Zelenskyy to visit Berlin for meetings ahead of Trump-Putin summit
Merz has convened a series of virtual meetings on Wednesday in an attempt to have the voice of European and Ukraine's leaders heard ahead of a summit that they have been sidelined from.
Zelenskyy is due to meet with European leaders first, to prepare for a virtual call with U.S. President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance about an hour later. A call between leaders involved in the "coalition of the willing" countries prepared to help police any future peace agreement will take place last.
Trump has said he wants to see whether Russian President Vladimir Putin is serious about ending the war, now in its fourth year.
Trump has disappointed allies in Europe by saying Ukraine will have to give up some Russian-held territory. He also said Russia must accept land swaps, although it was unclear what Putin might be expected to surrender.
The Europeans and Ukraine are wary that Putin, who has waged the biggest land war in Europe since 1945 and used Russia's energy might to try to intimidate the EU, might secure favorable concessions and set the outlines of a peace deal without them.
European countries' overarching fear is that Putin will set his sights on one of them next if he wins in Ukraine.
Zelenskyy said Tuesday that Putin wants Ukraine to withdraw from the remaining 30% of the Donetsk region that still it controls as part of a ceasefire deal, a proposal the leader categorically rejected.
Zelenskyy reiterated that Ukraine would not give up any territory it controls, saying that would be unconstitutional and would serve only as a springboard for a future Russian invasion.
He said diplomatic discussions led by the U.S. focusing on ending the war have not addressed key Ukrainian demands, including security guarantees to prevent future Russian aggression and including Europe in negotiations.
Three weeks after Trump returned to office, his administration took the leverage of Ukraine's NATO membership off the table -- something that Putin has demanded -- and signaled that the EU and Ukraine must handle security in Europe now while America focuses its attention elsewhere.
Trump has also routinely threatened and cajoled his NATO allies over defense spending, and has shown little mercy in trade talks by hiking tariffs on most EU imports to 5%, ostensibly for U.S. national security reasons.
Senior EU officials believe that Trump may be satisfied with simply securing a ceasefire in Ukraine, and is probably more interested in broader U.S. geostrategic interests and great power politics, aiming to ramp up business with Russia and rehabilitate Putin.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Mainichi
2 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Japan and China commemorate World War II anniversary on different dates
BENXI, China (AP) -- Eighty years after the end of World War II, Japan and China are marking the anniversary with major events, but on different dates and in different ways. Japan remembers the victims in a solemn ceremony on Aug. 15, the day then-Emperor Hirohito announced in a crackly radio message that the government had surrendered, while China showcases its military strength with a parade on Sept. 3, the day after the formal surrender on an American battleship in Tokyo Bay. Japan occupied much of China before and during WWII in a devastating and brutal invasion that, by some estimates, killed 20 million people. The wartime experience still bedevils relations between the two countries today. A museum in the Chinese city of Benxi highlights the struggles of anti-Japanese resistance fighters who holed up in log cabins through fierce winters in the country's northeast, then known as Manchuria, before retreating into Russia. They returned only after the Soviet Union declared war on Japan and launched an offensive into Manchuria on Aug. 9, 1945 -- the same day the U.S. dropped an atomic bomb on Nagasaki -- adding to the pressure on Japan to surrender. Nowadays, it is China's military that raises alarm as it seeks to enforce the government's territorial claims in the Pacific. When Japan talks of building up its defense to counter the threat, its militaristic past gives China a convenient retort. "We urge Japan to deeply reflect on its historical culpability, earnestly draw lessons from history and stop using hype over regional tensions and China-related issues to conceal its true intent of military expansion," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said last month. Japan's surrender broadcast Hirohito's prerecorded surrender broadcast on Aug. 15, 1945, was incomprehensible to many Japanese. He used arcane language and the sound quality was poor. What was important, historians say, was that the message came from the emperor himself. Hirohito was considered a living god, and the war was fought in his name. Most Japanese had never heard his voice before. "The speech is a reminder of what it took to end the wrong war," Nihon University professor Takahisa Furukawa told The Associated Press in 2015. The current emperor, Hirohito's grandson Naruhito, and the prime minister are set to make remarks at the annual ceremony in Tokyo on Aug. 15, broadcast live by public broadcaster NHK. At last year's event, Naruhito expressed deep remorse over Japan's actions during the war. But on the same day, three Japanese cabinet ministers visited Tokyo's Yasukuni shrine, drawing criticism from China and South Korea, which see the shrine as a symbol of militarism. China marks Victory Day Japan surrendered on Sept. 2, 1945, in a ceremony on board the American battleship USS Missouri. The foreign minister, in a top hat and tails, and the army chief signed on behalf of Hirohito. The signatories on the other side were U.S. Gen. Douglas MacArthur and representatives from China and other nations that had fought Japan. China designated the next day, Sept. 3, as Victory Day. Eleven years ago, the Communist Party stepped up how China marks the anniversary. All of China's top leaders, including President Xi Jinping, attended a commemorative event on Sept. 3. The renewed focus came at a time of rising tension with Japan over conflicting interpretations of wartime history and a still-ongoing territorial dispute in the East China Sea. The next year, China staged a military parade on the 70th anniversary of the end of the war. A decade later, preparations are underway for another grand parade with missiles, tanks and fighter jets overhead. Russian President Vladimir Putin is among those expected to attend.
