Governing AI for the public interest
https://arab.news/pdugg
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer last month published an 'AI Opportunities Action Plan' that includes a multibillion-pound government investment in the UK's artificial intelligence capacity and £14 billion ($17.4 billion) in commitments from tech firms. The stated goal is to boost the AI computing power under public control twentyfold by 2030 and to embed AI in the public sector to improve services and reduce costs by automating tasks.
But governing AI in the public interest will require the government to move beyond unbalanced relationships with digital monopolies. As matters stand, public authorities usually offer technology companies lucrative unstructured deals with no conditionalities attached. They are then left scrambling to address the market failures that inevitably ensue. While AI has plenty of potential to improve lives, the current approach does not set governments up for success.
To be sure, economists disagree on what AI will mean for economic growth. In addition to warning about the harms that AI could do if it is not directed well, the Nobel laureate economist Daron Acemoglu estimates that the technology will boost productivity by only 0.07 percent per year, at most, over the next decade. By contrast, AI enthusiasts like Philippe Aghion and Erik Brynjolfsson believe that productivity growth could be up to 20 times higher (Aghion estimates 1.3 percent per year, while Brynjolfsson and his colleagues point to the potential for a one-off increase as high as 14 percent in just a few months).
Meanwhile, bullish forecasts are being pushed by groups with vested interests, raising concerns over inflated figures, a lack of transparency and a 'revolving door' effect. Many of those promising the greatest benefits also stand to gain from public investments in the sector. What are we to make of the CEO of Microsoft UK being appointed as chair of the UK Department for Business and Trade's Industrial Strategy Advisory Council?
The key to governing AI is to treat it not as a sector deserving of more or less support, but rather as a general purpose technology that can transform all sectors. Such transformations will not be value-neutral. While they could be realized in the public interest, they could also further consolidate the power of existing monopolies. Steering the technology's development and deployment in a positive direction will require governments to foster a decentralized innovation ecosystem that serves the public good.
Policymakers must also wake up to all the ways that things can go wrong. One major risk is the further entrenchment of dominant platforms such as Amazon and Google, which have leveraged their position as gatekeepers to extract 'algorithmic attention rents' from users. Unless governed properly, today's AI systems could follow the same path, leading to unproductive value extraction, insidious monetization and deteriorating information quality. For too long, policymakers have ignored these externalities.
While AI has plenty of potential to improve lives, the current approach does not set governments up for success
Yet governments may now be tempted to opt for the option that is cheapest in the short term: allowing tech giants to own the data. This may help established firms drive innovation, but it also will ensure that they can leverage their monopoly power in the future. This risk is particularly relevant today, given that the primary bottleneck in AI development is cloud computing power, the market for which is 67 percent controlled by Amazon, Google and Microsoft.
While AI can do much good, it is no magic wand. It must be developed and deployed in the context of a well-considered public strategy. Economic freedom and political freedom are deeply intertwined and neither is compatible with highly concentrated power. To avoid this dangerous path, the Starmer government should rethink its approach. Rather than acting primarily as a 'market fixer' that will intervene later to address AI companies' worst excesses (from deepfakes to disinformation), the state should step in early to shape the AI market.
That means not allocating billions of pounds to vaguely defined AI-related initiatives that lack clear objectives, which seems to be Starmer's AI plan. Public funds should not be funneled into the hands of foreign hyper-scalers, as this risks diverting taxpayer money into the pockets of the world's wealthiest corporations and ceding control over public sector data. The UK National Health Service's deal with Palantir is a perfect example of what to avoid.
There is also a danger that if AI-led growth does not materialize as promised, the UK could be left with a larger public deficit and crucial infrastructure in foreign hands. Moreover, relying solely on AI investment to improve public services could lead to their deterioration. AI must complement, not replace, real investments in public sector capabilities.
The government should take concrete steps to ensure that AI serves the public good. For example, mandatory algorithmic audits can shed light on how AI systems are monetizing user attention. The government should also heed the lessons of past missteps, such as Google's acquisition of the London-based startup DeepMind. As the British investor Ian Hogarth has noted, the UK government might have been better off blocking this deal to maintain an independent AI enterprise. Even now, proposals to reverse the takeover warrant consideration.
