
I used a self-hosted app to track all my receipts and it's shockingly good
Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority
If you've ever tried to keep track of your receipts, you know how quickly it turns into a mess. Some are paper, some digital, and some are screenshots that you'll forget about in your phone's gallery. I've tried everything to get a handle on them. India-specific money management apps. Expensify. Google Sheets. I even built a little Notion template to manually track my receipts. And while each of them worked well enough for a while, they all broke down in the same few ways. Either they were too clunky to use daily, didn't play nice with different file types, were too complicated for family members to use, or locked useful features behind subscriptions I didn't want to pay for. But it wasn't until I tried a self-hosted tool called Receipt Wrangler that I found a system that finally made sense.
From Google Sheets to Expensify, nothing clicked till I tried out Receipt Wrangler.
I'll be honest. I wasn't expecting much when I stumbled upon the app's Github page. The description is minimal, the documentation isn't exactly welcoming, and there's no flashy pitch video or subscription model trying to upsell me. However, installing Receipt Wrangler isn't as complicated as it might look. The documentation might seem intimidating at first, but unlike many open-source projects, the developer has done a solid job detailing nearly every part of the installation process. I had it up and running using Docker on my Synology NAS within minutes.
A surprisingly powerful, fast, and frictionless workflow
Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority
First impressions are everything and Receipt Wrangler does a very convincing job right from the get go. Not only did it work, it worked better than most paid solutions I've tried. It's fast. It's flexible. And most importantly, it gives me a few very intuitive ways to manage my data. It hasn't just become my personal receipt tracker; I've set it up for my family, too. And that's the true litmus test for any self-hosted tool.
Receipt Wrangler puts the most obvious use cases front and center. You can set up a dashboard or even multiple dashboards with widgets showing amounts you owe to someone or are owed. You'll also see recent receipts right up front. Pretty straightforward. It's worth pointing out that Receipt Wrangler isn't the prettiest app around. There are no flashy graphics or onboarding tooltips. But after five minutes inside the dashboard, you don't miss any of that. Everything's where you expect it to be. Click a receipt, view the details, and start tagging or editing immediately. It's built around speed and clarity.
The UI might not be flashy, but Receipt Wrangler just gets out of my way and works.
The real magic, of course, is in how it handles receipt input. You can rename receipts, tag them, group them, and search. If a file has embedded text, the app indexes it. If it doesn't, you can manually input the data through one of the most frictionless forms I've used in a while. And this matters more than it sounds. Because it lets you build a consistent, searchable archive that doesn't depend on weird folder structures or convoluted filenames. That frictionless interface also plays a huge role in making the app stick.
Google Sheets, for all its flexibility, really started to show its limits when I put it through the same kind of workflow. A spreadsheet just isn't made for entering long lists of data on the go. I tried building linked folders and matching upload dates with bank transactions, but that approach fell apart fast. If I forgot to log something, it vanished into the ether. If I scanned a receipt but didn't rename it, I'd waste ten minutes later trying to remember what it was. Receipt Wrangler fixes that by putting everything in one place, with metadata you can actually use.
Elsewhere, tagging might sound like a basic feature, but it's become my favorite way to sort information across self-hosted tools, whether it's notes, photos, or receipts. It's what turned me from a casual user into someone who now relies on Receipt Wrangler full time. I started tagging receipts by store, category, and purpose. So when it's time to send invoices to the chartered accountant at the end of the month, I don't have to dig through emails or bank statements. I just filter by 'Office' and month, and everything is right there, even if the filename is nonsense. It's made filing monthly invoices almost boring, in a good way.
Receipt Wrangler's efficient tagging system is critical to sorting your pile of receipts.
Of course, Receipt Wrangler isn't the only tool with tagging support. But most other apps don't do it in a way that fits naturally in my workflow. Expensify, for example, lets you tag but is focused on reimbursements and team reporting. Shoeboxed forces you into their preset categories. Receipt Wrangler lets you make your own. Want to tag every invoice from your freelance gigs? It can do it. Want a tag for 'Reimbursed' and another for 'Pending'? That works too. You can sort out your archive of receipts however you want without working around a pre-defined system.
