logo
Hotel Miramar Singapore close to sealing sale at under S$200 million

Hotel Miramar Singapore close to sealing sale at under S$200 million

Business Times23-07-2025
[SINGAPORE] A deal is said to be in advanced stages of negotiations for a sale of Hotel Miramar Singapore at 401 Havelock Road, near the Singapore River.
The pricing for the 344-room hotel, on a site with a balance leasehold tenure of about 41.5 years, is expected to be below S$200 million. The hotel has significant value-add potential, including an opportunity to tap some 100,000 square feet (sq ft) of unutilised gross floor area (GFA), and repositioning the asset to a more upscale product.
The Business Times understands that the prospective buyer is Aravest, a carve-out of the private funds business of ARA Asset Management unveiled last year. Aravest is owned by Japan's Sumitomo Mitsui Finance and Leasing (SMFL) Company units SMFL Mirai Partners (Singapore) and Kenedix.
Industry players said Aravest will be teaming up with co-investors for the Hotel Miramar acquisition in Singapore. Aravest is expected to appoint an international hotel chain to manage and rebrand the property.
Hotel Miramar Singapore is owned and operated by an eponymous company set up in 1968; its biggest shareholder is a company named Lim Tjhun Seng, which is controlled by two low-profile individuals with the surname Lim.
Other shareholders of Hotel Miramar (Singapore) Limited include a few families from Singapore and Indonesia.
A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU
Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights
Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Savills Singapore executive director of investment sales and capital markets Yap Hui Yee marketed the hotel via a private expression of interest exercise which closed in March.
According to industry players, a drawback of the property is that the authorities have turned down a request to top up the site's lease to 99 years.
The 16-storey Hotel Miramar is on a 100,528 sq ft site; this is one of three hotel sites along the stretch of Havelock Road sold by the state about 57 years ago on 99-year leasehold tenures starting from February 1968. On the other two neighbouring plots stand Copthorne King's Hotel and Furama Riverfront Singapore (formerly known as Novotel Apollo and Apollo Hotel).
The Urban Redevelopment Authority has retained the hotel zoning for the three sites under the Draft Master Plan 2025 unveiled last month.
Also left untouched is the 3.5 plot ratio – which refers to the ratio of maximum GFA to site area – for the trio of sites.
Industry observers said the authorities probably prefer to maintain flexibility on future plans for the stretch.
Private-sector hotel deals on sites with short balance land tenures are not unheard of in Singapore in recent years; typically, buyers would be looking for an attractive yield and/or value-adding opportunities.
Last year, Frasers Property sold the 313-room Capri by Fraser Changi City, near the Expo interchange MRT station, for S$171.8 million to a consortium comprising family office Atelier Capital Partners Singapore, TPG Angelo Gordon, Heeton Holdings and Far East Consortium International.
The hotel, which has been rebranded Dorsett Changi City Singapore, is part of an integrated project on a site with a balance term of about 45 years at the time. The new owners have begun asset enhancement works to create additional hotel rooms by subdividing some rooms, while still maintaining some of the larger rooms popular with staycationers. Some underutilised space in public areas including the lobby will be converted into revenue-generating space such as restaurants.
In late 2023, Viva Land – linked to convicted Vietnamese businesswoman Truong My Lan – sold the former SO/Singapore hotel on a site at 35 Robinson Road with about 47.5 years' balance lease. The property was bought by a consortium that included the Tan family behind Sunray Woodcraft Construction and Mini Environment Service. Mingtiandi reported the price at around S$170 million to S$180 million.
Hotel Miramar's guest rooms have an average room size of 26 square metres (about 280 sq ft); the rooms are on levels five to 16 in two towers.
The hotel rooms are above a four-storey commercial podium which includes the hotel lobby as well as office and food and beverage/retail units for lease. Behind the commercial podium and two towers is a four-storey carpark block with nearly 200 car parking spaces. The carpark is connected to the hotel towers.
The incoming owner is expected to embark on asset enhancement works such as upgrading existing rooms. There is potential to increase the room inventory by tapping around 100,000 sq ft of unutilised GFA to build a new hotel wing – which could be located where the multi-storey carpark is – subject to approvals by the relevant authorities. Another way to increase the room count would be to subdivide some of the existing rooms in the two towers.
An industry player said there is scope to uplift the ambience of the hotel by injecting more greenery and having a biophilic design. Appointing an international hotel management chain to rebrand and operate the hotel should improve operational efficiency and revenues.
In March last year, ESR Group announced the sale of ARA Asset Management's private funds business in Australia, Singapore, South Korea and the US to the two SMFL units. The consideration was based at an enterprise value of US$270 million.
The divestment came two years after ESR completed its buyout of Singapore-based ARA Asset Management, co-founded by Singaporean John Lim and backed by Hong Kong billionaire Li Ka-shing.
Additional reporting by Chong Xin Wei
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Analysis: How mounting losses and an ageing fleet could have sparked BlueSG's 'strategic pause'
Analysis: How mounting losses and an ageing fleet could have sparked BlueSG's 'strategic pause'

