Club World Cup final: A win for Chelsea, FIFA and Trump – DW – 07/13/2025
"The golden era of global club football has started," said FIFA President Gianni Infantino at Trump Tower in New York on Saturday. "We can say definitely this FIFA Club World Cup has been a huge, huge, huge success."
It's the kind of hyperbole favored by the owner of Trump Tower, where FIFA have recently rented an office. Donald Trump and Infantino have grown ever closer this year, ostensibly because of this revamped and expanded tournament and next year's World Cup, to be hosted in the USA, Canada and Mexico — an event many feel will be used by Trump to further push his message.
"He loves the game," Infantino said of the man who sat next to him at the MetLife Stadium in New Jersey on Sunday. "You cannot organize a competition like this without the full support of the government. Great thanks to President Trump – he has been fantastic."
So too was Chelsea's Cole Palmer. The English attacking midfielder scored twice and made a third goal for Brazilian striker Joao Pedro to put European champions Paris Saint-Germain to the sword before halftime. PSG had no answer in the second half, as Chelsea cruised to victory.
Infantino's main measure of success for the Club World Cup, though, appears to be financial. He reported revenues of over $2 billion (€1.7 billion) and average earnings of $33 million per match for FIFA. Not bad for an organization whose remit is organization and promotion of the sport, rather than pure profit.
FIFA aside, the biggest financial beneficiaries were the two teams that contested the final. Chelsea will get $40 million for the final alone while Paris Saint-Germain gets $30 million for the match, plus both get their share of the overall $1 billion prize pool. It's a sizable chunk, even for a team owned by an American private equity firm who bought it from a sanctioned Russia oligarch and one owned by the oil-rich nation state of Qatar. A $250 million solidarity payment was also promised by FIFA "to club football across the world."
The fact that the final contained European teams who won two of three continental competitions in the season just finished is evidence of the primacy of European football. Three of the four semifinalists were European, as were the majority of the quarterfinalists. It remains to be seen how much a solidarity payment split between the rest of the teams in FIFA's 211 member states will impact the inequalities in the global game.
Though Infantino has been effusive in his praise, many in the game have found failings with the first edition of a revamped competition pushed through by the FIFA boss.
"The Club World Cup is the worst idea ever implemented in football in this regard," German coach Jürgen Klopp, who coached Liverpool and Borussia Dortmund said during the tournament. "People who have never had or do not have anything to do with day-to-day business anymore are coming up with something. There is insane money for participating, but it's also not for every club.
"Last year it was the Copa [America] and the European Championship, this year it's the Club World Cup, and next year the World Cup. That means no real recovery for the players involved, neither physically nor mentally."
The issue of exhaustion, echoed by many players, coaches and fans throughout the tournament, was exacerbated by the extreme temperatures in some of the matches.
"Honestly, the heat is incredible. The other day I had to lie down on the ground because I was really dizzy," said Chelsea midfielder Enzo Fernandez on the eve of the final. "Playing in this temperature is very dangerous, it's very dangerous." Borussia Dortmund coach Niko Kovac, meanwhile, described conditions for his team in Charlotte as being like "a sauna" in the group stage.
While there are mandated cooling breaks, Infantino has now said indoor air-conditioned stadiums will be used as much as possible for daytime kickoffs across the 16 venues that will host 2026 World Cup matches. But only Atlanta, Dallas, Houston and Vancouver (which has the coldest average temperatures of any venue at the relevant time of year) have such facilities in place.
FIFA also made a surprise player welfare announcement on Saturday. An agreement has been made for a mandatory 72-hour minimum gap between games and a three-week period of rest in the off season, with global players' union, FIFPRO, among those who have been pushing hard for similar measures. The amount of long haul trips taken by players will also be considered in future.
All that may well have been some distance from the Chelsea players' minds as, after a brief scuffle on the pitch with PSG players and staff, they celebrated a win that clearly meant something to them.
As he headed from the stands to hand medals to those victorious players, a beaming Infantino was likely reflecting favorably on the beginning of his "golden era". The next stage will be the biggest one of all, the World Cup. Infantino seems well disposed to let Trump bask in some of football's light there too.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
3 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Trump Claims Russia-Ukraine War Wasn't His 'Initial Focus' Despite Promise to End Conflict on 'Day 1'
Donald Trump downplayed his role in the Russia-Ukraine war on Monday, calling it "a Biden war" and saying the conflict was "not an initial focus" of his administration, despite repeatedly promising to end the war on "day 1" of him being back in office. The president's remarks came during a joint press conference with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, following a meeting in which the two leaders discussed military aid to Ukraine. In response to a reporter's question about why he was giving Russia 50 more days to negotiate, Trump said, "I've just really been involved in this for not very long. It wasn't an initial focus. This is a Biden war. This is a Democrat war." Trump has long claimed he could broker peace in Ukraine "within 24 hours," often criticizing Joe Biden for fueling the war through U.S. support. But the recent comments marked the first time Trump acknowledged a lack of personal involvement or focus on the war during the early part of his second term, now six months in. He also promised that if negotiations failed within 50 days, he would impose a 100% tariff on Russian goods. In the same briefing, Trump announced a new agreement with NATO allies to supply Ukraine with American-made weapons, reportedly funded by European nations, according to the Mirror . "We made a deal today... We're not buying it, but we will manufacture it and they will be paying for it," Trump said. While the president now insists on a short timeline for negotiations, he offered no specific diplomatic plan beyond tariffs and weapons sales. Originally published on Latin Times
Local Germany
6 hours ago
- Local Germany
How could welfare reforms in Germany affect you?
