logo
‘My baby is ugly' — a candid warning about the horrors of motherhood

‘My baby is ugly' — a candid warning about the horrors of motherhood

Times10-05-2025

There has been a lot of brutally honest writing about motherhood in the 24 years since Rachel Cusk's memoir A Life's Work blew the whole maternal contentment racket wide open. The taboos on anxiety, depression, milk and gore are long gone. The only thing that might shock now would be a literary writer declaring her joy in having a baby.
Even so, it's a surprise to read a woman admitting, as Sarah Hoover does in Motherload, to finding her baby 'ugly' and impossible to bond with. In her son, Guy, Hoover sees 'all my worst traits: weird eyes and big ears'. She writes that he 'meant as much to me as a stone-cold marble statue in the antiquities section of an art museum — aka something that I knew was valuable but not so much to me'.
Hoover, 40, is a former director of the Gagosian gallery in New York, where she lives with her husband, the artist Tom Sachs. When they met in 2007 he was 41 and established, while she was a 23-year-old gallery assistant. For Hoover, anxious about her status, marriage represented 'my little power trip, a small corner I could control in the grand design of our relationship'. They married in 2012 and in 2017 Guy arrived.
In retrospect the warning signs were clear. Hoover suffered from nausea during her pregnancy to the point that just thinking about lettuce could make her retch. Her labour was slow and agonising, the baby's spine pressing against hers with each contraction. Her husband was distracted by his work and emotionally unfaithful.
On top of that the medical care she received was often not caring. When she asked a doctor about her relentless sickness, she was told to tolerate the 'discomfort' because 'you're nothing but a house for your baby for ten months'. The birth was even worse: the same doctor (a woman) manually broke Hoover's waters with little warning or explanation, causing 'pain so deep inside my body that I didn't even know it could hurt there'.
For Hoover, this violation recalled every physical assault she had ever suffered, from groping to rape (Guy was born in the same week that Harvey Weinstein's abuses were exposed). 'I don't think I'll ever be able to reconcile that I'm supposed to allow medical instruments and penises inside this same cavity and just turn off the different emotions that each provokes,' she writes. A misandrist rage consumed her. She was angry all the time, especially at her husband.
Instead of love for her son she felt terrible, overbearing fear: 'Every night, in my dreams, I watched the baby die … he'd be shot by snipers, thrown onto the train tracks, burnt up in a house fire.' Intrusive thoughts like these are relatively common among new mothers (I used to be haunted by the idea of dropping my baby down the stairs to my flat), but Hoover's were so ceaseless and vivid she came to think of them as a form of psychosis.
• We need to tell the truth about what motherhood does to women
Hoover is a great narrator of her descent, often funny and never self-exculpatory. 'My breakdown,' she writes, 'was embarrassing at times, especially considering how it exposed me as a puerile and spoiled little fool.' Without that caustic note it might indeed be hard to sympathise with a woman who could afford to hire a full-time, live-in nanny so she could escape into getting high as much of the time as possible.
A particular low came when Hoover was dragged out to accompany her husband to a Guggenheim gala — she prepared for the art world's big night out by mixing mushrooms with the opioid Vicodin. Her post-pregnancy boobs broke the zip of her dress and her infuriated husband was left hissing: 'People are looking. Tracey Emin is looking. Your butt's out.' After this she rented a bungalow at the Chateau Marmont hotel in Los Angeles and took more drugs.
The only point where Hoover lost me is when she got to the nub of her complaint, which is this: 'Birth and motherhood did not match up to the narrative I'd been fed and it felt like a nasty trick … I'd been misled.' Misled by whom, though? Where is the lie of motherly joy coming from? Certainly not from memoirs, which are dominated by unhappy domesticity. In the past couple of years alone, the poet Maggie Smith (You Could Make This Place Beautiful) and writer Leslie Jamison (Splinters) have taken on the Cusk mantle with their stories of maternal frustration and marital collapse. Surely no well-read young woman could come away with the idea that becoming a mother is a painless process.
When Cusk published A Life's Work in 2001, one reviewer wrote, 'If everyone were to read this book, the propagation of the human race would virtually cease.' For what it's worth, I suspect there's a link between the rise of the motherhood misery memoir and the decline in fertility rates, but I think that it runs in the opposite direction. It's not that women are avoiding having children because they are reading these books. They are reading these books because they don't want to have children. Stories of lost selves, shattered relationships and wrung-out bodies are most appealing as a reminder of what you've avoided: this is some other poor cow's fate, not yours.
Hoover writes that she had no interest in having a child until she and her husband decided to have one. Even if she did pay attention to what other women were saying about pregnancy, why would she — a person with no intention of getting pregnant — apply it to herself? All the warnings in the world mean little if you don't think they are addressed to you.
• 'Negative tales of motherhood nearly put me off having a baby'
For a quarter of a century the dominant mode of writing about motherhood has been negative. I have no ideological beef with the genre, 'but if its aim was to inform other women that a woman of Hoover's intelligence and education can still claim ignorance about the tough side of maternity, then that suggests it has failed.' please change to but if its aim was to warn the mothers to come, then you have to say that it's failed if a woman of Hoover's intelligence and education can still claim ignorance about the tough side of maternity.
With the support of a therapist, Hoover was eventually able to confront her past and her not-so-loyal husband. 'Now I was glad to say I saw all men, all people, as unique entities capable of their own special brands of shitty and loving behaviours,' she writes. She also realises that her fears for Guy mean she probably always did love him through her crack-up.
She feels, finally, like a mother — not just someone with a baby — and she finds purpose in being an advocate for better care for women. 'I will not stop talking about this until the end of time,' she writes. That's laudable, but my fear is if Hoover wasn't listening to Cusk et al for all those years, will anyone listen to Hoover now?
The Motherload: Episodes from the Brink of Motherhood by Sarah Hoover (Simon & Schuster £20 pp352). To order a copy go to timesbookshop.co.uk. Free UK standard P&P on orders over £25. Special discount available for Times+ members

