logo
Ten Bagger: Is your explorer serious? This could be the sign they're onto something real

Ten Bagger: Is your explorer serious? This could be the sign they're onto something real

News.com.au07-05-2025
Welcome to Ten-Bagger, where Lowell Resources Fund chief investment officer John Forwood gives us his take on a sector of the ASX resources market full of value.
This month, John looks at the confidence boost ASX juniors are giving investors by investing in underground exploration declines.
Everyone is hoping to find the real deal when it comes to an exploration stock, one that's looking to turn dollars to gold and back again, not just a well oiled PR machine that's "mining the market".
But how do you know your board has serious confidence in the quality of their deposit.
Lowell Resources Fund (ASX:LRT) CIO John Forwood is seeing one telltale sign that management has real conviction when it comes to an underground development.
And it's a trend that's emerging more and more in recent times.
"In terms of exploration there are probably not too many more significant things you can do than put in an exploration decline," he told Stockhead.
An exploration decline is a big upfront capital investment for a junior explorer or miner.
At an average cost of $15,000 per metre, a 700m decline down to 100m below surface on a 1:7 incline gradient could chew up $10m, Forwood roughly estimates.
But it has the potential to both save costs down the line and massively increase the confidence an investor can have that a resource or reserve will hold up once mining begins.
By getting closer to the source of the mineralisation, the explorer can drill more holes at shorter distances and closer spacings, and have more certainty that drill holes won't be disrupted by unknown ground conditions.
With discoveries made deeper under cover these days, that could deliver major savings and spare the embarrassment of poor grade reconciliation down the line.
"You don't have to avoid doing too many thousand metre drill holes to make an exploration decline, just pay for itself if you like," Forwood said.
"If you get underground you can do much shorter holes like 50 metres or a couple hundred metres deep for long holes.
"You're saving on drilling costs. You've got that big upfront capital, of course, but if you really believe in your deposit, you've got a reason to do that."
The Spartan lesson
Among the most prominent examples of the exploration decline method in action came from Spartan Resources (ASX:SPR), which was established via an $18.3m contract with underground mining experts Barminco.
The decision to sink the Juniper decline was dual train. It was blasted wide enough to become a production decline in the future, short circuiting the company's path back to production at the Dalgaranga gold project in WA.
It also provided access to drill on tight spacings at the emerging Never Never and Pepper discoveries, now comprising 2.3Moz at over 9g/t.
But there was another advantage.
Explorers who strike it big commonly follow what's called the Lassonde Curve, a chart named after well-known mining investor Pierre Lassonde that suggests the fast lift in a company's share price which follows a discovery is followed by a plateau as it moves into feasibility studies, which present risks if results disappoint.
But continuing to drill, Spartan was able to continue catching the upside from growing its resource base and was eventually picked up at a premium in a $2.4bn takeover by Ramelius Resources (ASX:RMS).
"The market still maintained that interest in Spartan because they were still exploring and they still had lots of blue sky," Forwood said.
" Often when you put a resource around something and you move your focus from exploration to development, the blue sky disappears from your share price and then your shares go through that valley of death."
Exploration declines also show investors that by going the extra yards juniors are willing to derisk their future reserve base.
"We always used to think of that approach as the way that the Russians did it," Forwood said.
"The Russians wouldn't classify what we call reserves until they had actually driven drives, multiple drives through an orebody and could touch and feel the actual ore."
Companies taking the plunge
Not every explorer has the goodwill with investors and capacity to fund an ambitious initiative like an exploration decline.
But those that can stand to reap the rewards.
Southern Cross Gold (ASX:SX2), which has dual listings in Australia and Canada, has pledged to spend C$27m on a 1km long decline at its highly touted Sunday Creek gold and antimony project in Victoria, where a long-anticipated maiden resource is due in 2027.
C$53m will be spent on drilling to establish the inferred resource out of a C$143m ($162m) private placement led by Stifel Nicolaus Canada, Aitken Mount Capital partners and co-managed by Jett Capital Advisors.
For SX2, Forwood says the exploration decline will provide a signal to the market for the company's ability to get permitted in a jurisdiction known for its regulatory complexity.
"Once you can get the decline permitted, it is so much easier to then do the drilling. So you don't have to go and licence individual drill pads on surface," Forwood said.
" You're ... almost unconstrained by permitting once you've done that."
Also in Victoria, Catalyst Metals (ASX:CYL) has touted plans to seek approval from the State Government for an "exploration tunnel" at the Four Eagles gold project.
Surface drilling has so far outlined a resource at the JV with Gina Rinehart's Hancock Prospecting of 163,000oz at 7.7g/t.
That includes 70,000oz at an outrageous 26g/t at the Boyd's Dam project. Catalyst, in its deal to sell the Henty gold mine in Tasmania to Kaiser Reef (ASX:KAU), also secured a 12-year option to acquire 50% of KAU's 200,000tpa processing plant.
Forwood says the access to the processing plant capacity means material stockpiled from the decline development could cover some of its costs if it contains economic but sub-resource grade gold.
Meanwhile, over in Arizona in the USA, New World Resources (ASX:NWC) is considering the establishment of the single decline at its Antler deposit to expand its copper dominant resource, with some of the best grades hit in deep drilling.
A DFS is due later this year with the company expecting the high grade project to be fully-permitted by early 2026.
'One of the highest grade holes ever drilled at Antler is the deepest hole drilled, but they're very expensive holes to drill from the surface,' Woolrych told Stockhead in a recent interview.
' One of the reasons we're looking to advance our decline and get that started later this year is we are looking to drill from underground. For every metre we can drill from surface we can drill four from underground.'
Lowell holds a small stake in NWC, with Forwood saying the early development of the decline would assist in getting the company ahead of the curb as it waits for permitting for the full project.
The views, information, or opinions expressed in the interviews in this article are solely those of the interviewee and do not represent the views of Stockhead.
Stockhead does not provide, endorse or otherwise assume responsibility for any financial product advice contained in this article.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Short-term rental advocates say restrictions hurt tourism, not help housing
Short-term rental advocates say restrictions hurt tourism, not help housing

