Heathrow airport expansion will smash our community, say nearby villagers
Campaigners in a village which could be partially demolished to make way for a third runway at Heathrow airport have said the plans could 'smash our community'.
Hundreds of homes could be demolished in the west London villages of Harmondsworth and Longford if the expansion gets the green light.
Justine Bayley, who lives in Harmondsworth and is chairwoman of the Stop Heathrow Expansion group, said the scheme risked wiping most of the village.
She told the PA news agency: 'It's inevitable that demolishing hundreds of homes will smash up a community.
'We have two pubs and two shops that would become unviable because of a lack of customers.
'There's a bus route that would have to disappear because there's a runway in the way.
'You'd end up with people being left behind … (but) the community would be gone.'
Ms Bayley, who has lived in the village for 30 years, said her home would not be demolished but would be roughly '50 paces' from the boundary of the new runway.
She added: 'There is some disbelief that it will actually go ahead.
'It's not the first time we've been here and this is the last in a series of proposals.
'There are many different views in the village and some, particularly those who can't sell their houses at the moment, are just wanting clarity.
'Some people think any decision is better than no decision.'
The airport wants to build a third runway to raise capacity and boost resilience.
In a speech on Wednesday, Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves highlighted the scheme among a throng of major projects she said the Government would support.
Ms Reeves later said she wanted to see the expansion completed by 2035 and added the whole Cabinet is 'united' behind the plan.
Richard Young, vicar at the St Mary the Virgin church in Harmondsworth, said the plans 'cut very deeply' for residents living in what he described as a 'tight-knit community'.
He added: 'If it went ahead, it would have a devastating effect on the place. The vast majority of it would disappear.
'The church would stay but the community around it would go.
'(The plans) have been talked about for decades and has been a blight hanging over everyone's heads.
'People can't move because no one wants to buy their homes.
'People love living here. It's their home.
'There's anxiety, fear and anger.
'But there's also tension because some people hold different views.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Over 12,000 Harvard alums lend weight to court battle with Trump in new filing
More than 12,000 Harvard University alumni have signed onto a legal document in support of the university's lawsuit against the Trump administration. The document, known as an amicus brief, hasn't been officially accepted by the court as of 2 p.m. Monday. It is a reaction to the federal government pulling or freezing nearly $3 billion in funding to the university. 'As alumni, we are deeply alarmed by the Government's reckless and unlawful attempts to assert control over the core functions of Harvard and its fellow institutions of higher education. Without due process or any recognizable basis in law — and with complete disregard for the freedoms the Constitution secures and the constraints it imposes — the Government has embarked on a campaign to deploy every power at its disposal to damage Harvard,' the brief reads. The 12,000 alumni range from being a part of the Class of 1950 all the way through the Class of 2025. Crimson Courage, a community of Harvard alumni whose mission is to stand up for academic freedom, kicked off the campaign for signatures. Several other individuals and groups have or aim to submit court documents in support of Harvard's lawsuit. Among them have been two dozen universities, Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell, the American Civil Liberties Union, the American Council on Education, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression — also known as FIRE — and Columbia Alumni for Academic Freedom, according to court filings. Read more: 'We are not just fighting for Harvard': For alums, this year feels different 'The Government's escalating attacks — and this case — are about much more than funding. The Government strikes at the very core of Harvard: the longstanding practices and values of openness, free inquiry, and mutual respect, and its founding commitment to veritas — the quest for truth above all,' the brief said. 'The Government's end goal is to narrow our freedoms to learn, teach, think and act, and to claim for itself the right to dictate who may enjoy those freedoms. As alumni, we attest that Harvard's true greatness resides in the ways we share these values and exercise these freedoms, which have long shaped how we understand and connect with one another, and how we anchor our continuing efforts to make a difference in service to the world,' it states. All Ivy League schools are supporting Harvard lawsuit — except these 2 Embassies directed to resume processing Harvard University student visas 'We are not just fighting for Harvard': For alums, this year feels different What a monk, a librarian and a dentist have to do with Harvard's fight with Trump Judge blocks Trump admin from banning Harvard international students from entering US Read the original article on MassLive.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The benefits system is out of control
The decision to axe the winter fuel payment for most pensioners must rank among the most ill-judged policies introduced by a Chancellor in recent times, and there is strong competition for that accolade. Rachel Reeves made the decision shortly after taking office because she said it was necessary to help plug a £22 billion 'black hole' she had discovered in the nation's finances. Her argument might have had some merit had she not then blown much of the savings on pay rises for train drivers and public sector workers. The juxtaposition of help for Labour's union allies while pensioners shivered rapidly became toxic for the Government, generating one of the fastest reversals of support for any new administration. In the end, with Reform advancing in the polls – and pledging to restore the payment – Sir Keir Starmer ordered a screeching U-turn which the Government maintains is possible because the economy is doing so well, as if anyone believes that. Now, instead of around 1.5 million older people on pensioner credit receiving the payment, it will be paid to about nine million OAPs with an income below £35,000. Why this figure has been chosen is as much a mystery as other 'cliff edge' sums that abound in our overly complex tax and benefit system. Indeed, this U-turn just makes it even more convoluted. Everyone will receive the payment but it will then be clawed back from an estimated two million people earning more than the £35,000 threshold via PAYE or a tax return. In other words, yet more red tape will be imposed to make a quarter of pensioners return an allowance that began life in 1997 as a universal benefit. Although many better-off pensioners often said they did not need the money, and many gave it to charity every Christmas, at least it was straightforward. To some extent so was limiting it to people on pensioner credit, since that is already linked to income. But what is now proposed is a dog's breakfast, with opt-outs and other implications still to be resolved. Tomorrow, Ms Reeves will unveil her spending plans for the next four years. She is being urged to get a grip on the rapidly expanding benefits budget; but if this experience is to be our guide, there is little chance that it will ever be reined in. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
E&E News
an hour ago
- E&E News
BLM moving acting Alaska director to senior bureau post
The Bureau of Land Management's senior leadership shuffle continues. Karen Kelleher, who in March was reassigned from deputy director of state operations to serve as acting director of the bureau's Alaska office, will not be returning to her deputy director's post. Instead, Kelleher will transition to another top headquarters position — assistant director of business management and administration — the bureau announced to senior executives Friday in an email viewed by POLITICO's E&E News. Advertisement The assistant director's position Kelleher will take over on June 29 is responsible for overseeing development of BLM's budget, as well as handling contracts and communicating internal bureau policies and priorities to roughly 9,000 employees. Barbara Eggers, who had held the post since 2019, stepped down last month after accepting the deferred resignation and early retirement offer that allows staffers to stay on the federal payroll through September if they agree to leave as part of President Donald Trump's ongoing efforts to reshape the government workforce.