The little things that make it stick
Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority
I've always been skeptical of automatic OCR. Too many tools promise to extract all your data and then get half of it wrong. Receipt Wrangler plays it smart. If a file has embedded text, it pulls it. If not, you can hook it up to self-hosted AI models like Ollama or external ones like OpenAI or Gemini. Once configured with API keys, it can send receipts to these LLMs to interpret and complete tagging. I like the flexibility, and in a quick test, it worked pretty well. However, I'm not totally ready to send my financial data to an external AI. That said, I've been thinking about running an Ollama instance locally to handle it. But that's a project for another day.
Receipt Wrangler lets you connect to LLMs to automatically scan and tag your receipts.
The biggest advantage isn't just the features. Self-hosting the app is the biggest win when investing your time and energy into getting an app like Receipt Wrangler running. It's the fact that I own the whole thing, uptime pain-points included. The database lives on my server. Files don't get sent to someone else's cloud. I can back it up how I want, archive to cold storage, and trust that nothing disappears if a company shuts down or moves features behind a paywall.
That kind of control is rare now. Most tools try to lock you in, not help you out. Receipt Wrangler flips that. It feels like something built for people who actually care about owning their data or future-proofing their workflows instead of renting convenience. And if Receipt Wrangler ever stops development, I can just keep my instance running forever. That's obviously not an option with commercial tools.
There are a few more features here that sealed the deal for me. First, the way Receipt Wrangler handles backups. You can export everything easily, and since it's just a local app with a simple database, it's trivial to plug into any backup system. Second, it doesn't nag you. No emails. No reminders. No upgrade pitches. It just works, quietly. And third, maybe most importantly, it made me feel like I wasn't just getting better at tracking receipts, I was getting better at organizing my digital life. Instead of letting invoices pile up in a folder till the end of the month, the no-fuss interface makes it easy to file them right then and there. As someone who is notorious for procrastinating with paperwork, this is the system seller.
This is how receipt tracking should feel
Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority
I didn't expect to care this much about a tool for scanning receipts. But here we are. Receipt Wrangler turned a chore into something I actually enjoy. It gave me more control, more peace of mind, and fewer excuses to procrastinate. Compared to everything else I've tried — Google Sheets included — this is the first time I feel like I'll actually stick with a system. I'm not hoping that a free tier stays generous, I'm not bracing for a broken update, and most importantly, I'm not at the mercy of someone else's business model. All of that combined with the general excellence of the app has made it an integral part of my daily productivity workflow.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Android Authority
2 hours ago
- Android Authority
The USB-C dream is dead and it's too late to revive it
Robert Triggs / Android Authority I've been writing about USB-C for what seems like forever (seriously, it's been seven or eight years!). From a unifying, one-size-fits-all specification to the grim reality of compatibility issues and opaque feature support, USB-C has its plaudits and detractors. Me? I sit firmly in the middle — aware of the problems yet still hoping, however foolishly, that the trusty port will one day live up to its promise. Unfortunately, as time passes, USB-C's window of opportunity is closing, and fast. To understand exactly what's 'wrong' with USB-C, just look around your living room. Can you remember which of your power packs charges which of your gadgets quickly or slowly? Laptops and PCs are no better. Back when we had DisplayPort, HDMI, and barrel sockets, you knew where you stood — but now, deciphering which of today's three or four USB-C ports does what requires serious manual-reading. And who has time for that? From charging, data, and peripherals, USB-C does it all but seldom does it well. Playing 'Guess Who?' with a socket that claims to do everything but seldom does is just a microcosm of USB-C's biggest problem — the swirling mess of the specification itself. Big points to anyone who can tell me how many different charging standards are still kicking around in the smartphone world, or how many different data speeds exist across Apple's Mac lineup. Honestly? I've given up