Prioritizing support for homegrown entrepreneurs and initiatives over dominant foreign companies is crucial
Government policy must also recognize that Big Tech already has both scale and resources, whereas small and medium-size enterprises require support to grow. Public funding should act as an 'investor of first resort' to help these businesses overcome the first-mover bias and expand. Prioritizing support for homegrown entrepreneurs and initiatives over dominant foreign companies is crucial.
Finally, since AI platforms extract data from the digital commons (the internet), they are beneficiaries of a major economic windfall. It follows that a digital windfall tax should be applied to help fund open-source AI and public innovation. The UK needs to develop its own public AI infrastructure guided by a public-value framework, following the model of the EuroStack initiative in the EU.
AI should be a public good, not a corporate tollbooth. The Starmer government's guiding objective should be to serve the public interest. That means addressing the entire supply chain — from software and computing power to chips and connectivity. The UK needs more investment in creating, organizing and federating existing assets (not necessarily replacing Big Tech's assets entirely). Such efforts should be guided and co-financed under a consistent policy framework that aims to build a viable, competitive AI ecosystem. Only then can they ensure that the technology creates value for society and genuinely serves the public interest.
- Mariana Mazzucato is Professor in the Economics of Innovation and Public Value at University College London and the author, most recently, of 'Mission Economy: A Moonshot Guide to Changing Capitalism' (Penguin Books, 2022).
- Tommaso Valletti, Professor of Economics at Imperial College London, is Director of the Centre for Economic Policy Research and a former chief competition economist at the European Commission.
- Copyright: Project Syndicate
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asharq Al-Awsat
7 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Meta Becomes the Latest Big Tech Company Turning to Nuclear Power for AI Needs
Meta has cut a 20-year deal to secure nuclear power to help meet surging demand for artificial intelligence and other computing needs at Facebook's parent company. The investment with Meta will also expand the output of a Constellation Energy Illinois nuclear plant. The agreement announced Tuesday is just the latest in a string of tech-nuclear partnerships as the use of AI expands. Financial details of the agreement were not disclosed. Constellation's Clinton Clean Energy Center was actually slated to close in 2017 after years of financial losses but was saved by legislation in Illinois establishing a zero-emission credit program to support the plant into 2027. The agreement deal takes effect in June of 2027, when the state's taxpayer funded zero-emission credit program expires. With the arrival of Meta, Clinton's clean energy output will expand by 30 megawatts, preserve 1,100 local jobs and bring in $13.5 million in annual tax revenue, according to the companies. 'Securing clean, reliable energy is necessary to continue advancing our AI ambitions,' said Urvi Parekh, Meta's head of global energy. Surging investments in small nuclear reactors comes at a time when large tech companies are facing two major demands: a need to increase their energy supply for AI and data centers, among other needs, while also trying to meet their long-term goals to significantly cut greenhouse gas emissions. Those emissions are generated, in large part, from the burning of fossil fuels like gasoline, oil and coal. Nuclear energy, while producing waste, does not emit carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gases. Constellation, the owner of the shuttered Three Mile Island nuclear power plant, said in September that it planned to restart the reactor so tech giant Microsoft could secure power to supply its data centers. Three Mile Island, located on the Susquehanna River just outside Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, was the site of the nation's worst commercial nuclear power accident in 1979. Also last fall, Amazon said it was investing in small nuclear reactors, two days after a similar announcement by Google. Additionally, Google announced last month that it was investing in three advanced nuclear energy projects with Elementl Power. US states have been positioning themselves to meet the tech industry's power needs as policymakers consider expanding subsidies and gutting regulatory obstacles. Last year, 25 states passed legislation to support advanced nuclear energy, and lawmakers this year have introduced over 200 bills supportive of nuclear energy, according to the trade association Nuclear Energy Institute. Advanced reactor designs from competing firms are filling up the federal government's regulatory pipeline as the industry touts them as a reliable, climate-friendly way to meet electricity demands from tech giants desperate to power their fast-growing artificial intelligence platforms. Amazon, Google and Microsoft also have been investing in solar and wind technologies, which make electricity without producing greenhouse gas emissions. Shares of Constellation Energy Corp., based in Baltimore, were flat Tuesday.