ABC News

time12 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Short-term rental advocates say restrictions hurt tourism, not help housing

Advocates of short-term rentals say regulations in the sector are shifting the blame away from governments and towards property owners. Short-stay rentals, typically associated with websites like Airbnb and Stayz, have drawn criticism for taking properties away from the long-term rental market. In other parts of the world, jurisdictions are putting restrictions on short-stay accommodation, including in New York City and Barcelona, amid housing shortages. But research from the University of South Australia has claimed restrictions and bans have done little to help housing stocks. Tourism expert and study author Peter O'Connor said jurisdictions that had banned short-stay accommodation failed to see any meaningful growth in housing access. He said the main consequence was limiting tourism accommodation, in turn increasing prices. "If you reduce the number of short-term rentals which are available, one of the things you do is make it more difficult for tourists to find accommodation," Professor O'Connor said. "Here in Australia, tourism is our number one service export and it has a lot of knock-on effects in terms of the local community and spending in bars, restaurants and shops." A South Australian parliamentary committee is looking into the short-stay accommodation sector, including possible regulations on short-stay rentals. Wendy Roeters owns two homes in Mount Gambier which she rents out for short stays. She said the sector was needed in regional areas where workers travel and stay for extended periods and where there were fewer large hotels. "For companies, the short-term stays are the better option," she said. "You get a lot of people for the hospital, like doctors and nurses. I've just had a nurse stay for three weeks. "You'll have work crews who might be working on construction who might be doing it for a period of six months." Ms Roeters added it was unfair to penalise short-stay property owners for there being a wider shortage of housing. "I can understand that the government wants housing, but that's not the responsibility of people that have a property, that's the government's responsibility," she said. Property reform advocacy group Grounded produced its own report into the short-stay sector in Australia, released in June. It found the profits on short-term rentals were 81 per cent more than if the property was placed on the long-term market in 13 of Australia's busiest tourism towns. Grounded managing director Karl Fitzgerald said it was clear short-stay accommodation was impacting local housing supply. "It's more supply coming out of the long-term rental market and out of the ownership market," he said. "When government is talking about supply on every front, it's strange that Airbnb is not considered as a factor. Mr Fitzgerald said a plan to limit the growth of short-stay accommodation would be more effective, such as a "cap and trade" scheme, which would give licenses to property owners. "That's where having at least a licensing system that regulates the growth and the supply and perhaps caps it and reduces it over time until there's enough funding to channel some of the profits away from Airbnb," he said. "Use that money to fund long-term affordable housing under a community land trust model." Professor O'Connor argued short-stay accommodation had become a "quick fix" for governments in favour of more complicated plans to ease the housing crisis. "It's a lot easier for a state government or a council to introduce a regulation that limits the number of short-term rentals than it is to introduce some way of encouraging the building of new houses," he said. South Australian Greens MLC Robert Simms is leading the state's parliamentary committee into short-stay accommodation. He agreed the sector was not solely to blame for the state's housing crisis, but said it still needed regulation. "I think there's no doubt that short stay is here to stay, but the question is whether or not we've got the balance right," he said. "It is concerning that people might be running a property that is, in effect, a business, and yet they might be paying at the same rates as their neighbour who is living in a private residence. "That doesn't really seem fair, and that's why I think there's a level of community interest in the idea of regulation of the sector."

