant, according to the Afterschool Alliance.
Up to 926 Boys & Girls Club centers, serving more than 220,000 kids, could be forced to close if the funds are not released, Clark said. Many of them are from underserved communities, and 'will lose access to essential supports like healthy meals, caring mentors, and safe spaces during the most vulnerable hours of the day,' he added.
Addie Nardi, who runs a Boys & Girls Club in a rural part of Maryland about 90 minutes from Washington, DC, said the sudden funding freeze this month felt like 'a kick to the gut'— but the shock was 'secondary, almost, to the concern of how we were going to be able to continue to serve these kids.'
If the funds don't come through, the site will likely permanently close, leaving elementary students and their families without one of their only options for support in the area, Nardi said.
There is no timeline for when the Department of Education review will be completed and if the money will ever start up again.
The impetus for the pause came from the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB), which described it as part of an 'ongoing programmatic review of education funding.'
In a statement, OMB raised concerns about how some of the funds may have been used by schools.
'Initial findings show that many of these grant programs have been grossly misused to subsidize a radical leftwing agenda. In one case, NY public schools used English Language Acquisition funds to promote illegal immigrant advocacy organizations. In another, Washington state used funds to direct illegal immigrants towards scholarships intended for American students. In yet another, School Improvement funds were used to conduct a seminar on 'queer resistance in the arts.''
OMB did not provide documentation about their claims when asked by CNN.
Grant, of Afterschool Alliance, says the move feels extreme.
'Nobody even knows what they're reviewing,' Grant said, 'If there's a specific program that they're concerned about, they should be investigating that program but not holding up funding for all of these other kids across the country.'
Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers union, said the freeze of funds already approved by Congress for this summer is particularly damaging. The Department of Education's move is 'hurting children and creating chaos,' she said.
Beyond the immediate threat to summer schools vying to stay open now, school districts and nonprofit education programs are bracing for more hardship into the school year.
According to an analysis by the New America Foundation, a Washington, DC, think tank, school districts will lose an average of $220,289 if the funds continue to be withheld. Some stand to lose millions, with the poorest districts suffering the most.
'Districts serving high-poverty student populations (those where over 25 percent of children live in poverty) will lose over five times as much funding per pupil as low-poverty school districts (those where fewer than 10 percent of children live in poverty),' according to New America's analysis. 'The 100 school districts facing the biggest cuts on a per-pupil basis have an average child poverty rate of 24.4 percent, much higher than the national average of 15.3 percent.'
Many school districts work with outside organizations to use federal grants to run after-school care or offer academic support for children from low-income families.
Aspire in Virginia, for example, runs after-school programs at a community center and two local schools that serve many low-income families. Ninety-nine percent of Aspire's students are from families of color, and more than 90% are living below the poverty line. Over three-quarters speak a language other than English at home.
Colorful posters line the walls at the community center where Aspire holds its programs, available to kids from 3rd to 8th grade. In one room, an arts and crafts project making masks was taking place, and in another, it was 'pirate day' where teachers dressed as pirates were fielding questions.
Some students and former students who have come back as volunteers are serving snacks: On the day CNN visited, it was pineapples and blueberry muffins.
The program regularly wraps up and discreetly sends home any leftovers to families in the program who would otherwise go without food.
Kids who participate in the program earn points for academic and social achievements — and the difference it makes shows. 'I feel, like, happy because I now, I know how to read,' shared Monserrat, a little girl from Bolivia who is entering 4th grade in the fall.
She joined Aspire a year ago, when her family moved to the US. She likes Aspire more than her regular school, she said, because she feels more competent and gets extra support.
April, a rising 4th grader, said that Aspire helped her with her English, and now, she even helps translate for her parents. (April and Monserrat's parents asked that their last names not be used to protect their privacy.)
When asked for thoughts on their experiences at Aspire, the girls raised both arms high above their heads, with two enthusiastic thumbs-up, flashing wide smiles.
The states suing the Department of Education are asking the court to issue a preliminary injunction to unfreeze the funds immediately in at least some states.
Fynboh said she fears the day Aspire will have to close.
'Walking by an empty classroom every day is going to be hard,' said Fynboh. 'We know these kids and we know their parents, their faces, their names, their stories, their gifts, their talents, and we know which ones are going to lose access to the program. And that's just heartbreaking.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Piers Morgan: ‘No Wonder' Stephen Colbert Got Canceled When Most Late Night Hosts Are ‘Activist Hacks for the Democrats'
Piers Morgan: ‘No Wonder' Stephen Colbert Got Canceled When Most Late Night Hosts Are ‘Activist Hacks for the Democrats'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Piers Morgan: ‘No Wonder' Stephen Colbert Got Canceled When Most Late Night Hosts Are ‘Activist Hacks for the Democrats'

