Ohio's $2.5 billion infrastructure plan goes to voters Tuesday
Why it matters: If OK'd by voters, it would authorize the state to allocate $2.5 billion over 10 years to fund public infrastructure projects to improve bridges, roads, sewers and water lines.
In case you missed our recent explainer, the State Capital Improvement Program dates back to 1987, and it's been renewed at the ballot box about every 10 years.
How it works: The program is funded with bonds, meaning your property tax bill won't change whether it passes or fails.
The program currently disburses up to $200 million annually. A successful Issue 2 would up the yearly amount to $250 million.
Local governments first request grants. A committee of local officials sends approved projects to the Ohio Public Works Commission, which administers the program.
Zoom in: The State Capital Improvement Program has supported nearly 4,500 projects over the past decade in every county.
Cleveland projects have included the design and rehabilitation of a number of major streets — Carnegie and Payne downtown, West 65th Street and Fulton Road on the west side, and East 79th Street and Martin Luther King Jr. Drive on the east.
By the numbers: There's no "Issue 1" this year and won't be for many years to come.
The statewide ballot numbering system previously reset every year, but now will be numbered sequentially through 500 before returning to 1 to avoid confusion.
✏️ Voters in Bay Village and Parma will also be deciding on school levies Tuesday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
White House starts TikTok account as platform in US legal limbo
The White House launched a TikTok account on Tuesday, as President Donald Trump continues to permit the Chinese-owned platform to operate in the United States despite a law requiring its sale. "America we are BACK! What's up TikTok?" read a caption on the account's first post on the popular video sharing app, a 27-second clip. The account had about 4,500 followers an hour after posting the video. Trump's personal account on TikTok meanwhile has 110.1 million followers, though his last post was on November 5, 2024 -- Election Day. TikTok is owned by China-based internet company ByteDance. A federal law requiring TikTok's sale or ban on national security grounds was due to take effect the day before Trump's inauguration on January 20. But the Republican, whose 2024 election campaign relied heavily on social media and who has said he is fond of TikTok, put the ban on pause. In mid-June Trump extended a deadline for the popular video-sharing app by another 90 days to find a non-Chinese buyer or be banned in the United States. That extension is due to expire in mid-September. While Trump had long supported a ban or divestment, he reversed his position and vowed to defend the platform -- which boasts almost two billion global users -- after coming to believe it helped him win young voters' support in the November election. Trump's official account on X, formerly Twitter, has 108.5 million followers -- though his favored social media outlet is Truth Social, which he owns, where he has 10.6 million followers. The official White House accounts on X and Instagram have 2.4 million and 9.3 million followers, respectively. des/st
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Multiple ballot proposals underway for 2026 election
(The Center Square) – More than a year from Election Day, a number of proposals are already moving toward appearing on Michigan's 2026 ballot. Currently, six proposals have received approval from the state Board of State Canvassers and are in the process of gathering signatures. One proposal is already set to appear on the ballot. Each proposal must be presented in a 100-word summary to voters. According to state law, the board must determine whether the language of the summaries are 'true and impartial.' Since 1986, Michigan voters approved 34 ballot proposals, defeating 31. The one measure already set to appear on the ballot asks voters whether to hold a state constitutional convention. It will appear on the ballot as an automatic ballot referral, meaning it automatically appears on the state's ballot every 16 years. Michigan is one of 14 states that provides for an automatic constitutional convention question, something that was first approved by Michigan voters in 1960. Five of the proposals are constitutional amendments. • AxMITAX: Prohibit state, county, or municipal property taxes; require 60% of voters to approve local taxes; and require a 2/3 vote of both the state Senate and House to increase any state tax which would raise revenue by more than 0.1% over five years. • Protect Voters Rights: Require individuals to verify United States citizenship during voter registration; require photo ID for in-person and absentee voters. • Americans for Citizens Voting, Version 1: Require the Secretary of State to verify citizenship of all registered voters, document citizenship, remove non-citizens using governmental records, and track separate eligibility requirements for federal and state/local elections; and prohibit counting ballots from voters with unverified citizenship. • Americans for Citizens Voting, Version 2: Require citizenship verification for all voters through statewide program, document submission, or provisional voting; require removing noncitizens after notice and 45-day rebuttal; and prohibit counting ballots from voters with unverified citizenship starting in 2027. • Rank MI Vote: Require ranked-choice voting for federal offices and state leadership by allowing voters to numerically rank candidates by voter preference starting in 2029. The sixth proposal that has been approved is a voter referendum. The Voters to Stop Paycuts referendum would repeal Public Act 1 of 2025, which raised the state minimum wage to $15 by 2027. If passed, it would return the state to previous legislation which totally phased out the tipped wage system. Business leaders in the state have been vocal in their opposition to this referendum. 