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Aimee Lou Wood and Walton Goggins on ‘ridiculous' feud rumours
Aimee Lou Wood and Walton Goggins on ‘ridiculous' feud rumours

BreakingNews.ie

time27 minutes ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Aimee Lou Wood and Walton Goggins on ‘ridiculous' feud rumours

The White Lotus co-stars Aimee Lou Wood and Walton Goggins have both denied rumours that either of them are in a feud as 'ridiculous'. There has been speculation that the two co-stars had drifted apart after being on the HBO show, which follows the lives of guests and staff at a luxury resort as dark secrets are revealed and tensions rise over the course of the holiday. Advertisement The third series sees the positive Chelsea, played by British actress Wood, 31, try to keep her mysterious older boyfriend, Rick, played by 53-year-old US actor Goggins, calm in Thailand. Walton Goggins. (Ian West/PA) Following the 2025 series, Goggins appeared to step away from his fellow co-stars, and unfollow Greater Manchester-born Wood on Instagram. They both addressed the swirling rumours during a joint interview for US publication Variety, which was published on Wednesday. Goggins said: 'There is no feud. I adore, I love this woman (Aimee) madly, and she is so important to me.' Advertisement He added that 'she's special', and explained he had not addressed the reports before as he did not want to talk about Wood when she was not there. 'I think it's such a comment on where we're at culturally. Why is everyone obsessing over Instagram? That is irrelevant. We don't give a shite about Instagram,' Wood said. Goggins said that when he finished The White Lotus he 'needed to just back away from everyone', as it is his 'process' when filming a project ends. 'It's all so ridiculous,' he said. Advertisement 'It's just a part of me just saying goodbye to this character so that now Aimee and I will be friends for f****** ever.' Wood previously criticised a Saturday Night Live sketch, with an cast member impersonating her with exaggerated prosthetic teeth, calling it 'mean and unfunny' on Instagram. She told Variety that it 'felt misogynistic. It felt like the punchline was a woman's appearance, which is just not funny. It's not cool'. Goggins shared the same sketch online and praised Jon Hamm for playing a version of his character, before deleting the Instagram post, ahead of hosting SNL> Advertisement He said he was 'gonna say it (something) to your face', and added: 'I don't use social media in any way, and I'm not a mean guy.' SNL apologised for the April sketch, according to Wood, and the comedian and cast member who impersonated her, Sarah Sherman, sent her flowers to apologise. Wood is also known for Netflix teen show Sex Education, BBC comedy Daddy Issues and the 2022 drama film Living with Bill Nighy. Goggins has been in Western series Justified, post-apocalyptic series Fallout, and drama Sons Of Anarchy. Advertisement He has had two Emmy nods, while Wood has won a TV Bafta for Sex Education and been given a Rising Star Bafta nomination.

