India view support for Iran port project despite US sanctions
India has pledged continued support for its joint project with Iran at the port of Chabahar, days after US President Donald Trump targeted the facility in new sanctions against Tehran. The Chabahar project is key for the region's economic development, New Delhi has said.
Speaking on Monday at an event to mark the 46th anniversary of the Islamic Revolution of Iran, Indian Foreign Ministry secretary Jaideep Mazumdar Mazumdar described regional connectivity as a
'crucial'
aspect of relations, according to the Times of India. He added that the development of the Chabahar deepwater port in southeastern Iran is a key example of the two countries'
'shared vision for mutual benefit through connectivity.'
His remarks come days after US President Trump passed an executive order to exert
'maximum economic pressure'
on Iran, directing Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to
'impose sanctions on the Iranian government, aiming to restrict its access to funds, including those generated through oil exports, ports, and related businesses.'
'The Secretary of State shall modify or rescind sanctions waivers, particularly those that provide Iran any degree of economic or financial relief, including those related to Iran's Chabahar port project,'
the order stated.
READ MORE:
Stunning images from Su-57 cockpit on India debut (VIDEO)
The Chabahar port was conceived as a strategic hub for the International North-South Transport Corridor, developed by India, Iran, and Russia as an alternative shipping route to the Suez Canal. The INSTC originates in Mumbai, traversing through Iran's Bandar Abbas, Bandar-e-Anzali, and Chabahar, before crossing the Caspian Sea to reach Astrakhan in southern Russia. It then connects to Moscow and St. Petersburg via rail and road links.
In 2024, New Delhi and Tehran signed a contract that involves India equipping and operating the Shahid Beheshti terminal of the port over the next ten years, opening up opportunities for India to increase trade and commerce with Central Asia and Russia, as well as Afghanistan, bypassing Pakistan. As per the contract, India Global Ports Limited (IGPL) will take over the operations of the general cargo and container terminals at the Shahid Beheshti port, one of the two facilities at Chabahar.
After the Chabahar deal was announced, the administration of US President Joe Biden threatened India with sanctions, saying that anyone considering
'business deals with Iran, they need to be aware of the potential risk of sanctions.'
Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar responding by saying that the long-term agreement between India and Iran to operate the Chabahar port is
'for everyone's benefit.'
READ MORE:
X suspends RT India account
Notably, the previous Trump administration had in 2018 exempted Chabahar from US sanctions, acknowledging its role in facilitating reconstruction efforts in Afghanistan.
An Indian government report recently noted a significant increase in maritime activity through the INSTC, with a 43% rise in vessel traffic and 34% growth in container traffic during the financial year 2023-24. The Iranian ambassador to India, Iraj Elahi, was quoted by the Times of India as hailing the strong partnership between Tehran and New Delhi and stating that economic ties are growing.
'Cooperation through the International North–South Transport Corridor is another key example of the strong partnership between our countries,'
he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Musk's father comments on son's spat with Trump (VIDEO)
Errol Musk has weighed in on the public feud between his son, Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, and US President Donald Trump, telling reporters in Moscow that the two may yet find common ground. The dispute between Musk and Trump – once close allies – escalated last week over the president's so-called 'Big Beautiful' tax and spending bill. Musk, who recently stepped down as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), had repeatedly criticized the bill, arguing it undermines his efforts to trim the fat off the federal budget. On Thursday, he accused Trump of 'ingratitude,' backed calls for his impeachment, and threatened to halt the US space program by grounding the Dragon spacecraft. Trump fired back, saying Musk had 'gone crazy' and blaming the spat on the end of what he called the 'EV mandate' – a reference to federal incentives that had benefited Tesla. Musk responded with a now-deleted post linking Trump to deceased financier and convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Speaking to journalists in Moscow on Monday, where he was attending a tech forum, Errol Musk suggested that his son's strong response was rooted in principle, but added there may be room for compromise. 'I think Elon might agree to step down a little … because he's basically standing up for his principles,' the elder Musk said. Errol Musk said his son had backed the Trump administration, believing it would cut government spending, not increase it, and that the shift in direction left him frustrated, as it went against the values he had agreed to support. The 79-year-old pointed out that government policy often requires compromise and long-term thinking. 'In politics, sometimes you have to spend money on products you have yet to make, because that money later helps increase production. It's the laws of economics,' Errol Musk explained. He added that both men may now be taking a more mature view of the situation – and hinted that a thaw in relations could be possible.
Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
The Russians' new enemy #1 is not the US. And we've been there before
They probably won't but Germans should pay close attention to a recent news item out of Russia: The Levada polling institute – long internationally acknowledged as serious and dependable – has published the result of a recent survey. It shows that Germany is now considered peak hostile by ordinary Russians: 55% of them name Germany as the country most unfriendly toward Russia. Five years ago, that figure stood at 40%. That was no small number either, but two things stand out now: First, the rapid increase in Germany's un-favorability rating and, second, the fact that Berlin has managed to take over the top position in this dismal ranking: For 20 years it was securely held by the US, which still came in at a whopping 76% as recently as last year. But now, clearly responding to Trump's new, comparatively more rational course toward Moscow, 'only' 40% of Russians see the US as the most unfriendly state. To paraphrase an old Soviet motto: Berlin has caught up with and overtaken America. Many Germans, especially in the political, mainstream media, and conformist 'expert' elites will either completely ignore or dismiss this shift. Others will even be foolish enough to feel pleased: What better evidence that the new German bellicism has left an impression? For a historian – or really anyone with a memory – the Levada finding should be alarming. To see why, we need a broader context. The thing about Germany is that, sooner or later, the question of war or peace – at least in Europe or even the world – depends on it, whatever usually unoriginal ideas its elites get worked up about at any given time. Maybe that special combustibility is due to a deep mismatch between Germany's resources and location, on one side, and its geopolitical environment, on the other, as Henry Kissinger used to quip. Perhaps the explanation is less forgiving and has to do with a failing political culture shaped by persistent habits of shortsightedness and misguided ambitions. In any case, in about 1945, after the second global war caused by Berlin in much less than half a century, everyone who mattered – not the Germans anymore at that point – seemed to understand that one large Germany can be, let's say, awkward for the rest of the world. Two seemed about right, especially when both were under firm control, from Washington and Moscow, respectively. The other thing generally accepted was that the old enmity between Germany and France had to be buried. A third crucial issue, however, was not only left unresolved but instead weaponized for Cold War purposes: if Germans had to finally play nice with the French and other West Europeans in general, the US needed its Germany to stay nasty toward the Russians, that is, at the time, the Soviets. In effect, West Germany was re-trained to come to heel toward the West but keep barring its teeth toward the East. The polite term for this act of national house-training in Western 'values,' 'civilization,' and, last but not least, geopolitical hierarchies is 'the long way West.' Fortunately, from the 1970s and through the unexpected yet quietly earthshaking advent of German unification (de facto West Germany annexing East Germany with Soviet, i.e., Russian permission), the deterrent logic of the Cold War and a fundamentally wise 'Ostpolitik' mitigated that teeth-baring a little. But now that policy has not merely been abandoned but anesthetized. Today, even wanting to talk to 'the Russians' to convey anything other than ultimatums is smeared as 'appeasement.' Former representatives of normal engagement are either forced into humiliating public recantations (for instance, President – no less – Frank-Walter Steinmeier) or ostracized (the once tone-setting journalist Gabriele Krone-Schmalz, for example). The worst sin in the new old German catechism is to even try to 'understand' Russia, literally: A 'Russlandversteher' is a heretic almost worthy of the stake now. Such heretics are clearly in the way of a new course – taken by all mainstream parties – that starts from the assumption that Germany and Russia must always be enemies, as current Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul recently stated in an unguarded and therefore honest moment. Consequently, the only policy that seems to be left to such hidebound minds is to build up the military and massively increase armament spending. That such spending has already been practiced and has a miserable record of inefficiency in Europe, as even the Financial Times admits, does not matter to them. Neither will it, of course, to the arms industry and its shareholders. And perish the thought that Germans could be smart enough to do both: (sensibly) modernize their military and, at the same time, engage in genuine talks and compromise – as well as renewed, mutually beneficial commerce, too – with Russia. That pattern – not dumb 'appeasement' – after all, was the real signature style of the cheaply maligned 'Ostpolitik.' But it seems that this ability to walk and chew gum, as Berlin's former American idol Joe Biden would have said, has been lost, or, perhaps, willfully abandoned. With the urge to splurge on weapons comes a clearly coordinated propaganda campaign as not seen since the early 1980s (at best): German politicians, generals, mainstream media, and conformist 'experts' have been unleashing a torrent, a veritable 'Trommelfeuer' of war hysteria on the German public. Professors of ancient history – noticing unintentional irony has never been a German forte – are explaining again that parents must be ready to sacrifice their offspring in war. Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori, and so on… As if the First World War had never been lost. The German military's top general can't quite make up his mind if Russia will attack in a few years or maybe tomorrow. And one TV talk show and documentary after the other is dedicated to the need for 'war proficiency' (in the original German 'Kriegstüchtigkeit,' a term with an untranslatably traditional ring to it, in a bad way). Finally, we have Friedrich Merz, a German chancellor with a flimsy mandate who clearly believes that it is his historic task to be even more bellicose than the Americans and take over their role in NATO Europe if necessary. The irony of a vassal government finally finding a spine just to be even more ideologically immobile than even its changing hegemon is not new in recent German history. That is, after all, how Erich Honecker, the last (relevant) leader of the former East Germany, chose to go out: by demonstratively snubbing Moscow's thaw with the West. In a similar spirit, Merz insists on continuing the proxy war in Ukraine and makes a point of not wanting the Nord Stream pipelines repaired, even while Russian and US investors (close to Trump, as it happens) are talking about precisely that. Merz has just been to see Trump in Washington. And mainstream media reporting on their encounter is unintentionally revealing of just how little he has achieved. In essence, the German chancellor is being praised for not having been brutally humiliated by Trump. Indeed, Merz was spared the fate of Vladimir Zelensky of Ukraine – and that is the best that can be said. Let's set aside that, actually, Trump did haze his guest, if comparatively mildly, teasing him about Germany's not-so-great experience of D-Day 1944 and offering condescending congratulations on his English. It was the kind of affability that Trump the former reality show host would have displayed toward an 'apprentice' currently in favor. What is more substantial is that Merz was not given one inch on any topic he cares about: Regarding NATO, US-European trade, and the Ukraine War, the German chancellor got precisely nothing. On the contrary, Trump has already made sure to signal how absolutely unimpressed he is by whatever Merz may have had to say, when not modestly silent: On Ukraine, Trump has publicly conceded that Kiev's recent sneak drone attack gives Russia the right to massively retaliate. On trade, Trump has increased the pressure again with steel and aluminum tariffs that will hit the EU and Germany hard. What a world Germany has made for itself: It has the US, a hegemon and 'ally' that first either blows up or is involved in blowing up its vital-infrastructure pipelines and then gets ready to take over and repair the ruins to have even more power over Berlin. With Zelensky's Ukraine, it has a very expensive, very corrupt client that even the Germans now admit was involved in the same terrorist attack on Nord Stream. Germany's economy, meanwhile, would greatly benefit from re-establishing a reasonable relationship with Russia. But Berlin's only strategy regarding Moscow is prolonged confrontation, an extremely costly armament program, and war hysteria so intense it makes it look as if German elites are not-so-secretly longing for yet another devastating clash with Russia. And by now, Russians have taken notice, not only within the elite but the general population. Good luck, Berlin: You've poked the bear long enough to get his attention. Again.
Russia Today
12 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump backs potential arrest of California governor (VIDEO)
US President Donald Trump has backed a proposal by White House border czar Tom Homan to have California Governor Gavin Newsom arrested for allegedly obstructing the administration's immigration enforcement efforts. Homan, the White House executive associate director of enforcement and removal operations, earlier said the governor and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass could face federal charges for attempting to impede immigration agents. This marked a sharp escalation following the president's decision to deploy the National Guard and active-duty Marines to help quell riots sparked by the arrests of suspected illegal immigrants. 'I would do it if I were Tom. I think it's great,' Trump said, responding to a reporter's question about whether he endorses Homan's proposal to arrest state officials who interfere with federal immigration raids. 'Gavin likes the publicity but I think it would be a great thing. He's done a terrible job… Look, I like Gavin Newsom, he's a nice guy, but he's grossly incompetent.' Trump's remarks come as Los Angeles enters its fourth straight day of protests, which began on Friday after the immigration authorities arrested over 40 people at a Home Depot parking lot and a clothing factory for allegedly using false documents. Demonstrations against Trump's immigration policy quickly escalated into looting and violent clashes with police. Similar protests have erupted in cities across the nation, including San Francisco, New York, Atlanta, Seattle, Dallas, and Louisville. Tensions rose after Homan warned that officials, including Newsom and Bass, could face arrest if they obstruct federal operations. 'It's a felony to knowingly harbor and conceal an illegal alien' and to impede law enforcement from 'doing their job,' Homan told NBC News on Saturday. He added that neither official has 'crossed the line yet.' Newsom dismissed Homan's threat in an interview on Sunday with MSNBC, urging him to 'just get it over with' and make the arrest. 'He's a tough guy. Why doesn't he do that? He knows where to find me,' Newsom said. 'That kind of bloviating is exhausting. So, Tom, arrest me. Let's go.' He also blasted the deployment of an additional 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles, bypassing the governor's authority, calling it a 'serious breach of state sovereignty.' Newsom, a Democrat and potential 2028 presidential candidate, filed a federal lawsuit in San Francisco on Monday against Trump, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and the Defense Department, aiming to overturn the president's order to deploy the National Guard. In a post on X, Newsom wrote that Trump 'flamed the fires and illegally acted to federalize the National Guard.'