'This is a damaging proposal for the economy, for small businesses, larger businesses, but especially for workers,' said Brian Calley, president and CEO of the Small Business Association of Michigan, as previously reported by The Center Square. To be placed on the November 2026 ballot, each proposal must receive more than 300,000 signatures by March 2026. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Angry Trump Accidentally Blurts Out Unnerving New Plot to Rig Midterms
President Donald Trump raged at Democrats Monday for supposedly cheating in elections in a long and unhinged Truth Social rant—and buried in his tirade is a clear indication of how he hopes to corrupt the 2026 midterm elections at a time when his agenda is nose-diving in polls. In his screed, Trump rehashed his familiar lies about how mail balloting is riddled with fraud, and promised to lead a new 'movement' to abolish it. But then he added this: WE WILL BEGIN THIS EFFORT, WHICH WILL BE STRONGLY OPPOSED BY THE DEMOCRATS BECAUSE THEY CHEAT AT LEVELS NEVER SEEN BEFORE, by signing an EXECUTIVE ORDER to help bring HONESTY to the 2026 Midterm Elections. Remember, the States are merely an 'agent' for the Federal Government in counting and tabulating the votes. Trump already unveiled a similar executive order in March designed to change election rules. It would have barred states from accepting ballots mailed on time but that arrive after Election Day and forced state officials to require documented proof of citizenship for everyone who registers to vote in federal elections. Such changes would have disenfranchised large numbers of voters. Two federal judges blocked it this spring after a coalition of states sued, the plaintiffs successfully arguing that it usurped their authority to set election rules. The administration is appealing. Trump appears prepared to have a second run at such an executive order. But what's critical about Monday's post is he connected this scheme directly to the midterms, inadvertently revealing the real aim behind it. Trump's new rant says he's going to 'lead a movement to get rid of' mail balloting, then later says this 'movement' will begin with his new executive order—a strong indication he will try to ban vote-by-mail by executive order. Voting rights advocates have long expected him to attempt something like this, perhaps by arguing that vote-by-mail is a threat to national security. That's because Trump's argument for his previous executive order failed in the courts after judges affirmed that the Constitution authorizes states to set the 'time, place and manner' of elections. Now Trump might try something new. 'It sounds like he will try to ban all mail-in balloting through executive order, and he's going to have to find some other rationale for such a sweeping presidential action,' said Pooja Chaudhuri, a lawyer at Democracy Defenders Fund, which represented other clients challenging the March executive order. For instance, Trump might argue that 'mail-in ballots are so fraudulent that they undermine the institutions of this country,' Chaudhuri continued, and that 'the president must get involved. This would represent an enormous abuse of power.' There is overwhelming evidence that any fraud in mail balloting is limited to nonexistent. Indeed, it's now beyond obvious that the pretext is the thing to watch. Trump is manufacturing a fake justification for nixing vote-by-mail because he believes (probably wrongly, but never mind that) doing so will help Republicans in the midterms. That he openly linked his announcement to the 2026 elections shows he isn't even bothering to hide the scam any longer. 'If they are going to try to stand for election integrity, it hurts them to point out that this is directly related to the 2026 elections,' said Greta Bedekovics, associate director of democracy at the Center for American Progress. 'It exposes that this is not about election integrity and national security, it's about election rigging.' It's no accident that this comes even as Trump is expanding the use of the National Guard in Washington, D.C., and other cities, based—again—on a manufactured pretext, this time about crime. At bottom, Trump's rant clearly signals his intent to use presidential power in every conceivable way he can to swing the midterm elections against Democrats. This could include ramped-up military maneuvers in Democratic strongholds or in swing areas—whether to intimate voters or to fabricate a crisis atmosphere meant to help Republicans—as well as whatever limits on voting he can impose, all justified with pretexts that he invents out of nothing. We all need to be ready for this. Fortuitously, Trump has told us himself exactly what he intends to do.