CNA

time16 hours ago

  • CNA

Analysis: How mounting losses and an ageing fleet could have sparked BlueSG's 'strategic pause'

SINGAPORE: BlueSG's move to suspend operations were likely influenced by losses caused by an ageing fleet, but its brand could take a hit from such a move even as the Singaporean car-sharing service plans a return in 2026, experts say. The firm on Monday (Aug 4) announced a sudden "strategic pause" of their electric vehicle (EV) point-to-point car-sharing operations starting from Friday, as it works to upgrade its infrastructure. BlueSG will also be laying off a portion of its workforce, though it did not state how many will be affected. Its new service will involve a new platform, a refreshed fleet with a new range of vehicles, an expanded network of pickup and drop-off points, as well as "greater reliability and a smoother user experience", the company said. BlueSG is the only car-sharing platform that offers point-to-point services in Singapore. 'They could have just continued operations and added the right vehicle fleet mix and changed policies and so on,' said Associate Professor Walter Theseira at the Singapore University of Social Sciences. 'But my suspicion is that they must have concluded that the cost of continuing to keep the fleet in operation as well as operating costs just vastly outweighed any benefit in (operating for) the next couple of months,' he added. 'It was better to draw a line underneath this and then change everything.' Agreeing, Associate Professor Jawn Lim from the Singapore Institute of Technology likened BlueSG continuing operations while revamping infrastructure to 'moving into a half-renovated home'. 'The issues from an incomplete and dusty interior could be more disruptive than waiting until the renovation is fully completed and cleaned,' he said. 'There may be more costs incurred to maintain the current BlueSG service than taking the 'strategic pause'.' BlueSG's annual financial statement from the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (ACRA) website showed a net loss of S$31.1 million (US$24.2 million) between January 2023 and March 2024. This was after a net loss of S$11.4 million between January and December 2022. Auditor EY noted that the company had changed its financial year end from December 2023 to March 2024 - and that the figures were "not entirely comparable" as they now covered a period of 15 months instead of the previous 12-month stretch. The accounts for the financial year ending March 2025 are not available yet. Founded in 2017, BlueSG was sold in 2021 to Goldbell, a local vehicle leasing company. Goldbell announced then that it would be investing S$70 million in BlueSG, and even expressed hopes for overseas expansion. According to its financial statement, Goldbell recorded a profit of S$24.2 million between April 2021 and March 2022; and S$6.2 million between April 2022 and March 2023. But between April 2023 and March 2024, it recorded a loss of S$3.4 million. Asked by CNA about the move to suspend operations and the role played by mounting losses, BlueSG CEO Keith Kee said the decision 'stems from a forward-looking review of how best to meet the evolving demands of shared mobility in Singapore'. While pausing operations could help save costs, intangibles such as consumer trust in the BlueSG brand could be hurt, said Professor Lawrence Loh, director of the Centre for Governance and Sustainability at the National University of Singapore (NUS). 'Whether they are upgrading or not, a total stoppage will result in lost revenue, lost users and given the layoffs ... it will have an impact on the credibility of the company,' he said. Mr Kee said 'serious consideration' was given to keeping the BlueSG service running while rebuilding in parallel. 'But (we) ultimately recognised that this would divide our efforts and risk further disruptions for users,' he added. 'Taking a short, planned pause now gives us the focus needed to return faster - and stronger.' "DOUBLE WHAMMY" BlueSG founder Franck Vitte, who served as the firm's managing director until 2021, told CNA he believes the firm's transition to a new IT system in 2023 proved to be more challenging than anticipated. The new system had led to disruptions and left users frustrated over issues such as difficulty ending rentals. It is possible that back then, BlueSG needed to 'completely redesign its system architecture to enhance customer service and achieve financial sustainability', said Mr Vitte, who is now the MD of TotalEnergies, BlueSG's charging network. 