Major Publishers From The Guardian To Condé Nast Sue AI Startup For Copyright Violation In Latest Salvo
Fourteen publishers have sued Canadia artificial intelligence firm Cohere for widespread unauthorized use of their content in developing and running its generative AI systems, alleging massive, systematic copyright and trademark infringement. It's the latest legal salvo in the battle between content providers and generative AI models that digest their text and spit it back to users often word for word, including articles behind a paywall.
The complaint, filed in the Southern District of New York, says Cohere has infringed on thousands of articles and seeks a permanent injunction, jury trial and damages of up to $150k per work infringed.
More from Deadline
AI Chatbots Have "Significant Inaccuracies" When Summarizing News, BBC Says; Top Exec Deborah Turness Says Tech Firms Are "Playing With Fire"
Elon Musk's "Whole Life Is From A Position Of Insecurity," Taunts Sam Altman As AI Wars Heat Up, "I Feel For The Guy"
Elon Musk Investor Group With Ari Emanuel Offers $97B For OpenAI; CEO Sam Altman Says "No Thank You"
'This is a lawsuit to protect journalism from systematic copyright and trademark infringement,' says the suit by Advance Local Media, Condé Nast, The Atlantic, Forbes Media, The Guardian, Business Insider, LA Times, McClatchy Media Company, Newsday, Plain Dealer Publishing Company, Politico, The Republican Company, Toronto Star Newspapers and Vox Media, all members of trade association News/Media Alliance.
'Rather than create its own content, Cohere takes the creative output of Publishers, some of the largest, most enduring, and most important news, magazine, and digital publishers in the United States and around the world. Without permission or compensation, Cohere uses scraped copies of our articles … to power its artificial intelligence ('AI') service, which in turn competes with Publisher offerings and the emerging market for AI licensing.'
The burgeoning field of generative AI require huge amounts of content to train its models, resulting in increasingly frequent litigation. The New York Times is suing ChatGPT parent OpenAI in a similar action. News Corp.'s Dow Jones, which owns The Wall Street Journal and New York Post, has sued Jeff Bezos-backed Perplexity AI. A handful of lawsuits have hit over the past several years from novelist Michael Chabon to comedian Sarah Silverman, playwrights and others whose material has been used to train so-called large language models without permission or compensation.
In one victory earlier this week, Thomson Reuters won the first big AI copyright case from a 2020 lawsuit against startup Ross Intelligence. A judge ruled the AI firm had infringed copyright law by reproducing material from the media giant's legal database Westlaw.
Cohere, today's suit reads, 'freely admits that 'AI is only as useful as the data it can access' … [but] fails to license the content it uses. Cohere takes Publishers' valuable articles, without authorization and without providing compensation. Cohere copies, uses, and disseminates Publishers' news and magazine articles to build and deliver a commercial service that mimics, undercuts, and competes with lawful sources for their articles and that displaces existing and emerging licensing markets.'
'Command is incapable of performing its own original research. It invests no resources into news gathering in the field and no has writers, fact-checkers, or editors on staff.' On the strength of the content it steals, the suit says, it charges for its product suite and actively courts customers.
The suit includes numerous screenshots of ripped off articles including an example of output that states, ''This story is available exclusively to Business Insider subscribers. Become an Insider and start reading now,'' all the while providing the full article to any user who asks for it, whether they have a Business Insider subscription or not.'
As alarming are examples of 'hallucinations,' or references to articles that do not exist.
'Not content with just stealing our works, Cohere also blatantly manufactures fake pieces and attributes them to us, misleading the public and tarnishing our brands,' the suit says.
It cites an article in The Guardian published on October 7, 2024 titled 'The pain will never leave: Nova massacre survivors return to site one year on.' When prompted for this piece, Cohere 'delivered a wildly inaccurate article that it represented was 'published on June 29, 2022 in The Guardian by Luke Harding.' Among other flaws, the Cohere article confused the October 7, 2023 massacre at The Nova Music Festival with a mass shooting that took place in Nova Scotia, Canada in 2020. Cohere also manufactured details about the Nova Scotia tragedy, attributing several quotes—including those gathered in The Guardian's reporting — to Tom Bagley, a man who was murdered in the 2020 shootings and thus could neither 'return to the scene of the killings' nor offer quotes to a news outlet. Needless to say, this fictional article never appeared in The Guardian.'
