logo
Explainer-Why is Britain recognising a Palestinian state, and which other countries have done the same?

Explainer-Why is Britain recognising a Palestinian state, and which other countries have done the same?

Straits Times29-07-2025
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
LONDON - Britain announced on Tuesday it was prepared to recognise a Palestinian state in September unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the "appalling situation" in Gaza and meets other conditions.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer's decision follows in the footsteps of France, after President Emmanuel Macron confirmed his country's intention to pursue recognition of a Palestinian state and to encourage other partners to do the same.
Below are some details about Starmer's announcement, driven by a rising global outcry over starvation and devastation in Gaza amid Israel's war against Hamas militants, as well as other nations' position on having Palestinian statehood recognised.
WHAT DID STARMER SAY?
Starmer said Britain would make the move at the United Nations General Assembly unless Israel took substantive steps to allow more aid to enter Gaza, makes clear there will be no annexation of the West Bank, and commits to a long-term peace process that delivers a "two-state solution" - a Palestinian state co-existing in peace alongside Israel.
He said his government would make an assessment in September on "how far the parties have met these steps", but that no one would have a veto over the decision.
The prime minister reiterated that there was "no equivalence between Israel and Hamas and that our demands on Hamas remain, that they must release all the hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, accept that they will play no role in the government of Gaza, and disarm".
WHY DID STARMER DO THIS?
Successive British governments have said they will formally recognise a Palestinian state when the time is right, without ever setting a timetable or specifying the necessary conditions.
Starmer said the move was timed to affect the situation on the ground in Gaza at a moment when the prospect of a two-state solution was under grave threat.
A growing number of lawmakers in Starmer's Labour Party have been asking him to recognise a Palestinian state to put pressure on Israel.
HOW COULD THIS AFFECT U.S.-UK RELATIONS?
Starmer has been building warm relations with U.S. President Donald Trump, and Britain has rarely strayed from the United States on foreign policy matters.
The two leaders met in Scotland on Monday, but U.S. President Donald Trump said he and Starmer did not discuss Britain's plan during their meeting.
When asked on Monday whether he agreed with Starmer's earlier position on Palestinian statehood being a concrete step towards a lasting peace, Trump said: "I don't mind him taking a position. I'm looking for getting people fed right now - that's the number one position. You have a lot of starving people."
Following France's announcement last week, Trump's Secretary of State Marco Rubio outright rejected the plan, calling it a "reckless decision that only serves Hamas".
HOW DID FRANCE REACT TO BRITAIN'S DECISION?
French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot wrote on X that Britain was "joining the momentum initiated by France for the recognition of the state of Palestine".
"Together, through this pivotal decision and our combined efforts, we are putting an end to the endless cycle of violence and reopening the prospect of peace in the region," Barrot said. "Nothing can stand in the way of a just and clear idea."
WHAT HAS BEEN BRITAIN'S POSITION ON ISRAEL SINCE OCTOBER 7?
At the start of the Gaza war in October 2023, when Starmer was the opposition leader, he fully backed Israel's right to defend itself. But his stance has shifted over the years to a tougher approach to Israel, especially since his election as prime minister just over a year ago.
His government dropped the previous administration's challenge over arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and has suspended some weapon sales to Israel.
Last month, Britain sanctioned two far-right Israeli cabinet ministers, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, accusing them of repeatedly inciting violence against Palestinians.
WHO ELSE HAS RECOGNISED PALESTINIAN STATEHOOD?
Last year, Ireland, Norway and Spain recognised a Palestinian state with its borders to be demarcated as they were prior to the 1967 Middle East war, when Israel captured the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem.
However, they also recognised that those borders may change in any eventual talks to reach a final settlement, and that their decisions did not diminish their belief in Israel's fundamental right to exist in peace and security.
About 144 of the 193 member states of the United Nations recognise Palestine as a state, including most of the global south as well as Russia, China and India. But only a handful of the 27 European Union members do so, mostly former Communist countries as well as Sweden and Cyprus.
The U.N. General Assembly approved the de facto recognition of the sovereign state of Palestine in November 2012 by upgrading its observer status at the world body to "non-member state" from "entity".
WHO COULD BE NEXT?
Starmer's decision may put pressure on other major countries like Germany, Australia, Canada and Japan to take the same path.
Germany said on Friday it was not planning to recognise Palestinian statehood in the short term, with its priority to make "long-overdue progress" towards a two-state solution - Israel and a Palestinian state co-existing in peace.
Italy's foreign minister said recognition must occur simultaneously with the recognition of Israel by a new Palestinian state. "A Palestinian state that does not recognise Israel means that the problem will not be resolved," Antonio Tajani told a gathering in Rome. REUTERS
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Forum: Initiatives must benefit both hawkers and customers
Forum: Initiatives must benefit both hawkers and customers