trying to keep track. USB-C's biggest problem isn't even that it's unclear what each port does; it's that matching two products that supposedly use the same interface has become an absolute nightmare — and it's only gotten worse over the past decade. Unfortunately, much like my USB-C cable drawer, I've lost hope of ever untangling this mess. Two steps forward, one step back It's taken nearly a decade, but efforts to improve gadget charging have emerged. Perhaps the biggest recent win is that USB Power Delivery (USB PD) support is now mandatory for 15W USB-C gadgets and above, thanks to an EU directive. While this doesn't guarantee fast charging on every device, it ensures common protocol support for all 'fast' charging gadgets. The really good news? Modern chargers will supply at least some power to all modern smartphones, as we've seen from many newer models out of China. Speaking of China, it hasn't been idle either. A collective effort to unify its cluttered fast-charging portfolio has produced the Universal Fast Charging Specification (UFCS). Though UFCS is a separate standard to Power Delivery, it's designed to be compatible with USB PD 3.0, offering similar voltage levels and power capabilities. China is also gradually moving to universal charging, but it's taking a long time. Unfortunately, UFCS isn't backwards compatible with existing standards like SuperVOOC or HyperCharge, so widespread adoption will take time. Still, it shows that even China's biggest players are concerned about interoperability and e-waste. The OnePlus 13, OPPO Find X8 Pro, and HUAWEI Mate 70 series are recent smartphones supporting UFCS alongside their proprietary standards. Certainly, the gradual adoption of USB Power Delivery as the primary method for fast-charging phones, laptops, and other gadgets has been a positive step for consumers. However, even ignoring proprietary standards, the USB Implementers Forum hasn't helped consumers navigate what should be a simple plug-and-play scenario. C. Scott Brown / Android Authority The introduction of USB Power Delivery Programmable Power Supply (PPS) added flexibility for the fine voltage control required to fast-charge modern batteries. However, USB PD PPS took years to reach the plug market, and it's still not apparent to most consumers that you need a PPS-compatible USB PD plug to fast-charge the Galaxy S25 series above 18W, for example. Regular PD is still the standard, but it's going out of fashion for smartphones and even laptops. We're still buying OEM-branded chargers as a compatibility hedge — that's how bad USB-C still is. Worse, the PPS specification now has even more sub-specifications, which are as confusing as the proprietary protocols. Google's Pixel 9 Pro XL is a prime example: it will only hit 37W power levels with a specific 20V PPS plug — the 'old' 9V PPS ones won't cut it, leaving you stuck at 27W. Good luck finding that small but critical detail on many plug spec sheets, if you even bother to look. All these years later, we're still buying OEM-branded chargers as a hedge against compatibility — what a joke. USB-C is determined to undermine itself Robert Triggs / Android Authority Charging speeds dominate smartphone conversations, but USB-C encompasses far more: data transfer speeds, audio, display support, and PCI-E extensions. You name it, USB-C can probably do it, depending on the specific port configuration. Outside of charging, data is the one area where the spec continues to confuse consumers the most. Since its inception, USB-C hasn't mandated a specific data-transfer protocol. It can be backed by USB 2.0, USB 3.2, or even Thunderbolt controllers, meaning speeds range from a measly 0.48 Gbit/s up to a speedy 20 Gbit/s. Consumers and experts alike have found it anything but straightforward to figure out what each USB-C port can do. Despite promising to help, USB4 has made things even worse. USB4 was introduced in 2019 specifically to clear up some confusion. The spec was based on (but not directly compatible with) Thunderbolt 3, bundling DisplayPort 2.0 support, a baseline 20 Gbit/s data speed, and backward compatibility with older standards. While this didn't directly address legacy standards still used over USB-C, the idea was that if your product was USB4-compliant, you'd know what to expect. USB4 was meant to bring order, but instead splintered into a soup of Gen 2×1, 3×2, and Gen 4 variations — each with wildly different speeds from 10 Gbps to 120 Gbps. Confused? You're not alone. Many DisplayPort, power, and PCI features also remain optional. If all that wasn't confusing enough, you'll have to buy a top-of-the-line USB-C cable to ensure the advanced features work correctly. Despite pages of official labeling guidelines, cheap and counterfeit cables have only made the