Best of Deadline
A Full Timeline Of Blake Lively & Justin Baldoni's 'It Ends With Us' Feud In Court, Online & In The Media
Everything We Know About 'The Night Agent' Season 3 So Far
'A Complete Unknown's Monica Barbaro On Finally Meeting The 'Thoughtful And Wonderful' Joan Baez And A Sweet Moment With Ariana Grande
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
19 minutes ago
- Axios
AI leaves web in the lurch
The AI-fixated tech industry is rapidly dismantling the old web, with no game plan for how to replace it. State of play: Chatbots have already begun to intercept web traffic and drain publishers' revenue. Now tech giants and startups aim to remodel the devices and browsers we use to access web pages, using AI to summarize or pre-empt the content that people and publishers post online. Driving the news: Tech circles were abuzz over the past week with news from the normally sedate browser world — the software category that has been shaping access to digital information since the '90s. Firefox last week debuted an experimental browser tool that provides AI summaries when users hover over links. Also last week, the Browser Company, maker of the Arc browser that's beloved by some power users, announced it was pivoting to focus on a new AI-powered browser called Dia. OpenAI has long been rumored to be working on its own browser, but has yet to ship anything. Over the last two years Google, which customarily casts itself as champion of the open web, has steadily increased the prominence of its AI summaries in every aspect of search. At Google's I/O developer conference last year it announced the U.S.-wide rollout of the AI summaries, which sit on top of search results and allow users to get their answers without clicking through to source pages (while also sometimes providing made-up facts). At this year's I/O, the company said that AI Mode, which turns a user's search into an AI chat conversation, would now be a standard feature — although some early reviews have found its information unreliable. Meanwhile, OpenAI made headlines with its announcement that it was purchasing Apple designer Jony Ive's AI device startup. Ive will now spearhead OpenAI's plan to sell new, non-smartphone gadgets that could bring generative AI answers more thoroughly into users' everyday lives. At Microsoft's recent Build developer conference the company introduced a new open project called NLweb, aimed at letting websites build their own chatbots to help site visitors access content. What they're saying: "Increasingly, web pages — apps, articles, and files — will become tool calls with AI chat interfaces," Browser Company CEO Josh Miller wrote to explain why his firm was stopping further work on Arc. Yes, but: As tech goes all in on rebuilding our web experiences with AI, there's no guarantee that the web will still be there when that job is done. With chatbots becoming users' default way to find out what's happening in the world, their makers pretend they can plaster this new interface layer over the internet without disrupting the data sources that feed it. But some media observers believe an AI-first web will choke off the money and attention that motivates web creators to keep extending the common knowledge pool. Many publishers are already seeing significant traffic and income declines from the shift toward AI search, though Google disputes there's a connection. And creative artists fear their work is being stolen or devalued. This is everyone's problem. Of course the businesses and people that have built their work around the web are afraid — but AI makers should be worried, too. The web's vast treasury (and cesspool) of human creative work has accumulated since the 1990s because people wanted to share what they know either for financial or reputational gain, or just to advance a cause or do some good. That setup gave us everything from Wikipedia and YouTube tutorials to blogs and Reddit. Nearly all of the old-school web has already been fed into AI training databases for regurgitation by bots like ChatGPT. From now on, valuable new contributions are likely to sit behind subscription paywalls or depend on unsteady alternate means of support (membership programs, nonprofit grants, government funding). If AI undermines the incentives for human beings to update the web with their news, opinions and arguments, it will also cut off its own future. The intrigue: Some in the web avant-garde are already anticipating a world in which the most ambitious or meaningful creative work takes place in what they're calling a "dark forest" web. They imagine creative communities that are purposefully isolated from the Silicon Valley bazaar, generating "anti-memes" and critical ideas without participating in social media's algorithmic competition or AI's sloppy reductivism. The other side: AI firms have introduced modest efforts to feed money back to content providers. OpenAI, for instance, has made multiple deals with online publishers (including Axios). But it's hard to see how that kind of arrangement replaces the search traffic and ad revenue that's been the sustaining anchor for so many web publishers for the past decade. When it looked like Facebook's rise was threatening to hobble news publishers, the social media