Resident of one of NYC's tallest skyscrapers says visitors are terrified by view from his windows
Resident of one of NYC's tallest skyscrapers says visitors are terrified by view from his windows

Daily Mail​

time28 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Resident of one of NYC's tallest skyscrapers says visitors are terrified by view from his windows

A New York City resident has shared the incredible views he experiences from his luxury penthouse apartment although visitors have said they were 'terrified' by the experience. The man, who goes by @NYChighlife on TikTok, regularly uploads videos of views from his home, from dazzling sunsets over the city to thick, ominous fog that engulfs the top half of the building. The resident appears to live in 30 Hudson Yards, a distinguishable 'supertall' skyscraper situated on the West Side of Midtown Manhattan. One person wrote: 'I'd never live there not because I'm scared of heights, but if there's something happening in the building good luck getting out in time.' Another observed: 'Is it me or are the windows terrifying,' while another added, 'Imagine how much more scarier lightning is.' At 1,270 feet, it currently stands as the seventh-tallest building in New York City, and the ninth-tallest in the United States - so it's no surprise it offers one of the most stellar views of the Big Apple. The building also has a triangular observation deck, named The Edge, on the 100th floor, as well as a bar and event space on the 101st floor. In one clip, uploaded in 2022, the resident showed off the 'beautiful view' from his apartment on a particularly wet and gloomy day, which often results in white clouds blanketing the top of the building. The man explained that he his journey home is 'long and perilous', but it's 'all worth it to see the world above the clouds'. In the video, he gets the lift to his apartment at the top of the building, before turning the camera to the 'blinding white light' shining through the windows in his lounge. He then sticks his hand out of the window - which does not appear to have a safety lock installed - to demonstrate how he can touch the 'moist' clouds. He pans the camera to the ground below, which is entirely blocked from view from the thick clouds above. In another recent video, the resident flaunted the stunning spectacle from his high-rise home as a golden sunset swept over New York City, which saw him 'hurry' to his apartment to get a birds-eye view. He captured his ascent to the top of the building, including the moment he 'tipped' the concierge so he could bypass other residents waiting in line at the elevator and 'go up as fast as possible past the cheaper floors'. The man then entered his apartment, before panning his camera towards his windows, where dazzling hues of pink, purple and orange danced over the sprawling skyline and Hudson River. Although many viewers were left impressed by the resident's unique view of the city, many slammed the content creator for his 'rude' and 'narcissistic' attitude, while others questioned the safety of the apartment. A fourth said: 'Legally to have windows open fully on a floor that level is crazy,' while another quizzed, 'Anybody else's stomachs churn a little when he stuck his phone out the window?' Other questioned the legitimacy of the resident's so-called 'luxury' lifestyle, as one viewer jabbed: 'Someone who actually has money doesn't need to validate themselves online by literally only posting about their high rise penthouse.' Another wrote: 'Gave him a tip and cheaper floors? I don't like this narcissistic language tbh.' While one commented, 'Why didn't you just say lower floors? This was rude calling them cheaper floors,' while a third added, 'Cheaper floors? You think you live in heaven?'

An AP discussion on the courts, lawyers and testimony inside the Diddy, Weinstein and Mangione cases
An AP discussion on the courts, lawyers and testimony inside the Diddy, Weinstein and Mangione cases

The Independent

time31 minutes ago

  • The Independent

An AP discussion on the courts, lawyers and testimony inside the Diddy, Weinstein and Mangione cases

