Strong Museum of Play faces $500K shortfall from funding cuts
ROCHESTER, N.Y. (WROC) — The Strong National Museum of Play said two federal grants were terminated by Executive Orders 'associated with shifting federal spending priorities.'
In a newsletter sent out Tuesday, Vice President for Collections and Chief Curator Chris Bensch said the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) and Institute of Museum and Library Services, which provides nearly half a million dollars, were terminated suddenly.
'These sudden terminations have left the museum with an unprecedented half-million dollar shortfall for projects designed to serve children, families, researchers, and scholars — including a critical collections care initiative and a new, one-of-a-kind exhibit dedicated to exploring the history and cultural impact of game shows.'
The Strong credits the grants to have helped develop new exhibits and initiatives, and are asking for the public's help to 'sustain core museum programs in the face of losing future federal funding opportunities.'
On Tuesday, New York Attorney Letitia James won a court order stopping the Trump administration from dismantling three federal agencies — including IMLS.
News 8 asked The Strong if the court order would change funding impacts, to which a spokesperson said, 'We haven't received any communication about how this court order might affect our canceled grants, and we're just starting to research and try to understand its implications.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Frustrated Democrats try new response to Trump barrage: Flood the zone right back
Frustrated Democrats are fighting to counter President Trump's flood-the-zone approach by adopting a mirror strategy with a simple goal: To flood the zone right back. Democrats have struggled to keep pace with the machine-gun tempo of Trump's second term, which has featured a blitz of boundary-busting executive orders, mass deportations, federal firings, and broader efforts to gut the federal government. The Democrats' response to the frenzy of executive actions has infuriated the party's liberal base, which loudly accused Democratic leaders of failing to push back against an aggressive White House in ways that meet the urgency of the moment. The party brass appears to have noticed. Recent weeks have seen the Democrats coalescing behind an assertive new strategy designed to fight fire with fire — what House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) characterizes as a 'more is more' playbook. The strategy is very much a work in progress as Democrats scramble through trial and error to locate communications techniques that can break through the noise of Trump's frenzied second term. And the actions of some lawmakers, like Sen. Cory Booker's (D-N.J.) marathon floor speech, have been better received than the tactics of others, like Rep. Al Green's (D-Texas) heckling of Trump on the House floor, which angered some Democratic moderates and led to Green's censure. Still, Democrats are increasingly rallying behind a mantra that's perhaps best encapsulated by words attributed to the hockey great Wayne Gretzky: 'You miss 100 percent of the shots you don't take.' 'I'm trying stuff — some stuff works, some stuff doesn't,' said Rep. Becca Balint (D-Vt.), who spoke up at a recent Democratic caucus meeting to warn colleagues that they're losing the messaging war. 'But, like, every once in a while I get something that really captures the imagination and then my team goes back, we figure out: What was it about that?' she continued. 'We have to do our own data-crunching in real time about what is resonating.' 'Flood the zone,' echoed Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.), a leader of the Democrats' messaging arm. 'Communicate often, all the time, about what's going on with a very simple message that the Republicans right now are — the reason they want to cut Medicaid, the reason they want to cut food stamps, is because they want to give billionaires a tax cut.' 'That's what we're talking about. And it's resonating with people.' They have their work cut out. Not only do Democrats lack an obvious national leader, but from the minority wilderness in Congress the party lacks the authority to bring legislation to the floor, conduct hearings on topics of their choosing, or investigate the many scandals of Trump's second term with the subpoena power available to the majority Republicans, who have shown little inclination to check the White House. Democrats are being advised to stay focused on how the Republicans' legislative designs will affect Americans' futures, but they're also stuck relitigating the past amid new revelations about former President Biden's health. And in the ongoing contest for voter attention, Democrats simply don't have the same media infrastructure erected by the right, where conservative voices like Joe Rogan and Dave Portnoy enjoy wide appeal with millions of younger voters who have flocked to Trump. In an effort to close the messaging gap, Democrats are turning to unusual tactics, like diving into GOP-held districts to conduct town halls. That strategy has allowed Democrats to communicate directly with voters in battleground regions, while also highlighting the fact that most Republican lawmakers are avoiding such public events amid an outcry over the steep cuts in federal programs featured in Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' 'What we're trying to tell people is that as much as [Trump] said he's for you, he's not. And the proof is in the pudding,' said Stacey Plaskett (D), the House delegate from the U.S. Virgin Islands. 