giant announced multiple programs to funnel them cash. But that support was fickle and fleeting, and site owners and creators know they can't sustain their businesses purely on tech largesse. What's next: Advertising in AI chats is still in its infancy, but OpenAI has said it's going to build ads into ChatGPT, and its competitors won't be far behind. Everyone assumes this business will evolve rapidly, building on the performance-based model and personalization techniques that emerged in the search and social media eras. That can only further undermine the remnants of the web publishing industry, unless AI makers choose to share this new income with information providers. But they're spending billions on data centers, and their investors are expecting astronomical revenue growth, so no one should be surprised if they want to hold onto the lion's share. The bottom line: Google shaped a search-based web on which independent publishers and individual contributors could survive, if not always thrive. Now AI is ready to turn that entire ecosystem into a legacy product.
The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
Britain is getting a defense boost aimed at sending a message to Moscow, and to Trump
LONDON (AP) — The United Kingdom will build new nuclear-powered attack submarines and create an army ready to fight a war in Europe as part of a boost to military spending designed to send a message to Moscow — and Washington. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Britain 'cannot ignore the threat that Russia poses' as he pledged to undertake the most sweeping changes to Britain's defenses since the end of the Cold War more than three decades ago. 'We have to recognize the world has changed,' Starmer told the BBC. 'With greater instability than there has been for many, many years, and greater threats.' The government is to respond to a strategic defense review commissioned by Starmer and led by George Robertson, a former U.K. defense secretary and NATO secretary general. It's the first such review since 2021, and lands in a world transformed by Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, and by the re-election of President Donald Trump last year. The government says it will accept all 62 recommendations made in the review, aiming to help the U.K. confront growing threats on land, air sea and in cyberspace. Defense Secretary John Healey said the changes would send 'a message to Moscow, and transform the country's military following decades of retrenchment, though he said he does not expect the number of soldiers — currently at a historic low — to rise until the early 2030s. Healey said plans for defense spending to hit 2.5% of national income by 2027 a year are 'on track' and that there's 'no doubt' it will hit 3% before 2034. Starmer said the 3% goal is an 'ambition,' rather than a firm promise, and it's unclear where the cash-strapped Treasury will find the money. The government has already, contentiously, cut international aid spending to reach the 2.5% target. Starmer said he wouldn't make a firm pledge until he knew 'precisely where the money is coming from.' Even 3% falls short of what some leaders in NATO think is needed to deter Russia from future attacks on its neighbors. NATO chief Mark Rutte says leaders of the 32 member countries will debate a commitment to spend at least 3.5% of GDP on defense when they meet in the Netherlads this month. Monday's announcements include building 'up to 12' nuclear-powered, conventionally armed submarines under the AUKUS partnership with Australia and the United States. The government also says it will invest 15 billion in Britain's nuclear arsenal, which consists of missiles carried on a handful of submarines. Details of those plans are likely to be scarce. The government will also increase conventional Britain's weapons stockpiles with up to 7,000 U.K.-built long-range weapons. Starmer said rearming would create a 'defense dividend' of well-paid jobs — a contrast to the post-Cold War 'peace dividend' that saw Western nations channel money away from defense into other areas. Like other NATO members, the U.K. has been reassessing its defense spending since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Healey said Russia is 'attacking the U.K. daily,' with 90,000 cyberattacks from state-linked sources directed at the U.K.'s defense over the last two years. A cyber command to counter such threats is expected to be set up as part of the review. 'This is a message to Moscow,' Healey told the BBC. It's also a message to Trump that Europe is heeding his demand for NATO members to spend more on their own defense. European countries, led by the U.K. and France, have scrambled to coordinate their defense posture as Trump transforms American foreign policy, seemingly sidelining Europe as he looks to end the war in Ukraine. Trump has long questioned the value of NATO and complained that the U.S. provides security to European countries that don't pull their weight. Robert Jenrick, justice spokesman for the main opposition Conservative Party, called on the government to be more ambitious and raise spending to 3% of national income by 2029. 'We think that 2034 is a long time to wait, given the gravity of the situation,' he told Sky News.