Julie Walker, AP radio correspondent: We're here to talk about three big cases in New York. Sean "Diddy" Combs charged with sex trafficking and racketeering by the Feds. He pled not guilty. Down the street in state court, Harvey Weinstein's retrial by the Manhattan DA on rape and sex assault charges. He also pled not to guilty. And then there's Luigi Mangione. He's charged by both the state and the Feds with killing United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson and has also pled not guilty. Joining me now, two of the Associated Press reporters covering the cases and the courts, Larry Neumeister and Mike Sisak. And I'm Julie Walker. All right, let's start with Sean "Diddy" Combs, what's been going on with that trial? Larry Neumeister, AP courts reporter: They're fascinated by a celebrity on trial. And as part of that, I've been trying to figure out what was he really called around his office? Was he called Diddy? Was he call Puff Daddy? Was called he Puff? Was he, called you know, Sean Combs? A lot of the witnesses seem to have called him Puff every day at the office. So that's my first takeaway from the trial. Mike, how about you? Michael Sisak, AP law enforcement reporter: I think it's fascinating that you have Sean Combs on trial at the same time as Harvey Weinstein's retrial, because you have the arc of the #MeToo movement playing out in the entertainment industry and across different aspects of the entertainment industry. Harvey Weinstein 's allegations in 2017 really kickstarted the #MeToo movement. He then had his trial in 2020. Now we're sort of on the other side of that arc where it's Sean Combs opening a window into the hip-hop industry, into the music industry, certainly the most famous, most well-known person from that aspect of entertainment, on trial, and you see the media and public attention gravitating to the Combs trial, to the Diddy trial, much more so than the Weinstein retrial, in part because of the fascination with celebrity. NEUMEISTER: And plus, I think with Weinstein, he's convicted out in LA. So, because he's already, you know, going to be in jail, even if he got exonerated at this second trial, he's still sentenced to a long time in prison. SISAK: He has a form of cancer, he has heart issues, he has all of these things that have only gotten worse, his lawyers say, since that first trial. But to your point, Larry, yes, he is convicted in Los Angeles, and the retrial in New York was caused by an appeals court overturning that 2020 conviction. WALKER: So, to sum it up for just one moment, two very different men, but at one point, very powerful, thought to be very untouchable. And I want to get back to both of them, but I want a pivot just for a minute and remind everyone that we're also talking about Luigi Mangione. SISAK: The fascinating thing about the Mangione case is that he could wind up in both courthouses. You have Diddy in the federal courthouse, you have Weinstein in the state courthouse, and Mangione faces murder charges in both the federal jurisdiction and the state jurisdiction. And initially, we thought and were told by prosecutors that the state case would proceed first. Now the state case, the maximum punishment would be life in prison. However, the Trump administration has gone ahead and filed paperwork indicating that they will seek the death penalty in the federal case, that case appears like it will now be the first one out. His next court date in the federal case is not until December. NEUMEISTER: Seeking the death penalty right off the bat adds one year to everything, and probably two to three years in the long run, because everything will get appealed to the hilt, certainly if they found the death-penalty. But the last time I saw in Manhattan them, the prosecutors seeking a death penalty, was in 2001, and it was two guys charged in an attack on two African embassies that like over 100 people. I think it's hard to win a death penalty case in Manhattan. WALKER: Now the other interesting thing is that Luigi Mangione and Sean "Diddy" Combs are in the same jail right now. SISAK: Yeah, Mangione and Combs are both at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, which is a federal jail that has been in the headlines not only because of the celebrity guests there. Sam Bankman-Fried, the cryptocurrency scammer, was also detained there, but also because that jail has a lot of problems. It's the only federal jail in New York City now. They closed the one in Manhattan where Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide. NEUMEISTER: And you know what, we've had a lot of celebrities appear in the federal courts in Manhattan. I mean, over the years, we had Martha Stewart convicted here. We had, just in the last year or two, we had Robert De Niro in the Robert De Niro civil trial. Well, one thing that's interesting about this Sean Combs trial that I don't think I've ever seen is so many witnesses that are subpoenaed to appear in the trial. We must have had a good four or five witnesses who were subpoenaed to appear. A couple of them said they definitely didn't want to testify. One of them would have pleaded the fifth, but was given immunity. So he testified. He said it was the last place he wanted to be. And what that enables is the defense to really kind of co-opt them as their witness. WALKER: You're talking about the ex-assistant. NEUMEISTER: Yes, George Kaplan, I believe is his name, and he appeared and said all these wonderful things about Sean Combs. He still sends him birthday greetings every year, although he did remark that he invited Combs to his wedding and Combs didn't even respond. So, you know, I don't