Texas Republicans take aim at public transit in two major cities
Republican legislators are entertaining proposals to sap hundreds of millions of dollars from Dallas Area Rapid Transit, the state's largest public transit system, and thwart the voter-approved expansion of public transportation in Austin known as Project Connect.
Texas Republicans have long been wary of investing in public transit, given the state's cultural ties to oil and gas and automobiles — and have long pursued ways to undercut the state's urban areas. In the case of Project Connect, lawmakers see state intervention, at least in part, as a way to rein in high property taxes.
Here's what the proposed legislation would do.
North Texas legislators want to reroute 25% of the sales tax revenue collected by DART, which serves Dallas and 12 neighboring cities, toward a 'general mobility program.' Those cities could then draw upon those funds to pay for projects like building sidewalks and roads and installing traffic signals.
Transit agency officials say such a move would be catastrophic, costing DART more than $234 million in the upcoming fiscal year. That loss would spur deep service cuts and layoffs. More than 125,000 people would completely lose access to bus and light rail service, the agency projects, including vulnerable residents like seniors and lower-income families. With decreased service, the agency would collect less in rider fares and lose federal funds, further compounding budgetary problems and creating a downward spiral.
'I think this is the end of DART if we do it,' board chair Gary Slagel said at a recent DART meeting discussing the legislation. 'I don't know how we survive if we do this.'
Some cities have sought to reduce how much in sales tax revenue they pay into the transit agency, complaining that they don't benefit in proportion to how much they contribute. Plano, for example, contributed $109 million in sales tax revenue to the system in 2023, but received about $44 million worth of investment, according to a survey conducted by EY, a consulting firm. DART officials have said the EY survey doesn't capture the full financial benefit transit service brings to member cities. The disparity has undergirded those cities' push to establish the mobility program, which proponents said is modeled on a similar program in Houston.
'Plano is not looking to leave DART,' said Andrew Fortune, Plano's director of policy and government relations. 'We are interested in a transit system that is going to work not only for our residents, but also the visitors and the employees who come to our city. Our hope is that this bill will not only protect against inequities like what we've experienced, but it will help us make a better transit solution and ultimately help those who need to move from place to place in Plano and to connect to the region as a whole.'
In an attempt to appease those cities' concerns and convince them to stop pursuing the legislation, the DART board voted in March to create its own general mobility program — though using 5% of its sales tax revenue, not 25%. Such a plan would still prompt service reductions and budget cuts, though not as deep as those prompted by the legislation.
Regional transportation planners warn cutting DART's funding so drastically will hamper mobility across the entire Dallas-Fort Worth region, worsen air quality and throw a wrench in public transit plans for next year's FIFA World Cup, when the region will host nine matches. The Trinity Railway Express, a commuter rail line that runs between Dallas and Fort Worth, plays a central role in the region's plans to ferry soccer fans to and from matches at AT&T Stadium in Arlington. DART projects a 25% cut in its sales tax revenue would wipe out its ability to fund the rail line. Officials with Trinity Metro, the Fort Worth area's transit agency which co-owns and -operates the line, have said they would not be able to pick up the cost.
'This could not be occurring at a worse time,' said Michael Morris, transportation director for the North Central Texas Council of Governments.
Lawmakers once more have taken aim at how Austin plans to pay for Project Connect, a multibillion-dollar public transit plan that includes an expansion of the city's light-rail network.
Austin voters in 2020 approved a hike in city property taxes to pay for the plan and create the Austin Transit Partnership, a local government corporation set up to build the light-rail extension. Under the plan, the partnership receives city property tax revenue to help secure loans needed to fund construction.
Texas Republicans have taken issue with that funding mechanism and resurrected legislative efforts to kill it at the state level. The funds are generated from the portion of Austin's property tax rate that funds maintenance and operations, or "M&O." Attorney General Ken Paxton has argued that those dollars can't be used to pay for debt and has contested the mechanism in court.
