Scranton council president apologizes for not stopping derogatory remarks
Smurl's apology that opened council's meeting Tuesday came in response to comments the prior week by resident Bob Bolus opposing having the rainbow flag flying at City Hall for Pride Month, as well as other remarks Bolus directed at a pro-LGBTQ resident, Angela Ramone, who was in attendance at that meeting.
The events also resulted in several other residents attending Tuesday's council meeting to express support for LGBTQ people and condemn hate speech, according to an Electric City Television simulcast and video of the weekly meeting posted online.
According to ECTV videos and minutes of council meetings, preceding events at council meetings included:
April 29: Ramone advocated for LGBTQ protections and challenged council members to voice support for them.
May 13: Ramone expressed opposition to a bill in the state Legislature that would ban transgender athletes from competing in sports in the state and 'require genital inspections for any player that is accused of being transgender, specifically playing in women's sports. This bill is incredibly, incredibly invasive and disgusting and hurtful.'
May 27: Bolus spoke about his efforts and intent to run for mayor of Scranton. Ramone noted a prior Bolus felony conviction makes him ineligible to serve as city mayor.
June 3: Noting June is Pride Month, Councilwoman Jessica Rothchild said having a rainbow pride flag raised on June 1 on a City Hall flagpole was a great way to have the LGBTQ community feel welcome and a part of the city. Bolus spoke directly to Ramone, who was seated in the gallery, as having made false comments the prior week about Bolus that 'disparaged' his name. He warned Ramone against battling him and 'mouthing off about me.' Bolus then called the pride flag raised June 1 at City Hall a 'slap in the face' to veterans and likened it to an affront to the 'Rule of God,' among various other remarks. Ramone reminded council of its rules prohibiting anyone speaking during public comment from addressing any individual council or audience member, and asked that council enforce its rules. Resident Doris Koloski said she's glad the pride flag is being flown and it wouldn't be needed 'if people didn't act like Mr. Bolus.' Resident Norma Jeffries said no one has a right at council 'to degrade or bash' anyone because of who they are, and chastised Smurl for not gaveling down Bolus. Councilman Bill King agreed with Koloski and Jeffries and told Smurl he needs 'to start using that gavel because our rules were violated and it's not acceptable.'
On June 6, Smurl submitted to council a letter of apology that he read aloud at Tuesday's meeting.
'I understand a lot of hateful statements were made and some were directed towards speakers and council members. It is my job as council president to not allow hateful and derogatory remarks to be directed at any one individual. As council president, I take full responsibility for not doing my job to maintain order at last week's meeting. I apologize for not performing my job properly,' Smurl's apology said in part. 'Going forward, I will fulfill my duties that I promised to uphold when I was sworn in as council president.'
Scranton city councilman Gerald Smurl walks out of council chambers at Scranton City Hall before a council meeting in 2022.
Also at Tuesday's meeting, Bolus said, 'I make no excuse for last week.' He read a lengthy statement that noted Rothchild on June 3 expressed opinions about Pride Month and the pride flag and he should be allowed to express his opinions. As his speaking time ran out, Bolus was saying he filed a lawsuit to have the pride flag removed from City Hall.
Bolus filed that lawsuit Friday in Lackawanna County Court on a pro-se basis, meaning representing himself without an attorney. This lawsuit as a 'mandamus petition for extraordinary relief' sought to compel the removal of the pride flag from City Hall, as well as having it barred from display there and at all public buildings in the county. Also on Friday, Lackawanna County Judge Terrence Nealon dismissed Bolus' lawsuit on various procedural errors, including that he did not properly file or serve the action or name defendants. Nealon dismissed the case 'without prejudice,' meaning Bolus could try to do it again properly.
Bob Bolus Sr. (COURTESY OF BOB BOLUS SR.)
Some residents who spoke Tuesday in support of the LGBTQ community urged people to speak out against intolerance.