Japan Times
6 hours ago
- Japan Times
How a call from Trump ignited a frantic week of diplomacy by Ukraine
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine was returning from the front line last week when he joined a pivotal call with U.S. President Donald Trump. Hours earlier, Zelenskyy had visited soldiers defending Ukraine's northeastern Sumy region against Russian ground assaults. Now, stopping in the small city of Romny, he listened on a secure line with other European leaders as Trump outlined Russia's proposal to end the war. Russia, Trump told them, was ready to halt hostilities under a deal involving a territorial exchange between Russia and Ukraine, according to a Kyiv-based European diplomat and a top Ukrainian official who were briefed on the call and spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive information. Seeing a chance to broker peace, Trump told those on the line that he would meet one on one with President Vladimir Putin of Russia to try to seal an agreement. Trump had just brought into play two of Ukraine's deepest fears: that it would be forced to cede land to Russia as part of a peace deal and that Putin would be given a way out of his diplomatic isolation. It was a direct challenge to Ukraine's core principles that territorial issues be addressed only after a ceasefire and that no deal be concluded without Kyiv. After Zelenskyy left the call, he recorded his usual evening address to Ukrainians, trying to project optimism. "I spoke with President Trump,' he said, speaking from a playground in Romny as the sun set behind him. "Russia now seems to be more inclined toward a ceasefire — the pressure is working.' But, he cautioned, "the key is to ensure they don't deceive anyone in the details — neither us, nor the United States.' What followed was a week of frantic diplomacy as Ukraine scrambled to avoid being sidelined in the negotiations and prevent Russia from dictating the terms of peace talks. Zelenskyy spoke with nearly 30 world leaders, while his top advisers met online and in person with senior European and American officials to press their case. In doing so, Ukraine turned to a tactic honed over more than three years of war: rallying partners through repeated behind-the-scenes calls and meetings to keep a seat at the negotiating table. Crucially, Ukraine leaned heavily on its European allies to form a united front and relay its message to the Trump administration. Debris in Kostyantynivka, a city in the Donetsk region of Ukraine, on June 20. | David Guttenfelder / The New York Times "The goal was to build a common position with the Europeans and a way to communicate it to Trump,' Oleksandr Kraiev, the director of the North America program at the Kyiv research group Ukrainian Prism, said in an interview. "The Europeans have been really useful in helping Ukraine get back to the table.' Ukraine's first task was to determine exactly what Russia had proposed to end the war. Trump had been vague on the call, the officials briefed on it said, leaving it unclear which territories might be swapped. Would it involve large areas such as the Ukrainian-controlled part of the eastern Donbas region for Russian-occupied land in the south, or smaller, strategic sites like the Russian-held Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant for a Ukrainian city? Zelenskyy instructed his top aides to clarify the situation. They got on a call last Thursday with European counterparts and Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy for peace missions, who had received Russia's proposal during a meeting with Putin in Moscow last week. But Witkoff's explanations were muddled, according to the Kyiv-based European diplomat, prompting another call the next day to clear up the confusion. After that second call, it became clear that Russia was not actually offering to relinquish any land, but only demanding that Ukraine give up the territory it holds in the Donbas in exchange for a ceasefire that would freeze the current front lines elsewhere. "Putin wants to achieve by diplomatic means what he failed to achieve by military means,' said Alyona Getmanchuk, the newly appointed head of Ukraine's mission to NATO. "Putin thinks he can use President Trump's mediation and determination to end the war as soon as possible to achieve his goals.' The Russian proposal was a nonstarter for Ukraine, and Kyiv moved to convince the Americans that it was a dangerous gambit. If Russia took all of the Donbas, Ukrainian officials argued, it would gain control of cities and fortifications forming Ukraine's main defensive belt in the area. That would put the Russian army in a much stronger position to attack nearby regions should it decide to resume the war. At first, Kyiv kept Russia's proposal under wraps, worried about how Ukrainians would react, Kraiev said. Most Ukrainians oppose giving up any territory not already under Russian control or formally recognizing Russia's occupation. "It's a classic diplomacy rule: If a possible peace treaty is not acceptable to your public, you limit your comments — you don't say anything,' Kraeiv said. But after Trump disclosed last Friday that a peace deal could include "some swapping of territories,' Zelenskyy had little choice but to push back. "Ukrainians will not gift their land to the occupier,' he