From memes to misinformation: Gen Z creators fight back against antisemitism online
But in the last few years, especially since October 7, it has become mainstream: a digital virus, spreading at light speed through the smartphones of younger generations.
This is not the antisemitism of our grandparents' era. Today, it thrives in the algorithms. It hides in TikTok trends, in manipulated Instagram Reels, in "funny" memes with dangerous undertones. Misinformation can be dressed up with trending audio and rack up millions of views before the real story has even logged on. And because social media has become the primary lens through which Gen Z and Gen Alpha see the world, these narratives aren't just influencing opinion, they're shaping identities.
Unfortunately, when it comes to Israel and the Jewish people, the digital sphere is dominated by political content designed to isolate Israel and attack Jews who support it.
TalkIsrael was created to change that.
TalkIsrael is a nonprofit with a clear mission: meet young people where they are, in their feeds, and tell Israel's story with authenticity, speed and creativity. The organization empowers Gen Z creators through free workshops, mentorship and influencer collaborations to produce short, scroll-stopping videos and relatable content. Every piece is grounded in real stories and honest storytelling, which dismantles misinformation and builds pride.
It's a recognition of a simple truth: If you want to reach the next generation, you have to speak their language. That language is visual, fast-paced and driven by authenticity. The old model of issuing press releases or holding panel discussions won't reach a 16-year-old scrolling at midnight, but a 25-second reel capturing everyday life in vibrant Israeli neighborhoods - shared by a creator they already follow - just might.
The rise of digital antisemitism didn't happen overnight. The vacuum that allowed it to grow was created by years of silence in the social media space, years when Jewish and pro-Israel voices were drowned out by aggressive, coordinated campaigns from Israel's detractors. TalkIsrael is proof that the tide can turn, but only if we show up authentically, in the same places and with the same skill.
This isn't just about protecting Israel's image globally; it's about protecting Jewish students in American high schools and colleges from walking into classrooms where their peers' only exposure to the Jewish story comes from misleading or malicious posts online.
Antisemitism has adapted to the era of the iPhone. Now, so have we. TalkIsrael's work is a blueprint for the fight ahead: authentic, creative, and in the palm of your hand.
Because if the fight against antisemitism is happening on social media, the answer isn't to log off. It's to log on smarter, stronger and with pride.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
6 hours ago
- Atlantic
The Awkward Adolescence of a Media Revolution
There's a quiet revolution in how millions of Americans decide what's real. Trust is slipping away from traditional institutions—media, government, and higher education—and shifting to individual voices online, among them social-media creators. The Reuters Institute reports that this year, for the first time, more Americans will get their news from social and video platforms—including Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, TikTok, and X—than from traditional outlets. According to Pew Research, one in five adults now regularly turns to influencers for news. For anyone who cares about credible information, this is a potentially terrifying prospect. Social media rewards virality, not veracity. Spend five minutes scrolling TikTok or Instagram and you might encounter influencers 'educating' you about a global elite running the world from 'hidden continents' behind an 'ice wall' in Antarctica, or extolling the virtues of zeolite, 'a volcanic binder for mold' that will 'vacuum clean all kinds of toxins' to lift brain fog, prevent cancer, and remove microplastics from testicles. (Link to purchase in bio.) It's an environment perfectly engineered to scale both misinformation and slick grifts. And yet the popular notion that social media is just a dumpster fire of viral lies misses something vital: Millions of people still care about truth. They are seeking facts on social media from credible voices they can trust. They just aren't always sure where to find it or from whom. I know because I interact with these people every day. I was among the first independent journalists to bring news reporting to Instagram; today my outlet, News Not Noise, spans Instagram, YouTube, a podcast, Substack, and other platforms. In my years of directly engaging with an on-platform audience, the question I receive more than any other remains simply, 'Is this true?' I'm here to tell you the truth isn't dead. Thousands of people like me operate online as what I call 'evidence-based creators.' We're journalists and specialists who use expertise, original reporting, and reliable sources to refute misinformation, add context to breaking news, and answer the endless questions flooding our DMs. The topics we cover range from redistricting to medical misinformation, beauty fads to whether that viral health-food trend might actually kill you. The work is an uphill battle. My cohort is not John Oliver–level media personalities with PR teams, production crews, and a research staff to fact-check the punch lines. We are independent voices operating without safety nets. I like to think of us as the digital equivalent of artisanal chefs working in a factory for mass-produced junk food. The very things that make us valuable—our obsession with facts, our commitment to nuance, our hours spent answering audience