A pair of bills authored by state Rep. Ellen Troxclair, a Lakeway Republican and former Austin City Council member, and state Sen. Paul Bettencourt, a Houston Republican, would enshrine that argument in state law.
The legislation would effectively get rid of Project Connect's funding plan by outlawing the mechanism approved by voters. Taxpayers could also sue to stop the city from collecting property taxes used to fund the project if a court finds the project now 'materially deviates' from how it was initially pitched — a nod to how planners, owing to inflation and other factors, reduced the project's scope in the years after voters first approved it.
'We don't mix M&O tax revenues with debt, and we don't allow them to be mixed through a third party,' Bettencourt said earlier this year. 'That's not how things work. Taxpayers deserve transparency and that's not transparency.'
Austin transit officials have defended the project and argued that the funding mechanism is legal.
'Austin voters overwhelmingly approved this transformative project that will reduce travel times, spur the development of much-needed housing, and generate jobs and state-wide economic benefits,' Greg Canally, Austin Transit Partnership CEO, said in a statement. 'The need for more local investment in our transportation infrastructure will only increase as our state and community continue to grow.'
Tickets are on sale now for the 15th annual Texas Tribune Festival, Texas' breakout ideas and politics event happening Nov. 13–15 in downtown Austin. Get tickets before May 1 and save big! TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
13 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump is wildly unpopular and losing ground fast. Why is anyone afraid of him?
Trump's approval rating in the YouGov polling has tumbled from +3% at the beginning of February to -15% now. He's underwater on every issue Americans care about. While the top issues for most Americans are high prices, inflation and health care, our increasingly unpopular president is laser-focused on things nobody cares about. Like downplaying exhibitions on the history of slavery at the Smithsonian. On the same day a new poll by The Economist/YouGov showed Donald Trump's disapproval rating hitting a new high, the president took time to post this on social media: 'The Smithsonian is OUT OF CONTROL, where everything discussed is how horrible our Country is, how bad Slavery was, and how unaccomplished the downtrodden have been.' How bad slavery was? I'm not quite sure what that implies, but suffice it to say the new poll didn't find 'See less about how slavery was bad' to be a priority for American voters watching the costs of beef and vegetables skyrocket. Americans care about inflation, Trump cares about 'WOKE' museums Trump went on to say he has 'instructed my attorneys to go through the Museums' and start getting rid of 'WOKE,' whatever that means. The Aug. 19 poll and Trump's rambling post about ridding our museums of history create a perfect moment to pose this question: Why is anyone in American politics or in the corporate world afraid of this toxic president? Trump's approval rating in the Economist/YouGov polling has tumbled from +3% at the beginning of February to -15% now. He's underwater on every issue Americans care about, from immigration (53% disapprove) to jobs and the economy (53% disapprove) to inflation (61% disapprove) to foreign trade (56% disapprove). Nearly two-thirds of Americans – two-thirds! – say the country, under the leadership of President Donald Trump, is 'out of control.' Trump is so unpopular that there's no risk in standing up to him So when a public figure who is unpopular comes out and says he wants to scrub all the stuff about 'how bad Slavery was' from America's museums, I think other public figures would be on solid ground if they denounced him. Republicans won't do it, of course. They've spent decades ignoring the needs of their voters, focusing instead on tossing them red meat from the culture wars and assuming that bashing liberals is all that matters. But even in Democratic circles, most continue to go after Trump with kid gloves, with notable exceptions like Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, Rep. Jasmine Crockett, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and California Gov. Gavin Newsom. And corporate types are, by and large, either silent or outright supportive of a president liked by fewer and fewer Americans. From a marketing and political strategy standpoint, none of this makes sense. Trump's bullying nature and willingness to use the power of the federal government against his enemies are clearly cowing many, which is pathetic. You don't wait around for an unpopular bully to gather more power. Most Americans don't see US as a dark and dangerous place Think about Trump's anti-immigrant, anti-woke, fearmongering worldview. He