know how that plays to the jury. But yeah, you know, there's so many witnesses and the defense lawyers more than I've ever seen in I think any trial I've witnessed in 33 years covering the courts, the defense lawyers keep treating a lot of these witnesses as their friendly witness. WALKER: I want to get back to the defense and his defense team, but let's talk about the jury for a minute, because a lot of people ask me about that since I have been in court with the two of you. And obviously, you know, the jury is anonymous. Eight men, four women, and then the six alternates, and it's like a slice of life from New York. NEUMEISTER: Well, there's many kinds of anonymous juries, and this is not a super anonymous jury like you have at a terrorism trial where by the end of the trial, all you know is they had numbers. It doesn't seem to be the kind of anonymity that jurors sometimes get to protect their safety or things like that. So, it's more of a milder version of an anonymous jury. But one thing I've seen with this jury that I've hardly ever seen with a jury is incredible attention to every witness. They turn in their chairs, they're pointed toward the witness, they're scribbling notes like mad. I've never seen so much as a juror yawn, although I did see Kid Cudi, he was yawning several times. SISAK: To your point, Larry, I think, you know, you talk about the anonymous jury, or at least the anonymity in that we don't know their names. These high profile cases, more and more, you're seeing judges take extra steps to protect the jury. And in the case of Sean Combs, you also had allegations of witness tampering, witness interference, leading to his arrest in September of 2024. So that could also explain why some of these witnesses are reluctant to come forward. NEUMEISTER: That's the main reason he wasn't given bail, is that they felt he was a threat to witnesses and had reached out to a couple of them. WALKER: Now, in New York, court cases are not televised. We do have sketch artists who are allowed to be in the courtroom, and then we are able to show those sketches. And we see a very different looking Diddy. His hair is completely gray, his goatee gray. He is allowed to wear his own clothes, as is Harvey Weinstein. Let's talk a little bit about what we're actually seeing that people aren't privy to. NEUMEISTER: Can't have dye, right, Mike? SISAK: What we've learned from this trial is that Sean Combs, according to his assistant who testified, was using Just For Men to hide gray hair and he had jet black hair up until the time he was arrested and put in jail last year. And then we also learned that hair dye is not allowed in jail. So in court, he has had this gray salt and pepper hair, goatee. He has been allowed to wear for the trial, sweaters, button down shirts, khakis and the like. It's a stark difference in look. NEUMEISTER: I'll tell you though, the guy is so involved with his defense, it's like off the charts, kind of amazing. I don't think I've ever seen this to this degree before. There was a witness, it was Kid Cudi, where at the end of his testimony, the prosecutors got him to say he believed Sean Combs was lying when he said he didn't know anything about his car when he brought it up. Kid Cudi's car was exploded in his driveway one day with a Molotov cocktail. And absolutely destroyed. And so he had a meeting with Sean Combs some weeks after that. And at the very end of the meeting, he said, brought up the car. And Sean Combs said, 'oh, what are you talking about? I don't know anything about that.' And after, as soon as that, the prosecutor finished asking the questions, got that response, then two lawyers, one on each side of Combs looked to him Combs said no, and only then did the lawyers inform the judge that there would be no more questioning. SISAK: I recall being in the courtroom earlier in the trial when some images were shown from some of the videotapes at issue here with these sex marathons that have become known in his parlance as "freak-offs." And there was a binder of some of these images, and Combs was sitting next to his lawyer and waved over, hey, I want to see those, and he's looking through them and he's holding the press, the public. We were not allowed to see these images. Their graphic images. The defendant, of course, was allowed to see them and he held them in a way that we could not see what he was looking at. And then he passed it back. And then other times he's hunched over a laptop computer looking at exhibits that are showing text messages and emails that were exchanged over the years with various people involved in the case. And then when there are breaks, we see him standing up, stretching, turning around, looking at his supporters in the gallery. His mother has been there. Some of his children have been there, some of his daughters have left the courtroom during the especially graphic testimony. But at other times, when his children are there, when his supporters are there, he's shaping his hands in the shape of a heart. He's pointing at them. He's saying, I love you. He's whispering. There was a moment when another reporter and I were sitting in the courtroom during a break and Sean Combs turns around, there's nobody in front of us and he asks us how we're doing. We say hi back to him because you're in such close proximity. We're only 10 feet apart or so. I'll pivot quickly to the Harvey Weinstein case where there's not as much of that because while Harvey Weinstein does have a contingent of supporters, it's mostly paid supporters, his publicist, his lawyers, his jury consultant. People that he will wave to and talk to and acknowledge as he's