questions in the apps—put us at a profound disadvantage in the attention economy. What does it take to produce a slick video claiming that beef tallow is nature's Viagra? Fifteen minutes with an iPhone and zero regard for reality. While we're still sourcing assertions and trying to make complex ideas both accurate and engaging, the bullshit factory has already pumped out six more viral falsehoods. Our secret weapon isn't production value or algorithm hacking; it's trust. When I debunk a viral lie, I'm not a faceless institution. I'm the person who's been with my audience while they brush their teeth every morning, the person who's been in their ears during commutes, the person whose face they've studied through hundreds of 90-second windows into complex issues. This isn't an audience of passive consumers. They're hungry for more—more reporting on more topics, more conversations with experts, more explanations that break things down but don't treat an audience like idiots. 'Can the Supreme Court disbar an attorney?' 'Will the military disobey unconstitutional orders?' 'Do I need another measles vaccine as an adult?' All of this leaves evidence-based creators in a strange limbo. We're clearly valued; Substack, for instance, is proving that audiences are willing to stop scrolling and financially support 'verifiers' they trust. But we're still largely disconnected from the resources and collaborative frameworks that could multiply our impact. We're working so hard at the work itself that we have little opportunity to build the scaffolding required to create a durable new model in digital publishing—one that includes tools such as high-powered marketing and growth engines to reach new audiences, editorial oversight to help with difficult judgment calls, and shared research that would prevent each of us from having to build expertise from scratch with every breaking story. I see this obstacle as an opportunity. History shows us that industries facing technological disruption tend not to simply collapse—they transform. Look at what happened to the music industry when Spotify and its streaming cohort crashed the party. In the old days, musicians lived and died by album sales and radio play, with major labels acting as gatekeepers. Then streaming blew the doors off. The revolution was messy. Many artists found themselves with more listeners than ever but paychecks that wouldn't cover a month's worth of ramen. What helped the music industry find its footing wasn't nostalgia for CDs or vinyl. It was new infrastructure: playlist curation that helped listeners find their next obsession, analytics tools that told artists who was actually listening, distribution services that got music onto platforms, and business models that went beyond streaming royalties to include direct-to-fan revenue and merchandising. Artists still face challenges, but now labels are investing heavily in data to understand trends, offering artists different types of deals, and using their marketing muscle to help artists cut through the digital noise. The industry evolved by creating tools that complemented streaming algorithms instead of fighting them—helping artists understand their audiences, not just pray for a decent playlist placement. In our current information ecosystem, we're stuck in the awkward adolescence of a media revolution. The need for innovation couldn't be more urgent. Local newspapers are dying like mall food courts— 2,500-plus have shut down since 2005. Traditional media outlets are under assault by the Trump administration. And AI is flooding us with convincing fake content, making human truth tellers all the more necessary. Conversations about the press and the tech revolution often get stuck on the problems with or the inadequacy of any solution. It's time that changed. So I'll take the leap and propose some imperfect innovations. First, audiences could benefit from an independent, off-platform certification system to help them discern which independent voices adhere to journalistic standards. Not to be all 'Papers, please' about it, but audiences need signals about who's committed to accuracy versus who's just chasing likes. One solution: a nonprofit voluntary opt-in LEED-type certification that awards something like a blue check mark—but vetted far more rigorously—to creators who use agreed-upon trusted sources, check their facts, and reveal when their content is sponsored. I'm aware that any credentialing system risks backlash from those suspicious of 'gatekeeping.' But people shouldn't be disparaged for 'doing their own research' if they aren't offered the tools to tell reality from fiction. Second, evidence-based creators need support. Imagine a fractional-ownership model where like-valued creators buy into a shared professional framework. With an economy of scale, we could collectively share in things such as legal protection and sophisticated audience-development tools designed specifically for evidence-based content. We could sign sponsors who understand the unique value of trusted voices. We could offer bundled subscriptions to help audiences find more of us at once. This could create sustainable revenue streams without compromising integrity. Finally, legacy media, please stop viewing creators as a threat. We don't have to be competitors—we can be the connective tissue between trusted journalism and the platforms where people now consume most of their information. Traditional media outlets can stay relevant in the new digital reality by partnering with us. But first, it'd help if they'd allow for the possibility that what's happening isn't just the death of an old system—it's the messy, complicated birth of a new one. And like a newborn, it needs more than good intentions in order to thrive.