has dispatched the National Guard to Washington, DC, to fight a crime wave that doesn't exist. He speaks routinely about big U.S. cities being crime-ridden, trotting out words like 'filth' and 'squalor,' and he demeans Americans who don't stand in lockstep with him. Now consider this question posed in the YouGov poll under 'World View': Which comes closest to your view? The answer 'Our lives are threatened by terrorists, criminals, and illegal immigrants and our priority should be to protect ourselves' was chosen by only 35% of respondents. The answer 'It's a big, beautiful world, mostly full of good people, and we must find a way to embrace each other and not allow ourselves to become isolated' was chosen by 50% of respondents. Corporate leaders only stand to benefit from taking on Trump People aren't buying what Trump is selling. They don't like what he's selling. And they don't like him. There is zero political risk to standing up against this president. There is only upside, and how more haven't realized it yet is beyond me. Powerful people in the business and political worlds, along with everyday Americans, don't have to sit silently and let Trump do what he wants, whether it's militarizing city streets, cruelly rounding up immigrants and forcing them into camps, or purging the evils from America's past to create a fake United States of Righteousness. Opposing him has the benefit of being the moral move and the popular move. The arrow pointing to the right side of history is brighter than the sun. Bending to the will of a wannabe tyrant has never benefited anybody. Standing up and shouting a wannabe tyrant down, on the other hand, is the kind of thing that gets remembered. Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at
CNN
13 minutes ago
- CNN
Texas GOP nears vote on new maps as Democrats stage protest in state House
Texas Republicans are moving closer to approving new congressional maps amid a Democratic show of protest over the GOP House speaker's order that members who fled the state weeks earlier be placed under law enforcement watch. The state House is set to reconvene Wednesday as Republicans push ahead with their Trump-backed redistricting plan, which would create five more GOP-leaning House districts in time for next year's midterm elections. The House could vote Wednesday and the Senate as early as Thursday. It's not yet clear exactly when the House will vote, however, and a lengthy floor debate could delay the process. Relegated to the minority, Democrats have no viable way to stop passage of the maps, but have continued to protest GOP tactics to prevent them from leaving the state again. House Speaker Dustin Burrows required that the quorum-breaking Democrats be placed under the around-the-clock supervision of the Department of Public Safety to be allowed to leave the House floor. However, state Rep. Nicole Collier has refused to do so and has been confined to the House chamber. Other Democrats on Tuesday evening ripped up the written agreements that allowed them to leave the chamber and vowed to spend Tuesday night on the House floor. 'This is a civil discussion and disagreement, and in order to win, the other side is willing to use force — to use the arms of a state to get what they want. Good guys don't do that,' Rep. Gene Wu, the Texas House Democratic leader, told CNN's Pamela Brown on 'The Lead.' In California, Democrats moved forward with their own redistricting countermeasure. Two committees advanced a trio of bills that ask voters to amend the state constitution and approve new maps that create five additional Democratic leaning seats. Now that Democrats have returned to the state, the House is all but guaranteed to have the two-thirds quorum it needs to conduct business when Burrows gavels the chamber into session Wednesday. The only item on the day's agenda is House Bill 4 — the measure that would redraw the state's congressional map to add five more Republican-leaning seats. That bill cleared a committee on a party-line vote Monday. What's not clear is how long debate will last before votes place. It could drag well into Austin's evening hours. The state Senate, where the redistricting plan's passage is all but certain, is scheduled to return Thursday night. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott said Monday on Fox News that the new congressional maps 'will become law probably by the end of this week.' Burrows imposed an unusual requirement on the Democrats who ended their 15-day boycott and returned to the Capitol on Monday: They'd be released from the House floor into the custody of a Department of Public Safety officer who would ensure their return Wednesday. The move came after the civil arrest warrants Burrows signed shortly after Democrats fled the state proved unenforceable outside of Texas. Most Democrats complied with the law enforcement escort, showing reporters what they called 'permission slips' they received to leave the House floor and pointing to the officers escorting them around the Capitol. But some Democrats protested. Collier refused to leave the House floor, sleeping there Monday night and planning to do so again Tuesday. Wu and Rep. Vince Perez, who signed the 'permission slips' to leave with a police escort, stayed with Collier through Monday night. 