
NFR: Data center tax payment plan could aide arena project
During a Zoom call organized by the data center's lead advocate, Niagara Falls Redevelopment, company representatives suggested they're open to using a specialized payment program that would allow tax payments from their project to be placed into a fund the city could use for a designated purpose such as paying for Centennial Park, which is expected to cost at least $150 million.
NFR representatives, joined by the company's economic consultant, Michael N'Dolo of the MRB Group, said municipal governments that would derive tax revenue from the data center could authorize what's called Pilot Increment Financing, or PIF, for the project. The tax payment structure allows local governments to enter into payment-in-lieu-of-taxes agreements with the owners of specific redevelopment sites, with a portion of the proceeds from those projects being set aside to cover capital improvements.
Restaino and some city lawmakers have previously said they may borrow funds through the bond market to cover costs associated with building Centennial Park.
During Monday's Zoom session, NFR's long-time Executive Vice President Roger Trevino suggested authorizing the so-called 'PIF' to be created for the company's Falls data center could help the city cover the cost of any such bond.
'This is the revenue stream that would be used to pay down a bond,' Trevino said. 'At present, all the discussions have not involved a mechanism to pay down the bond.'
Monday's review of the project and its potential benefits included guests invited by NFR, including what Trevino said were developers, attorneys, political activists, tour operators and school officials.
City Council Chairman Jim Perry did not attend the session but said on Monday he had no faith in the possibility of the data center supporting the city's arena efforts, suggesting it's a 'waste of time' to discuss another 'false story' being put out by NFR.
Perry said he's convinced, based on the company's track record in the Falls, which has included decades of promising developments that have never materialized, that the data center is 'just another publicity stunt.'
'I will tell you with no hesitation, there is no data center going to be built,' Perry said.
Restaino, with support from Perry and some other council members, has aggressively sought to use the city's power of eminent domain to forcibly acquire 10 acres of NFR's land off John B. Daly Boulevard near the intersection of 10th and Falls streets for the purposes of developing Centennial Park.
NFR insists its consultants have determined that the same exact 10 acres must be the starting point for the first phase of its data center, which the company publicly announced in 2022 with its partner in the project, the Toronto firm Urbacon. The companies claim the first building would be part of a larger nine-building complex to be developed on part of the 140 acres of land NFR owns to the east of Seneca Niagara Resort & Casino.
The city and the company have for years been at odds over which of the so-called two projects for the Falls has more merit.
Restaino, like Perry, has consistently held that the company's data center and its lofty revenue, tax and jobs numbers are not real, while NFR has frequently questioned the cost of Centennial Park, the chances of the city obtaining the money needed to build it from the state and the project's ability to offer any real return on investment for taxpayers.
On Monday, Trevino suggested his company is not opposed to the city having an arena, despite what some officials have viewed as the company's opposition to Restaino's idea.
'We are not against an events center, never have been,' Trevino said. 'In fact, we actually believe in the two-project solution.'
Some critics view NFR's plan as a ruse designed to inflate the value of the 10-acre site in court. As part of the eminent domain process, final value will be determined by a local judge based, in part, on the property's 'highest and best use.'
Restaino's administration, in documents filed in 2022 with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, estimated it would cost $10 million for land acquisition, which would be about $1 million per acre.
Data center advocates, including the Niagara Reporter, have suggested that the site, due to its proximity to the old Niagara Splash Park property across John B. Daly Boulevard, has a true value closer to $20 million.
NFR and its partners previously sought $75 million for the Splash Park site, which was forcibly acquired by the state using its power of eminent domain to support the development of Seneca Niagara Casino. In a 2010 decision, former Niagara County State Supreme Court Justice Richard Kloch determined the Splash Park land had a final value of $17.17 million, or about $1 million per acre.
NFR spokesperson James Haggerty previously called suggestions that the company introduced its data center proposal in an effort to drive up the value of its 10 acres 'utter nonsense.' He also noted that NFR and Urbacon first inquired about the possibility of building a data center on land in the Falls eight months before Restaino first publicly discussed his plans for Centennial Park in October 2021 and more than a year before the city formally commenced eminent domain proceedings involving the company's 10 acres.