affordability-versus-quality gamble worse. So much for simplicity. Apple bungled it too A reluctant latecomer to USB-C, Apple finally adopted the port with the 2024 iPhone 15 series following the European Commission's ruling. While Apple usually tightly controls and optimizes user experience, being dragged kicking and screaming away from Lightning resulted in a half-assed approach at best. I'd hoped Apple might bring some order to the USB madhouse. Instead, the iPhone embraced the chaos plaguing the wider tech world. If anyone could reign in USB-C it was Apple. Another chance missed. There's no better example than the iPhone 16's data speeds. The budget models still use sluggish USB 2.0 ports — rare outside the cheapest Android phones. Meanwhile, the Pro models are 20x faster but still don't match the 40 Gbps Thunderbolt capabilities of the iPad Pro. Recent iPhone Pro models charge a bit faster than basic models, but Apple has never clarified when this is the case, and hasn't adopted USB PD PPS to boost speeds further. iPhone 15/16 iPhone 15/16 Plus iPhone 15/16 Pro iPhone 15/16 Pro Max Connector iPhone 15/16 USB-C iPhone 15/16 Plus USB-C iPhone 15/16 Pro USB-C iPhone 15/16 Pro Max USB-C Data speed iPhone 15/16 USB 2.0 480Mbps iPhone 15/16 Plus USB 2.0 480Mbps iPhone 15/16 Pro USB 3.1 Gen 2x1 10Gbps iPhone 15/16 Pro Max USB 3.1 Gen 2x1 10Gbps Charging Power iPhone 15/16 20W iPhone 15/16 Plus 20W iPhone 15/16 Pro 20W (~25W recorded) iPhone 15/16 Pro Max 20W (~25W recorded) The only reason the Pros have faster data speeds is to enable the transfer of ProRes video. Otherwise, Apple has done the bare minimum with USB-C to pass muster; it seems more focused on MagSafe as the future standard for its mobile products. The USB-C mess is here to stay Robert Triggs / Android Authority By now, these problems are well-documented, and I'm sure you've experienced some of these frustrations yourself. USB-C is over ten years old and has done little more than give us a reversible connector to use on all our gadgets. That's a small success, but hardly the plug-and-play future we were promised. Worse, the genie is out of the bottle. With everything from headphones, laptops, and VR headsets now mandated to use USB-C, the port is everywhere. But with that ubiquity comes a sprawling mess of standards and support that cannot be undone. There's simply no way to rewind and set things on a simpler path, even if major players like Apple or Google suddenly wanted to. That fragmentation doesn't just frustrate, it undermines one of the fundamental USB-C promises: reducing e-waste. One of USB-C's biggest selling points has been the reduction of clutter and superior reusability across devices. Instead, users are still hoarding multiple cables, chargers, and dongles to cover all possible bases. While the connector is universal in shape, it doesn't always lead to fewer accessories in circulation. If, by some miracle, USB-C gets its act together eventually, what do we do with all of today's accessories? Just bin them? USB-C isn't just frustrating, the mess undermines its eco-promise. USB-C had a unique opportunity to tame the Wild West of data and power cables, unifying them into something simpler. While a fixed specification would have stifled innovation, tighter control with gradual, cohesive upgrades across sibling specifications every few years, preferably with mandatory support levels, would have prevented many of today's issues. Instead, USB-C has become a black box of 101 different capabilities, old and new. It might make a small dent in the e-waste problem, but it could have been so much more. What a spectacular failure.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
US trade team said to extend India stay as talks gather momentum
(Bloomberg) — A US trade team that's currently in India for negotiations has extended its stay, according to people familiar with the matter, in a sign talks are progressing ahead of a July deadline. Next Stop: Rancho Cucamonga! Where Public Transit Systems Are Bouncing Back Around the World ICE Moves to DNA-Test Families Targeted for Deportation with New Contract US Housing Agency Vulnerable to Fraud After DOGE Cuts, Documents Warn Trump Said He Fired the National Portrait Gallery Director. She's Still There. The team, which was initially scheduled to hold talks with Indian officials on June 5-6, will now be staying till Tuesday to continue discussions, the people said, asking not to be identified because the information isn't public. Most of the issues may get finalized within a week, the people estimated. India and the US are working on a phased trade deal with an early agreement targeted for July, the deadline for implementation of the so-called reciprocal tariffs. At the same time, those tariffs are facing legal challenges