'My constituents sent me to Austin to protect their voices and rights,' Collier said. 'I refuse to sign away my dignity as a duly elected representative just so Republicans can control my movements and monitor me with police escorts. My community is majority-minority, and they expect me to stand up for their representation. When I press that button to vote, I know these maps will harm my constituents — I won't just go along quietly with their intimidation or their discrimination.' Other Democrats joined Collier and Wu on Tuesday night. State Rep. Penny Morales Shaw said after returning to the Houston area under police escort, she realized it was a mistake to enter into the agreement, arguing she is now 'correcting course.' 'Yesterday, I left in custody and I came back in custody, because I stand with Nicole Collier and Gene Wu,' she said. 'This is illegitimate, this is a wrongful use of power, and I will not condone it, and I don't want to be a part of setting a very bad and low precedent for future legislators.' The state's Senate and Assembly elections committees both advanced Democrats' redistricting countermeasure Tuesday, despite opposition from Republicans on the panels. 'When other states decide to do something else, we shouldn't react to them,' Republican state Assemblymember David Tangipa said Tuesday. 'We should prove by example that we can do this better.' Democrats have framed their push to redraw the maps as a check on Texas Republicans. 'Let's not dance around the issue here: If California Democrats had our way, the midterms would continue as they are, with a map drawn by the state's independent California citizens redistricting commission,' Cecilia Aguiar-Curry, the Assembly's Democratic majority leader, said during the chamber's elections committee meeting. 'But that's not good enough for this president or the Republicans following his commands in Texas and DC.' Under the proposals, voters would have the opportunity to approve or reject a constitutional amendment allowing Democrats to override the state's independent redistricting commission and redraw congressional lines through the 2030 elections. The proposed lines could net Democrats an additional five favorable seats as well as shore up the districts of some vulnerable incumbents. The bills will be considered by the Assembly's appropriations committee Wednesday at 9 a.m. PT/12 p.m. ET before the full legislature votes on Thursday. Democrats, who have a supermajority, will need two-thirds support in both chambers. Many California Republicans have acknowledged that their best chance to block the new maps are by defeating them in November. But that hasn't stopped GOP lawmakers from attempting to stop the proposed constitutional amendment from making it onto the ballot. California Republicans filed a lawsuit with the state Supreme Court Tuesday requesting an emergency injunction to stop the redistricting effort on the grounds that the legislature didn't give voters enough notice. State Rep. Carl DeMaio, a San Diego Republican, also filed a proposed citizens' initiative that would retroactively ban lawmakers who approve the constitutional amendment from running in one of the new districts. The proposal mirrors a rule that bans members of the independent redistricting commission from running on maps they drew. It's also a dig at DeMaio's Democratic colleagues, including Mike McGuire, the senate president pro tempore. McGuire, who is term-limited, is seen as a likely candidate to run in a redrawn Northern California district under the new maps. If DeMaio and his allies gathered enough signatures, the measure would not appear before voters until 2026. Republicans have also grilled Democrats over the origin of the maps, leading to tense exchanges during the Assembly's elections committee meeting Tuesday. 'Who drew the maps? It's a very simple question,' state Assemblymember Alexandra Macedo, the committee's Republican vice chair, said during the panel's Tuesday meeting. 'The assembly did,' Aguiar-Curry said. 'I'm in the Assembly, and I did not draw these maps,' Macedo responded. The chair of the Assembly's elections committee, Gail Pellerin, also declined to say who drew the maps during a gaggle with reporters Tuesday. Pellerin said it was a 'collaboration' with several people. One reporter asked: 'When you consume something, don't you want to know who makes it?' 'When I go to a restaurant, I don't need to meet the chef,' Pellerin said. 'I just enjoy the food.'
