Trump threatens 100 pc secondary tariffs on countries buying Russian energy
He gave a 50-day deadline for the punitive tariff to take effect if Russia did not make a peace deal with Ukraine, while speaking to reporters with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte at the White House.
'We're very, very unhappy with them, and we're going to be doing very severe tariffs. If we don't have a deal in 50 days, tariffs at about 100 per cent, you'd call them secondary tariffs', he said.
The tariff is directed against Russia, but if it comes into force, India, which is racing to finalise a bilateral trade agreement with the US, would be a collateral victim of the Washington-Moscow standoff.
If China and India can be forced to stop buying energy from Russia, Washington expects it would impact Moscow's war machine by squeezing the funds available to it.
It could also motivate China, in particular, to put pressure on Russia to make a peace deal, in the US reckoning.
Trump said he supported a proposed bill that would impose a 500 per cent tariff on countries buying energy products from Russia.
But, he said, 'I'm not sure we need it' since he can impose the punitive tariff by himself.
Republican Senator Lindsey Graham proposed the 500 per cent bill, which has 85 co-sponsors, including many Democrats.
Trump added, 'It's certainly good that they're doing it.'
Graham held off introducing the bill till he got a go-ahead from Trump.
Graham is working with House Speaker Mike Johnson, and it 'is probably going to pass very easily' with some 'little tweaks', Trump said.
'They've actually crafted a pretty good piece of legislation,' he said. Because of the tariff-imposing powers he has exercised, he said he does not need legislation 'because I don't want them to waste their time.'
India has defended the oil purchase from Russia because it is needed for the development of the country, as well as helping stabilise international oil prices.
India's External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said in December that Russia's oil 'is not necessarily cheap.'
Given the tight oil market, he said, 'India did the entire world a favour by buying Russian oil because if we had not done so, the global oil prices would have skyrocketed to $200 a barrel.
Trump also said he would impose 'very severe tariffs' on Russia.
Expressing his anger at Russia's President Vladimir Putin, he said, 'My conversations with him are very pleasant, and then the missiles go off at night.'
'I felt we had a deal about four times″ between Russia and Ukraine, 'but it just kept going on and on', said Trump, who tried to broker a deal.
He also announced that the US will send Patriot missiles and other arms to Ukraine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
EU sanctions Rosneft's Nayara refinery in Gujarat; lowers Russian oil price cap to $47.6 per barrel
New Delhi: The European Union has sanctioned the Rosneft-owned Nayara Energy 's 20 million metric tonne refinery in Vadinar, Gujarat, and reduced the price cap on Russian oil to USD 47.6 per barrel from the earlier USD 60, in a fresh round of measures targeting Moscow's energy revenue. The latest sanctions package includes restrictions on 105 additional vessels involved in transporting Russian crude oil through the so-called shadow fleet. This takes the total number of sanctioned vessels to 444, all of which will face a port access ban and prohibition on receiving maritime-related services. "We are standing firm. The EU just approved one of its strongest sanctions package against Russia to date. We're cutting the Kremlin's war budget further, going after 105 more shadow fleet ships, their enablers, and limiting Russian banks' access to funding. For the first time, we're designating a flag registry and the biggest Rosneft refinery in India," said Kaja Kallas, EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, on X. The Council of the European Union said in its statement, 'Full-fledged sanctions (asset freezes, travel bans, bans on providing resources) target Russian and international companies managing shadow fleet vessels , traders of Russian crude oil and a major customer of the shadow fleet – a refinery in India with Rosneft as its main shareholder.' The move is expected to impact Rosneft's export operations and possibly its shareholding in Nayara Energy. In March 2025, The Economic Times had reported that Rosneft, which holds a 49.13 per cent stake in Nayara, was exploring options to exit the Indian venture due to its inability to repatriate earnings amid existing sanctions. "With today's package, the EU is curtailing Russia's energy revenues through a number of different measures. The EU is lowering the price cap for crude oil from USD 60 to USD 47.6 per barrel, to align it with current global oil prices and is introducing an automatic and dynamic mechanism to modify the oil price cap and ensure that this price cap is effective. Oil exports still represent one third of the Russian government's revenues," the EU Council said. India imported around 1.75 million barrels per day (bpd) of discounted Russian crude in the first half of 2025, accounting for 35 per cent of the country's total imports. In June 2025 alone, Russian imports surged to 2 million bpd, while imports from the Middle East declined. 'The EU's move to sanction a Rosneft-linked refinery in India—a key crude-supply hub for IOCL and BPCL—is a strategic jolt for the domestic downstream sector,' said Anirudh Garg, Partner and Fund Manager at INVasset. 'Even though the measure targets a single facility, it may trigger ripple effects—restricting access to Russian crude via banking channels, shipping insurance, or logistical bottlenecks. That would undercut the premium discount India's refiners currently enjoy and strain refining margins,' he added. Garg said IOCL and BPCL, which refinanced over a third of their crude requirement from Russia, may face incremental costs if they have to substitute Russian barrels with costlier alternatives from the Middle East or the US. 'With earnings season around the corner, investor sentiment may turn cautious until clarity emerges on policy support, sanction waivers, or alternative supply routes. For now, this sanction is a downside risk—firm but containable, provided mitigating measures follow swiftly,' Garg said.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
