EU welcomes Ukrainian law restoring independence to anti-corruption agencies
A total of 331 out of 340 lawmakers present voted in favor of the bill on Thursday, forming an overwhelming constitutional majority.
Last week, major anti-government protests broke out across Ukraine after the country's parliament approved a bill that brought the two main bodies – the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) – under government control.
The large-scale demonstrations were Ukraine's first major anti-government protests since Russia's 2022 invasion.
When approving the bill last week, Zelensky called it a necessary step to rid the two agencies of 'Russian influence.' Two employees of one of the bodies were arrested last week 'on suspicion of working for Russian special services.'
But on Thursday, the president about-faced, saying in a statement posted to X that he had listened to the Ukrainian people and that the 'right decision' was to reverse the controversial bill.
The law he signed Thursday is a 'guarantee of the proper independent functioning of Ukraine's anti-corruption bodies and all law enforcement agencies,' Zelensky said, adding that the new law will ensure regular polygraph checks for 'all law enforcement personnel who have access to state secrets or have relatives in Russia.'
'This is the right decision. It is very important that the state listens to public opinion. That it hears its citizens. Ukraine is a democracy – without a doubt,' he said.
Ukraine had long been seen as one of the most corrupt countries in Europe. The European Union warned Kyiv that it must implement strong anti-graft measures if it wants to join the bloc.
Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, and António Costa, the president of the European Council, both said in identical posts on X that the new law signed Thursday was a 'welcome step.'
'Ukraine's rule of law and anti-corruption reforms should continue. They remain essential for Ukraine's progress on the European path. The EU will continue to support these efforts,' they said.
Kaja Kallas, the EU's High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, also wrote on social media that 'Ukraine's move to restore powers of anti-corruption bodies demonstrates its resolve to quickly get back on course when European democratic values are at stake.'
'The rule of law and fighting corruption are crucial for any country aspiring to join the EU,' she said.
Diplomats from the EU countries of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal and Sweden also welcomed the move.
CNN's Ivana Kottasová contributed to this report.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sentebale war of words continues as charity calls for clarity on commission's probe into Prince Harry claims
The war of words over Sentebale is continuing, with the charity calling on the Charity Commission to provide clarity that its recent report did not specifically investigate claims of racism and misogyny against Prince Harry. Sources close to the Duke of Sussex claim they are "rehashing unsubstantiated allegations of bullying, misogyny and more", describing their latest move as not "just provocative, it's pitiful". A source at Sentebale has told Sky News: "We have written to The Charity Commission stating that the onus is on the commission to restate for the record that individual allegations of bullying have not been investigated or addressed in the commission's report." It comes after the Charity Commission report stated that "based on the evidence provided and reviewed by the commission, it found no evidence of: widespread or systemic bullying or harassment, including misogyny or misogynoir at the charity". However, the commission added that it "acknowledged the strong perception of ill treatment felt by a number of parties to the dispute and the impact this may have had on them personally". But sources at Sentebale believe the reporting around this statement - that Prince Harry has been cleared of bullying - has been inaccurate, as the charity watchdog did not specifically look at allegations made by the chair, Dr Sophie Chandauka, including during an exclusive interview on Sky News. A source close to Prince Harry and the former board of trustees has hit back, and said: "It's remarkable, just yesterday Ms Chanduaka was applauding the Charity Commission's findings, yet today, after a flurry of unflattering headlines, she's back on the warpath. "Issuing yet another media statement only reinforces the commission's criticism about using the press to air internal disputes. "Rehashing unsubstantiated allegations of bullying, misogyny and more, which the commission found no evidence of and dressing them up as veiled threats isn't just provocative, it's pitiful. "If Ms Chanduaka has genuine concerns, she should spell them out plainly or, better yet, redirect her energy toward something truly worthwhile, like raising money for the children Sentebale exists to support." It's understood Prince Harry and his supporters have also been left unsatisfied by the scope of the report, including their concerns about money spent on consultants that was authorised by Dr Chandauka. Read more from Sky News:Responding to Sky News, the Charity Commission said: "We have issued the charity with an action plan which sets out steps the current trustees need to take to improve governance weaknesses and rectify findings of mismanagement. "We now urge all involved to put their differences behind them and allow the charity to focus on its work and beneficiaries". Their report, released on Wednesday, was highly critical of all parties for allowing their disagreement to play out so publicly and allowing it to severely impact the charity's reputation.
Washington Post
21 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Kremlin, sensing advantage, confirms Putin-Trump meeting in coming days
President Donald Trump's abrupt shift on Wednesday from frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin's intransigence to a potential one-on-one meeting soon — despite Putin's refusal to halt attacks on Ukraine or back away from Russia's core war aims — handed the Russian leader a diplomatic coup, which the Kremlin embraced Thursday.
Forbes
21 minutes ago
- Forbes
Swiss Shock - Can Switzerland Reverse The 39% Tariff?
The imposition of a 39% tariff on Swiss exports to the US has been greeted with shock, despair and much ire in Switzerland – the main newspaper NZZ greeting the move as 'absurd'. Considerable offense was taken by the fact that the announcement came on the Swiss National holiday (August 1st). Equally, local business leaders and economists have been perplexed by the fact that the tariffs have been calculated on the back of a trade deficit that was skewed by the export of gold – the deficit is now a surplus. Equally, many of the goods that Switzerland exports to the US, do not have competitors there (Swiss chocolate, watches and more importantly specialized industrial goods which are used by the likes of Boeing). Neither is the Swiss franc a weak currency. There is also a feeling in Switzerland that its role on the international stage, and facilitator of American diplomacy (the Swiss embassy in Tehran has traditionally acted 'for' the US), has gone un-noticed. Swiss politics is normally a very staid affair but this episode has led to infighting across the spectrum, and considerable blame has been focused on the President of the government Council, Karin Keller-Sutter. As a result, the Swiss negotiating team that will return to Washington this week will have representation from the conservative SVP, and more officials from the trade and finance divisions. The Swiss case highlights the flaws in the methodology of the White House approach. While its economy is extremely resilient, the Swiss will not be able to suffer a 39% tariff lightly. Our sense is that the counterargument will centre around a re-framing of the trade relationship between the two countries, a re-evaluation of how Swiss industry in particular helps US firms, and an undertaking for Swiss industry to invest in the US. The hope here is that Switzerland ends up with an EU style deal, of tariffs of 15%, and a somewhat empty promise to invest 'billions' into the US. From a diplomatic point of view, given that the Swiss had traditionally been so helpful to US interests, this is an own-goal by the White House. At the time of writing, there is no indication at all as to whether this episode pushes Switzerland closer to the EU (in terms of trade – there is no question of Switzerland joining the EU). For its part, the EU is still trying to get the White House to agree the wording of deal reached in Scotland – there is ongoing lobbying from the spirits industry in Europe, not to mention the auto manufacturers. The deal is not yet watertight and needs to be implemented by individual members. There is still uncertainty over the threats to place specific tariffs on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals firms based in Europe next week (Ireland in particular) and the USD 600bn that is supposed to be invested by European firms in the US. If sector specific tariffs are severe the backlash to the deal could grow and there is rising chance that it could fall apart.