in Washington. India's Commerce Ministry and the US Trade Representative's office in Washington didn't respond to email requests for comment outside of regular business hours. Local Indian media earlier reported the extension of the visit. Indian Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal described his meeting with US counterpart Howard Lutnick during a visit to the US in May as 'constructive.' Earlier this month, Lutnick said he's 'very optimistic' about prospects for a trade deal between the US and India 'in the not-too-distant future.' India was one of the first countries to begin negotiating a trade deal with the US, hoping to avert President Donald Trump's reciprocal tariffs, which are scheduled to kick in on July 9. —With assistance from P R Sanjai. Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again The SEC Pinned Its Hack on a Few Hapless Day Traders. The Full Story Is Far More Troubling Is Elon Musk's Political Capital Spent? What Does Musk-Trump Split Mean for a 'Big, Beautiful Bill'? Cuts to US Aid Imperil the World's Largest HIV Treatment Program ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio


Android Authority
3 hours ago
- Android Authority
Let's rank all the Android phone camera apps from worst to best
Rita El Khoury / Android Authority There's more to a great camera phone than hardware. Sure, camera sensors, focal lengths, and the chipset all have a major role to play. However, a phone's camera app can make or break the experience. So with this in mind, we decided to rank every major Android phone maker's pre-installed camera app from worst to best! We took several factors into account, namely image quality, the quantity and quality of features (not including gallery features), and the camera app's design. I relied on some colleagues to rank the camera apps, but also used my own discretion in a few places. Either way, this is just for fun, but you can give us your own list in the comments! Which smartphone maker has the best camera app? 1 votes Google 0 % HONOR 0 % Motorola 0 % Nothing 0 % OPPO/OnePlus 0 % Samsung 0 % Sony 0 % TECNO 0 % vivo 100 % Xiaomi 0 % 10. TECNO Hadlee Simons / Android Authority We thought TECNO's HiOS was the worst Android skin out of all the major manufacturers, and the camera app isn't much better. The good news is that the app has a solid, if generic, UI. That's where the positives generally end. My time with 2023's Phantom V Flip and Phantom V Fold devices showed that TECNO's camera app didn't threaten rivals for image quality. Daytime snaps are handled well enough, but low-light performance is inconsistent to outright poor. You'd better enable the Super Night mode in these scenarios. The camera app also tends to suffer from poor zoom quality, even when the phone has a telephoto camera. TECNO's camera app doesn't have many standout features, although basic options like an ultra-steady video mode, night mode, and full-resolution capture are available. There are also plenty of beautification features if that's your thing, including a plump butt filter (seriously). Just don't expect features like Samsung's Single Take or Google's Add Me. At least the brand beat Google to the punch by a few years in offering better support for darker skin tones. 9. HONOR Robert Triggs / Android Authority HONOR routinely offers some fantastic camera hardware, as seen on its Magic 7 Pro and foldable phones. However, the company could do a better job with the camera app. For starters, the camera UI isn't bad, but it lags well behind big-name rivals. There's nothing here that truly screams 'HONOR.' The camera app generally delivers solid image quality. Colleague C Scott Brown praised the consistency across all three rear cameras on the Magic V3 foldable, while Rob Triggs praised the HDR performance in our Magic 7 Pro review. However, Rob sharply criticized the phone's AI-assisted zoom, which added obvious AI-generated imagery at 30x or higher, as well as the AI-enhanced portrait mode. Scott also took issue with the oversaturated colors in general. The camera app also has plenty of modes and features. These include three color profiles, LUT support, a variety of filters, a stage mode, a night video mode, and a 'Falcon Capture' option for fast-moving subjects. It clearly keeps up with other brands in this regard but doesn't pull ahead. 