'If There Was A Smoking Gun...': Trump Questions Why Democrats Did 'Nothing' On Epstein Files
Donald Trump accused Democrats of withholding Jeffrey Epstein evidence. US President Donald Trump lashed out at Democrats, accusing them of sitting on Jeffrey Epstein-related evidence during their time in power. The remarks came hours before House Republicans narrowly passed Donald Trump's $9 billion rescissions package- marking a significant rollback in government spending and further cementing partisan tensions on Capitol Hill. 'If there was a 'smoking gun' on Epstein, why didn't the Dems, who controlled the 'files' for four years, and had Garland and Comey in charge, use it? BECAUSE THEY HAD NOTHING!!!" Donald Trump posted on his social media platform Truth Social, referring to US Attorney General Merrick Garland and former FBI Director James Comey. He added, 'They controlled the files, and they came up empty. That tells you everything." The US President's remarks follow a contentious back-and-forth over the release of Jeffrey Epstein-related materials, which have gained renewed attention after the Justice Department concluded this month that there was no credible 'client list" found in the files and no evidence of blackmail against prominent individuals. The investigation into the late financier's alleged sex trafficking ring led to the release of some documents- including flight logs- but withheld others deemed too sensitive, including material described as child sexual abuse content. Who Is Jeffrey Epstein? Jeffrey Epstein was a financier and convicted sex offender who was accused of running a vast sex trafficking operation involving underage girls and powerful global figures. He was first convicted in 2008 on charges of soliciting prostitution from a minor but served only 13 months in a controversial plea deal. In 2019, Jeffrey Epstein was arrested again on federal charges of sex trafficking and conspiracy. He died by suicide in August 2019 in a Manhattan jail while awaiting trial. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
‘America can fight an 8-day war, then… nuclear': Ex-Pentagon adviser says US must stop sending weapons abroad
Ex-Pentagon adviser Douglas Macgregor warns the US has only eight days' worth of missile stockpiles, suggesting America may be forced to rely on nuclear options if drawn into a prolonged war. read more A former Pentagon adviser has issued a stark warning about the state of America's military readiness, claiming the United States has only enough offensive and defensive missiles to sustain combat for eight days before facing the prospect of resorting to nuclear weapons. Retired Colonel Douglas Macgregor, who served as a senior adviser to the Secretary of Defence during the Trump administration, made the alarming claim in a post on X (formerly Twitter), urging the US to immediately halt the export of weapons abroad. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD America needs to stop sending weapons abroad. Very reliable sources tell me we have roughly 8 days of offensive and defensive missiles on hand and readily available. Translation, we can fight an 8 days war and then we would have to go nuclear. — Douglas Macgregor (@DougAMacgregor) July 18, 2025 The comments come amid renewed concerns over America's depleting military stockpiles, particularly in light of its continued military aid to Ukraine. Just days before Macgregor's post, President Donald Trump announced a major new shipment of American weapons to Kyiv in a reversal of his earlier calls for restraint on military support. Trump's move was welcomed by Ukrainian officials, who hailed it as a vital lifeline in their ongoing defence against Russian aggression. However, analysts have raised concerns about whether the scale of US military assistance is sustainable given the strain on domestic reserves. Reports in recent months have pointed to the Pentagon's difficulty in replenishing high-grade weapons systems and munitions after years of support for Ukraine. The US military has already acknowledged that some key arms deliveries including long-range missiles, Patriot interceptors and 155mm shells are facing production bottlenecks and supply delays. Macgregor's remarks have amplified calls within conservative circles to reassess America's foreign military commitments. Critics argue that continued exports are risking the country's ability to respond to a future major conflict involving peer adversaries. The issue is further complicated by growing tensions with Russia, which has strongly criticised Western arms shipments to Ukraine. Moscow has accused Ukrainian forces of using long-range weapons supplied by the US and its allies to strike civilian areas on Russian territory, alleging that these actions sabotage peace efforts. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Russian President Vladimir Putin has previously warned that the deployment of such systems could fundamentally alter the character of the conflict. 'We will make the necessary decisions based on the threats we face,' Putin said recently, suggesting that the Kremlin could reconsider its military calculus if NATO countries are perceived to be directly involved in the war. As the Biden administration and Trump's political team contend with domestic and international pressure, questions remain about whether Washington can balance global military commitments with national defence readiness.