Bürgergeld and other unemployment benefits are is to be reformed (read cut) in order to save money, according to statements made by Chancellor Friedrich Merz to ARD in a televised interview on Sunday. Specifically, Merz spoke in favour of noticeable cuts to Bürgergeld, including potentially enforcing a cap on payments towards rent. "It should be called basic security ( Grundsicherung ) and no longer citizen's money ( Bürgergeld )...' Merz said, adding that he envisions the government saving more than one or two billion euros via cuts to welfare cash benefits. Federal Labour Minister Bärbel Bas (SPD) reportedly wants to present a draft for a Bürgergeld reform after the summer break. What would a Bürgergeld reform look like? Among the main points Merz addressed on camera were a cap on the amount of rental costs that can be covered, as wekk as adjustments intended to stop people from collecting unemployment money on top of undeclared or other part-time work. A cap on rental costs could have a particular impact on people living in tight housing markets, such as in Berlin, Munich or other major cities, where housing costs are often high and more affordable options aren't readily available READ ALSO: Germans taking on personal debt at 'nearly twice the European average' The Chancellor also suggested that in some cases, like immediately after losing one's job, he could imagine increasing the unemployment benefits rate in some cases. Merz' comments, taken along with similar comments from Federal Labour Minister Bärbel Bas (SPD), suggest a looming cuts to Germany's welfare benefits system. For her part, Bas has also spoken of a broad reorganisation of Bürgergeld to make it 'more targeted and better at getting people into work', according to a report by The Labour Minister has also spoken out in favour of stricter rules for welfare recipients, including sanctions for people who miss appointments at the job centre . Advertisement Welfare politicised Germany's long-valued welfare benefits, and Bürgergeld in particular, have become issues of political contention in recent months. The far-right Alternative for Germany party has taken to pushing a narrative that immigrants in Germany are milking the country's welfare system, despite evidence to the contrary . READ ALSO: Fact-check - Are immigrants in Germany taking advantage of the welfare state? It's not surprising that the conservative Christian Union parties under Merz' leadership are pushing for social welfare reforms, but exactly how far they will push remains to be seen. The black-red government was confronted with a substantial hole in the federal budget as soon as it came to power, and having run on plans to cut certain taxes and raise spending on defence and infrastructure, they are limited in where they can look for potential savings. But exactly which benefits will be capped or cut, and by how much, will ultimately come down to the compromises reached in debates between Merz' conservatives and the centre-left Social Democrats (historically regarded as defenders of the welfare state).
DW
6 hours ago
- DW
Europe walks tightrope amid intensifying US-China rivalry – DW – 07/14/2025
Can the EU still trust the US after Trump's latest tariff threat? And can it risk closer ties with China? The European bloc is caught between a hard and a rock place. Last week, China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi held talks with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on the sidelines of the ASEAN summit in Kuala Lumpur. The meeting between two top diplomats is especially noteworthy due to Rubio being sanctioned by Beijing in recent years. Chinese officials imposed an entry ban and freeze of assets against the US official. Before he was tapped by President Donald Trump to become US secretary of state, Rubio had served in the US Senate, where he was a member of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China. The commission is charged with monitoring human rights and the development of the rule of law in China, and submitting an annual report to the US president. As a member of this body, Rubio sharply criticized the Chinese government for suppressing the democracy movement in Hong Kong, and for drastically restricting civil rights in the western province of Xinjiang. Beijing lambasted what it saw as "interference in internal affairs" and placed Rubio on the sanctions list after the US government imposed punitive measures on Chinese politicians. Last Friday, the first face-to-face meeting between Rubio and Wang took place behind closed doors in Malaysia. Both sides didn't reveal much on what was discussed but Chinese state media later reported that the talks were "positive, pragmatic and constructive." At the Saturday press conference, Wang gave a brief summary of the conclusions made: Maintain contacts, avoid misjudgment, manage differences and expand cooperation. However, he made no mention of whether Rubio would remain on Beijing's sanctions list. There is a "strong will" in both Washington and Beijing to organize a meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, Rubio said after the talks. No date has yet been agreed. While the US still remains the sole global superpower, the gap with China is narrowing. President Xi wants China to become a "strong, democratic, civilized, and harmonious socialist nation" by 2049, the centenary of the People's Republic. A study published by the consulting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) at the start of 2025 projected that China would overtake the US and become the world's top economy over the next three decades. The US-China competition is already shaping the global economy and politics today, including trade wars, a global arms race and rising geopolitical tension. The US is now using its economic might to force all economically weaker countries to compromise on trade. On Saturday, Trump announced a 30% tariff on all imports from the EU from August 1. According to the DPA