Arab News
8 hours ago
- Arab News
Makkah Health Cluster brings AI-powered healthcare platform ‘iSelfie' to region
The Makkah Health Cluster has signed a cooperation agreement with Canadian company AIZTech, which specializes in AI-powered medical diagnostics, to deploy the iSelfie platform across its facilities, including King Abdullah Medical City and several major hospitals in Makkah. The signing ceremony was attended by Jean-Philippe Linteau, ambassador of Canada to Saudi Arabia; Dr. Mubarak Al-Mulhem, director general of healthcare at the Ministry of Investment; and Dr. Hatim Al-Omari, CEO of the Makkah Health Cluster, which oversees more than 10 hospitals in the city. Also present were Dr. Adel Tash, CEO of King Abdullah Medical City, and Tarek Sultan, vice chairman of Agility. The agreement was signed by Al-Omari and Mohamed Sheta, CEO of AIZTech. This marks the first agreement of its kind in the Middle East, allowing patients to benefit from instant health assessments using AI through a short facial video, with no additional hardware required. The iSelfie platform analyzes the video to extract key health metrics including blood pressure, heart rate, blood oxygen saturation, and respiratory rate. The platform will be integrated into the patient-facing screens within hospital facilities and will be used with the assistance of medical staff. Al-Omari said: 'We are proud to be the first in the Kingdom and the region to adopt this advanced technology, which reflects our ongoing commitment to harnessing the latest digital solutions to enhance diagnostic efficiency and accelerate patient care. This step marks a qualitative leap toward a more advanced and innovative healthcare system, aligned with the goals of Saudi Vision 2030.' Tash added: 'In line with the spirit of digital transformation and the ambitious Saudi Vision 2030, we are pleased to launch this innovative AI-powered technology in Makkah. This launch is backed by a pivotal study conducted across the Kingdom, where the technology showed promising results when compared with 1,021 cases diagnosed using traditional medical devices. We are committed to expanding access to these advanced tools to benefit the wider community in the region.' Sheta said: 'We are honored to collaborate with one of the Kingdom's leading public healthcare institutions. This agreement is a clear indicator of the growing trust in AI-powered healthcare solutions and reinforces our belief that remote, non-invasive early diagnostics will be a core part of healthcare's future.' Ambassador Linteau said: 'Digital health innovation is gaining momentum in Canada, and Saudi Arabia is a market that is open to early adoption of innovation in the health sector.' He also expressed hope that the platform will achieve remarkable success in the early detection of health conditions in patients. The iSelfie platform has proven its effectiveness through clinical trials conducted in Saudi Arabia, the US, Canada, and Brazil, including a national study supported by the Saudi Food and Drug Authority. Results showed that the platform provides accurate readings comparable to traditional medical devices, with the added benefits of rapid assessment, accessibility, and cost efficiency. This collaboration aligns with the goals of Saudi Vision 2030, which places innovation and digital transformation at the heart of healthcare development by improving the quality of life, promoting preventive care, and expanding access to modern medical services.