Newsweek
14 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Georgia Moves Closer to Eliminating Income Tax
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Lawmakers in Georgia have met to discuss the possibility of axing personal income tax. Supporters say eliminating the state's income tax could attract businesses and residents, continuing recent tax relief efforts. Critics warn it would force service cuts or higher sales taxes, hitting low- and middle-income households hardest. Why It Matters Georgia has been amending its personal income tax rates in recent years. Governor Brian Kemp this year signed into law income tax rebates of up to $500 and a rate cut to 5.19 percent starting in January for all income earned in 2025. The measure is part of a broader plan to lower the rate to 4.99 percent. The law also replaced Georgia's system of tax brackets with a flat income tax. According to the Governor's Office of Planning and Budget, individual income taxes are expected to amount to around 47 percent of Georgia's state revenue for the current budget year, which started on July 1. Currently, only eight states don't tax individual income, according to the Tax Foundation. What To Know The effort to abolish the Peach State's individual income taxes is being led by Lieutenant Governor Burt Jones, a Republican, who argued in a Tuesday meeting that reducing income taxes to zero would help the state stay competitive, particularly among southern states like Florida and Tennessee which have no income tax, and Mississippi and North Carolina, both of which are working toward eliminating personal levies. Jones said lawmakers have already given back billions of dollars to taxpayers in recent years through tax cuts, rebates and other measures. Some $7.6 billion has been returned to Georgia taxpayers through property tax relief, motor fuel tax relief, and income tax rebates and cuts, according to Kemp. "But we must go further," Jones told the Senate Special Committee on Eliminating Georgia's Income Tax. "We must seize this opportunity to lead the South, not trail behind it." The Georgia State Capitol in Atlanta on December 30, 2024. The Georgia State Capitol in Atlanta on December 30, 2024. GETTY Danny Kanso, senior fiscal analyst at the Georgia Budget and Policy Institute, said that for most Georgia households, eliminating the income tax would effectively be a "massive" tax increase. To offset the deficit, he said, the state would need to triple the sales tax and apply it to new products, calling that "a very tall order to replace the state's largest source of revenue." "[It] doesn't really make sense when you hear we're going to lower taxes, eliminate sources of revenue, and somehow we're also going to raise more money," Kanso said. "That's not something we've really seen work in the past." The committee also heard from Democrats, who warned that eliminating the income tax could force Georgia to either cut services or raise sales taxes, measures they said would hit low- and middle-income residents the hardest. "The same people who favor lowering taxes want the ambulance to be there in four minutes when their loved one is having a health crisis," said State Senator Nan Orrock. "That requires an investment." The committee also heard from Grover Norquist, president of the conservative group Americans for Tax Reform. Norquist argued that states like Florida, which has no income tax, continue to generate revenue even after cutting personal levies. He said that when businesses see states moving to eliminate the tax, they begin investing there, and residents follow. What People Are Saying Georgia Lieutenant Governor Burt Jones said on Tuesday: "If we want to continue to stay competitive here in the state of Georgia, and continue to be the number one state to do business, we've got to be looking for ways to keep us competitive and make it where we have a competitive advantage over states that we are competing with all the time." Danny Kanso, senior fiscal analyst at the Georgia Budget and Policy Institute, said in Tuesday's meeting: "The proposal would have to increase taxes on far more Georgians than it would reduce taxes on, and so it's a little bit of a solution in search of a problem that would likely cause ripples all across the state and across the economy as well." What Happens Next The committee has set a goal of delivering a workable plan to eliminate income taxes ahead of next year's legislative session, which begins in January 2026.