NFR officials continue to insist the data center proposal is genuine and have hired MRG Group to reinforce the point by conducting a study of the project's potential economic benefits.
The Rochester-based firm's study claims NFR and Urbacon's Niagara Digital campus could result in 'more than $414 million in additional tax revenues' for the city, county, state and local school district over a 20-year period. It also claims the data center development would create 'almost 1,000 jobs per year on average' with estimated earnings of '$1.66 billion over 20 years.'
On Monday, N'Dolo spent about a half hour reviewing his company's findings including MRB group's suggestion that tax revenues resulting from the development of the data center over 20 years would equal more than $400 million in total, including $298 million for the city and Falls school district, $54 million for Niagara County and $62 million for the state.
The MRB study calculates what it calls a 'property tax savings to a 'typical' owner of an average-priced single-family home,' concluding that the homeowner would 'save approximately $14,603 over 20 years' or 'an average of approximately $730 per year.' The consultant defines the 'savings' as 'revenues that the city and school district otherwise would have to collect via their respective tax levies.'
'If the project moves forward, you get this; if the project doesn't move forward, you don't get this,' N'Dolo said.
Data center advocates did not directly answer a question from the Niagara Gazette about what the city may be doing, or not doing, to prevent NFR and Urbacon from moving forward with the data center.
Haggerty did say that the firm submitted updated documents for the data center to the city's planning board last week. Those documents include an updated application to establish a Negotiated Planned Development District, also known as a Planned Unit District, for the purposes of developing the data center in the city's South End. The updated planning documents, which would require approval from the city before the project can move forward, will be made available on NFR's digital campus website on Tuesday, according to Haggerty.
'All we need is cooperation to put shovels in the ground and move this forward,' Haggerty said.
Trevino said there are still many 'moving parts' to this type of development and with a project of the size and magnitude of the data center. He said his company remains open to answering questions and doing its part to make the plan happen.
'At the end of the day, what we need here are jobs and we need high-tech, not low-paying jobs. We need good-paying jobs,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Insider
2 days ago
- Business Insider
Analysts Have Conflicting Sentiments on These Consumer Cyclical Companies: Hyatt Hotels (H) and Yeti Holdings (YETI)
Analysts have been eager to weigh in on the Consumer Cyclical sector with new ratings on Hyatt Hotels (H – Research Report) and Yeti Holdings (YETI – Research Report). Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Hyatt Hotels (H) Bernstein analyst Richard Clarke reiterated a Buy rating on Hyatt Hotels on August 8 and set a price target of $167.00. The company's shares closed last Friday at $135.86. According to Clarke is a 3-star analyst with an average return of 4.3% and a 52.4% success rate. Clarke covers the NA sector, focusing on stocks such as Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Marriott International, and Booking Holdings. Currently, the analyst consensus on Hyatt Hotels is a Moderate Buy with an average price target of $153.83, implying an 11.9% upside from current levels. In a report issued on July 30, CFRA also upgraded the stock to Buy with a $161.00 price target. Yeti Holdings (YETI) In a report issued on August 8, Alexander Perry from Bank of America Securities reiterated a Hold rating on Yeti Holdings, with a price target of $35.00. The company's shares closed last Friday at $32.66, close to its 52-week low of $31.48. According to Perry is a 1-star analyst with an average return of -0.5% and a 42.8% success rate. Perry covers the NA sector, focusing on stocks such as Life Time Group Holdings, Topgolf Callaway Brands, and Canada Goose Holdings. Currently, the analyst consensus on Yeti Holdings is a Moderate Buy with an average price target of $34.92, implying an 8.3% upside from current levels. In a report issued on August 6, TD Cowen also maintained a Hold rating on the stock with a $33.00 price target.


