Former South Carolina clerk in Murdaugh murder trial arrested on multiple felonies
South Carolina authorities on Wednesday morning charged Becky Hill, the former Colleton County court clerk who presided over the Alex Murdaugh murder trial, with multiple felonies.
The State Ethics Commission last year accused Hill, 57, of using her official position as Colleton County clerk for financial gain, specifically to promote her book about the Murdaugh case, part of which she admitted to and apologized for plagiarizing.
While her charges are not specified, the Colleton County website states that Hill is also under a "hold for South Carolina Law Enforcement Division."
"We are aware of the charges filed against Becky Hill, and while these developments are serious, they are not surprising," Dick Harpootlian, Murdaugh's defense attorney, told Fox News Digital in a statement. "We have long raised our concerns about her conduct during and after the trial and this arrest further underscores the need to protect the integrity of the judicial process. Every defendant is entitled to a fair and impartial trial and we look forward to Alex Murdaugh finally getting that fair treatment."
Hill was previously accused of sending herself nearly $10,000 in federal bonuses in the form of child support payments, according to a notice of hearing. She used federal funds to give food and gifts to court employees, including "Easter Goodies," Mother's Day gifts, Father's Day gifts and Valentine's Day gifts; paint supplies; flowers and decor; various meals for herself; office furniture; dog food, dog bones and a dog bed, among other items.
South Carolina Supreme Court Justice Jean Toal ruled in January 2024 that a new trial was not necessary for Murdaugh, who was convicted in the June 2021 murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul, on his family hunting estate. Murdaugh requested a new hearing based on allegations of jury tampering surrounding Hill, which Murdaugh's defense team had argued warranted a new trial.
Of 12 total jurors who found Murdaugh guilty in 2023, 11 said Hill did not influence their decisions. One said he heard the clerk make comments about watching Murdaugh's body language but said her words did not influence his verdict.
Hill is reportedly set to be indicted for perjury, according to The State newspaper.
South Carolina attorney Eric Bland, who represented several victims of Murdaugh's financial crimes, said he "used to think that there was very little chance that our South Carolina Supreme Court would reverse former Chief Justice Jean Toal's decision in February 2024 when she denied Alex Murdaugh a new trial on his double murder conviction because of Becky Hill alleged jury interference."
"I thought that if he was to get any relief, it would come after he exhausted his state court appeals and it would be on the federal level," Bland said in a Wednesday post on X. "According to the State Paper, the perjury charge arises out of her testimony that she gave in the February 2024 hearing in front of Justice Toal. I think this further complicates the situation and increases the chances that he will get a reversal and a new trial. It still will come down to whether the federal standard for alleged jury tampering should have been applied by Justice Toal or she was correct in applying the state standard."
The former court clerk, who held her position for about four years, resigned in March following allegations of jury tampering in the Murdaugh trial but maintained that her decision to leave office was not the result of her conduct during the double murder trial.
"Another significant impact in our clerk's office was in 2023, when we had to manage one of the biggest trials in South Carolina history. Our small town came together and made everyone proud," Hill said during a news conference at the time to announce her resignation. "Managing a trial with such importance to the people of South Carolina, as well as to the national and international media interest and public scrutiny, has caused me to reflect upon decisions involving my stay in the office of the clerk of court."
She added that her decision not to seek re-election in 2024 would allow her to "focus on being a wife, a mother and a grandmother," and that she wants to provide "ample time to other Republican candidates" interested in the position of Colleton County Court Clerk.
