logo
Maura Healey and Christina Romer reflect on how business can be more like government—yes, government

Maura Healey and Christina Romer reflect on how business can be more like government—yes, government

Fast Company12-05-2025

Hello and welcome to Modern CEO! I'm Stephanie Mehta, CEO and chief content officer of Mansueto Ventures. Each week this newsletter explores inclusive approaches to leadership drawn from conversations with executives and entrepreneurs, and from the pages of Inc. and Fast Company. If you received this newsletter from a friend, you can sign up to get it yourself every Monday morning.
Long before the Trump administration tapped Elon Musk to cut federal costs and headcount via the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), business leaders and politicians have been trying to find ways to make government leaner, less bureaucratic, and more like a well-run corporation.
In 1982, Ronald Reagan asked J. Peter Grace, CEO of W.R. Grace & Co., to lead a private sector committee to root our government waste. While campaigning for the presidency in 1992, Bill Clinton promised to 'radically change the way government operates—to shift from top-down bureaucracy to entrepreneurial government.' The notion that federal agencies and programs can be run more like businesses has animated the Oval Office aspirations of executives such as Michael Bloomberg, Howard Schultz, and Doug Burgum.
Public-sector playbooks for CEOs
But are there lessons that executives in the private sector can learn from their public counterparts? Businesses certainly have benefitted from government; tech companies owe a debt to DARPA, the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, for funding the predecessor to the internet, for example. Local governments can be particularly good at empowering employees at all levels to innovate, something that can confound large corporations. Rick Wartzman and Lawrence Greenspun, when they were with the Drucker Institute, shared the story of how a single front-line employee and two-middle managers in South Bend, Indiana, streamlined the city's application for tax-abatement to four pages from 22 and moved the process online. The mayor who challenged them to innovate? Pete Buttigieg, who went on to become U.S. Secretary of Transportation during the Biden administration.
Government has produced and shaped other notable leaders, including Christina Romer, the former chair of the Council of Economic Advisers in the Obama administration; and Maura Healey, the current governor of Massachusetts, whom I happened to interview last week at Think 2025, IBM's annual event for senior business and technology leaders (Fast Company was a strategic media partner at Think). At a time when many forces are pushing government entities to be more like businesses, I asked both of them to reflect on what business can learn from government. Here's what they had to say:
Maura Healey, governor, Massachusetts:
'Nobody has ever asked me that question. In many ways, government can do better by operating like a business, but in other cases that just doesn't hold. Government is the place where things have to get done that the market isn't going to do. As governor, I have to be attentive to the needs of seven million residents, some of whom voted for me and some of whom didn't, many of whom have competing interests. In government you have to find a way to account for all of that. It gets messy; it gets noisy; but at the end, it helps in terms of productive policy formulation when you have that kind of stakeholder incorporation.
'For purposes of creating a better world—I think in big terms—a world where there is an abundance of energy, of housing, of healthcare, of transportation, of economic opportunity and prosperity for every child, it has to come from a broader lens than sometimes might be incentivized by the bottom line.'
Christina Romer, professor emerita, Graduate Division, University of California at Berkeley, former chair of the Council of Economic Advisers:
'Government policymaking is often chided for being slow, and it can indeed be frustratingly bureaucratic and incremental. But 'moving fast and breaking things' is not what Social Security recipients want when they are waiting for their checks or what the public expects when the FAA is reconfiguring flight patterns and deciding control-tower staffing. At their best, government actions are carefully researched, broadly vetted, and deliberately implemented. This approach wouldn't work in every business setting, but it could certainly help prevent many bad decisions and unintended consequences.
'Something else that impressed me during my time in government was the high quality of government workers. Far from being the lazy, overpaid bureaucrats they are often caricatured to be, I found government workers to be knowledgeable, hard-working, and committed to serving the public. Businesses would certainly benefit if they could generate that kind of loyalty and passion in their workers.'
Good enough for government work
Are you a business leader who has worked in government? What did you learn from your experiences in the public sector? Send your stories to me at stephaniemehta@mansueto.com. I may include insights in a future newsletter.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Joann, Rite Aid, JCPenney, and other store closings contribute to a 274% surge in retail layoffs in 2025
Joann, Rite Aid, JCPenney, and other store closings contribute to a 274% surge in retail layoffs in 2025

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Joann, Rite Aid, JCPenney, and other store closings contribute to a 274% surge in retail layoffs in 2025

