National Western Stock Show: 98 junior livestock champions fetch record-breaking amount
DENVER (KDVR) — It's time to take down those holiday lights and buckle in for a long year until the 120th National Western Stock Show, as the 2025 event marketed as the 'best 16 days in January' came to a close.
Organizers said this year drew over 658,109 visitors during the two-week-and-two-day stint, with fans donning their best Western regalia for the traditional events. The participation places 2025 among the top 10 stock shows for attendance in history.
Bull rider injured at National Western Stock Show rodeo event
The stock show set its record attendance numbers in 2006 for the 100th anniversary — 726,973 people attended that year. This year's attendance numbers had to compete with the frigid cold — 91 hours straight of this year's stock show were held while the temperature remained below freezing.
'Every guest that walks through our gates is part of the Stock Show family, and we are incredibly thankful for their support,' said Paul Andrews, President and CEO of the National Western Stock Show, in the Sunday afternoon release.
The NWSS highlighted its Auction of Junior Livestock Champions which had 98 animals that fetched a 'record-breaking $1,452,500 — the highest total in stock show history.'
The funds go to the National Western Scholarship Trust, which gives scholarships to students pursuing agriculture and rural medicine careers. The Coors Western Art Exhibit and Sale also gives its process to the trust, which broke records with $1.4 million in sales to date, the stock show shared.
'Thanks to these events and the incredible generosity of our supporters, we're able to fund 120 scholarships annually, ranging from $2,500 to $15,000 per student,' Andrews said in the stock show release. 'These scholarships represent an investment in the future of agriculture, helping students pursue their dreams and make meaningful contributions to their communities.'While this year's stock show is over, it's time to save the date for next year's: The National Western Stock Show is set to return to Denver on Jan. 10-25, 2026.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
China Reacts to Trump Review of Nuclear Submarine Deal
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. China reiterated its opposition to the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal after the Trump Administration said it is reviewing the defense agreement to ensure it fits with its "America First" agenda. AUKUS is a partnership between the U.S., U.K., and Australia centered on developing nuclear-powered attack submarines that will expand patrols of the Pacific by Western allies. The deal, agreed in 2021, is worth $240 billion and is now under scrutiny by the Pentagon, led by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. "China has made clear more than once its position on the so-called trilateral security partnership between the U.S., U.K., and Australia, designed to advance cooperation on nuclear submarines and other cutting-edge military technologies," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian said at a briefing on Thursday. "We oppose manufacturing bloc confrontations and anything that amplifies the risk of nuclear proliferation and exacerbates the arms race." This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
A Belgrade landmark bombed by Nato could get Trump makeover
One of the first sights that greets arrivals to the centre of Serbia's capital Belgrade are government buildings in an advance state of collapse. Nato planes bombed them back in 1999 – and they remain in much the same condition. The message they deliver to visitors could be "welcome to Serbia, our recent history has been tumultuous and complicated – and we still haven't quite finished processing it". Like a smile with a row of broken teeth, the Defence Ministry buildings are still standing. But they clearly took a serious hit when Nato intervened to stop Serbia's then military campaign in Kosovo. As a member of the Western military alliance, the US was implicated in the bombing. Given that history, last year it came as something of a jolt for Serbians when the government struck a deal with a company called Affinity Global to redevelop the site into a $500m (£370m) luxury hotel and apartment tower complex. Not just because the business concerned is American, but due to the fact its founder is Jared Kushner, best-known as Donald Trump's son-in-law. And because the planned development is due to be called Trump Tower Belgrade. While these has now been a major twist in the tale that puts the scheme in some doubt, the Serbian government's decision to strike the deal wasn't too surprising. Before he became US president in 2016, Donald Trump himself expressed interest in building a hotel on the site. The move also fits a government pattern - as alleged by the Serbian opposition - of allowing foreign investors to profit from public property. They cite, as a prime example, the Belgrade Waterfront residential and retail project, constructed by Emirati developers on land owned by Serbia's railways. Where there used to be rusting rolling stock and derelict sidings, there is now a swish shopping centre, smart restaurants and the oddly bulbous, 42-storey Belgrade Tower. It is not to everyone's taste. That, however, was a brownfield site, rather than a city centre landmark. The Defence Ministry complex is an entirely different proposition – not least because it acts as a memorial to the casualties of the 1999 bombing campaign. It is also a highly visual reminder of why the vast majority of Serbians remain opposed to Nato, and feel sympathetic towards Russia. In that context, granting a US developer a 99-year lease on the site, reportedly for no upfront cost, is a bold move. But Serbia's president, Aleksandar Vucic, is unapologetic. "It's important to overcome the burden from 1999," he tells the BBC. "We are ready to build better relations with the US – I think that is terribly important for this country." That view garners a degree of sympathy from Belgrade's international business community. Foreign