Her former attorney, Justin Bamberg, who has represented victims of Murdaugh's financial crimes, said at a March news conference that Hill's decision had nothing to do with any pending investigations involving the clerk.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sacramento County fails to address elder financial abuse, Grand Jury finds
( — The Sacramento County Grand Jury released a new report on Wednesday, stating that the county is not doing enough to protect against elder financial abuse. According to Elizabeth TenPas, Grand Jury Foreperson, it is unlike other counties; Sacramento does not have a proactive approach in dealing with what they said is a serious and growing problem. Financial abuse can result in great harm to victims over the age of 65. The Grand Jury has deemed that elder adults who are victims of abuse by family members, trusted advisors, tradespeople, or unrelated caregivers are being disadvantaged of justice, TenPas said. TenPas stated in a press release that the Grand Jury's investigation found that from 2019 through 2024, Sacramento County Adult Protective Services confirmed almost 4,000 cases of elder financial abuse, but the law enforcement within the county only referred 123 cases to the District Attorney's Office for possible prosecution. From brunch to BBQ to hiking: Celebrate Father's Day in Sacramento 'Neither the District Attorney nor county law enforcement agencies have dedicated staff specifically trained to investigate and prosecute elder financial abuse,' said Elizabeth TenPas, Grand Jury Foreperson for 2024-2025. 'In fact, the District Attorney's website explicitly states that such exploitation is only prosecuted on 'rare occasions' by the elder abuse unit. Many abusers avoid consequences because the District Attorney's Office does not prosecute financial abuse cases that are not accompanied by physical abuse, or involve large dollar losses or multi-victim schemes.' After the cases had been given to the DA's office, they only filed charges for 99 cases of the 123 that were given to them, authorities said. The newly published report found additional findings to focus on the need for: Increased funding for creating elder financial abuse prosecutor, investigator, and victim advocate positions in the DA's office. Each law enforcement agency to have at least one detective with specialized training in the investigation of elder financial abuse, as well as training for uniformed officers on recognizing the signs of such abuse. Reactivation of the Financial Abuse Specialist Team to facilitate collaboration between the DA, law enforcement, social service agencies, legal services organizations, victim advocacy organizations, and financial institutions to combat financial elder abuse. Improved record-keeping and data collection practices by Adult Protective Services and law enforcement agencies to allow tracking of elder financial abuse cases. Greater community outreach on the part of Adult Protective Services, the DA and law enforcement agencies. Officials stated that the Grand Jury makes many recommendations that include adding funding in the DA's office to investigate and prosecute these crimes, while also recommending specialized training for law enforcement to know the signs of financial elder abuse. For more information about the investigation, click here to review the Grand Jury website. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
San Antonio police were 'premature' in saying Jonathan Joss' murder wasn't a hate crime, police chief says
San Antonio's Chief of Police is walking back his department's previous claims that there was "no evidence" to suggest Jonathan Joss' death was a hate crime — instead saying that the assertion was "way premature." Police Chief William McManus rescinded the department's previous statement at a press conference Thursday while also apologizing to the LGBTQ+ community for dismissing their concerns. "We issued a statement the day after Jonathan Joss' murder that was way, way, way premature. Shouldn't have done it," he said. "It was way too soon before we had any real information, and I will own that and simply say we shouldn't have done that. It was way too early in the process for any statement of that nature to be issued." "We understand that many in the LBGTQ+ [sic] community are feeling anxious and concerned," McManus continued. "A lot of that has to do with that premature statement that we released, and again, I own that. We shouldn't have done it. The loss of Jonathan Joss was tragic and most heavily felt by the LBGTQ+ [sic] community." Joss, 59, was an out Indigenous actor known for his roles in comedies such as King of the Hill and Parks and Recreation. He had married his partner, Tristan Kern de Gonzales, just a few months ago on Valentine's Day. The couple had been living in Joss' childhood home for at least two years before it burned down in January. Kern de Gonzales revealed in a Facebook post that he and Joss were "involved in a shooting" when they returned to the site of their former home to check the mail. He claimed that the fire and the shooting occurred "after over two years of threats from people in the area who repeatedly told us they would set it on fire," and that despite reporting the threats to law enforcement multiple times, "nothing was done." Jonathan Joss "When we returned to the site to check our mail we discovered the skull of one of our dogs and its harness placed in clear view," Kern de Gonzales wrote. "This caused both of us severe emotional distress. We began yelling and crying in response to the pain of what we saw. While we were doing this a man approached us. He started yelling violent homophobic slurs at us. He then raised a gun from his lap and fired." Kern de Gonzales asserted in his Facebook post that throughout their time living at Joss' family home as a couple, they "were harassed regularly by individuals who made it clear they did not accept our relationship. Much of the harassment was openly homophobic." He later claimed in an interview with NBC that the alleged killer, Sigfredo Alvarez Ceja, called him and his husband "jotos," a Spanish slur for gay people, before shooting Joss. "He was murdered by someone who could not stand the sight of two men loving each other," he said in his post. The San Antonio Police Department released a statement shortly after Joss' death claiming that they had uncovered "no evidence" to suggest that the killing was a hate crime, which Kern de Gonzales' statement contested. "SAPD Homicide is currently investigating the murder of Mr. Jonathan Joss," the department wrote. "Despite online claims of this being a hate crime, currently the investigation has found no evidence to indicate that the Mr. Joss's murder was related to his sexual orientation." After retracting their previous statement at the Thursday press conference, McManus clarified that the police department doesn't charge hate crimes in Texas. Instead, they "gather the facts and we give those facts to the district attorney's office, then that hate crime designation is determined at sentencing." "There's also concern about the circumstances surrounding that death and the history in the neighborhood leading up to that," McManus said. "One of the most common questions that we've received is why this case isn't being charged as a hate crime at this point ... In Texas, hate crimes are not separate charges. Instead, they are addressed through sentencing enhancements." "Our homicide detectives are continuing to pursue every lead in the case to ensure that we understand the full picture of what led up to the senseless murder of Mr. Joss," he added. "We're committed to delivering a thorough and complete investigation."