8. Motorola Ryan Haines / Android Authority I relied on our US writers to give me their opinions on Motorola's camera app owing to the brand's ready availability there. Meanwhile, my last experience with a Motorola phone was probably 2016's Moto Z Play. Oof. In any event, the camera app UI is a little generic at first glance, but it evokes the Pixel camera app due to that familiar camera mode carousel. At least you can't accuse Motorola of copying the iPhone camera app. Motorola's image quality hasn't historically been great. Our reviewer complaints over the years include over-sharpened and/or over-saturated images during the day and dark, blurry snaps at night. The camera situation has improved in recent times, but good low-light images aren't a guarantee on its budget phones or the Razr series. The Moto camera app doesn't have the most tricks, either. We've got expected features like portrait mode and night mode, as well as cool additions like horizon-locked stabilization and the ever-fun color pop feature. Fortunately, the latest flagships also offer nifty options like Action Shot, Group Shot, and a Signature Style feature that learns your desired image style. Pretty cool. 7. Sony Alex Walker-Todd / Android Authority Sony is arguably the king of camera software for photography enthusiasts. The company has historically offered plenty of pro-level features in its camera app, including eye-tracking autofocus, several video profiles (e.g., S-Cinetone), and a smorgasbord of manual photo/video controls. The Sony app even lets you pair your phone with a Sony Alpha camera — how cool is that? Sony's app doesn't have a lot of traditional smartphone tools, though, but you still have robust livestream support, portrait mode, a variety of color profiles, full-resolution photo capture, and bokeh video. Sony previously had several camera apps on its phones, making for a messy experience. Thankfully, the company has since integrated all these apps into one camera app. The actual UI design isn't anything to write home about, but it's not bad. We also thought that recent Sony flagship phones, like the Xperia 1 VI, took great images that didn't look over-processed. However, colleague Rob Triggs previously opined that the Xperia 1 V wasn't as consistent as rival handsets, and consistency is key for a great camera app. We haven't reviewed a mid-range Xperia phone in a couple of years, but colleague Adam Birney previously described the Xperia 10 IV's cameras as 'below average.' In other words, there's no guarantee that basic image quality holds up across various price points. 6. Nothing C. Scott Brown / Android Authority Nothing's camera app would be ranked lower on the list, but our US reviewers all ranked it in their top five. I can see why, based on the camera app UI, which offers a distinctive design. You really aren't going to mistake this for a Pixel or iPhone. The company is starting from scratch, so it can't lean on legacy features, but there are a few cool capabilities worth knowing. For one, the Nothing Phone 3a series offers custom camera filters that can be shared with other Nothing Phone owners. These phones also offer a decent variety of neat filters, along with Log video support and the ability to upload custom LUTs for images. In fact, colleague Ryan Haines praised the latter feature last month. You also have the expected portrait and night modes, but that's about it. So you'll have to look elsewhere if you want loads of camera modes and tools. We thought Nothing devices took some solid photos over the past few years using this camera app, although we lamented issues like shutter lag and poor low-light quality on previous phones. But the Nothing Phone 3a series shows the brand has a good handle on hybrid zoom. 5. Xiaomi Aamir Siddiqui / Android Authority Xiaomi has delivered some excellent camera phones in recent years, such as the Xiaomi 15 Ultra and Xiaomi 14 Ultra. These phones have impressive hardware, but the Xiaomi camera app also delivers good image quality. Even the company's cheap Android phones generally offer solid to good 1x shots, although they do tend to lag behind the Pixel A series. The Xiaomi camera app is packed full of features. Options found on flagships include adjustable color profiles on Leica-branded handsets, an AI Zoom toggle for long-range zoom, Log video, a motion capture mode for fast-moving subjects, and more. Cheaper Xiaomi phones lag far behind in terms of modes, but you still have options like a long-exposure suite of modes, a motion capture feature for fast-moving subjects, and a teleprompter mode. I'd argue that Xiaomi's app still doesn't have its own visual identity after all this time. I can take a split-second glance at Samsung or Google's camera app and know what I'm looking at, but the same can't be said for the Xiaomi app. 4. vivo Hadlee Simons / Android Authority The vivo camera app just misses out on a podium spot, but this is still a good showing. Vivo phones generally offer good photo quality, although over-processing can be an issue in some scenarios (e.g., low light). So, those who prefer more natural-looking images might be a little disappointed at times. Easily the best thing about the vivo camera app is the number of features