news agency, the decree will not apply to steel and aluminum. However, they are already subject to high tariffs. The US, for instance, imposes a 25% tariff on cars and car parts imported from the European Union and a 50% duty on steel and aluminum. The president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen promptly responded, saying that she would take "all necessary steps" to protect EU interests. At the same time, she said she is prepared to continue efforts to reach a mutually acceptable agreement with Washington. EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic was scheduled to hold talks with the US side on Monday. German businesses have sounded the alarm amid the latest crisis. The tariffs could damage "economic recovery and innovative strength," said Wolfgang Niedermark, member of the executive board of the Federation of German Industries (BDI). Confidence in international cooperation would also be affected, he added, noting that Germany, as an export-oriented nation, is just as dependent on free trade as China. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Against this backdrop, the question arises as to upon whom the EU can rely — on the US, an old ally which is now throwing obstacles in the way of globalization, or on the communist China which is now seeking closer ties with Europe and Germany despite ideological differences. Is a Trump-led US, like China, now seen seen as a "partner, competitor and rival" for Brussels? This is the question asked by China experts Paula Oliver Llorente and Miguel Otero-Iglesias in a new paper issued by Spanish think tank Elcano Royal Institute. The phrasing is borrowed from EU documents defining its relations with China, with the words also being included in the German government's China strategy in 2023. "Uncertainty has become the defining factor looming over the strategic positioning of the EU in the context of US-China rivalry," the two scholars claim. "For Germany, Trump's policies and the US-China conflict present historic challenges," said Claudia Wessling and Bernhard Bartsch, China experts at the Berlin-based MERICS think tank. They point out that the US administration under Donald Trump upended trans-Atlantic relations, shaking some long-held and deeply entrenched beliefs in Germany. At the same time, Germany also cooled its ties with China despite intensive trade and business links. Just last week, Germany's Foreign Office summoned China's ambassador after Berlin accused a Chinese warship of aiming a laser at a German aircraft on patrol in the Red Sea. The German plane was deployed as part of an EU-led operation to protect commercial ships from the Houthi militia operating out of Yemen. But China has disputed Germany's allegations, saying it was "totally inconsistent with the facts known by the Chinese side." The Chinese Ministry of Defense said the Chinese frigate in question was not in the Red Sea but in the Gulf of Aden at the time. And if Germany manages to set aside all the differences with China and moves closer to Beijing, it would certainly anger Washington, which still irreplaceable in the European security architecture. Notably, Russia's ongoing war against Ukraine has brought the importance of US military presence in Europe into sharp focus. "Germany's new government (...) now faces unprecedented pressure to navigate in a geopolitical world amid an ongoing polarization of society at home," underlined Wessling and Bartsch. That being said, the EU and the US have substantially different threat perceptions of China, said Llorente and Otero-Iglesias. "The US is trying to fight a hegemonic competitor and an existential threat, while the EU is aiming to establish a balanced relation with a global player," they argued. Against this backdrop, the experts underlined, "the EU prefers to develop differentiated de-risking strategies to reduce critical dependencies in its economic relations with China." The German government's China Strategy, unveiled in 2023, indeed emphasized "de-risking," to reduce reliance on China. Recent years have also seen many German firms investing not only in China, but also in the US. However, many actors are now recognizing that these business strategies — such as further relocation to China and, increasingly, to the US — may ultimately run counter to the interests of the German economy, potentially leading to a crisis marked by declining exports and job losses, stressed Wessling und Bartsch. "Thus, the slogan 'derisking, but doing it right' could prove to be a challenging mandate for the new German government." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The EU-China summit will take place in Beijing at the end of July. Could this be a new start for Beijing and Brussels? The answer likely depends on Trump. His administration has already specified tariffs on the EU and its most important Asian allies, saying Washington will demand a 25% levy on imports from Japan and South Korea from August 1. The latest US plan for goods from China, however, has yet to be announced. If the trade war between the two escalates once again, China might try to use the EU market to absorb Chinese production overcapacity. In turn, the US could also redefine goods manufactured in the EU through Chinese direct investment as Chinese products and demand higher levies from EU businesses. All EU states must act together to reduce their external dependencies, the Spanish experts said. "Different Member States have different types of relations and dependencies with both the US and China, as well as individual interpretations of economic security and strategic autonomy," they pointed out. This "inherent heterogenous nature" of their trade ties leads to divergent foreign policy priorities, Llorente und Otero-Iglesias argued. Nevertheless, "partnerships are indispensable for the EU," they added. "China will have to, among other things, open its market to European businesses, and this needs concrete actions and not just promises."