direct investment inflows have more than tripled over the past decade. But GDP per capita remains low compared to EU member states. It stands at just one third of the bloc's average. To keep those figures moving in the right direction, attracting new investors is vital. And while the financial details of the Ministry of Defence development have not been revealed, the New York Times has reported that the Serbian government will get 22% of future profits. "For a small and specific market – ex-Yugoslavia, outside the EU – all publicity is good publicity," says James Thornley, a former senior partner at KPMG Serbia, who is now a partner at financial consultants KP Advisory in Belgrade. "If you have major international players coming in, it's a pull, it's a draw. You're getting the name and opportunity out there." Mr Thornley has lived in Serbia for 25 years and is fully aware of the sensitivities surrounding the Defence Ministry complex. But he believes that views would change once people saw the benefits of the development. "That site is an eyesore and should be resolved," he says. "Nothing's happened for 26 years, let's get it sorted out." But not everyone involved with international investment in Serbia is so enthusiastic. Andrew Peirson was the managing director of global real estate giant CBRE in Southeast Europe, and now holds the same role at iO Partners, which focuses entirely on the region. He admits that the shattered state of the Defence Ministry complex is "not good for the city's image", and that the deal to develop the site is "probably good news, because it shows the country can attract big investments". But he has serious qualms about how the government struck the deal with Affinity Global. Mr Peirson says that there was no open tendering process that would have allowed other firms to bid for the site. "With state-owned land, you should be able to prove you're getting market value for the site. The way you usually do that is to run a proper tender process," says Mr Peirson. "If it had been in UK, Germany, Hungary or even Romania or Bulgaria, there would have been a process; it would have gone through the open market. Developers that were looking to enter Serbia, or already active, would have been given the chance to buy it themselves." Back in 2023 Vucic said he met with Kushner and had an "excellent conversation" with Jared Kushner regarding the "potential for large and long-term investments." And Donald Trump Jr has since made follow up visits to Belgrade after Affinity Global announced that a Trump International Hotel would form part of the development. The role of Trump Jr and the family business is thought to be limited to the hotel. Questions have been raised about the Trumps making commercial deals while Donald Trump is in the White House but his press secretary has rejected any suggestion he is profiting from the presidency. Mr Peirson is concerned that the nature of the Ministry of Defence building deal may irk businesses which have already committed to Serbia. "If I'm an investor already putting tens or hundreds of millions into the country, I would feel sad that I hadn't been given the chance," he says. Both Affinity Global and the Serbian government did not respond to requests for comments about how the deal over the site was agreed, and whether or not there was an open tendering process. Ros Atkins on... Trump's deals in the Gulf Then there is the question of whether a commercial development should be taking place at all. The site, even in its current state, remains architecturally and historically significant. The buildings were originally constructed to welcome visitors to the capital of Tito's Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Architect Nikola Dobrovic created two structures on either side of Nemanjina Street which, viewed together, took the form of a gate. The design also echoes the contours of Sutjeska Gorge, the site of the Yugoslav Partisans' pivotal victory over Nazi forces in 1943. And in 2005, it was granted protected status under Serbia's cultural heritage laws. "No serious city builds a modern future by demolishing its historical centres and cultural monuments," says Estela Radonjic Zivkov, the former deputy director of Serbia's Republic Institute for the Protection of Monuments. "For Serbia to progress, it must first respect its own laws and cultural heritage," she insists. "According to Serbian law, it is not possible to revoke the protection of this site." But just when it seemed the site's fate was sealed, Serbian organised crime prosecutors delivered a twist worthy of a Hollywood thriller. On 14 May, police arrested the official who had given the green light for the lifting of the Defence Ministry complex's protected status. Prosecutors said Goran Vasic, the acting director of the Republic Institute for the Protection of Cultural Monuments, had admitted to fabricating an expert opinion which had been used to justify the change of status. He faces charges of abuse of office and forgery of official documents. This admission has been seized on by those opposed to the project as evidence Kushner got preferential treatment. The Serbian government denies this. Where this leaves the Affinity Global project – Trump International Hotel and all – is not entirely clear. Repeated efforts to arrange an interview with the company have been unsuccessful, though it did issue a statement insisting that Mr Vasic had "no connection to our firm", adding that it would "review this matter and determine next steps". Vucic, meanwhile, denies there is any problem with the development. During a meeting of European leaders in Tirana, he said "there was not any kind of forgery". Still, it seems the Defence Ministry's shattered visage will remain unchanged for a while at least. And thanks to the Trump connection, it will offer even more of a talking point for first-time visitors to Belgrade. Winemakers finding Trump's tariffs hard to swallow Did Trump really strike Gulf deals worth $2tn? The world's most dangerous country for trade unionists Is the US finally on track to build a high-speed rail network?