said Saturday morning. U.S. President Donald Trump speaks at the Kennedy Center in Washington on Wednesday. | Bloomberg Zelenskyy, however, appears to have not entirely ruled out possible territorial exchanges, telling reporters this week that this is "a very complex issue that cannot be separated from security guarantees for Ukraine.' To bolster its stance with the Americans, Ukraine continued to enlist its European allies. Over the past week, Zelenskyy spoke by phone with more than 20 European leaders, including several times with President Emmanuel Macron of France, a close ally. That strategy echoed a familiar tactic first applied this spring, when European leaders repeatedly engaged with Trump to press Ukraine's case during early rounds of peace talks and acted as troubleshooter during moments of tension between Kyiv and Washington. On Saturday, senior European and Ukrainian officials met outside London with top American officials, including Vice President JD Vance, to try to dissuade the United States from cutting a peace deal with Russia behind their backs. The intense week of diplomacy culminated in a joint call between European leaders, Zelenskyy and Trump on Wednesday, exactly a week after Trump first revealed Russia's peace proposal. European leaders reiterated their key principles: that a ceasefire must come first; that the current front lines should be the starting point for any negotiations, including on territorial issues; and that any deal would have to be accompanied by security guarantees for Ukraine. The top Ukrainian official said the Americans had carefully listened to Ukraine's and Europe's arguments throughout the week, but he cautioned that no one really knew what they had in mind before Friday's meeting. Zelenskyy echoed that sentiment Tuesday. "I don't know what they will talk about without us,' he told reporters. But he stressed that "substantive and productive talks about us without us will not work.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times © 2025 The New York Times Company
Yomiuri Shimbun
9 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Dismissal of U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Chief: Reckless Exercise of Power Threatens to Undermine Reliability
The dismissal of a senior government official threatens the reliability of U.S. economic data and the country's statistical system. U.S. President Donald Trump should refrain from attempting to unjustifiably distort statistics. In early August, Trump fired Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics at the U.S. Labor Department. Following significant revisions to July's employment statistics data, he criticized the data as having been 'rigged in order to make the Republicans, and me, look bad.' He intends to nominate E.J. Antoni, an economist from a conservative policy research institute, as her successor. As Antoni has praised Trump and seen statistics as problematic, it has led to growing concerns about political interference in economic data. McEntarfer was appointed the commissioner by former U.S. President Joe Biden and confirmed by Congress. Given this background, Trump appears to want to suggest that the statistics data was manipulated to favor the Democratic Party. However, Trump has not provided clear evidence of any alleged wrongdoing. Significant revisions to employment statistics data are not uncommon. It takes time for most of the responses from businesses to be collected and for the accuracy of the statistics to improve. Issues such as the pace of gathering statistics data slowing down after the COVID-19 pandemic have also been pointed out. This time, the growth in nonfarm employment, which reflects economic trends, was significantly revised, from when the June figure was released, downward by 258,000. The data indicates that the economic slowdown may have been influenced by factors such as increased uncertainty due to Trump's tariff policies and strict crackdowns on illegal immigrants. The dismissal of the labor statistics chief should be seen as using power to try to distort the statistics. Trump has recently become more confident in his economic policies. In early July, Trump passed a large-scale tax-cut bill into law, which was one of his signature policies. He also used 'reciprocal tariffs' as a way to conclude a series of deals. Given that he had been boasting about these achievements, Trump may have been unable to tolerate the statistics data, as it threw cold water on them. Highly reliable statistics are the foundation for appropriate economic policy management and a healthy financial market. The United States, which is at the core of the international financial system, bears heavy responsibilities. The country must not undermine the reliability of statistics. Employment statistics, in particular, are crucial for assessing the state of the economy. They are a key indicator to which the U.S. Federal Reserve Board attaches extreme importance, influencing monetary policy, as well as stock, foreign exchange and other markets. Political interference in statistics can often be seen in authoritarian nations like China. If U.S. statistics become opaque, the negative impact will be immeasurable. It is hoped that Trump will consider the issues and exercise restraint. (From The Yomiuri Shimbun, Aug. 14, 2025)