Straits Times

time26 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Forum: Initiatives must benefit both hawkers and customers

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Minister Ong Ye Kung's clarification that stallholders at Bukit Canberra Hawker Centre will not face penalties for not providing meals to low-income residents is welcome news ( Ong Ye Kung rebuts complaints about treatment of stallholders at Bukit Canberra Hawker Centre, Aug 11). The episode underscores a deeper point: good intentions alone are not enough. For any initiative to succeed, it must translate into tangible benefits for both hawkers and customers. Hawkers are already facing significant pressures – rising rents, higher ingredient costs, and intense competition from larger, better-resourced players. At the same time, customers expect genuine value and accessibility, especially for initiatives meant to improve affordability. Take for example some hawker centres operated by the FairPrice Group. While they are commendable for including 'budget meal' options in their menus, these meals are often unavailable when customers try to order, and some stalls that are actually operating are not reflected in their app listing. If the aim is to make affordable options widely accessible, then such offerings must be reliably available and clearly communicated to customers. When policies are rolled out, they should be designed with mutual benefit at their core. For hawkers, this means ensuring schemes do not increase operational strain or reduce income potential. For customers, it means making promised benefits actually achievable in practice. Otherwise, initiatives risk being perceived as token gestures rather than meaningful improvements. Hawker culture is a cornerstone of Singapore's identity, built on the hard work of stallholders and the everyday enjoyment of diners. It thrives when both sides are supported and respected. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore 2 dead after fire in Jalan Bukit Merah flat, about 60 evacuated Singapore TB screenings at two pre-schools after staff member diagnosed in July Singapore HSA seeks Kpod investigators to arrest abusers, conduct anti-trafficking ops Opinion The 30s are heavy: Understanding suicide among Singapore's young adults Singapore Lawyer who sent misleading letters to 22 doctors fails in bid to quash $18,000 penalty Business Haidilao to close Clarke Quay outlet on Aug 31; exit follows 3 earlier outlet closures Singapore Jail, caning for recalcitrant drug offender who assaulted 2 cops with stun device Singapore SG60: Many hands behind Singapore's success story Josephine Lim Teo Hwee

Serbia's police intervene to end standoff between ruling party supporters and anti-government protesters
Serbia's police intervene to end standoff between ruling party supporters and anti-government protesters

Straits Times

time32 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Serbia's police intervene to end standoff between ruling party supporters and anti-government protesters

