logo
Kristen Stewart's First Feature ‘The Chronology of Water' Felt So Good, She Says, She'll Direct Again

Kristen Stewart's First Feature ‘The Chronology of Water' Felt So Good, She Says, She'll Direct Again

Yahoo25-05-2025
Kristen Stewart has been 'wanting to make movies since I was nine or 10 years old,' she told me on her fourth trip to Cannes in 2017, for the short 'Come Swim.' She's been a fixture at the festival ever since her maiden voyage in 2012 with Walter Salles' 'On the Road,' followed by Woody Allen's 'Cafe Society,' Olivier Assayas' 'Clouds of Sils Maria' and 'Personal Shopper,' and David Cronenberg's 'Crimes of the Future.' She also served on Cate Blanchett's Competition jury in 2018.
Stewart's audacious debut, the Un Certain Regard entry 'The Chronology of Water,' was well-received. After eight years of development, Scott Free financed the mood poem about swimming and writing for survival amid personal trauma. Stewart is ebullient after having talked about making her first feature for so long. Back in 2022, she announced that she was adapting (with Andy Mingo) Lidia Yuknavitch's frank 2011 memoir. Stewart resonated with her hardscrabble story about a woman (Imogen Poots) coping with her teenage sexual abuse by her father via sex, anger, competitive swimming, addiction, and creative writing.
More from IndieWire
Darren Aronofsky Partners with Google DeepMind on Generative AI Short Film Initiative
Google Unveils Gen-AI Video Tool with Camera Controls, Consistent Character Design, and Even Sound
Stewart and I talked on a balcony at the Majestic Hotel. The interview has been edited for clarity and brevity.
Anne Thompson: What made you so clear that you should turn this material into your first feature? You went for it.
Kristen Stewart: It's not a movie about the things that actually happened to Lidia. It's about the things that happened to all of us, and then how to take those things into your body. [They] might not be equivalent or exactly like the experience and abuse specifically that she had. Her plight might not be everyone's, but it's similar. There's thievery and violence in the fucking female experience right now, with the imagery that's thrust at us and the conversations that are had outside of our bodies and what they do to our inner voices, when we go: 'I don't think you should do that. Don't say it, keep it a secret. Don't tell anyone you're in pain. Don't tell anyone that that wasn't OK with you. Keep it to yourself. Oh, don't vouch for yourself. Don't fight for that. Oh, don't speak too loud; they won't hear you.' Measure, measure, measure. Shame, shame, shame. And so it was not possible to pull back, because the whole movie is about getting that feeling out. I've never felt like a provocateur. I never was trying to push buttons.
It doesn't feel like that. It feels like you're expressing yourself in every fiber of your being.
It is the truth. There was never a point where I ever questioned it, because there was no way that I was alone in this. The book is such a lifeboat. It's like a flotation device. It's such a good place to start. It's very meta to make a movie about how hard it is to say something that's exactly what I was experiencing.
Over your career, you've taken control of your choices. You've often taken the indie route.
Absolutely. This was not without help. I needed to have a couple of public temper tantrums in order to get the right people to listen. I have this stunning collaborator in Charles Gillibert, who [produced] 'On the Road,' 'Personal Shopper,' and 'Clouds of Sils Maria.' He understands that [women] need help and we need a fucking leg up. It took a long time to get this made. Yeah. It took forever.
What hurdles did you face?
The book is not about the things that happened to her, but about how she processes those things, and about how art can save you. And there was no way to sell the movie as an idea. It was impossible to say to people that I wanted to make a DMT trip experience, a life flashing before your eyes, in the way that your memory feels neurological and physical to you. It's different from the book. It's a faithful adaptation, but it is not the same experience. There was no way for me to tell people that I needed to go make so many puzzle pieces that I could come home and find authentic, emotional connective tissue, because you cannot plan for things like this. You can't plan for the ephemeral. You have to go catch it. You have to go create an environment in which things can sprawl and people can explore and learn things. And so therefore, the movie had to have a life in order for it to have its own memory. It couldn't be exacting, controlled. My hands and my fingerprints are all over it, but I'm not strangling the movie, because the movie had such volition, it had such its own life, that it was telling me what it wanted every day.
Was the movie finished when you brought it to Cannes? Would you go back to the editing room?