Piers Morgan is weighing in on the cancellation of 'The Late Show With Stephen Colbert.' On Sunday morning, the TV personality took to X to say that most late-night hosts have become nothing more than 'hyper-partisan activist hacks' for the Left and that it's really 'no wonder' why Stephen Colbert got the boot. He also shared a New York Post cover that read, 'No wonder he was canned, 'The Left Show With Stephen Colbert.'' More from Variety David Letterman Blasts CBS and Skydance on 'The Late Show With Stephen Colbert' Cancellation: 'This Is Pure Cowardice' Stephen Colbert Hails 'South Park' Premiere's Naked Trump as 'Important Message of Hope for Our Times' LISTEN: 'Saiyaara' Shines Bright for Bollywood; 'Superman' Hangs Tough in Week 2; Stephen Colbert Fallout 'This is so damning,' Morgan wrote. 'Most of America's biggest late-night hosts have become nothing more than hyper-partisan activist hacks for the Democrats – a party that's rarely been more unpopular. No wonder Colbert got canned. More will follow.' Morgan is not the only television authority to speak out on Colbert's cancellation. Also on Sunday, former 'Tonight Show' host Jay Leno said late-night frontmen too often alienate part of their audience by 'cozying up' to one political party. 'I love political humor, don't get me wrong. But it's just what happens when people wind up cozying too much to one side or the other.' Leno said in an interview with David Trulio, president and CEO of the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute. 'Why shoot for just half an audience all the time? You know, why not try to get the whole. I mean, I like to bring people into the big picture.' It was announced on July 17 that the entire 'Late Show,' not just Colbert's iteration, would come to a close after the next TV season. CBS cited the move as a 'financial decision,' but some have wondered if it was to appease Donald Trump's FCC amid a pending merger between CBS' parent company, Paramount, and Skydance. Best of Variety New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts? Final Emmy Predictions: Talk Series and Scripted Variety - New Blood Looks to Tackle Late Night Staples Solve the daily Crossword

US and China to talk in Stockholm on trade with eye on Trump-Xi summit later this year
US and China to talk in Stockholm on trade with eye on Trump-Xi summit later this year

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

US and China to talk in Stockholm on trade with eye on Trump-Xi summit later this year