Layoff announcements from U.S. employers have increased 80%, to 696,309 job cuts, through May of this year. That's in comparison with the 385,859 cuts announced throughout the first five months of 2024, according to the latest layoffs report from Challenger, Gray & Christmas, a Chicago-based executive outplacement firm. Why you're catching the 'ick' so easily, according to science Uber's new senior mode aims to remove barriers for aging riders Why AI Is Making 1:1 Meetings Irrelevant Federal government agencies have been most impacted by planned job cuts in 2025, with 284,827 job reductions year to date, compared with 36,325 U.S. government job cuts announced during the same period last year. Retail is the second-leading industry in job cuts this year, with 75,802 cuts since the start of 2025. That's a 274% increase in retail job reductions compared with the same period last year, when U.S. companies announced 20,276 layoffs. According to the report, DOGE-related efforts remain the leading reason given for job cut announcements this year. This includes reductions in federal employee and contractor roles, and private nonprofit layoffs resulting from federal funding cuts. Market and economic conditions were the second-most cited explanation for announced U.S. layoffs, followed by store closings. In a news release discussing the layoff report, Andrew Challenger, senior vice president of Challenger, Gray & Christmas, said: 'Tariffs, funding cuts, consumer spending, and overall economic pessimism are putting intense pressure on companies' workforces. Companies are spending less, slowing hiring, and sending layoff notices.' Store closings being among the top reasons cited for U.S. retail layoffs is unsurprising. Fast Company has written extensively about retail store closings throughout the U.S., from companies like Kohl's, Macy's, and JCPenney. While some retailers have chosen to shutter the doors of some locations, others have filed for bankruptcy protection and announced company-wide store closures. In January 2025, Joann filed for bankruptcy for a second time. The fabric and crafts store previously filed for bankruptcy protection in March 2024. Similarly, Rite Aid publicized its decision to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on May 5. The retail pharmacy first filed for bankruptcy in October 2023. As for hiring efforts, U.S. companies have announced 79,741 planned hires through May of this year, an increase of 57% from the same period last year. However, planned hiring announcements remain historically low compared with pre-pandemic and early-pandemic years. This post originally appeared at to get the Fast Company newsletter: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Wonder, Marc Lore's food tech startup, is planning to go public in early 2028
Wonder, Marc Lore's food tech startup, is planning to go public in early 2028

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Wonder, Marc Lore's food tech startup, is planning to go public in early 2028

Billionaire entrepreneur and Wonder CEO Marc Lore has confirmed that his food and restaurant technology startup is planning for an initial public offering. Why you're catching the 'ick' so easily, according to science Uber's new senior mode aims to remove barriers for aging riders How to watch the NBA Finals 2025: Pacers vs. Thunder, live online or on TV, including free options And though it won't happen right away, he offered a very specific time frame. 'We're going to IPO [and we're] kind of working backwards from March 30, 2028,' Lore said on Thursday at Fast Company's Most Innovative Companies Summit in New York. 'Whether we hit it or not, we will see.' He added that a full board of directors will be in place and that the restaurant technology startup wants to 'look and act like a public company' by the end of next year in preparation for the future offering. 'So all of 2027, we get four quarters of practice,' Lore said. 'That was really important to me to get four quarters of practice where we're giving EPS [earnings per share] guidance, having quarterly earnings calls, doing the comp committee, treating it like a public company. So when we go public in Q1 of 2028, we've already had that muscle.' He predicted an accelerating growth rate for the business, continuing through 2028 with $5 billion in revenue, and additional 'big growth' in 2029. Wonder, which Lore has described as a kind of 'Amazon for food and beverage,' has brick-and-mortar restaurants and a vertically integrated food delivery app. Lore is working to revolutionize the food and restaurant space by building a 'superapp for mealtime'—one that blends food delivery, AI-driven nutrition, and smart restaurant tech. The company most recently secured $600 million in a funding round backed by Google Ventures, for a post-funding valuation of $7 billion, according to PitchBook. Wonder ranks No. 45 on Fast Company's World's Most Innovative Companies list for 2025. The ultimate goal? To become the platform that meets all your food needs while embracing personalized dining, driven by AI, Lore said. The startup has also acquired a number of food companies, including Blue Apron, Grubhub, and the media brand Tastemade. When asked by Mansueto Ventures CEO Stephanie Mehta why an IPO is the goal, Lore replied, 'I am really excited about having that public currency.' The entrepreneur has founded a number of notable companies, including which he sold to Walmart nine years ago. 'I think there's so much growth and potential in this business that we could put a lot of capital to work, even post-IPO,' Lore said. 'I'm excited to do some big acquisitions.' This post originally appeared at to get the Fast Company newsletter: Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Health insurers seeking steep rate increases
Health insurers seeking steep rate increases

Boston Globe

time13 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Health insurers seeking steep rate increases