The picture is pretty final, it's color-corrected. I'm not going to cut it, OK? It deserves space. It's not like the normal success story that has a three-act structure in the terms that we're used to. Audience are trained, everybody is, because you could not be, to have a certain capacity and a certain expectation for a rhythm and a time code: 'I'm supposed to get this now. I want it. Where is it?' Quite often in the movie, there's so many false wins and starts and hard crashes. And there's an undulation that resembles a female orgasm that steps away from this 1-2-3, punch of the climax and a sigh of relief in the last five minutes, and the movie's over. You think you're there, you think you're there, you're not sure. Then you kill it, then you pull back, and then you're: 'Why am I still here?' And it's frustrating at times, probably. Three-quarters of the way through, you might think to yourself, 'Where are we going?' It is intentional.
Imogen Poots anchors it.
She's the reason why you can get away with all the rest of it, because you never want to stop hanging out with her. Unless we had somebody who really kept you on a line, we were dead in the water.
How did you know she was the right one?
She's a walking motif. Look at her eyes. Visually, I was taken aback when her face filled my Zoom screen in which we did a pseudo audition, aah, I started getting this feeling: 'Oh, my God, the movie might exist.' Because without Lidia — her body is our movie.
You do not shy away from all the orifices and aspects of a woman's body, and you show a lot of blood.
The second shot of the film is intentional. Fifty percent of the population is not going to wonder where that blood came from. It didn't come from a wound. It's textured and chunky, and it's being sucked down a drain. She also comes into her hand so hard that it's dripping from her fingers, and she smells it before getting her mind blown by the sheer capability of her own body. And then the hymen breaking, all of the times that she was aching and itching and bleeding. How often have you ached or itched or bled in public and just been: 'No, you never, that's an alone experience, no matter what.' It's isolating. I hate walking around not telling people what's going on with me.
It happens to everyone. Women will respond to this. It's all about the physical.
Yes — the movie takes place on the surface of this woman's skin. We would arrange rocks on the sand in the same configuration as my favorite pattern of moles on her stomach, just to make sure that we related her to organic material, to imply that she grew here. She did not choose the things that happened to her. We are gouged out. Our desires are given to us. We experience things that we don't choose, and then they define us for the rest of our lives. [It's] a book about revering words, and the life-saving significance and importance of words. I also wanted to stay outside of any word, inside the unnamed wet, because we don't have to take credit for all the shit that comes out of us, but we can turn it into something that is pleasure and pain at once and have that be something that you can decide whether or not it hurts or it feels good.
It must have felt good for you. You're a director now.
Oh man, it felt so good. I'm dying.
You're going to do it again.
I can't wait.
Have you got things in the hopper? Now they'll give it to you easily.
Yeah, several. It's going to be a lot easier this time. I've always said that as long as I can make another movie after my first one, that I don't need to be precious or clever about it at all. It just needs to feel pure. I've earned the right to try one more time. I never want to make the same movie twice. So whatever comes out next is going to not be anything like this. I can't fucking wait.
Jim Belushi is brilliant as Lidia's writing mentor, Ken Kesey.
He brought pages to our pages. He's a movie star: He did so much research. He was the person that we needed to come pat us on the back and remind us that it's okay to want approval from a male figurehead, it's not weird, and it's not anti-feminist. You're not a bad feminist if you want someone like Jim Belushi to pat you on the back and tell you that you're a good girl.Why did you shoot in 16 millimeter?
Because I didn't want to record this. I wanted to take pictures so I could slice them up, and I wanted it to feel like a dream, and I needed it to flash before your eyes. And there's just too much information in a digital image. You can't put yourself into it, and it also doesn't speak to time in the way that the movie needs to. The movie needs to fracture. You can't fracture a recorded image. There's no break. You get all the information. [The movie] is a completely and utterly inundating experience. But for us, we only have 24 pictures every second, and sometimes less because we've pulled them out. And so we really fuck with the experience of literal time, and we put it back into the body, and we can span four decades fluidly, because we shot on film. And also, it does something to people on set. You realize your camera has a heartbeat, you can hear it when the camera starts running — whir — everyone stands at attention. It infuses an immediacy and a sort of honor.
'The Chronology of Water' premiered at the 2025 Cannes Film Festival. It is currently seeking U.S. distribution.
Best of IndieWire
Quentin Tarantino's Favorite Movies: 65 Films the Director Wants You to See
The 19 Best Thrillers Streaming on Netflix in May, from 'Fair Play' to 'Emily the Criminal'
Martin Scorsese's Favorite Movies: 86 Films the Director Wants You to See
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Giada De Laurentiis says she cried after this famed chef credited her success to 'big boobs' in cookbook foreword
Giada De Laurentiis says she cried after this famed chef credited her success to 'big boobs' in cookbook foreword