being wheeled into the courtroom. He uses a wheelchair to get in and out of court. One of the interesting things that ties the Sean Combs case and the Luigi Mangione case is one of the lawyers, Marc Agnifilo, represents both of those men. Karen Friedman Agnifilo is the lead defense attorney for Luigi Mangione. She is married to Marc Agnifilo. They are partners in the same law firm and Marc Agnifilo is ostensibly the lead attorney for Sean Combs. He is also assisting on Luigi Mangione's defense, both in the state and federal case. WALKER: In the beginning of the Combs case, the jury was shown that explosive video that the public already saw in the L.A. hotel hallway of Combs dragging Cassie and kicking her when she's on the ground and he made a public apology on his social media to her. And his lawyers have said that he's not a perfect person and he has anger issues, but he's not charged with domestic abuse. SISAK: The refrain from the defense has been that, if anything, there could have been domestic violence charges brought against Sean Combs back in 2016. Those charges would have been brought in a California court by Los Angeles police. There has not been any real discussion of an investigation in 2016 of any effort to charge Sean Combs with domestic violence at that time. So, in some sense, while it's a thread that the defense is pulling, that he's actually charged with sex trafficking and racketeering in this federal case, it almost is a bit of apples and oranges in the sense that the violence that the defenses conceding to, prosecutors allege, was part of the mechanism of the racketeer of the sex trafficking. In other words, they allege that Sean Combs used violence to keep people quiet, to people compliant. NEUMEISTER: And a lot of charges like domestic violence are all kind of things they could have brought against Sean Combs years ago. Well, there's a statute of limitations that would rule out certain charges. And certain charges just, there is no federal domestic violence charge. So when the feds go after somebody, they look for what kind of charges are federal crimes. And in this case, sex trafficking, bringing people across state lines to do illegal sex acts, or racketeering, which can involve many different things, including that 2016 tape of Cassie being beat up by Sean Combs by the Elevator Bank in that Los Angeles hotel. That, actually, is a centerpiece of the evidence against Combs in this case. WALKER: The point is that that hallway video of Diddy beating up Cassie is actually part of the case of racketeering because he's using violence to control people. NEUMEISTER: Listen, there's violence all through this, right Mike? SISAK: The Kid Cudi arc in this narrative, which is in 2011, Cassie, who's the longtime girlfriend of Sean Combs, starts dating Kid Cudi. Combs is upset about that, according to this witness, Capricorn Clark. Combs comes into her home holding a gun, kidnaps Capricorn Clark, takes her to Kid Cudi's home, where according to Clark, Combs was intent on killing Kid Codi. Now, Cudi was not there. He testified at this trial, so Combs is alleged wish of killing him did not come to fruition, it may be a bit of a crafty strategy by the defense in this case to own the things that they cannot otherwise explain away. They are owning the things the jury eventually is going to see. The video of the 2016 assault at the hotel in Los Angeles. A video, by the way, that was suppressed from public view until it aired last year on CNN. NEUMEISTER: And that is part of the racketeering charge, it's alleged that he used all of his employees and his whole security staff to cover up these things. So, when that happened in 2016 at that L.A. hotel, they paid like $100,000 to try to get the copy of the security video so it would never become public. WALKER: I think we've covered so much that I'm not sure what we have left to cover, although there probably is more. But are there any big points or big arcs that you think are worth mentioning? NEUMEISTER: In the beginning, the first week, it was all Cassie's testimony and there was so much evidence in everything and her testimony about sexual acts and such but last week it seems all about violence and threats and how he would have used his employees to cover up the crimes. SISAK: We've heard from Cassie about the freak-offs. We've heard from some of the male sex workers that were involved. And then we're seeing other pieces of evidence that prosecutors say show the depravity of these events and then also the network of people that Combs relied on to keep them secret, to keep going, but to keep them secret. WALKER: Well, I think that that about sums it up. The judge in the beginning said he wanted to be done by July 4th. SISAK: We've had people ask us, all three of us that have been in court at various times, what do you think of the prosecution's case so far? And as reporters, we don't have opinions on things, but I would urge caution whenever there's a case, let the presentation play out, get to the end of the prosecution case, but also listen to the cross-examination, listen to what the defense puts on. Often defendants will not testify on their own behalf because it can be perilous, but there are cases where it might be advantageous. NEUMEISTER: When there's celebrities involved, it's a wild card, where you really can't predict what's going to happen and how that's going to play into the jurors' minds and everything else. WALKER: And I think that's a good place to leave it. Thank you both. Mike Sisak, Larry Neumeister. I'm Julie Walker. Thank you for listening. ___

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store