USA Today
4 days ago
- USA Today
Saudi Arabian PIF plans to open three new courses, with one LIV golfer involved in design
Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund – best known by its acronym PIF and the owner/operator of LIV Golf – has announced plans to build three new golf courses over the next three years in the desert country. One LIV golfer, a former U.S. Open champion, will be involved in the design of one of the courses. There are a handful of golf courses in Saudi Arabia now, and the PIF said in a press release to announce the three new courses that the country plans to triple its total courses in the next few years. The first of the three new courses will be Shura Links on Shura Island alongside the Red Sea. The release said that American-based Curley-Wagner Design signed on to lay out the course, which will play to a par of 72 at 7,601 yards. That course is slated to open in September of 2025. Trojena Northern Golf Course will be the second of the new three courses. Located in the Sarwat Mountains, this mountain-top course will be laid out by McDowell & Dusenberry Design, which includes Northern Irishman Graeme McDowell, currently a LIV golfer and winner of the 2010 U.S. Open. An opening date has not been announced. The third of the new three layouts will be Laheq Golf Course near the Red Sea. Curley-Wagner design also will lay out this course, with an estimated opening in 2028. Plans for all three courses will be shown as part of a PIF Future Fairways display at the PIF Championship on the LET Tour at Centurion Club in London on Aug. 8-10, at the Aramco Houston Championship as part of the PIF Global Series on Sept. 5-7, and at the Aramco Shenzhen Championship at Mission Hills in China on Nov. 6-8. The display will include 3D mapping and simulators.


New York Times
4 days ago
- New York Times
Newcastle's rivals have taken £500m in transfer fees from PIF clubs. Is it hurting Newcastle?
In landing Darwin Nunez from Liverpool in a deal worth at least £46million this week, Al Hilal will believe they have made another statement for the Saudi Pro League. A Premier League title winner from last season might have chosen other European options, but found greater attraction in a country intent on disrupting football's ecosystem. Advertisement Al Hilal have ample reason to be satisfied as they aim to build on reaching the quarter-finals of the Club World Cup last month. Yet in strengthening one of its leading clubs this summer, Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund (PIF) might indirectly end up diminishing the powers of another. No transfer is an island, and Nunez's exit from Anfield could carry obvious ramifications. That £46m ($61.7m) increases Liverpool's financial muscle for the closing weeks of the window and also leaves a space to fill in the attacking options of Arne Slot. The obvious, albeit far from guaranteed, answer is Newcastle United's Alexander Isak. One bid of £110m has already fallen short of Newcastle's valuation this summer, but a cash injection, effectively delivered by PIF, could in turn heighten the vulnerability over Isak's future. Ripples from the Nunez deal have the obvious potential to quickly reach Tyneside. It is the latest deal to illustrate the quirks of this outlier in football's multi-club world. PIF has owned Newcastle since 2021, transforming the outlook of a once bedraggled institution and delivering a first domestic trophy in 70 years. In the same period, however, PIF has routinely been found — in a sense — giving financial aid to Newcastle's Premier League rivals. Al Nassr, Al Hilal, Al Ahli and Al Ittihad, four of PIF's Saudi Pro League clubs, have now written cheques totalling £500million to English clubs, including Chelsea, Aston Villa and Manchester City, in the last two years. That recruitment drive has scattered stardust over the Saudi Pro League, but has inadvertently helped to aid the financial health of the selling clubs. Chelsea and Villa, who finished either side of Newcastle in last season's Premier League table, have both benefited in times of PSR worries. And now, two years after banking £40m for a 29-year-old Fabinho when selling on to Al Ittihad, Liverpool have received another windfall from a PIF-owned club. Whether it is enough to help their pursuit of Isak remains to be seen — it might be that Liverpool choose not to increase their bid, even with the cash injection — but Saudi's domestic focus would suggest there is little thought for life solely through a Premier League lens. The Saudi Pro League's pursuit of established Premier League players began in earnest two years ago. Four of the country's biggest clubs — Al Nassr, Al Hilal, Al Ahli and Al Ittihad — were taken over by PIF in June 2023, triggering a rush of ambitious signings to join Cristiano Ronaldo, whose move to Al Nassr had been confirmed on the final day of 2022. Advertisement The 2023-24 season saw over £250m spent on Premier League players, with the