'We recognize that Americans are getting their information and news not in the traditional ways that they used to. And it's important for us to go to where they are.' Frost, for one, has joined forces with Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) to stage town halls in red regions. And he pointed, as another successful model, to the Democrats' response to Trump's joint address to Congress in February, when Democrats hosted a 'spin room' in the Capitol basement where progressive podcasters and influencers mingled with Democratic lawmakers — and broadcast their anti-Trump messages to niche audiences far and wide. 'Usually, the caucus will have maybe 30, 40 members go down there. This year, because the leader himself was involved and pushing people to go, we had 150,' Frost said. 'But one time doesn't win it,' he quickly added. 'We need it to be a part of everyone's day-to-day. So we're getting there.' Jeffries has taken the lead of the Democrats' enhanced outreach campaign, abandoning his traditional routine of one weekly press conference in the Capitol to stage at least two meetings with reporters each week — and sometimes more — to push back against the blizzard of White House actions. In another gambit in late April, he and Booker staged a daylong sit-in on the Capitol steps to draw attention to the Republicans' policy plans. The approach is not quite blind: Jeffries emphasized that the pushback effort is opportunistic — designed around the 'timing and the rhythm of the legislative process and how we engage in making sure that we are aggressively pushing back when the moment presents itself.' 'We continue to be in a more-is-more environment,' he said. Rep. Dina Titus (D-Nev.), a front-line Democrat, said she's encountering voters of all stripes who are feeling anxious amid the unpredictable actions from the White House, and they want to see Democrats fighting back with every tool available. In that environment, she said, the key is persistence. 'We've been attacking it on all fronts, and we have to keep doing that. Whether it's amicus briefs or town halls or legislation or letters to the administration — we've just got to keep the drumbeat going,' she said. 'They like it when you fight.' 'I don't care what I'm invited to,' echoed Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.). 'I did the LA City Business Council — I took that as an opportunity to do my town hall. So I do it everywhere.' Democrats are resigned to the likelihood that the immediate impact of the fight will be that nothing changes. Indeed, for all their fierce messaging against Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' they were powerless to block it from moving through the House last month. But the ultimate goal is longer-term: flipping control of the House in next year's midterms so they can provide a check on Trump in the final two years of his presidency. 'We need every single tool right now, because we're focused on winning back the majority. Like, that is the focus right now, because how else can we stop … all of these horrible policies?' Balint said. 'It's a numbers game. We have to get those people in those seats.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump is not a king – but that doesn't stop him from reveling in his job's most ceremonial and exciting parts
Heads of state are the symbolic leader of a country. Some of them, like King Charles III of the United Kingdom, carry out largely ceremonial roles these days. Others, like Saudi Arabian King Salman, are absolute monarchs and involved in governing the country's day-to-day activities and policies. It also means that the Saudi monarch gets to do whatever he wants without much consequence from others. In the United States, the president is both the head of state and head of government. The head of government works with legislators and meets with other world leaders to negotiate agreements and navigate conflicts, among other responsibilities. Some presidents, like Jimmy Carter, got so bogged down in the specifics that the nighttime comedy show 'Saturday Night Live' made fun of it in 1977. 'SNL' spoofed Carter responding in extreme, mundane detail to a question about fixing a post office's letter sorting machines. As a political scientist who studies American presidents, I see that President Donald Trump loves the power and prestige that comes with being head of state, but does not seem to particularly enjoy the responsibility of being head of government. Trump rarely talks about the often-tedious process of governing, and instead acts with governance by decree by signing a flurry of executive orders to avoid working with other parts of the government. He has also likened himself to a king, writing on Feb. 19, 2025, 'Long Live the King!' As much as Trump loves hosting sports teams and talking about paving over the White House's rose garden in a remodeling project, he seems to begrudgingly accept the role of head of government. Trump revels in social events where he is heralded as the most important person in the room. On Feb. 9, 2025, Trump became the first sitting president to attend a Super Bowl. A week later, he attended the Daytona 500 at Daytona Beach, Florida, where his