Heathrow airport expansion will smash our community, say nearby villagers
Hundreds of homes could be demolished in the west London villages of Harmondsworth and Longford if the expansion gets the green light.
Justine Bayley, who lives in Harmondsworth and is chairwoman of the Stop Heathrow Expansion group, said the scheme risked wiping most of the village.
She told the PA news agency: 'It's inevitable that demolishing hundreds of homes will smash up a community.
'We have two pubs and two shops that would become unviable because of a lack of customers.
'There's a bus route that would have to disappear because there's a runway in the way.
'You'd end up with people being left behind … (but) the community would be gone.'
Ms Bayley, who has lived in the village for 30 years, said her home would not be demolished but would be roughly '50 paces' from the boundary of the new runway.
She added: 'There is some disbelief that it will actually go ahead.
'It's not the first time we've been here and this is the last in a series of proposals.
'There are many different views in the village and some, particularly those who can't sell their houses at the moment, are just wanting clarity.
'Some people think any decision is better than no decision.'
The airport wants to build a third runway to raise capacity and boost resilience.
In a speech on Wednesday, Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves highlighted the scheme among a throng of major projects she said the Government would support.
Ms Reeves later said she wanted to see the expansion completed by 2035 and added the whole Cabinet is 'united' behind the plan.
Richard Young, vicar at the St Mary the Virgin church in Harmondsworth, said the plans 'cut very deeply' for residents living in what he described as a 'tight-knit community'.
He added: 'If it went ahead, it would have a devastating effect on the place. The vast majority of it would disappear.
'The church would stay but the community around it would go.
'(The plans) have been talked about for decades and has been a blight hanging over everyone's heads.
'People can't move because no one wants to buy their homes.
'People love living here. It's their home.
'There's anxiety, fear and anger.
'But there's also tension because some people hold different views.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Social Security Is Turning 90. Here Are 6 Myths About It That Won't Go Away.
The concept of retirement as we know it was born 90 years ago this month. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed Social Security into law on Aug. 14, 1935, ushering in the idea of a time of independence from work. At that time, Americans had no meaningful way to plan for an income after work ended — large-scale pensions and retirement savings programs did not exist. When most people stopped working, they either relied on their families or became impoverished. Some wound up in poorhouses — government-run facilities that provided support, such as shelter and food, often in exchange for work. 'Almost every state had them, and they mainly housed old people,' said Nancy Altman, a Social Security advocate who has written several books about the history of the program. It was the depths of the Great Depression, and roughly half of America's elderly population lived in poverty. In the decades since, Social Security has played a key role in improving the economic security of seniors — it prevented an additional 16.3 million adults age 65 and older from living below the poverty line in 2023, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Without Social Security, that would have meant a poverty rate of 37.3 percent, compared with the rate of 10 percent that year. Roosevelt also was inaugurating a new era of social insurance in the United States — the concept of national programs sponsored by government that pool contributions by employers and workers to protect Americans. Today, social insurance programs include not only Social Security, but Medicare, Medicaid and unemployment insurance. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Foreign offenders to be deported sooner
Victims minister Alex Davies-Jones says foreign national offenders will now be deported upon sentencing, instead of after serving half their term, to ease prison overcrowding and reduce costs to taxpayers. . Solve the daily Crossword
New York Times
5 hours ago
- New York Times
Book Blacklist in Kashmir Aims to Muzzle Criticism of India
One book tells the story of Kashmiri women waging a decades-long search for their disappeared loved ones. Another examines how history, politics and local events shaped one of South Asia's longest conflicts. A third tells the story of democracy under threat in Kashmir, by a journalist who saw it unravel. These and 22 other books have been banned by authorities in the Indian-administered part of Kashmir, the disputed borderland that India and Pakistan have fought over for more than three-quarters of a century. In announcing the list on Tuesday, the federally appointed government of the Indian-administered region called the works 'secessionist literature' that were 'disguised as historical or political commentary' but promoted a 'culture of grievance, victimhood and terrorist heroism.' The order makes it illegal to circulate, possess or access the texts in the valley, under threat of years in prison. How well it can be enforced is unclear, however, given that many of the works can be accessed online or bought outside Kashmir. Still, authors of the outlawed books and analysts described the ban as the latest move in India's long-running attempts to muzzle free expression in a region that has endured decades of conflict and insurgency, and a symbol of the tightening repression in Kashmir since it was stripped of its autonomy in 2019. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