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Overcrowded, Understaffed and Unsafe: One Woman's Night in Atlanta's City Jail
Dominique Grant said she was in the middle of a mental health crisis when she was pulled over driving on Moreland Avenue by a Georgia State Trooper the Friday before Mother's Day. Arrested under suspicion of DUI, the 32-year-old mother was booked into the Atlanta City Detention Center (ACDC) around 11 p.m. that night. Grant admits to speeding but denies being intoxicated. She believes the officer was upset that she requested a field sobriety test and chose to arrest her instead. After she was handcuffed and placed in the back of the police car, she said the officer then offered her a Breathalyzer, which she refused. Grant is a full-time advocate and community organizer working with currently and formerly incarcerated women. So it felt like an unfortunate twist of fate when she found herself behind bars in one of the jails she regularly visits. 'I asked to be taken to the diversion center instead of ACDC, and I was denied that option,' she told Capital B Atlanta. When Grant arrived at the jail, she said, she was able to get in contact with her husband before she was put in a cell with two other women. One she said was visibly drunk and cursing at corrections officers, and another who she thought was experiencing withdrawal symptoms had a large open wound on her leg. Throughout the night, Grant said, she asked to be given water and was ignored, until an officer offered her water out of his own cup. When she asked for a new cup, he declined and continued to disregard her pleas. 'I got there at 11 o'clock at night, it's now 6 o'clock in the morning and I haven't gotten water or a phone call since … so I'm just crying,' she said. Grant said the treatment she and the other people detained in the jail that night was unprofessional, and she made it known. 'I said, 'We really push [the incarcerated women we work with] to respect y'all, because y'all are doing y''alls jobs, but to see how y'all treat people is really crazy,'' she recounted. Once the corrections officers found out she was with Women on the Rise, a local organization working to combat mass incarceration and empower formerly incarcerated women, she said her treatment changed. She was allowed to leave her cell and make a phone call at 6:15 a.m. 'I call my husband, and he's like, 'Yeah, I've been sitting in the lobby since 2:30. Your bond has been posted since 2 o'clock,'' she said. Grant was relieved to be released at 6:30 a.m. on Saturday morning so she could spend Mother's Day with her 4-year-old son. Still, the overall experience left a bitter taste in her mouth but even more committed to her work. Since her release, Grant has hired an attorney, begun seeing a therapist, visited a psychiatrist and restarted mental health medication. She also plans to take a driving class before her August court date. As the campaign and operations manager for Women on the Rise, Grant has been front and center with Communities Over Cages, a coalition of local organizations working to close the Atlanta City Detention Center. Built in 1995 ahead of the Olympic Games, ACDC is owned and operated by the city of Atlanta. But it is not the responsibility of the city to maintain a jail. According to Georgia law, that responsibility falls to the county's elected sheriff, Patrick Labat. Facing an overcrowding crisis and deteriorating conditions at their main jail led Fulton County leaders to turn to Atlanta for help. But even with access to a newer, not overcrowded jail, many of the same issues persist. Last fall, the U.S. Department of Justice released a 97-page report on the jail that described how policy, training, and systems of accountability do little to prevent excessive uses of force by corrections officers against incarcerated people. Read More: Renovating Fulton County Jail Isn't Enough, Sheriff Says 'The DOJ report talks about the fact that the issue with Fulton County or with Rice Street isn't necessarily the condition of the building itself. It's the culture amongst [corrections officers] and that shit is carrying straight over to ACDC,' Grant said. The four-year lease agreement between the city of Atlanta and Fulton County, that allowed for Grant to be detained at ACDC rather than in a Fulton County-owned jail, will end in December 2026, and the contract explicitly states renewal is not an option. With the lease's expiration date on the horizon, advocates like Grant are hopeful they can successfully get the city to close the jail once and for all. Fulton County officials, however — such as Board of Commissioners Chairman Robb Pitts — have been vocal about wanting to purchase ACDC from the city. While Atlanta Mayor Andre Dickens has said he has no plans to sell or relinquish the jail to the county, Pitts told Capital B Atlanta that based on his own conversations with the mayor's office, he still believes it is a possibility. This isn't the first time Atlanta has gotten this close to closing its downtown jail. In September 2018, former Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms ended the city's eight-year agreement to house Immigrations and Customs Enforcement detainees in ACDC. 