Who Is Sajid Tarar, Pakistani-American Businessman Who Brokered Trump–Asim Munir White House Lunch?
Last Updated:
A vocal supporter of Donald Trump since 2016, Tarar founded The American Muslims for Trump, and is known for advocating conservative values within the Muslim-American community
A rare private lunch between US President Donald Trump and Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff, General Asim Munir, in the prestigious White House Cabinet Room dominated global headlines this week.
According to Firstpost, this was only the second time in over two decades that a Pakistani military chief was hosted at such a level in Washington—the first being General Pervez Musharraf after the 9/11 attacks.
As Trump discussed regional politics, the Isarel-Iran conflict and defence technology with Munir, there was buzz over who had been able to broker the high-level luncheon. Reports now suggest that it was Sajid Tarar, a Pakistani-American businessman, who orchestrated Munir's invitation during the latter's five-day US visit to strengthen bilateral ties.
WHO IS SAJID TARAR?
The businessman is a lawyer, activist, and Republican political figure based in Baltimore. Born in Mandi Bahauddin, Punjab, Pakistan, Tarar immigrated to the US in the 1980s–90s, studied law at the University of Baltimore, and became a US citizen. He runs multiple business interests and serves as President of Maximus Investment Group, dealing in finance and real estate. He's also the CEO of the Center for Social Change, a Baltimore-based non-profit focused on community programmes and social services.
A vocal supporter of Donald Trump since 2016, he founded The American Muslims for Trump, and has spoken at Republican National Conventions and is known for advocating conservative values within the Muslim American community. He served as an advisor to Trump on Muslim‑American engagement and frequently appeared in conservative media defending the administration's policies.
According to Times of India and Firstpost, Tarar's influence in Republican circles extends beyond political rhetoric. His son reportedly worked at the US State Department during Trump's first term, further signaling his integration into Washington's conservative establishment.
He also advocates for improved India–Pakistan relations and has, in the past, praised PM Narendra Modi and encouraged regional peace initiatives.
While the meeting made headlines for its setting, it also stirred controversy in Pakistan. As Moneycontrol and Economic Times point out, there was no official representation from Pakistan's civilian government. This raises concerns about the military conducting parallel diplomacy—a long-standing criticism in Pakistan's power structure.
The fact that a private individual like Tarar could facilitate such a high-level engagement without the Foreign Office being involved has unsettled parts of Islamabad's civilian leadership.
WHAT HAPPENED IN THE MEETING?
According to top diplomatic sources in Washington, Trump laid out a series of sweeping demands and bold offers aimed at reshaping the regional power balance during the lunch meeting. Trump has reportedly asked Pakistan for unconditional military and strategic support, including access to air bases, ground logistics, and potentially sea routes—making Pakistan a critical player in any upcoming military theatre.
In return, Trump has promised Pakistan unprecedented access to American defence technology—including 5th-generation stealth jets and advanced missile systems—along with significant financial aid.
Trump reportedly urged Munir to 'distance Pakistan from Eastern blocs," including BRICS, and instead re-join the US-led security framework.
The Trump–Munir meeting comes amid shifting global alliances, ongoing unrest in West Asia, and a changing power dynamic in South Asia. As reported by Moneycontrol, this private diplomacy could signal a future alignment where military figures bypass diplomats.
With his increasing involvement in geopolitical dialogues, Sajid Tarar may be shaping a new model of diaspora-driven diplomacy—one that sidesteps traditional gatekeepers in both Washington and Islamabad.