'At the same time, its vehicle fleet was ageing, and maintaining the Bluecars had become increasingly difficult, particularly since production of the model ceased several years ago." Mr Kee, the CEO, said: 'When we first took over the service, we inherited a legacy system. A major milestone for us was the successful migration to a more robust, insight-driven backend - which allowed us to stabilise operations and deliver steady growth in subscriptions and rentals. 'That migration also revealed the limitations of the existing infrastructure - especially as new technologies emerged and demands accelerated,' he added. 'It became increasingly clear that a full platform upgrade was needed to meet future demands with greater agility, efficiency and scalability.' Associate Professor Raymond Ong from NUS also pointed to fast-developing advancements in the EV landscape, and how that combined with an ageing fleet for a 'double whammy' for BlueSG. Charging points have since become more widespread islandwide, yet BlueSG cars can only be charged at specific stations. This puts a lot of cost pressure on the firm, said Assoc Prof Ong. 'It could be better for BlueSG to work with a power company to come up with a better funding mechanism for their charging infrastructure,' he said. 'All this has to be looked into as the EV market is changing so fast.' He also noted that BlueSG's ageing cars now have shorter range compared to newer EVs. The company did attempt to refresh its fleet in 2022, by adding 500 Opel Corsa-e cars. Assoc Prof Theseira said this could have been a misstep. 'For whatever reason, they decided to go with a European model instead of going for, for example, a Chinese model, which everybody knows is not only enjoying a lot of popular support in Singapore, but is also likely to be cheaper,' he said. IS THERE DEMAND? The abrupt cut-off of BlueSG operations will be felt by its thousands of users. On one community Telegram Channel, news of the pause led to several users leaving notes of appreciation, citing how they had come to rely on the service. Some hoped BlueSG would come back stronger next year. Prof Loh from NUS believes BlueSG users will likely turn to other car-sharing firms or fall back on ride-hailing - possibly even causing temporary price increases in those services. 'If demand is more than supply, there could be potential for price increases (and) more surge pricing (during peak hours),' he said. Assoc Prof Theseira had a different view. 'If (BlueSG) had embarked on this move, they must have seen from the operating numbers that basically, demand was not there, or not there to sustain operations,' he said. 'So what is the effect, then, of removing what is now a more marginal player with depressed demand? Not much effect, right?' 01:11 Min IS THE BLUESG MODEL TENABLE? As Singapore's only point-to-point car-sharing service, BlueSG's pause has invited questions of whether the model is sustainable at all. Assoc Prof Theseira called the point-to-point modality the 'holy grail' of car-sharing - because it opens up to a much larger market, compared to one where rented cars have to be returned to the same place. 'But the problem here is that point-to-point also requires a sufficient density in your network, as well as systems - both operating and pricing-wise - to actually encourage proper circulation of cars,' he said. He likened BlueSG's issues to those faced by bicycle-sharing firms - where the vehicles do not always spread themselves across the island evenly, due to demand patterns. For instance, in Singapore people typically work, play and live in distinct areas. This means that BlueSG cars in use are typically moving from one place to another, rather than circulating. 'Who comes (to a Housing Board estate) to work or play? Everyone in those estates goes to work and play in the town area,' said Assoc Prof Theseira. This differs from cities like Tokyo, where its suburbs are a mix of residences, workplaces and leisure spots. 'Somebody may live in part A of Tokyo and go and play or work in part B; and somebody who lives in part B might go and work or play in part A,' said the transport economist. In general, the car-sharing market is difficult to sustain, as also seen in other parts of the world, he pointed out. Earlier this year, US car-sharing firm Getaround abruptly shut down operations, citing financial difficulties. In 2018, French point-to-point EV car-sharing firm Autolib also ceased operations after chalking up major losses. Despite the current headwinds, former BlueSG executive Vitte hopes the firm he founded can bounce back. 'I believe that car-sharing has a natural place, especially in a city like Singapore, where it perfectly complements the existing transport options,' he said. 'I remain hopeful and confident that a new car-sharing service will emerge in the coming months, one that applies the lessons of the past to deliver a high-quality experience for Singaporean commuters.'