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mike Lee reinstates language to sell Utah public land in Trump tax bill
WASHINGTON — Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, reinstated language to make public land in Utah eligible for sale, adding the proposal back to President Donald Trump's massive tax package after it was removed by GOP leaders in the House last month. The proposal would pave the way to sell off a small percentage of Utah's public lands, as well as other Western states, to be used for affordable housing and increase revenue for conservation projects. The public land sale proposal is tucked into a larger section of energy-related provisions headed by Lee as chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, which released its portion of Trump's reconciliation bill on Wednesday. 'This is President Trump's agenda: cut the Green New Scam, reduce the deficit, and unleash American energy,' Lee said in a statement. 'We're cutting billions in unused Biden-era climate slush funds, opening up energy and resource development, turning federal liabilities into taxpayer value, while making housing more affordable for hardworking American families. This is how we make government smaller, freer, and work for Americans.' The move comes after the House stripped language to sell more than 211,000 acres across Utah and Nevada, an amendment led by Utah Rep. Celeste Maloy, R-Utah, who said she drafted the provision upon request from local officials. However, the language was ultimately removed from the House version amid pushback from some Republicans as well as concerns it did not adhere to strict reconciliation rules. Under the reconciliation process, all provisions in the massive package must adhere to what is known as the 'Byrd rule,' which prohibits policies that are unrelated to budget changes or that outweigh budgetary effects. To comply with the Byrd rule, Lee made substantive changes to Maloy's amendment that would refrain from using specific maps to target land in the western states. The updated language also excludes specific acreage, instead instructing the interior secretary to sell off between just 0.5% to 0.75% of federal lands in specific states. The states listed include Utah as well as Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Washington, and Wyoming. However, the bill carves out specific guardrails for what land can be sold, excluding at least 15 categories of protected land from the list. That means national parks, monuments, and land dedicated to wilderness reserves would not be included. Instead, GOP aides stressed it would only sell 'unused or underused federal lands adjacent to cities or metropolitan areas.' To adhere to Byrd Rule requirements that policies must contribute to deficit reduction, the provision would stipulate that the money made from land sales goes toward conservation efforts, maintenance projects, infrastructure improvements for roads and utilities, and school funding. Maloy worked with Lee to draft the updated version of the land sales to be included in the final package, arguing it was crucial to affordable housing projects in the two western states. The proposal was also backed by Trump, who campaigned on the issue throughout the 2024 election. About 63% of Utah's land is owned by the federal government, the most of any state in the country aside from Nevada. But the initial proposal was met with pushback from some Republicans who have historically opposed public land sales, such as Rep. Ryan Zinke, R-Mont., the co-chairman of the newly created Public Lands Caucus. Lee's office worked closely with Montana Sens. Steve Daines and Tim Sheehy to assuage concerns from the state delegation about public land sales. The reconciliation language exempts Montana from any sales, but much of the framework was inspired by the Montana senators' suggestions to ease concerns about lack of a public process. The provision would require the interior secretary to consult with state and local governments as well as any Indian tribes before facilitating any sort of sale, according to the bill. That way, aides noted, it created a 'public participant process.' Democrats have also expressed opposition to the proposal, including Sen. Catherine Masto Cortez, D-Nevada, who contended much of the land being sold couldn't be converted into housing anyway. 'Their reconciliation package included federal land sales…that weren't even near areas where you could actually do affordable housing,' Masto said to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum during a Senate hearing on Wednesday. The land is 'in the middle of the desert. There's no infrastructure. I don't know any builder who is going to build housing in the middle of the desert, it makes no sense.' The proposal is also likely to face pushback from some public lands organizations. More than 100 groups penned a letter to Lee and other Senate leadership earlier this week urging them not to include language that would greenlight any land sales. However, GOP aides argued the land sales would help with housing affordability crises in Western states, especially for those who live close to national parks where housing prices are expensive. The public land sales proposal is tucked into a larger section of energy-related provisions, which also includes provisions paving the way for increased lease sales in Alaska, permitting reform, repealing Biden-era clean energy policies, and more. The full section must now be approved by the Senate parliamentarian, who will determine whether the contents adhere to the Byrd Rule and can be included in the final reconciliation package.