'As we work to achieve our vision of an Atlanta that is welcoming and inclusive, with equal opportunity for all, it is untenable for our City to be complicit in the inhumane immigration policies that have led to the separation of hundreds of families at the United States southern border,' Bottoms said in 2018. For a while, it looked like the jail was close to being shuttered. Once it was no longer holding ICE detainees, the jail housed fewer than 50 people on average while operation costs continued to rise for the building that was designed to hold 1,300 people. In May 2019, then-City Council member Dickens successfully authored and introduced a bill to create the Reimagining ACDC Task Force made up of residents, organizers, and local government representatives. The next week, Mayor Bottoms signed legislation authorizing the closure of ACDC with the goal of transforming it into a centralized hub for social services like behavioral health programs and job training and placement. Despite the task force developing four proposals for how to repurpose the facility in 2020, ACDC now houses over 400 people. In December 2022 — at the end of one of the most deadly years at Fulton County's main jail on Rice Street, where 15 people died — the city of Atlanta entered into a four-year lease agreement with the county for up to 700 beds in the city's detention center. Two of the 19 people who have died in Fulton County custody since then were incarcerated at ACDC. At the start of the lease, Fulton County was housing around 3,400 people in its main jail, which was built to hold 2,500. Half of those in custody were unindicted. According to the county's public safety dashboard, the number of incarcerated people sleeping on portable or temporary bunks continued to rise in the months after the lease agreement began and did not reach zero until a year later. 'The leadership of the grassroots movement, especially Women on the Rise, gave the city a blueprint for how they could repurpose that space, and the city broke its promise,' said Tiffany Roberts, who served on the Reimagining ACDC Task Force, in an interview with Capital B Atlanta. Read More: Why Does Atlanta Want to Lease Its Jail to Fulton County? Roberts is also director of public policy at the Southern Center for Human Rights, who, along with Women on the Rise, was a vocal opponent of the lease with Fulton County and warned that it would not alleviate the overcrowding issue that the lease purported to address. As a former criminal defense attorney with the Fulton County Public Defender's Office and then in her own private practice, Roberts saw how the jail was used to warehouse people who often didn't have the resources to pay for their own release. '[I was] representing people who were homeless or who were profiled by police and were stuck at the detention center for city ordinance violations that were essentially either crimes of race or crimes of poverty,' she said. Roberts has been telling officials and residents for years that overcrowding will not be solved until local elected officials address the root causes of the issue instead of throwing more money at police, prisons and prosecutors to lock up more people. It was recently reported that the multi-million dollar Fulton County Center for Diversion and Services is barely utilized by the 15 police departments in the county, including APD, that are authorized to use the facility 'There should be incentives, for example, for police officers to use [diversion services] rather than arrest. Mayor Dickens has within his power to tell the police to deprioritize crimes of homelessness,' she said. A representative from Grady Health System, which operates the diversion center, told the Fulton County commissioners last week that the staff sees an average of only three people each day. Next year, Fulton County will have to find a way to house the 400, mostly women, that are currently being detained in ACDC. No announcements have been made yet, but prior to the lease, they were being detained at the south annex jail in Union City that the county has been renovating over the last year. Legislation introduced in March by council member Antonio Lewis to begin planning a staged withdrawal of detainees has stalled in the Public Safety and Legal Administration Committee. Roberts said now is the time for Atlantans to press local elected officials to prioritize uplifting Black communities, not criminalizing the people who live in them. 'We have to stop defaulting to this nonsensical belief that authoritarianism and over-policing is okay as long as Black people do it. We complain about other folks doing it at the national level, so we've got to be paying attention to what our local officials are doing,' she said. The post Overcrowded, Understaffed and Unsafe: One Woman's Night in Atlanta's City Jail appeared first on Capital B News - Atlanta.