'When someone stands at this podium and spews dehumanizing rhetoric and it's met with a 'thank you' or no response at all it sends a message, a message that hate has a place here. Silence is not neutrality. It comes off as complicity,' resident Jessica McGuigan said. 'We are living in a moment where lines are being drawn across the country, in our own backyards, and the fear, the rhetoric of fear, division and dehumanization is not abstract. It's being written into laws, spoken from pulpits and shouted at school board meetings.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
16 hours ago
- New York Post
NJ ‘Moms for Liberty' leader claims Girl Scouts fired her for not promoting Pride Month activism
A New Jersey Girl Scout troop leader who was fired by the renowned youth organization claimed she was let go for not bringing her group to LGBTQ+ events during Pride Month. Alexandra Bougher, a 45-year-old Moms for Liberty chapter chair in Bergen County, was released by two members of Girl Scouts of Northern New Jersey during a phone call on Wednesday, she said. 3 Alexandra Boughter, 45, concluded she was removed from the Girl Scouts of Northern New Jersey for sharing anti-LBGTQ+ stances online. Instagram/@alexandrab444 Advertisement Bougher said the pair who fired her didn't elaborate on their reasoning and only vaguely pointed to a violation of their code of conduct. She said that her daughter was also removed from the scouts as part of her own excommunication. She independently concluded that the entire ordeal had to do with a comment she shared in June responding to a post on the Girl Scouts of Northern New Jersey's social media celebrating Pride Month. 'I reposted it and I said, 'Just to be clear, my troop will not be doing this,'' Bougher told NJ Advance Media. Advertisement 'I guess that's the one. They actually refused to tell me which one it was, but I'm assuming it was that one since it was pulled off their site.' 3 Boughter said she commented that her troop would not be participating in Pride Month celebrations. Facebook/Moms for Liberty Boughter was a seven-year leader with the troops and led roughly 30 girls before she was canned. She said she was appalled by the Girl Scouts' apparent shift towards left-wing advocacy, including promoting LGBTQ+ events and Black Lives Matter protests in 2020. Advertisement 'And we were like, this is not what Girl Scouts is about, and it's also dangerous — bringing young children there. We sort of saw that change and some other things too, but you know, I kept my mouth shut, I kept my troop — they're all friends with each other. They can do those events and we'll do our own thing, you know,' Boughter told the outlet. Her firing came two months after sharing a since-deleted post online that spurred threats of violence against a local church displaying a pride flag, reported. 3 Boughter worked with the Girl Scouts for seven years. X/@AlexandraBough3 She shared a post condemning a local church's display of a Progressive Pride Flag, which includes black and brown stripes representing queer folks in marginalized communities and other colors for transgender pride. Advertisement Many of the comments on Boughter's post repeatedly insisted that the expansion of the Pride Flag included representation for 'minor-attracted persons,' which is not true. The church added that 'one commentator suggested the only way to deal with us was with 'gasoline and a match'.' Boughter still stood by her original message and condemnation, but denounced the calls to violence. The Post has reached out to Girl Scouts and the northern New Jersey chapter for comment.
Business Insider
20 hours ago
- Business Insider
'Something's Gotta Break!': Target Stock (NYSE:TGT) Slips, New Boycott May Rise
There are some cracks emerging in the facade of retail giant Target (TGT). Foot traffic is still down even six months after the last boycott hit. Moreover, there could be another boycott brewing that will hit Target ahead of holiday shopping season. The idea left investors cold, and shares slipped nearly 1.5% in Friday afternoon's trading. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Target has had some serious trouble lately with political matters. Around two years ago, during the Biden administration, conservatives took aim at Target. They launched a boycott over Target's sale of LGBTQ-themed merchandise, as well as certain policies about the store's restrooms. The boycott seemed to work, and Target pivoted, changing display policies, bathroom policies, and even later making the move to end diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies in accordance with new policies from President Trump. But liberals saw that the boycott plan worked, and launched their own, in protest of the DEI shutdown. Reports noted that foot traffic at Target is down, and falling. In fact, foot traffic fell for the sixth month in a row in year-over-year comparisons. Yet not all the lost foot traffic is attributable to politics. Some believe that Target is '…slipping on retail basics,' like empty cart corrals and