WASHINGTON (AP) — When top U.S. and Chinese officials meet in Stockholm, they are almost certain to agree to at least leaving tariffs at the current levels while working toward a meeting between their presidents later this year for a more lasting trade deal between the world's two largest economies, analysts say. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng are set to hold talks for the third time this year — this round in the Swedish capital, nearly four months after President Donald Trump upset global trade with his sweeping tariff proposal, including an import tax that shot up to 145% on Chinese goods. 'We have the confines of a deal with China,' Trump said Friday before leaving for Scotland. Bessent told MSNBC on Wednesday that the two countries after talks in Geneva and London have reached a 'status quo,' with the U.S. taxing imported goods from China at 30% and China responding with a 10% tariff, on top of tariffs prior to the start of Trump's second term. 'Now we can move on to discussing other matters in terms of bringing the economic relationship into balance,' Bessent said. He was referring to the U.S. running a $295.5 billion trade deficit last year. The U.S. seeks an agreement that would enable it to export more to China and shift the Chinese economy more toward domestic consumer spending. The Chinese embassy in Washington said Beijing hopes 'there will be more consensus and cooperation and less misperception' coming out of the talks. With an eye on a possible leaders' summit, Stockholm could provide some answers as to the timeline and viability of that particular goal ahead of a possible meeting between Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping. 'The meeting will be important in starting to set the stage for a fall meeting between Trump and Xi,' said Wendy Cutler, a former U.S. trade negotiator and now vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute. 'Beijing will likely insist on detailed preparations before they agree to a leaders' meeting.' In Stockholm, the two sides are likely to focus on commercial announcements to be made at a leaders' summit as well as agreements to address 'major irritants,' such as China's industrial overcapacity and its lack of control over chemicals used to make fentanyl, also to be announced when Xi and Trump should meet, Cutler said. Sean Stein, president of the U.S.-China Business Council, said Stockholm could be the first real opportunity for the two governments to address structural reform issues including market access in China for U.S. companies. What businesses will be seeking coming out of Stockholm would largely be 'the atmosphere' — how the two sides characterize the discussions. They will also look for clues about a possible leaders' summit because any real deal will hinge on the two presidents meeting each other, he said. Fentanyl-related tariffs are likely a focus for China In Stockholm, Beijing will likely demand the removal of the 20% fentanyl-related tariff that Trump imposed earlier this year, said Sun Yun, director of the China program at the Washington-based Stimson Center. This round of the U.S.-China trade dispute began with fentanyl, when Trump in February imposed a 10% tariff on Chinese goods, citing that China failed to curb the outflow of the chemicals used to make the drug. The following month, Trump added another 10% tax for the same reason. Beijing retaliated with extra duties on some U.S. goods, including coal, liquefied natural gas, and farm products such as beef, chicken, pork and soy. In Geneva, both sides climbed down from three-digit tariffs rolled out following Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs in April, but the U.S. kept the 20% 'fentanyl' tariffs, in addition to the 10% baseline rate — to which China responded by keeping the same 10% rate on U.S. products. These across-the-board duties were unchanged when the two sides met in London a month later to negotiate over non-tariff measures such as export controls on critical products. The Chinese government has long protested that American politicians blame China for the fentanyl crisis in the U.S. but argued the root problem lies with the U.S. itself. Washington says Beijing is not doing enough to regulate precursor chemicals that flow out of China into the hands of drug dealers. In July, China placed two fentanyl ingredients under enhanced control, a move seen as in response to U.S. pressure and signaling goodwill. Gabriel Wildau, managing director at the consultancy Teneo, said he doesn't expect any tariff to go away in Stockholm but that tariff relief could be part of a final trade deal. 'It's possible that Trump would cancel the 20% tariff that he has explicitly linked with fentanyl, but I would expect the final tariff level on China to be at least as high as the 15-20% rate contained in the recent deals with Japan, Indonesia, Vietnam,' Wildau said. US wants China to dump less, buy less oil from Russia and Iran China's industrial overcapacity is as much a headache for the United States as it is for the European Union. Even Beijing has acknowledged the problem but suggested it might be difficult to address. America's trade imbalance with China has decreased from a peak of $418 billion in 2018, according to the Census Bureau. But China has found new markets for its goods and as the world's dominant manufacturer ran a global trade surplus approaching $1 trillion last year — somewhat larger than the size of the U.S. overall trade deficit in 2024. And China's emergence as a manufacturer of electric vehicles and other emerging technologies has suddenly made it more of a financial and geopolitical threat for those same industries based in the U.S., Europe, Japan and South Korea. 'Some enterprises, especially manufacturing enterprises, feel more deeply that China's manufacturing capabilities are too strong, and Chinese people are too hardworking. Factories run 24 hours a day,' Chinese Premier Li Qiang said on Thursday when hosting European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Beijing. 'Some people think this will cause some new problems in the balance of supply and demand in world production.' 'We see this problem too,' Li said. Bessent also said the Stockholm talks could address Chinese purchases of Russian and Iranian oil. However, Wildau of Teneo said China could demand some U.S. security concessions in exchange, such as a reduced U.S. military presence in East Asia and scaled-back diplomatic support for Taiwan and the Philippines. This would likely face political pushback in Washington. The Stockholm talks will be 'geared towards building a trade agreement based around Chinese purchase commitments and pledges of investment in the U.S. in exchange for partial relief from U.S. tariffs and export controls,' Wildau said. He doubts there will be a grand deal. Instead, he predicts 'a more limited agreement based around fentanyl.' 'That,' he said, 'is probably the preferred outcome for China hawks in the Trump administration, who worry that an overeager Trump might offer too much to Xi.' ___ Associated Press writer Paul Wiseman contributed to this report Didi Tang And Josh Boak, The Associated Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store