
Big Ten's rigged College Football Playoff plan shut down by SEC
The Big Ten waged an all-out pursuit to rig the College Football Playoff with a stacked deck of automatic bids. Its plan for playoff evolution stalled after facing resistance from rival conferences.
The Big Ten lacked support from the SEC, a necessary ally, to advance a 16-team playoff that would preassign half the bids to the Big Ten and SEC.
SEC commissioner Greg Sankey extinguished what little life remained for the Big Ten's auto-bid-laden plan when he put his foot down last week at his conference's media days. If the SEC doesn't secure one of the expanded playoff plans it desires, Sankey said, then it's comfortable sticking with the current 12-team playoff format. And the SEC doesn't want the Big Ten's plan.
Well, that's that then.
PART OF PLAN?: NCAA settlement for college sports already faces challenges
PLAYOFF PROBLEM?: Why committee could be tested by two SEC teams
The 12-team playoff will be in place for 2025. The format for 2026 and beyond remains under debate. To expand the playoff, the SEC and Big Ten would need to align behind a plan by a Dec. 1 deadline.
Sankey referenced multiple playoff plans the SEC remains willing to consider. Notable by its omission: The Big Ten's plan that would earmark 13 of 16 spots as automatic bids preassigned to conferences.
'We're going to have 5+7, 5+9, (or) 5+11,' Sankey said.
The Big 12 and ACC support the 5+11 plan. The SEC retains interest in it, too.
In the math equations Sankey mentioned, the '5' means five automatic bids – one each going to the five-best conference champions. The second number in the equation means the number of at-large bids.
'We'll continue to debate whether expansion beyond 12 is appropriate,' Sankey said.
That debate won't, apparently, include the Big Ten's favored 4+4+2+2+1+3 plan, which would have awarded four automatic bids to the Big Ten, four more to the SEC, two apiece to the ACC and Big 12, and one to the next-best conference champion, leaving three at-large bids.
The SEC soured on this auto-bid plan in the spring, and, in Sankey's annual state-of-the-conference address, he offered no sign of retreating toward the Big Ten's plan.
No individual conference wields the authority to unilaterally push through an expanded playoff. College Football Playoff executive director Rich Clark told reporters last month that playoff expansion would require the SEC and Big Ten to agree upon a plan. What if they can't agree? That's a win for the status quo.
'We have a 12-team playoff, (including) five conference champions,' Sankey said. 'That could stay if we can't agree.'
Big Ten commissioner Tony Petitti will get the next word in this debate when his conference's media days begin this week. But, really, what can he say?
Sankey insists the SEC is comfortable staying at 12 if it can't achieve one of its preferred playoff expansion plans. If that's the case, then the Big Ten's pursuit of a 4+4+2+2+1+3 playoff has died on the vine.
To which I say, good riddance.
The 12-team playoff relies on a committee of subjective and imperfect humans to select most of the field, but subjectivity and imperfection are insufficient grounds to scrap this system in favor of a playoff that would pre-emptively reward conferences based on their history, brand and clout, instead of letting on-field results determine bid allocation.
Early last year, the SEC and Big Ten announced a pact to work together to chart college sports' future. Stakeholders from the two super conferences met multiple times and discussed playoff expansion possibilities. Much like the Big Ten's previous alliance with the ACC and Pac-12, the bromance between the Big Ten and the SEC fizzled in the face of competing interests.
There's "no rift" between Sankey and Petitti, the SEC commissioner said on his conference's television network last week, but they have "different views."
The Big Ten, according to multiple reports, might be willing to compromise in favor of a 5+11 playoff if the SEC and ACC add another conference game and join the Big Ten and Big 12 in playing nine conference games.
That's a fine wish, but the Big Ten lacks the muscle to force another conference to change its schedule. Sankey would like the SEC add a ninth conference game, but his membership has resisted his preference.
The Big Ten played its playoff hand, but it lacked the cards to win the bet.
'You always want to have a really good set of cards," Sankey said. "You want to have a good hand to play, right? I think we have the best hand.'