limousine led drivers in completing a ceremonial lap. Trump's preference for serving as head of state and not head of government was on full display during his now infamous Feb. 28, 2025, White House meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. In the televised Oval Office meeting, Trump repeatedly told Zelenskyy, 'You have to be thankful.' Trump was demanding deference from Zelenskyy to show his inferior and submissive position as a recipient of U.S. aid and military support. These are mannerisms of absolute kings, not elected officials. The beginning of Trump's second term in office has been filled with announcements of changes – mostly through executive actions. The Trump administration has ordered the Pentagon to stop cyber operations against Russia and fired hundreds of employees at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The administration has also closed the Social Security Administration's civil rights office and, among many other things, named the president chair of the Kennedy Center, a performance arts venue in Washington. Trump has enacted policy changes almost exclusively through executive orders, instead of working with Congress on legislation. Executive orders do not have to be negotiated with the legislative branch and can be written by a small team of advisers and approved by presidents. Within the first six weeks, Trump has signed more than 90 executive orders. By comparison, former President Joe Biden signed 162 executive orders during his four years in office. Many of Trump's executive orders are being challenged in court, and some have been found to likely not be constitutional. More importantly, Trump's successor can turn executive orders into confetti in an instant, simply with a signature. Trump himself has signed at least two executive orders that rescind over 60 previous executive orders, mostly signed by Biden. The fact that Trump has removed almost all of Biden's executive orders highlights how the orders can create change for a moment, or a few years. But when it comes to long-term policy change, congressional action is needed. Early in Trump's first term in 2017, the administration planned themed weeks called 'Made in America' and 'American Heroes,' for example, to emphasize changes it intended to pursue. Trump's staff launched, stopped and then relaunched a themed infrastructure week seven times in 2019. This happened after Trump repeatedly derailed infrastructure events to focus on a more interesting event or topic, ranging from defending his comments that seemed to suggest support for white supremacists to discussing the reboot of Roseanne Barr's sitcom. In his second term, Trump has farmed out many head of government tasks to other people, notably billionaire Elon Musk, who is leading the new so-called Department of Government Efficiency. By mid-February 2025, Trump gave Musk, who holds the title of special government employee, oversight for hiring decisions at every governmental agency. But as DOGE has initiated widespread cuts at different government agencies and offices in an effort to trim government waste, Musk has reportedly clashed with Trump's cabinet members. This includes Secretary of State Marco Rubio, as well as other independent agencies funded by Congress. Government agencies, funding recipients and others are pushing back against the cuts and at times are succeeding in getting court rulings that halt the dismissal of government workers, or reinstate other workers at their jobs. Trump also seems to have abdicated most responsibility of bureaucracy to others by allowing Musk's team unprecedented access to sensitive government programs and documents that include people's personal information. Absolute kings, queens, emperors and dictators are heads of state who demand obedience because they hold the nation in their grip. Presidents from elected democracies may, as in the case of the U.S., have a ceremonial aspect to the job, but it is only a part of it. The people democratically elect American presidents to serve everyone and provide the best government possible. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Shannon Bow O'Brien, The University of Texas at Austin Read more: Tyrannical leader? Why comparisons between Trump and King George III miss the mark on 18th-century British monarchy Trump's defiance of a federal court order fuels a constitutional crisis − a legal scholar unpacks the complicated case Donald Trump's nonstop news-making can be exhausting, making it harder for people to scrutinize his presidential actions Shannon Bow O'Brien does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Law firms targeted by Trump are on a winning streak against him