SG60: Reading between the lines of the Draft Master Plan 2025
SG60: Reading between the lines of the Draft Master Plan 2025

Business Times

time2 days ago

  • Business Times

SG60: Reading between the lines of the Draft Master Plan 2025

SINGAPORE'S urban and economic planning has long been pragmatic, but the Draft Master Plan 2025 signals something new: boldness. In response to shifting global and domestic fundamentals, the plan reframes land use through emerging tools such as polycentric gateway corridors, and a more agile, layered approach to decentralisation. This isn't a wholesale reinvention, but a quiet recalibration, adapting Singapore's planning ethos to meet an era of slower growth, more complex trade-offs, and heightened geopolitical uncertainty. Decentralisation under pressure The once-ambitious model of decentralising offices beyond the Central Business District (CBD) is slowing. As companies right-size and consolidate their operations, many are returning to the city core, drawn by cost-efficiency, branding visibility, and a concentration of talent and services. The traditional rental premium once commanded by the CBD has eroded, narrowing the cost differential and weakening the incentive to decentralise – unless firms are tightly woven into local supply chains or talent pools. This trend is not entirely new, but Covid-19 accelerated it. Hybrid work has reduced the average office footprint per firm. Large tenants are less willing to anchor fringe locations unless there are compelling ecosystem advantages. Meanwhile, commercial confidence has been tempered by global uncertainty, from US-China tensions to regional trade realignments. In this context, even flagship decentralisation projects are evolving. Jurong Lake District, once envisioned as a major commercial node, saw the planned commercial quantum of the white site on the reserve list reduced by 30 per cent. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond. Sign Up Sign Up While the long-term vision remains, near-term market sentiment is clearly influencing land release strategies. The return – and repositioning – of industrial land Beyond the commercial office market, Singapore's industrial landscape is entering a new chapter. Since 2022, roughly 36 hectares of industrial land have been returned to the state annually, a scale not seen since the 2015-2017 wave that preceded the last Master Plan. Then, as now, this land return reflects deeper structural shifts. Manufacturing is becoming less land-hungry. As companies digitalise and relocate lower-value operations to neighbouring countries, plots once allocated for logistics, clean tech or light manufacturing are being reassessed. The Draft Master Plan 2025 aims to stay ahead of this curve. While there are no radical rezoning moves in the downtown, the government is signalling flexibility. Incentives such as the CBD Incentive Scheme and the Strategic Development Incentive Scheme make it easier for older office buildings to be converted into mixed-use formats, shrinking pure office space while boosting residential and lifestyle offerings. The shift is also evident in the Government Land Sales (GLS) programme. There are no new confirmed downtown office sites, and only three white sites remain on the reserve list. This absence is likely intentional – a quiet nudge for landlords to explore adaptive reuse and a cue to the market that office decentralisation will now take a more tempered, organic form. Bishan returns to the spotlight One of the most intriguing updates is the re-designation of Bishan as a sub-regional centre, a role proposed initially in the 1991 Concept Plan. Back then, the idea was radical: decentralise Singapore's economic core and anchor new business activity in the heartlands. Today, Bishan already boasts strong transport connectivity, public agencies and community infrastructure that serve the broader Toa Payoh-Ang Mo Kio region. Its central location and direct access to Raffles Place via MRT make it an ideal candidate for polycentric growth. Together with Novena, Serangoon, and Toa Payoh, Bishan helps form a north-east arc of business activity – a 'string of pearls' that mirrors the southern belt stretching from Alexandra to one-north. Beyond convenience, this distributed model reflects a future in which live-work-play ecosystems are embedded into the islandwide urban fabric, rather than concentrated in a single hub. Vertical zoning: The next planning frontier Among the more speculative but intriguing concepts to emerge from the 2022 Long-Term Plan Review is the idea of 'vertical zoning'. The notion, layering light industry on the lower floors, offices above that, and residences at the top, was not formally proposed in the Draft Master Plan 2025. Still, it offers a glimpse of how Singapore might evolve its planning logic in response to changing economic and spatial realities. Seen in this light, vertical zoning is a conceptual provocation that asks whether future urban productivity might come not from expanding outwards, but from layering uses in smarter, more synergistic ways. If Singapore is serious about remaining spatially efficient and economically agile, this could be a frontier worth exploring further. While no specific developments have been announced, the pilot in Woodlands, which raises the allowable proportion of non-industrial uses from 40 to 70 per cent, may be an early signal of willingness to experiment. It echoes previous 'Business White' trials, which allowed greater flexibility in land use within designated business zones. If taken seriously, vertical zoning could represent a significant shift away from the traditional horizontal separation of uses that has long defined Singapore's land planning. It reflects a recognition that manufacturing today is cleaner and quieter, and that modern services are increasingly mobile and less reliant on sprawling floor plates. Sustainable and inclusive urban living In line with Singapore's push for environmental sustainability, new housing areas are being explored across the island, with a strong emphasis on reusing existing brownfield sites. Spaces such as Bukit Timah Turf Club, the old Keppel Golf Course, and the soon-to-be-vacated Paya Lebar Airbase are being considered for redevelopment into vibrant residential neighbourhoods. Besides building homes, these plans also aim to create active, socially connected communities, with shared amenities that support everyday life and bring people together. Many of these developments reflect a move towards vertical zoning, where housing is thoughtfully layered with community spaces and lifestyle facilities. A key planning principle is accessibility: Most residents will be within a 10-minute walk of parks, shops, schools, and essential services. As part of the broader 'live-work-play' vision, new opportunities for city and fringe-city living are also being introduced. Areas around Newton MRT station, Paterson Road near Orchard, and Dover-Medway near one-north have been earmarked for mixed-use development that balances inclusivity, sustainability and a strong sense of community. These well-connected neighbourhoods offer a good mix of amenities and entertainment, making them ideal for both families and working professionals. For instance, the idea of a new Village Square at Newton and a vibrant mixed-use hub at Paterson would help bridge luxury housing with the retail and activity of Orchard Road. The Draft Master Plan 2025 also puts greater emphasis on senior-friendly housing, including more assisted-living options and active-ageing centres to support older residents in living independently and meaningfully. Whether you're young or old, working or retired, the evolving urban plan seeks to make neighbourhoods more livable, connected and future-ready for everyone. Softer touch Even as it tackles hard economic questions, the Draft Master Plan 2025 doesn't lose sight of softer, human-scale priorities. Included among the proposals are plans for green connectors, heritage trails, repurposed viaducts, and playful public spaces. These aren't decorative add-ons; they are essential components of a livable, imageable city. Such spaces encourage social connection, promote mental well-being, and help Singapore remain globally competitive as a place to live, not just work. The Draft Master Plan 2025: A vision in transition More than a technical update, the Draft Master Plan 2025 reflects a society in flux, one that is learning from past successes, adapting to a slower-growth environment, and daring to imagine a more resilient, layered future. It is not a call to transform everything, but an invitation to reimagine selectively. To rethink what should be intensified, repurposed, or left open-ended. In that spirit, it strikes a balance: between continuity and change, between pragmatism and vision. The writer is head of research and consultancy, South-east Asia, at JLL