Gov. Maura Healey, too, linked the merged market proposal to broader economic concerns. Advertisement 'Health care costs, as reflected in the proposed rates filed by health insurers, are simply unsustainable. I directed our Insurance Commissioner to closely scrutinize these filings as part of the rate review process,' Healey said in a statement to the News Service. 'What is clear is that we all must do much more to lower the cost of health care in this state.' Eight major health insurance providers late last month submitted the proposed rates they want to charge next year in the merged market, which combines under one umbrella individual insurance and small group insurance for businesses with no more than 50 eligible employees. The new annual weighted average base rates would all increase by varying amounts, with Fallon Community Health Plan's 9.9 percent the lowest and Boston Medical Center Health Plan's 16.2 percent the highest, according to DOI data. Advertisement Taken together, the proposals reflect an average increase of 13.4 percent affecting more than 720,000 renewing members, a sizable jump over the 8.36 percent growth regulators approved last year and the 4.8 percent growth in 2024. Eileen McAnenny, president of the Employer Coalition on Health, said those hikes would be 'very difficult for small businesses to absorb,' especially as employers navigate high costs for energy and unemployment insurance as well as the prospect of tariffs. 'Those rate increases are alarming when considered in the context that Massachusetts already has the second-highest health insurance premiums in the nation,' she said. 'But unfortunately, I don't think it's surprising given that we set a cost growth benchmark each year that providers and drug companies blow through without consequence, and that we keep providing supplemental payments to providers and expecting nothing in return — no improved efficiency, no transparency.' Retailers Association of Massachusetts President Jon Hurst said the 'vast majority' of his group's 4,000 members would be affected by increases in the merged market premium rates. 'The average small business in the retail, small restaurant world has sales today equal to pre-COVID. Their sales are flat, but their costs are through the roof, primarily health insurance,' Hurst said. 'We've seen, over the last five years, an increasing number of dark storefronts. It's still continuing long past COVID because of these cost increases, and health insurance premiums are by far the biggest nut.' DOI will review each of the eight rate filings individually, and the department can reject proposals if it finds that the increases are 'not reasonable in relation to health plan benefits, or if they are excessive or inadequate or use rating factors that are discriminatory or not actuarially sound,' the department wrote in an advisory. Advertisement Last year, several carriers DOI plans a virtual public hearing on June 17, where insurance carriers will present their proposals and others are invited to offer testimony, ahead of a final decision expected in August. 'We're going to tell them it's unaffordable, reject them. They can reject them,' Hurst said. 'Maybe the insurers need to go back to the drawing board and reopen these contract negotiations with hospitals and pharma companies.' The vast majority of the merged market rate increases would be driven by increasing medical and pharmacy claims, according to data insurers submitted to the state, with administrative costs, taxes and fees accounting for less than one-tenth of the total average hike. Individual and small group health plans are required to spend 88 percent of premium dollars on health care services instead of administrative or other costs. Insurers have long contended their hands are tied by high provider and prescription drug prices. Lora Pellegrini, president of the Massachusetts Association of Health Plans group that represents insurers, said carriers 'are frustrated, too.' 'Premiums reflect those underlying health care costs. We have seen rate demands from providers in the high double digits. We have one provider who's asked for a 70 percent increase in their rate. Plans can only do so much,' Pellegrini said. 'The power of providers who have only gotten bigger and bigger with consolidation make it very hard for health plans to negotiate a robust deal, because consumers want these hospital systems in their networks.' Advertisement Pellegrini pointed to financial headaches at MassHealth and the Group Insurance Commission, the latter of which needed 'Private-sector health plans have those same challenges,' she said. Margins for private health insurers have been steadily declining. After peaking at 2.8 percent in 2020, the median private health insurer total margin dropped into the red in 2023 and fell again to -1.06 percent in 2024, according to data MAHP shared with the News Service. Financial strain is rampant across the health care landscape. Total health care spending per capita in Massachusetts The Division of Insurance has already flexed new authority to scrutinize health care costs. A market oversight law Healey signed in January tasked the office's regulators with determining whether proposed rates are 'excessive' by considering 'affordability for consumers and purchasers of health insurance products.' On March 12, the division 'We are actively looking at other actions we can take to contain these health costs,' Healey said. 'Everyone has a role to play – insurers, hospitals, the pharmaceutical industry – and everyone will need to step up to make Massachusetts a more affordable place to live and do business.' Advertisement Healey and the Legislature last term agreed on a hospital oversight and market review law and a measure intended to rein in prescription drug costs. While implementation of those laws unfolds, policymakers are weighing additional action to address what Asked how confident she is that Beacon Hill Democrats can navigate the thicket of competing interests to achieve additional reforms, McAnenny replied simply, 'I hold out hope.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store