First Published:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
29 minutes ago
- United News of India
President Putin weighs in on Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Iran wars, clarifies Moscow's stance
Moscow, June 21 (UNI) Weighing in on the Russia-Ukraine war, and the ongoing Israel-Iran war, Russian President Vladmir Putin highlighted their key aspects, and clarified Moscow's stance on both of them, in an interview with Sky News Arabia. Speaking on the Ukraine war, Putin claimed that external powers are actively blocking a peaceful resolution, accusing them of using Ukraine as a proxy to serve their own strategic goals. 'Ukraine deserves a better fate than to be a tool in the hands of external parties working against Russia,' he said, calling for a settlement that would ensure Ukraine's neutrality and end its pursuit of alliances, particularly military blocs. He insisted that Ukraine must renounce any ambitions related to nuclear weapons, describing it as a critical step toward regional stability. Putin also maintained that any lasting agreement must include recognition of the referendums held in four regions now claimed by Russia, warning that dismissing these results could reignite full-scale conflict. He pointed to the 2022 Istanbul talks as a missed opportunity, suggesting both sides had come close to a deal before it was derailed. Ukraine's current leadership, he said, should act in the country's own national interest rather than following the agenda of outside actors. Resolving outstanding humanitarian issues, he added, must be a key part of any future settlement. On the intensifying standoff between Israel and Iran, Putin reaffirmed Moscow's support for Tehran's right to use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, adding that Russia stands ready to provide technical support. While acknowledging that differences remain, particularly over Iran's nuclear programme, he said there is still space for agreement if both sides show flexibility. He stressed that the International Atomic Energy Agency had found no evidence that Iran possesses or is attempting to develop nuclear weapons. Putin reiterated Russia's long-standing opposition to the spread of weapons of mass destruction and welcomed Iran's adoption of a resolution banning the use of nuclear arms, calling it a move worthy of serious international recognition. He added that Moscow had repeatedly assured Israeli leaders that Iran is not seeking nuclear weapons, urging open dialogue to ease tensions and strengthen regional security. UNI ANV RN
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Giving them two weeks': Donald Trump's timeless countdown returns; this time with Iran
US President Donald Trump is expected to decide within the next two weeks whether to launch a military strike on Iran, according to the White House, a familiar timeline Trump has leaned on since his first term in office. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks,' she said in a statement issued through White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Thursday. Later on Saturday Trump again reiterated his 'two-week' timeline: "I'm giving them (Iran) a period of time- and I would say two weeks would be the maximum." Two-week a similar troupe Trump has pledged to make announcements or decisions 'in two weeks' more than a dozen times over the past two months, according to an NBC News analysis, a pattern that mirrors his tendency during his earlier presidency. Asked eight weeks ago if he could trust Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump replied, 'I'll let you know in about two weeks.' During his first term, Trump frequently invoked the 'two weeks' timeline for a range of major promises, from tax reform and health care policy to infrastructure plans and the fight against ISIS. Many of these proposals, including claims related to conspiracy theories and coal mine reopenings, were repeatedly touted as imminent but ultimately failed to materialize. Trump's repeated use of the 'two weeks' promise has surged in recent weeks, applied to everything from trade negotiations and tariff decisions to the Russia-Ukraine war. Yet, many of these pronouncements have failed to materialize. The phrase 'two weeks' under Trump has become less a literal timeframe and more a rhetorical device, a vague, elastic placeholder that can mean anything or nothing at all, to signal action while delivering delay. In Trump's lexicon, 'two weeks' doesn't measure time; it simply means 'later'. Will the United States bomb Iran? It's unclear. Will we get a definitive answer in the next two weeks? That's just as uncertain.
India.com
36 minutes ago
- India.com
If World War 3 breaks out THESE countries will be safest because...; Russia, Ukraine at most risk, India, Pakistan are ...
World's safest countries in a World War 3 scenario. (File/Representational) World's safest countries: Besides numerous small conflicts, and the unending tensions between India and Pakistan, there are two major wars currently raging in the world– the Russia-Ukraine war, and the Israel-Iran war– both of which threaten to boil over into a wider conflict that could trigger World War 3, engulfing the entire globe in a catastrophic war. But will be there still be any safe havens left when a global war breaks out and the bombs start falling? Well, according to the recently released 'Global Peace Index' 2025 report, these 10 countries will be the safest in a World War 3 scenario. As per the report, countries with lowest corruption, flexible resources and a well-functioning administrative structure, are the safest countries in the world. Iceland, which has topped the Global Peace Index list since 2008, retains its spot as world's safest country, followed by Ireland, New Zealand, Austria, and Switzerland. Here are the 10 safest countries in the world, as per the Global Peace Index 2025: Iceland (Europe) Ireland (Europe) New Zealand (Oceania) Austria (Europe) Switzerland (Europe) Singapore (Asia) Portugal (Europe) Denmark (Europe) Slovenia (Europe) Finland (Europe) Interestingly, eight of the 10 safest countries on the list are European nations, while Singapore is the sole Asian country considered safe enough to make the list. Which countries are the most unsafe? Now, let take a look at the flip side of the coin and find out which countries are considered the most unsafe on the planet and face the most risk if World War 3 erupts. According to the global peace index, Russia and Ukraine, which have been embroiled in a bloody war since February 2022, are the most unsafe countries in the world, and are at the most risk if a global war breaks out. They are followed Sudan, and the Democratic Republic of Congo, two African nations torn apart by years of civil war and violence. Here are the 10 most unsafe countries in the world, according to the index. Russia (Europe/Asia) Ukraine (Europe) Sudan (Africa) Democratic Republic of Congo (Africa) Yemen (West Asia) Afghanistan (Asia) Syria (West Asia) South Sudan (Africa) Israel (West Asia) Mali (Africa) What about India and Pakistan? India and Pakistan, bitter enemies since 1947, who came to the brink of a major war last month following the barbaric Pahalgam terror attack, are ranked 115th and 144th, respectively, on the Global Peace Index 2025. India's rank remains unchanged from last year, while Pakistan has jumped one spot from last year's 145. Islamabad is followed by its new 'friend', Turkey, which is ranked 146th on the list.