following campaign bringing a further £200m. Some, such as Jordan Henderson and Demarai Gray, did not join PIF-owned clubs, but the majority did. And that has meant cash heading to Newcastle's Premier League rivals. Chelsea, in particular, benefited from offloading the unwanted pairing of Edouard Mendy to Al Ahli and Kalidou Koulibaly to Al Hilal for a combined £36m, raising questions about PIF's relationship with Clearlake Capital, Chelsea's part-owners and private equity group. Angelo Gabriel, who never played a competitive game for Chelsea, was then sold to Al Nassr for another £19m. Joao Felix moved to the same club this summer, for a fee that could eventually be worth up to £46m. This switch rid Chelsea of another headache. Manchester City, too, have found willing buyers in Saudi Arabia. Riyad Mahrez's move to Al Ahli could be expected given his status as one of the Arab world's most recognisable footballers, but they also found new homes for Aymeric Laporte and Joao Cancelo. That trio alone brought in £75m in fees, as well as trimming wage bills. Villa, who Newcastle eventually pipped for Champions League qualification, have banked even more. The sales of Moussa Diaby and Jhon Duran last season, to Al Ittihad and Al Nassr respectively, brought in £115million, enabling Villa to spend in other areas. Newcastle, meanwhile, have struck just one deal with a club within the PIF stable. Mercurial winger Allan Saint-Maximin was sold to Al Ahli for £19m — as confirmed in Newcastle's accounts — in 2023. Compare and contrast this to Brentford, Wolverhampton Wanderers and Fulham, who have all been part of bigger deals when cashing in on Ivan Toney, Ruben Neves and Aleksandar Mitrovic, respectively. Newcastle's failure to sell big under Saudi rule has inhibited their ability to spend, with their PSR struggles well-documented in the past 18 months. Now there is headroom, enough to bid for Benjamin Sesko and a host of others this summer. Another PIF investment might have inadvertently helped Newcastle's rivals too. SURJ Sports Investment, controlled by Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund (PIF), bought a minority stake, said to be in single digits in terms of percentage, in broadcaster DAZN for a reported $1billion to strengthen relations between the two. DAZN paid $1bn to FIFA for the broadcast rights to the Club World Cup in the summer. That $1bn figure was the amount paid out in prize money to clubs competing at the tournament — including winners Chelsea and Manchester City from the Premier League. Speaking to The Athletic in June, DAZN pointed out the Club World Cup broadcast deal was done in December, while the Saudi investment came in February. DAZN's chief executive of growth markets Pete Oliver added: 'We've had $1billion from PIF, but that's to launch in Saudi.' Amid all of this, experts believe Newcastle are not PIF's most valued sporting project. The rise of the Saudi Pro League and successful bid for the 2034 World Cup have both followed the Newcastle takeover, a point that once promised to change everything at St James' Park. 'The focus of Saudi Arabia's national development strategy, which includes the development of football, is very much on Saudi Arabia and Saudi Arabian clubs,' says Simon Chadwick, a professor of sport and geopolitical economy at Skema Business School in France. Advertisement 'I think the Saudis would be reluctant to lose face and sell Newcastle United, but at the same time, I do think the PIF-owned clubs in Saudi Arabia are much more important to the Saudi government. 'The focus is on how they can successfully deliver the World Cup, and they're shaping their strategy in that context. Any club investments are going to have to service the needs of the 2034 World Cup. 'Newcastle United finds itself in a pretty unusual position. Yes, it's a family member, but I don't think it's a particularly valuable or important family member.' One thing that cannot be disputed is that PIF's multi-club operation is unlike any other. The purpose is typically to serve the needs of one club within an obvious hierarchical structure. Take Manchester City and City Football Group as the obvious case in point. PIF, though, have priorities that do not centre on the Premier League. Al Hilal have now spent £490m since they were taken over by PIF. Newly promoted Neom, a fifth PIF-owned club, have spent close to £80m this summer alone. 'Al Hilal is Saudi Arabia's biggest club, and it's arguable they're Asia's biggest club,' adds Chadwick. 'They performed very well at the Club World Cup, and this is not just about treading water or making political statements. This is about the club trying to get better and winning the Pro League again.' Nunez is the forward they hope can make the difference, but, unwittingly, it might end up making a difficult summer for Newcastle that little bit more challenging. (Top photos: Getty Images) Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Play today's puzzle