Cashed Up: Baby Boomer wealth tactic that no longer works in 2025
Cashed Up: Baby Boomer wealth tactic that no longer works in 2025

News.com.au

time12 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Cashed Up: Baby Boomer wealth tactic that no longer works in 2025

For decades, the financial playbook for getting ahead in Australia was simple - buy a home as soon as you could, pay it off, put a bit of cash into super, and maybe buy an investment property. That approach worked, and worked well, for a generation. But for younger Aussies trying to follow the same steps today, it's like turning up to the Tour de France with a BMX bike. The rules have changed, but most people are still playing the old game. So we wanted to cover what's broken, and what actually works instead. Cashed Up series is dedicated to helping young Australians kickstart their journey to financial freedom. The playbook for building wealth has changed and we are here to show you how to navigate it. The old formula is out of reach and out of date Boomers rode a once-in-a-century wave of economic tailwinds - affordable housing, strong real wage growth, generous tax savings, and a compulsory super system that matured at just the right time. A home in Sydney's Inner West might have cost $100,000 in the '90s. Today it's closer to $2 million, but incomes haven't increased 20x to match. When you add in stagnant wage growth, rising living costs, eye-watering childcare fees, it's no wonder younger generations feel like they need to push harder just to keep up. The most common money traps younger people fall into today include: • Buying your home too early: Scraping together a deposit for a tiny property in the suburbs can lock you into bad debt and kill your investing potential, • Saving without investing: Inflation and tax is killing your bank balance. Earning 4 per cent while costs increase by 6 per cent isn't saving, it's going backwards, • Blind faith in super: Most people under 40 won't see that money for decades, and leaving your entire financial strategy to a system you can't control isn't a strategy - it's a gamble. The new money game plan The old rule was 'buy as soon as you can', the new one is 'build your options first'. That means setting yourself up to take advantage of opportunities, not locking yourself into a giant mortgage just because it feels like the responsible thing to do. 1. Invest before you own Property can still be a powerful tool to grow your money - but owning the roof over your head isn't the only way to use it. More and more young Australians are rentvesting; renting where you want to live, and buying where it makes sense financially. You can use smart debt to invest into growth focused assets, not emotional purchases. 2. Make your money work harder If your savings are sitting in a high interest account, this just means you're slightly less broke than the person with it all in cash. But if you're serious about getting ahead, investing is non-negotiable. Shares, ETFs, and even crypto (carefully) can give you the kind of compounding growth that savings never will. Micro investing platforms mean you don't need thousands to get started, just consistency and a bit of time. 3. Use the tax rules you your advantage You don't need to be a finance nerd to benefit from smart tax moves. Salary sacrificing to your super fund, using strategies like negative gearing and debt recycling, and even investing through tax structures like bonds and trusts - can all accelerate your asset building when used intentionally. The new rich don't just earn more, they keep more. 4. Grow your income There's a limit to how much you can save, but there's no cap on what you can earn. Upskilling, changing jobs or industries, negotiating a pay rise, or launching a side hustle can fast track your money momentum more than giving up your daily coffee ever will. Rewriting the rules doesn't mean rejecting them all You don't need to throw out the baby with the bathwater. The principles behind the Boomer game plan - spend less than you earn, invest, and use time to your advantage - still hold up today. But the way you use those principles has to change. You don't need to own a home at 30 to be financially secure. You don't need to know how to pick stocks. And you definitely don't need to follow a blueprint written for a different economy. The wrap Waiting for things to 'get easier' or 'go back to normal' is like hoping VideoEzy will make a comeback - it's just not going to happen. But the good news is that there's a better path forward, one that's more flexible, more dynamic, and actually built for how young Aussies live and work today. You just need the confidence to stop following your parents and start crafting your own playbook. Ben Nash is a finance expert commentator, podcaster, financial adviser and founder of Pivot Wealth. Ben's new book, Virgin Millionaire; the step-by-step guide to your first million and beyond is out now on Amazon | Audiobook. If you want some help with your money and investing, you can book a call with Pivot Wealth here. Disclaimer: The information contained in this article is general in nature and does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Therefore, you should consider whether the information is appropriate to your circumstances before acting on it, and where appropriate, seek professional advice from a finance professional.