San Francisco Chronicle
35 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Britain is getting a defense boost aimed at sending a message to Moscow, and to Trump
LONDON (AP) — The United Kingdom will build new nuclear-powered attack submarines and create an army ready to fight a war in Europe as part of a boost to military spending designed to send a message to Moscow — and Washington. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Britain 'cannot ignore the threat that Russia poses' as he pledged to undertake the most sweeping changes to Britain's defenses since the end of the Cold War more than three decades ago. 'We have to recognize the world has changed," Starmer told the BBC. 'With greater instability than there has been for many, many years, and greater threats.' What's happening on Monday? The government is to respond to a strategic defense review commissioned by Starmer and led by George Robertson, a former U.K. defense secretary and NATO secretary general. It's the first such review since 2021, and lands in a world transformed by Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, and by the re-election of President Donald Trump last year. The government says it will accept all 62 recommendations made in the review, aiming to help the U.K. confront growing threats on land, air sea and in cyberspace. Defense Secretary John Healey said the changes would send 'a message to Moscow, and transform the country's military following decades of retrenchment, though he said he does not expect the number of soldiers — currently at a historic low — to rise until the early 2030s. Healey said plans for defense spending to hit 2.5% of national income by 2027 a year are 'on track' and that there's 'no doubt' it will hit 3% before 2034. Starmer said the 3% goal is an 'ambition,' rather than a firm promise, and it's unclear where the cash-strapped Treasury will find the money. The government has already, contentiously, cut international aid spending to reach the 2.5% target. Starmer said he wouldn't make a firm pledge until he knew 'precisely where the money is coming from.' Deterring Russia Even 3% falls short of what some leaders in NATO think is needed to deter Russia from future attacks on its neighbors. NATO chief Mark Rutte says leaders of the 32 member countries will debate a commitment to spend at least 3.5% of GDP on defense when they meet in the Netherlads this month. Monday's announcements include building 'up to 12' nuclear-powered, conventionally armed submarines under the AUKUS partnership with Australia and the United States. The government also says it will invest 15 billion in Britain's nuclear arsenal, which consists of missiles carried on a handful of submarines. Details of those plans are likely to be scarce. The government will also increase conventional Britain's weapons stockpiles with up to 7,000 U.K.-built long-range weapons. Starmer said rearming would create a 'defense dividend' of well-paid jobs — a contrast to the post-Cold War 'peace dividend' that saw Western nations channel money away from defense into other areas. Like other NATO members, the U.K. has been reassessing its defense spending since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Healey said Russia is 'attacking the U.K. daily,' with 90,000 cyberattacks from state-linked sources directed at the U.K.'s defense over the last two years. A cyber command to counter such threats is expected to be set up as part of the review. 'This is a message to Moscow,' Healey told the BBC. Bolstering Europe's defenses It's also a message to Trump that Europe is heeding his demand for NATO members to spend more on their own defense. European countries, led by the U.K. and France, have scrambled to coordinate their defense posture as Trump transforms American foreign policy, seemingly sidelining Europe as he looks to end the war in Ukraine. Trump has long questioned the value of NATO and complained that the U.S. provides security to European countries that don't pull their weight. Robert Jenrick, justice spokesman for the main opposition Conservative Party, called on the government to be more ambitious and raise spending to 3% of national income by 2029.