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox BELGRADE - Supporters of the ruling Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) threw flares and fire crackers at anti-government protesters in Novi Sad on Wednesday evening prompting police to intervene to end the standoff. Months of protests across Serbia following death of 16 people killed when a roof on a renovated railway station in Novi Sad collapsed, have rattled President Aleksandar Vucic and his SNS party. Interior Minister Ivica Dacic said one policeman was injured in Novi Sad. N1 TV footage showed flares and fire crackers being thrown at protesters from the direction of the SNS offices. Later near the parliament building in Belgrade, the police in riot gear blocked anti-government protesters approaching the area where Vucic's supporters have been camping since March. On his Instagram account, Vucic, a former ultranationalist who converted to the cause of European Union membership in 2008, published a video showing him sitting with supporters in front of the parliament. "I came here to be with people," he said. Earlier he addressed his supporters in Belgrade a few blocks away and said: "Our response (to protesters) is clear - we are not going to let you destroy Serbia." Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore 2 dead after fire in Jalan Bukit Merah flat, about 60 evacuated Singapore TB screenings at two pre-schools after staff member diagnosed in July Singapore HSA seeks Kpod investigators to arrest abusers, conduct anti-trafficking ops Opinion The 30s are heavy: Understanding suicide among Singapore's young adults Singapore Lawyer who sent misleading letters to 22 doctors fails in bid to quash $18,000 penalty Business Haidilao to close Clarke Quay outlet on Aug 31; exit follows 3 earlier outlet closures Singapore Jail, caning for recalcitrant drug offender who assaulted 2 cops with stun device Singapore SG60: Many hands behind Singapore's success story Also in Belgrade, near SNS city headquarters, protesters clashed with police who prevented them from approaching the SNS offices. The protesters have blamed corruption for the Novi Sad railway roof collapse and have demanded early elections that they hope would remove Vucic and his party from power after 13 years. They have accused Vucic and his allies of ties to organised crime, violence against rivals and curbing media freedoms. Vucic has denied the accusations. On Wednesday evening, students who are leading the protests called supporters to protest in front of SNS offices in major cities in Serbia including Belgrade, Novi Sad, Kragujevac, Cacak and Nis, after several protesters were injured in clashes with SNS in the town of Vrbas on Tuesday evening. REUTERS

Vizcarra becomes latest ex-president imprisoned in Peru
Vizcarra becomes latest ex-president imprisoned in Peru

Straits Times

time32 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Vizcarra becomes latest ex-president imprisoned in Peru

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox FILE PHOTO: Peru's former President Martin Vizcarra gestures after a judge rejected a preventive detention request for former President Vizcarra during a court hearing, who is currently on trial for allegedly accepting bribes while serving as governor of the southern department of Moquegua, in Lima, Peru, June 27, 2025. REUTERS/Gerardo Marin/File photo LIMA - A Peruvian judge ordered the pre-trial detention for former president Martin Vizcarra on Wednesday for allegedly taking bribes while he was governor more than a decade ago. At the hearing, Judge Jorge Chavez ordered Vizcarra to be held for five months, making him the fifth former Peruvian president to be jailed in recent years. Vizcarra is accused of taking bribes equivalent to $640,000 from construction companies in exchange for public works in the Moquegua region between 2011 and 2014. Vizcarra is now likely headed to a police base in Lima specially built to house former presidents. The prison is already busy, with former Presidents Alejandro Toledo, Ollanta Humala and Pedro Castillo currently held there. Its first inmate was former President Alberto Fujimori, who was sentenced to 25 years in prison in 2009 for human rights violations. Fujimori was pardoned in late 2023, sparking protests around the country. The former leader died of cancer the following year. Vizcarra, who has denied the charges and claimed to be a victim of political persecution, came to power in 2018 after his predecessor resigned. He was removed from office by Congress two years later when the investigations against him began. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore 2 dead after fire in Jalan Bukit Merah flat, about 60 evacuated Singapore TB screenings at two pre-schools after staff member diagnosed in July Singapore HSA seeks Kpod investigators to arrest abusers, conduct anti-trafficking ops Opinion The 30s are heavy: Understanding suicide among Singapore's young adults Singapore Lawyer who sent misleading letters to 22 doctors fails in bid to quash $18,000 penalty Business Haidilao to close Clarke Quay outlet on Aug 31; exit follows 3 earlier outlet closures Singapore Jail, caning for recalcitrant drug offender who assaulted 2 cops with stun device Singapore SG60: Many hands behind Singapore's success story A previous judge had rejected the prosecutor's request detain Vizcarra in June, but the public ministry appealed the ruling, dubbing Vizcarra a flight risk. Vizcarra had also planned to run in the 2026 presidential election. Vizcarra's lawyer said he would appeal the decision. The prosecution has requested up to 15 years in prison for the former president. Peru's politics have faced constant turbulence and upheaval, cycling through six presidents since 2018 amid corruption scandals, resignations and removals. REUTERS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store