Selling out or selling up? The battle for Santos takes a twist
Selling out or selling up? The battle for Santos takes a twist

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

Selling out or selling up? The battle for Santos takes a twist

The gloves are off. The battle for control of oil and gas giant Santos moved up a gear this week after Ryan Stokes, chairman of Beach Energy and son of billionaire Kerry, took a swipe at the Abu Dhabi government's tilt for a large slice of Australia's energy market. A clearly incensed Stokes delivered a blunt assessment of the Middle Eastern gas giant's $36 billion takeover, suggesting it could end up denying Australians access to their own energy source. "A question we'd have is: 'Is that right in the national interest, given the importance of domestic gas?'" he asked. He didn't have to wait long for a response. The Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC) quickly slapped him down, dismissing the criticisms as "clearly opportunistic and [reflecting] a commercial interest in the outcome". With $36 billion on the table — the biggest all-cash takeover offer in Australian history — ADNOC too has a significant commercial interest in the outcome. There's been surprisingly little, if any, debate around the merits of the takeover or the identity of the purchaser. Had the Australian government announced plans to purchase Santos, there undoubtedly would have been furious debate over the nationalisation of a vitally important commercial operation. Instead, a foreign government with potentially shifting global allegiances and a track record of dubious activities across Africa and Asia has stumped up a stupendous amount of cash for the same crucial energy infrastructure with nary a hint of community or political questioning. He's best known in the west as the money man behind the fabulously successful Manchester City Football Club. Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed al-Nahyan, the younger brother of the United Arab Emirates's all powerful ruler, is one of the richest men in the Middle East and the UAE's deputy prime minister and vice president. Rarely seen in public, he never attends Manchester City games and has managed to maintain a low profile despite controlling key institutions like the Emirati central bank, the Abu Dhabi criminal authority and the nation's rapidly growing $330 billion sovereign wealth fund. He also chairs the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company, the entity leading the Santos takeover. But his influence extends well beyond the UAE's borders. An in-depth investigation by the New York Times, published just last month, outlines a web of shadowy connections, linking Sheikh Mansour to several long-running conflicts in Africa. Until recently, he's somehow escaped scrutiny. But last year the British government intervened to prevent the sheikh buying The Telegraph over concerns it could diminish press freedom. His name was also raised in trials in the United States and Malaysia amid accusations Sheikh Mansour profited from 1MDB scandal, one of the world's biggest financial frauds. More recently, Manchester City has been accused of breaching funding rules on 130 occasions to purchase star players that have transformed the club from mediocre also-rans to top of the Premier League, accusations denied by the club. But it is the revelations of Sheikh Mansour's associations with regional warlords, outlined in the New York Times, that are concerning. For years, he has been aligned with Lt General Mohamed Hamdan, the powerful Sudanese commander who seized power in a coup and who, two years before the latest conflict erupted in the war-torn North African enclave, he had hosted at an Emirati arms fair. Just weeks before the conflict erupted into outright civil war in 2023, the NYT reported Hamdan was a guest at Sheikh Mansour's Persian Gulf palace. US Democrats have called for a ban on weapons exports to the Emirates. The UAE, meanwhile, has vehemently denied any involvement in arming Hamdan's forces, which have been accused of massacres, mass rape and genocide in the ongoing war. It is a conflict that has resulted in the death of 150,000 and displaced more than 12 million