and modes. The company offers a variety of portrait options (e.g. plenty of bokeh styles), some color profiles, LOG video, SuperRaw photos, a cinematic video mode on recent mid-rangers and flagships, handheld astrophotography, a teleprompter mode, perspective correction for buildings, and a street photography mode. The latter mode can be activated with an upward swipe and gives you a camera-like UI and custom shooting profiles. The app isn't going to win any awards as far as looks are concerned. The black, yellow, and white color scheme reminds me of Apple, and there's also the usual overflow menu at the top of the screen. I really like how vivo handles zoom controls, though. It lets you tap the preset zoom buttons a few more times to cycle through more zoom levels (e.g. tapping 1x will give you 1.2x and 1.4x options). So while it's not the best-looking app here, it makes up for this downside in other areas. 3. Samsung Hadlee Simons / Android Authority The Samsung camera app has just undergone a major overhaul as part of the company's One UI 7 update. This redesigned camera app certainly looks and feels fresh compared to rival camera apps while being optimized for one-handed usage. Samsung's app also has a good number of features, including cool options like Single Take, Director's View, and custom filters. Samsung also offers the Expert Raw app to expand the functionality of the stock camera app, but several rival brands offer some of these features without needing an extra camera app. Samsung's app has also long had a reputation for delivering arguably the best video quality on Android, but photo quality isn't as clear-cut. Photos generally look great, but problems like shutter lag on the Ultra and A series phones have made for a frustrating experience. Samsung's cheaper phones also sometimes capture extremely over-saturated snaps, as I found out on the Galaxy A55 5G last year. 2. OnePlus/OPPO Ryan Haines / Android Authority Are you surprised to see the OnePlus/OPPO camera app in the number-two spot? OnePlus flagships, in particular, used to lag behind the competition in terms of image processing, but the company has made major improvements over the past couple of years. In fact, we said the OnePlus 13 makes our shortlist for the best Android camera phone. You can also capture good-quality 1x shots on recently released mid-tier devices. That doesn't sound like a big deal, but it's noteworthy as the firm's cheaper phones used to offer a disappointing shooting experience. The biggest downside to the OnePlus camera app is perhaps the visual design. The viewfinder itself is inoffensive and relatively clean, but the settings menu rips off the iPhone camera's settings page. Perhaps the camera app's biggest strength is the breadth of features, at least on high-end phones. Flagship devices enjoy Hasselblad color profiles, a neat XPAN shooting mode, a Master Mode, and a variety of smart scenes (e.g. stage, fireworks). Cheaper OnePlus and OPPO phones definitely get the very short end of the stick, but you still have notable features like high-resolution shooting, long-exposure functionality, portrait photo/video capture, and tilt-shift. 1. Google C. Scott Brown / Android Authority Is this the greatest Android OEM camera app ever made? It's hard to argue from a historical perspective, as the Pixel camera app was the gold standard for almost a decade. It says a lot about your camera app when enthusiasts continue to unofficially port it to other smartphones in 2025. Google's camera app certainly looks the business, offering a simple, distinctive UI. I'm still not a fan of the pro settings icon in the bottom right corner, though, as I often confuse it for the main settings menu. Nevertheless, the Pixel camera app's popularity stems from its image quality. Google's HDR+ imaging algorithms were a cut above almost every other brand's image-processing software in the 2010s, as unofficial ports of the app delivered fantastic photos on even $200 phones. A few manufacturers have caught and arguably surpassed Google in 2025, but Pixel phones still generally take fantastic, natural-looking images. Google's app continues to deliver class-leading hybrid zoom, too, thanks to its Super Res Zoom tech. That means phones like the Pixel 9 Pro can take great 10x shots while mid-range Pixels without a telephoto camera still do a decent job out to 3x or 4x. Google's camera app offers standout features like Add Me, Video Boost, a shadow slider, and an astrophotography mode. However, the app is missing features seen on rival devices like user-selectable color profiles, Log video mode, native 8K capture, 4K/120fps video, and multi-camera capture. In spite of the feature gap, the Pixel camera app is still our pick for the top camera app among Android brands.