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Giada De Laurentiis says she cried after this famed chef credited her success to 'big boobs' in cookbook foreword

In a recent interview, the Food Network star said her editor had to completely rewrite the introduction before her 2005 debut cookbook was published. Giada De Laurentiis recently recalled crying after she read the disparaging comments that, she says, chef Mario Batali wrote about her in a foreword for her first cookbook. The Italian-born chef, cookbook author and Food Network regular joined host Samah Dada on her YouTube show On the Menu on July 29. In a clip from the episode shared on TikTok on Aug. 11, De Laurentiis told Dada she had a story about a person she was 'not supposed to talk about' but was 'going to.' That person was Batali, who De Laurentiis worked with at the Food Network early in her culinary career. De Laurentiis explained that she had asked Batali to write a foreword to her first cookbook, Everyday Italian, which debuted in 2005, as Batali was 'a legend in the Italian space' at the time. She said his 'stamp of approval' would have been 'huge' for her, and she was happy when he agreed to write it. 'When I read it, I cried because I realized, 'Oh, he's basically saying that I've gotten to where I've gotten, and I've had this little bit of success that I had, because I have big boobs, and that if he had boobs, he would even be much further,'' De Laurentiis recalled. 'Because I'm like, a joke, right? Like, to him, it was like a little bit of a joke.' De Laurentiis said she called her editor 'in tears,' knowing she could not use what Batali allegedly wrote in the intro of her book. Her editor said they would rewrite his foreword and send it to him for approval, which they did. 'So we rewrote it, but I will never forget that,' she said. 'That's basically what a lot of people figured: cute girl with big boobs, so that's why they're watching her.' The final version of De Laurentiis's foreword is flattering toward the author and focuses on her talents in the art of Italian cuisine. 'It turns out that Giada is smart, Italian-speaking, and family-oriented — the three qualities my grandma hoped I'd find in a girl to marry. (Too late for that.) She's also a great cook, highly knowledgeable about food, and a huge amount of fun to be around — the three qualities I'd hope to find in a television partner,' Batali's foreword reads. Batali has not commented on De Laurentiis's account of what he wrote. Batali is a famed American chef, known for his Italian cooking style. He previously had multiple restaurants across the globe and was a co-host of ABC's The Chew from 2011 to 2017. In 2017, Batali was accused of sexual misconduct by multiple women in an article on the food website Eater. Following the allegations, Batali stepped away from his restaurant empire and was asked by ABC to take leave from the talk show. In 2018, De Laurentiis appeared on the podcast Eater Upsell and stated that she was not surprised to learn of the allegations against Batali. 'I did not have those exact experiences with him, but it doesn't come as a huge shock,' she said at the time. 'Anybody who's ever hung out with Mario knows he's a very charismatic person,' she continued. 'We drink too much and sometimes … I'm not legitimizing it by any means. I know I've been through my own issues in this business. I think any woman in any business goes through stuff. It's just sad, you know? It's time, but it's also sad. It's a combo, and I think we all feel both.' Solve the daily Crossword

J-Hope's Entire Solo Chart History Reappears On The Same List
J-Hope's Entire Solo Chart History Reappears On The Same List

Forbes

time44 minutes ago

  • Forbes

J-Hope's Entire Solo Chart History Reappears On The Same List

K-pop stars are known as some of the bestselling musicians in the world these days. While many music fans have migrated to streaming platforms to consume the songs and albums they love, the biggest names emerging from the South Korean music industry have a tendency to sell huge quantities of individual tunes and full-lengths and EPs, usually on physical formats. Diehard K-pop fans often prefer CDs and, in some cases, vinyl, as the genre lends itself to collectibles. J-Hope, one of the seven singers that make up BTS, proves his selling ability once again in one of the largest music markets in the world this week. He returns to the Official Physical Singles chart, the U.K.'s ranking of the top-selling individual tunes available on any physical format. Typically that means vinyl, but for J-Hope, CDs are the go-to choice. 'Sweet Dreams' and 'Killin' It Girl' Reappear 'Sweet Dreams,' his collaboration with Miguel, and 'Killin' It Girl,' a team-up with rapper GloRilla, both find their way back to the roster this frame, coming in at Nos. 35 and 60, respectively. Both 'Sweet Dreams' and 'Killin' It Girl' debuted on the Official Physical Singles chart this year. J-Hope has only sent two tracks to the list as a soloist throughout his career, and his entire charting discography appears on the roster at the moment. J-Hope's Former No. 1 Hit Between the two, 'Sweet Dreams' is the bigger hit. It's the only one that reached No. 1, as 'Killin' It Girl' stalled one space shy of leading the charge. 'Sweet Dreams' has also spent more than four times as many frames on the Official Physical Singles ranking as 'Killin' It Girl,' with 14 weeks compared to the three that the GloRilla collaboration has managed thus far. Both J-Hope Smashes Haven't Been Gone For Long 'Sweet Dreams' last appeared on the format-specific list on the chart dated July 24, when it reappeared at No. 80 and then fell away. 'Killin' It Girl,' meanwhile, opened at No. 2 on the chart dated June 26, then fell to No. 19 and vanished. 'LV Bag' and 'Mona Lisa' J-Hope has spent 2025 doling out single after single, and he has dropped four solo tracks this year. In addition to 'Sweet Dreams' and 'Killin' It Girl,' he was credited on 'LV Bag' alongside Don Toliver, Speedy, and Pharrell Williams, and he also delivered the tune 'Mona Lisa.' All four cuts are standalone singles at the moment, as they haven't been connected to a larger project. J-Hope last released his EP Hope on the Street Vol. 1 in the spring of 2024.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store