Black America Web
7 hours ago
- Black America Web
Mamdani And Cuomo Spar Over Affordable Housing
Source: Michael M. Santiago / Getty With a little over three months left until New York City elects a new mayor, two of its most prominent candidates in Zohran Mamdani and Andrew Cuomo are verbally clashing. This time, Cuomo is attacking the frontrunner over his platform message of adding affordability in housing for citizens, questioning why he's living in a rent-stabilized apartment in Astoria, Queens, while making a $140,000 salary. While appearing at the National Dominican Day Parade on Sunday (Aug. 10), Cuomo attacked Mamdani and said he would create a new law to highlight the Democratic candidate's alleged hypocrisy. 'I think rent stabilized units when they're vacant should only be rented to people who need affordable housing, not people like Zohran Mamdani, and I'm gonna call it Zohran's law, because it is an abuse of the system,' he said to reporters. Mamdani fired back on Monday (Aug. 11), saying: 'What Andrew Cuomo is proposing, be it the rent control he cited, the rent stabilization, he intends to speak about, is in many ways reflective of the fact that I live rent free in his head.' He added that he had a salary of $50,000 at the time he moved into his apartment. The state assemblyman did express that he was against needs testing and income limits for housing. Incidentally, Cuomo currently resides in an apartment on the east side of Manhattan for $8,000 a month. The exchange is the latest between Cuomo and Mamdani, with Cuomo opting to deliver barrages against the candidate who defeated him soundly in the Democratic primary months ago. Cuomo, who served as the former governor of New York until stepping down in 2021 over sexual harassment allegations, was blasted by Mamdani campaign spokeswoman Dora Pekec, who called his comments 'desperate' before adding: 'If Mr. Cuomo really cared for working people in New York City, he'd commit today to reimburse the taxpayers the $60 million we are spending on his personal legal defense — which could pay for thousands of affordable housing units instead of probing the gynecological records of women he harassed.' Currently, the first poll released by Siena about the mayoral race shows that Mamdani still holds a strong lead of 19 percentage points over Cuomo, also holding a good share of potential Democratic voters. Cuomo still has an edge, however, over Mamdani as well as Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa and the incumbent Eric Adams among Black and Jewish voters. SEE ALSO Mamdani And Cuomo Spar Over Affordable Housing was originally published on
7 hours ago
Man throws sandwich at Border Patrol officer in DC, faces federal assault charges
A Washington, D.C., man is charged with assaulting a federal officer after they say he threw a sandwich at a Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agent during a confrontation this week, according to court documents. Sean Charles Dunn faces federal charges for allegedly throwing a sub-style sandwich at a CBP officer who was patrolling with Metro Transit Police in Northwest Washington around 11 p.m. on Sunday. According to the criminal complaint, Dunn approached the officer while shouting "f--- you! You f------ fascists! Why are you here? I don't want you in my city!" After several minutes of confrontation, Dunn threw the sandwich, striking the officer in the chest, the complaint says. The alleged incident was apparently captured in a video posted to Instagram. Authorities say that after attempting to flee, Dunn was apprehended and later admitted to the incident while being processed at the police station, allegedly telling an officer, "I did it. I threw the sandwich." The incident comes amid heightened tensions over federal law enforcement presence in the District. President Donald Trump recently announced plans to deploy National Guard troops in Washington, D.C., declaring a public safety emergency and putting the Metropolitan Police Department under partial federal oversight for 30 days. District Council member Brooke Pinto, who chairs the Committee on the Judiciary and Public Safety, expressed concern about the increased federal presence. "It paints a picture of a city that is not my own and is not the experience of the vast majority of District residents and visitors," Pinto told ABC News. While Trump has cited rising crime as justification for federal intervention, police statistics show violent crime has actually decreased. 'Violent crime in DC reached historic 30-year lows last year, and is down another 26% so far this year,' DC Attorney General Brian Schwalb said on X. The president maintains his stance, saying Wednesday, "Fighting crime is a good thing... Instead of saying 'He's a dictator,' they should say, 'We're going to join him and make Washington safe.'" Dunn has not yet entered a plea, and court records show no attorney listed for his defense.