understocked, unclean shelves. Another Boycott Brewing? There are also signs that another boycott could be in the works, which might hit Target at the worst possible time: holiday shopping season. Pastor Jamal Harrison Bryant has been working on the notion of getting his flock to stop shopping at Target stores, again over issues of DEI. Bryant took to his pulpit to insist 'Something's gotta break!' in the midst of a sermon about debt, divorce, and drugs, after which he quickly pivoted to taking on Target. While Bryant acknowledges that the momentum is against him—especially given that the Trump Administration is referring to DEI programs as 'illegal DEI'—Bryant believes that a boycott might also serve as a '…way to energize those younger churchgoers that remain,' a number that has been falling off historically since at least 2007. So if Bryant, and those like him, believe they may be able to use a Target boycott to put life back in their churches, then a boycott may indeed be coming. Is Target Stock a Good Buy? Turning to Wall Street, analysts have a Moderate Buy consensus rating on TGT stock based on 11 Buys, 17 Holds and four Sells assigned in the past three months, as indicated by the graphic below. After a 27.62% loss in its share price over the past year, the average TGT price target of $103.40 per share implies 0.51% upside potential.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Federal judge guts major portion of Florida's book ban, in a blow to DeSantis
A federal judge has closed the chapter on key parts of Florida's censorious ban on school library books that conservatives deem 'pornographic' and harmful to children. Amid a broader assault on diversity in the state, Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis signed a law in 2023, known as House Bill 1069, that set up a process for parents to challenge books for removal from school libraries that they feel are unsuitable for young readers. The repressive law requires that schools remove books within five days of a parents' complaint and make them unavailable while they're reviewed. The process, broadly targeting books with 'pornographic' content or that 'describe sexual conduct,' has ensnared many titles by nonwhite and LGBTQ authors over purported obscenity. Last year, multiple publishing companies, Florida parents and authors filed a lawsuit seeking to thwart the bill, naming as defendants various members of the state education board and school boards in Orange and Volusia counties. And the suit appears to have succeeded, in large part. 'By enacting HB 1069, the Florida legislature sought to prohibit material from entering or remaining in school libraries that is not obscene for minors,' District Court Judge Carlos Mendoza said in his ruling on Wednesday, which found the section that targets descriptions of sexual conduct to be unconstitutional. He listed several examples: The following books, among others, have been removed: The Color Purple, Half of a Yellow Sun, Cloud Atlas, The Splendid and the Vile, I am Not Your Perfect Mexican Daughter, The Freedom Writers Diary: How a Teacher and 150 Teens Used Writing to Change Themselves and the World Around Them, On the Road, Nineteen Minutes, Paper Towns, Looking for Alaska, How the García Girls Lost Their Accents, The Kite Runner, Slaughterhouse-Five, Shout, Last Night at the Telegraph Club, The Handmaid's Tale, Native Son, Kaffir Boy: The True Story of a Black Youth's Coming of Age in Apartheid South Africa, Water for Elephants, Beloved, Song of Solomon, The Bluest Eye, and Homegoing. None of these books are obscene. The judge said the law's focus on books that 'describe sexual content' is 'overbroad' and 'unconstitutional,' and he said the law 'mandates the removal of books that contain even a single reference to the prohibited subject matter, regardless of the holistic value of the book individually or as part of a larger collection.' Mendoza also rejected conservatives' argument that libraries — and the books in them — are forums for 'government speech.' He wrote that 'many removals at issue here are the objecting parents' speech, not the government's,' and that 'slapping the label of government speech on book removals only serves to stifle the disfavored viewpoints.' Citing Supreme Court precedent, the judge said, 'To be sure, parents have the right to 'direct the upbringing and education of children,' but the government cannot repackage their speech and pass it off as its own.' Mendoza declined to strike down the law completely, writing that the law's reference to 'pornographic' content can be read as synonymous with content considered 'harmful to minors' under Florida law, which means some books could still be banned but only if they meet a rigorous standard for obscenity known as the 'Miller Test.' The Authors' Guild, which was a plaintiff in the suit and claims to represent more than 16,000 members, called the ruling 'a sweeping victory for readers and authors.' State officials said they plan to appeal the ruling. This article was originally published on Solve the daily Crossword