Federal courts have handed a series of resounding victories to the law firms fighting back against President Trump's targeted executive orders, a sharp rebuke of his retribution campaign against them. Three judges, appointed by presidents of both political parties, forcefully struck down orders this month aimed at limiting government contracts and access for Big Law firms Perkins Coie, WilmerHale and Jenner & Block. The early wins underscore the legal system's ability to withstand the Trump administration's pressure test, and have led some in the legal community to take shots at other elite firms that struck deals with Trump to avoid punishments. 'This is a moment for courage, not capitulation,' said Harold Hongju Koh, a Yale Law School professor who authored papers calling Trump's orders retaliatory and the law firm deals unenforceable. 'The firms that showed courage are being vindicated, and the ones who have capitulated have another chance to show courage,' he continued. 'So, what are they going to do?' The judges ruling in favor of the law firms all deemed the administration's actions as illegal. Still, that might not make firms that chose to strike deals with Trump regret their actions. Those firms likely anticipated they could win in court, but decided it was in their better business interests to settle with Trump, said Rachel Cohen, a lawyer who made waves after she offered a conditional resignation from Skadden contingent on whether leadership came up with 'a satisfactory response to the current moment.' Skadden ended up reaching a deal with the Trump administration, and Cohen no longer works there. Cohen argued Trump has effectively won in getting a number of law firms to offer it concessions even though the administration had a weak case in court. 'The very fact that we're saying, 'What does it mean that the Trump administration has lost all of these legal battles' shows that they kind of won, right?' Cohen told The Hill. The three firms that won in court all have ties to people who are political opponents of Trump or who are otherwise seen as the president as enemies. Perkins Coie had long drawn Trump's ire for advising Hillary Clinton during her 2016 presidential campaign and working with an opposition research firm tied to the discredited Steele dossier. WilmerHale had employed special counsel Robert Mueller before and after his stint investigating Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, while Jenner & Block previously employed Andrew Weissmann, a prominent Trump critic and legal pundit who worked on Mueller's probe. A fourth firm fighting back, Susman Godfrey, is awaiting a ruling on a Trump executive order targeting it for punishment. The firm helped Dominion Voting Systems secure a multimillion-dollar settlement against Fox News after the 2020 election. The Trump administration has argued that it's within the president's discretion to decide who to trust with the nation's secrets, a reference to its decision to revoke the security clearances of the firms' employees. The orders were designed to assuage Trump's concerns about the law firms, the government has said. But judges haven't bought it. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon, an appointee of former President George W. Bush, said Tuesday in his ruling for WilmerHale that the president's orders against several of the nation's top law firms constituted a direct challenge to the independent judiciary and bar that are the 'cornerstone' of America's justice system. To let the orders stand would be 'unfaithful to the judgment and vision of the Founding Fathers,' the judge wrote in a 73-page opinion spattered with exclamation points. Before that, U.S. District Judge John Bates, another Bush appointee, slammed Trump's order against Jenner & Block as an effort to 'chill legal representation the administration doesn't like,' while U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell, appointed by former President Obama, said Trump's order against Perkins Coie 'draws from a playbook as old as Shakespeare, who penned the phrase: 'The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers.'' Trump's deal with Paul, Weiss was an earthquake in the legal world, and signaled that a number of powerful firms would be willing to do deals with Trump out of economic prudence. Trump revoked the executive order targeting Paul, Weiss after it agreed to provide $40 million in free legal services to support administration initiatives and other perks. 'As soon as Paul, Weiss made their deal, it was very clear to me that the industry wasn't going to act collectively and that they were going to splinter,' Cohen said. Soon after, Skadden struck its own deal with the president, agreeing to provide at least $100 million in pro bono legal services 'during the Trump administration and beyond.' Trump had not signed an order aimed at Skadden, though the administration signaled that additional law firms could come under fire. At least seven other firms entered agreements with Trump to provide tens of millions of dollars in pro bono work, despite no executive orders issued against them. 'There is a different motivation beyond 'Would I be able to win in court?' that is behind why these deals were entered into in the first place,' said Cohen. But Koh, the law professor, argued that it's not too late for the other firms to change course. In his essay in the law and policy journal Just Security, he contended that the agreements are unenforceable contracts. He offered a hypothetical: If you enter a contract to give someone a million dollars because they put a gun to your head, but then a court says it was illegal to put a gun to your head, would you still pay the million dollars? 'Right now, they are prisoners of handcuffs of their own making,' Koh said of the law firms. 'It's all in their mind — that's what these cases tell you. 'Whatever was their explanation for why they caved the first time, those justifications are gone,' he continued. 'They should start doing the right thing now; they have a second chance to do the right thing, and they should take it.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