Arab News
11 hours ago
- Arab News
EU and UK starting to put Brexit behind them
The process of delivering on the promise made by Britain's Labour Party during last year's election campaign to reset the UK's relations with the EU is now well and truly underway, but only slowly. Last month, almost a year after Labour decisively won the general election, negotiators from both sides unveiled a deal that signals they are adamant about putting the bad blood of Brexit behind them. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Prime Minister Keir Starmer were beaming when they announced they had reached a new agreement that rectifies some of the damage caused by Brexit. Nevertheless, the relatively small scope of the agreement suggests that, rather than a revolution in relations between these two closest of neighbors, this agreement represents a slow evolution and that this incremental approach is bound to continue. It is nine years since the British people decided in a referendum to implement Brexit, causing relations between London and Brussels to sour. The psychological scars caused by this unilateral decision have been at least as deep, if not deeper, than the practical implications of the separation. The very fact that, after decades of continuous expansion of this unique political project, one of its most powerful members was the first to leave, leading to years of acrimonious negotiations that were more about British domestic politics than what was in the interest of either, disappointed, or more precisely, angered Brussels. Rather than a revolution in relations between these two closest of neighbors, this agreement represents a slow evolution Yossi Mekelberg With the UK under relatively Europhile new management, the path to a positive resetting of relations was paved, but it is still bumpy, mainly because of the rise of populist, anti-globalization and anti-immigration sentiments in both the UK and the EU. Starmer, borrowing from the world of sports terminology, referred to the signing of a trade deal with the EU as one that completed a 'hat-trick of trade deals,' following similar agreements with the US and India in the preceding weeks. He also declared this was a 'clear message sent across the globe that Britain is back on the world stage,' departing from years of policies that reflected the island mentality, not to mention the incompetence, of his Tory predecessors, who were still quick to criticize the fresh agreement. To be sure, the deal is not even remotely a step toward the UK rejoining the EU, but it has kick-started what will be months of negotiations over many nitty-gritty details, some more controversial than others. A big draw for the UK entering a new phase in the relationship was the EU's consent to remove the need for health and veterinary certification, known as sanitary and phytosanitary checks, on exports of farm products, ranging from fresh vegetables and meat to dairy products and even timber and leather. In principle, this should never have been an issue, as the quality and standards in the UK did not change after Brexit. But in the poisonous atmosphere under which the divorce settlement was agreed in 2020, Brussels was in no mood to make it easier for a breakaway country. This measure alone is a lifeline. For instance, small-scale sausage and dairy product makers will once again be able to sell into the EU without health certification, avoiding the fate of those that have already gone out of business as a result of the need for such certifications. Moreover, farmers in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland will see reduced checks on fresh food moving between them and Great Britain. Previously, they were caught up in the impossible conflict between the terms of the Good Friday Agreement that brought peace to Northern Ireland and Brexit. This is as much symbolic as it is helpful to struggling farmers. What gave those in the UK who oppose closer ties with Europe some tailwind was the agreement over fishing rights Yossi Mekelberg What gave those in the UK who oppose closer ties with Europe some tailwind among the Conservatives and Reform UK — to the extent that, in another outburst of anti-European hysteria, the leader of the opposition Kemi Badenoch called the deal a 'surrender' — was the agreement over fishing rights. It might have been the case that Starmer's inexperience in negotiating on the world stage, or even being too keen on a deal, led to him agreeing to roll over the existing fishing deal for another 12 years, until 2038, providing access to UK waters for EU fishers. However, surrender it was not, as in any agreement it is the overall picture that counts and those who might lose out should be compensated. This is not only because it is fair, but also because it is prudent to avoid evoking anti-European sentiments. It is no secret that what accelerated the new 'entente cordiale' between the UK and the EU is the recognition that ensuring the defense of the realm — and, as a first step, winning the war in Ukraine — requires them to work closely together. This is now enshrined in the new document, which states that the 'UK and the EU share a responsibility for the security of Europe.' For the Britons, the prize of beginning talks on allowing its arms industry to access Security Action for Europe — a €150 billion ($171 billion) EU fund providing loans for defense projects — awaits. This would consolidate the close partnership of the UK as part and parcel of the defense of Europe. On at least two aspects of the new deal — the return of youth exchanges and British travelers once again being able to use e-gates when traveling to the EU — the psychological boost of being a partner is significant. The latter might not be a deal-breaker in relations, but after decades of whisking through terminals with a minimum of fuss, this Brexit hindrance symbolized for many the acrimonious separation between the Brits and the Europeans. Restoring access to e-gates will return the sense of close relations with our neighbors, even if not still belonging to the same family. For young people, to be able to work and study in Europe with fewer restrictions will enhance their experience. And maybe this will be the generation that rediscovers Europe and being European, which will lead to a much-needed antidote to Brexit, as well as a remedy for a world that currently thrives on what separates us, not what brings us together.