Trump modifies tariff rate for Lesotho to 15% as small country reels from tariff impacts, World News
Trump modifies tariff rate for Lesotho to 15% as small country reels from tariff impacts, World News

AsiaOne

time7 days ago

  • AsiaOne

Trump modifies tariff rate for Lesotho to 15% as small country reels from tariff impacts, World News

The small African country Lesotho received a modified tariff rate of 15 per cent Thursday (July 31) from US President Donald Trump as the nation continued to reel from high tariffs the administration had threatened to implement earlier this year. In an executive order, Trump modified reciprocal tariff rates for dozens of countries, including Lesotho, which had been under threat of a 50 per cent rate since April, the highest of any US trading partner. The Trump administration defended its tariff rate on the mountain kingdom in Southern Africa as reciprocal, stating that Lesotho charged 99 per cent tariffs on US goods. Lesotho officials have said they do not know how the White House arrived at that figure. After announcing the barrage of reciprocal tariffs in April, the administration paused implementation to give countries time to negotiate. Under the tariff threat and uncertainty, many US importers cancelled orders of Lesotho-produced textiles, leading to mass layoffs. "If we still have these high tariffs, it means we must forget about producing for the US and go as fast as we can... (looking for) other available markets," Teboho Kobeli, owner of Afri-Expo, which makes jeans for export, told Reuters earlier this year. [[nid:720836]]

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store