people, making it the world's biggest humanitarian crisis. For a country swimming in surplus energy, it seems almost inconceivable that Australia's most populated areas have faced gas shortages and soaring electricity prices for much of the past decade. The blame can be sheeted home to a series of bungled decisions that allowed gas to be exported from the east coast by three giant consortia without ensuring adequate domestic supplies. Domestic gas prices, which previously had traded around $3 a gigajoule, trebled and then quadrupled to match global prices and beyond. Much of the blame could be sheeted home to Santos. At the last minute, it doubled the size of its liquifying export plant on Curtis Island just off the Queensland coast near Gladstone without fully shoring up its gas reserves. Finding itself short of feed to meet its export contracts, it then proceeded to drain the domestic market. The ongoing shortfalls drove energy intensive manufacturers to the wall and were a major contributing factor to the inflation outbreak for the past three years that only now is under control. It is into this charged environment that ADNOC has parachuted. Santos, for decades a chronic investment underperformer, has been offered a price that far exceeds the company's value. According to one financier who requested anonymity, the UAE based group has suddenly decided it needs to be a global entity and is executing that strategy regardless of price. "There are only a handful of assets globally that are available if you wanted to scale up. There's a few in America and then there is Woodside and Santos. "So ADNOC is willing to deal on non-commercial terms." But there are concerns about the Middle Eastern energy giant's ambitions. Some believe that, despite its statements and assurances, it isn't the slightest bit interested in Australia's domestic gas market, Instead, the thinking is that the firm has its sights set on the Barossa gas field in the waters north of Darwin along with Santos's Papua New Guinea operations and its prospective play in Alaska. Ryan Stokes and his father Kerry have a direct interest in the outcome of this mega-deal. Their Beach Energy has a joint venture with Santos in one of the world's largest carbon capture and storage projects, in the Cooper Basin, a major gas field smack in the middle of Australia, that has supplied the east coast for decades. While Stokes has since gone to ground, insiders believe the pair were miffed at not being informed of the deal, given their commercial link, and may now be looking to expand Beach's domestic gas operations by purchasing Santos assets. ADNOC isn't alone on the transaction. There's another Abu Dhabi government entity along with US private equity group Carlyle. Exactly what role Carlyle will play has yet to be spelt out. It may be in the consortium to pick up the Australian domestic gas interests if the deal goes ahead. Or it could there to play a role in smoothing the way in the US, given the Alaska gas fields. First, however, the deal needs Jim Chalmers' tick of approval. ADNOC is still going over the Santos books and has yet to confirm a formal takeover offer. So the Foreign Investment Review Board has yet to receive an application. But ADNOC may face a tougher time than it anticipated. Foreign ownership has become a politically charged issue, highlighted by the federal government's determination to return the Port of Darwin to local ownership from Chinese control. Energy, and particularly gas, is in another realm altogether, given it is supposed to be the transition fuel to a renewables future. Then there's the history. Three prime ministers, Turnbull, Morrison and Albanese, were forced to personally intervene in the market. Such is the distrust of the gas exporters, the competition regulator has been charged with the task of keeping the east coast market under permanent review. Its most recent report forecasts ongoing and growing domestic shortages out to 2036. Not surprisingly, investors aren't all that confident the deal will proceed. The Santos share price hasn't risen above $8 since the bid was announced. That's an 11 per cent discount to the $8.89 offer.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store