The Big Ten is running out of moves.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Kirk Herbstreit: Play-in games may be right fix for College Football Playoff
Yahoo Sports' Jason Fitz spoke with the ESPN college football analyst about the suggestion from Missouri head coach Eli Drinkwitz that creating play-in games for automatic bids to the playoff may be the right solution moving forward. View more Video Transcript So I'm not sure in the short term how to get the Big Ten and the SEC to play nice in the sandbox together. Maybe they don't have to, but you've seen all of the playoff proposals. What do you think of what the Big Ten wants to do now with automatic qualifiers for their conference? I like, I like what Eli Drinkwitz came out and said against his own conference and, saying that why don't we have more play and opportunities. You know, can you imagine instead of that last Saturday this season being just the SEC or Big 10 or Big 12 or ACC championship. Imagine if the SEC had 1 and 2, but then you also have 3 and 6 and 4 and 5 playing each other. And imagine if we had the excitement of 3 and 6, winner of that game is in the playoff. 4 and 5, the winner of that game is in the playoff. I think that is fascinating, and he was very passionate in the way he described that. I would be a fan of that personally. And give these teams hope, as opposed to, you know, just the two teams that play in the conference championship have a shot to get that automatic spot, and then you're hoping for at large after that. I love the idea of a kind of a play-in weekend, throughout the entire country. I think that would create a ton of buzz for the players, and for the fans. It's fun debate, it's subjective, it creates a lot of passion. But I think it really, if you go back to the play-in model that I'm suggesting, it takes away some of the pressure of just a committee selecting these teams, and it gives the actual players a chance to set on the field by giving them that if they qualify, a play-in game, and then you have no one to blame. Hey, you were in, you had the play-in game, you lost, so you have no one to blame. You can't blame the committee. You know, you lost a football game, so you're not going. So I think that would be the right way to go personally. Close


Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Telix Shares Drop as SEC Probes Disclosures Tied to Prostate Cancer Drug Pipeline
Telix Pharmaceuticals Ltd. slumped as much as 16%, the most in 21 months, after the Australian developer of radioactive drugs said it received a subpoena from the US Securities and Exchange Commission seeking information about disclosures related to its prostate cancer therapeutic candidates. The Melbourne-based company said it's cooperating with the SEC and is in the process of responding to the request, according to a statement Wednesday. The update came alongside Telix's second-quarter results, which showed a 63% jump in revenue, even as its top-selling product Illuccix faced ongoing price pressure.


USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
College football expert believes the Oklahoma Sooners need John Mateer to be great in 2025
The Oklahoma Sooners need a bounce-back season in 2025. OU went 6-7 overall in head coach Brent Venables' third season last year, which included a 2-6 league record in their first season in the Southeastern Conference. They've retooled the offensive side of the ball to go with what was a strong defense in 2024. Although they were picked to finish 10th in the SEC, there are a number of analysts, like Josh Pate, who believe they are a top-10 caliber team. Now, the Sooners enter Venables' fourth year and their second year in the SEC, needing to prove the naysayers wrong after the disappointment of 2024. They'll face a challenging schedule that includes home games against Illinois State, Michigan, Auburn, Kent State, Ole Miss, Missouri, and LSU, as well as road games against Temple, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Alabama. Of course, Oklahoma's schedule also includes the annual Red River Rivalry matchup against Texas and the neutral-site Cotton Bowl in Dallas. OU has to deal with one of the toughest schedules in the country this year, but the Sooners have made plenty of moves this offseason to improve on the product they put on the field last season. J.D. PicKell, who covers college football for On3 Sports, has been vocal in his opinion this offseason that Oklahoma will be much improved in 2025. However, he said this week on "The Hard Count with J.D. PicKell" that he believes OU needs a few things to go right this year to have the kind of success Sooner Nation is used to. PicKell's biggest need for the Sooners this year is for new starting quarterback John Mateer to have an excellent season. PicKell has reason to believe that will happen, given Mateer's relationship with new offensive coordinator/quarterbacks coach Ben Arbuckle. It's night and day different when it comes to how stable they are and and what you can actually look at from playing games in the college football world on Saturdays and how you feel about it. You're not forecasting. You're forecasting to the SEC to a degree, but you're not forecasting if John Mateer can play D1 FBS football or not. You were a year ago with Jackson Arnold. You were a year ago with your offensive line and your offensive coordinator. You're not right now. You know Arbuckle and Mateer work well together. - PicKell, - The Hard Count PicKell went on to elaborate that Mateer, who was brought in by Venables and his staff to be the difference offensively, has to, in fact, be the difference-maker at the QB position they hope he is. The Sooners didn't have anything near that at QB in 2024, which is a big part of the reason why Mateer now resides in Norman. PicKell stated that Mateer has to be able to make the plays that win Oklahoma games in the fourth quarter in the SEC. Another "need" that PicKell outlined for the Sooners this year was a top-tier season from their defensive front-seven, especially on the defensive line. He believes that OU needs that group to be at their best in the biggest moments, just like Mateer needs to be for the offense. With bringing back the majority of your defensive line, that has to show itself in the biggest spots against those teams. Like, in the 'big dogs' tier of college football, you've got to have the big boys on the defensive side; and they do, but I want to see them play like it in those spots. - PicKell, The Hard Count Although the Sooners lost plenty of veteran talent, leadership and production on defense this year, especially in the front seven, they returned and retained plenty of good players as well. Guys like R Mason Thomas, Gracen Halton, Kobie McKinzie and Kip Lewis will now be counted upon to be the building blocks of the Venables defense in 2025. PicKell also stated that the 2025 Sooners must understand and embrace the weight of what it means to be playing football at the University of Oklahoma, something he thinks may not have been extremely present in 2024. Because at a place like Oklahoma, a 6-7 season isn't going to cut it. The expectation is to compete for championships. PicKell believes this year's team may have a better understanding of what it means to play at the University of Oklahoma. PicKell believes this year's team has an extra confidence and swagger to them that might have been lacking a year ago in Norman. He also feels strongly that Oklahoma will be far better this season than they were last season. Sooner fans are hoping he's right. Contact/Follow us @SoonersWire on X, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Oklahoma news, notes, and opinions. You can also follow Aaron on X @Aaron_Gelvin.