logo
Colorado attack shows why ICE can't just focus on ‘criminals'

Colorado attack shows why ICE can't just focus on ‘criminals'

New York Post3 days ago

On Sunday, Mohamed Sabry Soliman — an Egyptian national admitted under the Biden administration who overstayed a tourist visa — was named as a suspect in a heinous anti-Semitic attack in Boulder, Colo. His arrest shows why 'border czar' Tom Homan can't just focus on criminal illegal aliens.
An estimated 8 million illegal migrants poured into the United States over the Southwest border under Biden, and the media's attention has almost exclusively focused on them.
But illegal entrants are just a part of a US unauthorized population the Center for Immigration Studies conservatively estimates at 15.4 million.
3 Mohamed Sabry Soliman was accused of throwing molotov cocktails at Jewish people.
The rest came legally as 'nonimmigrants' — students, tourists, businesspeople, etc.
According to the Migration Policy Institute, there were 132.4 million admissions of foreign nationals as nonimmigrants in FY 2023, down from more than 186 million in FY 2019 but still higher than the 96.8 million who came in FY 2022, when Soliman purportedly entered.
Most, but not all, went back home as they were supposed to. A US Customs and Border Protection report estimates that among the nonimmigrants who came through airports and seaports and who were expected to depart in FY 2023, 1.45%, or 565,155 in total, didn't go home like they should have.
CBP estimated the overstay rate that year for Egyptian nationals who came as nonimmigrant visitors to be even higher — 7.56%, or 3,264 individual 'overstay events.'
In July 2015, then-Sen. (and now Secretary of State) Marco Rubio claimed 40% of all the illegal aliens in the United States were nonimmigrant overstays. If that percentage is lower now, it's because millions of migrants entered illegally under Biden, not because more nonimmigrants have respected the law and gone home.
3 Soliman overstayed his tourist visa and was living in Colorado.
CBS News
President Donald Trump has tasked Homan with overseeing a 'mass deportation' program to drive down the illegal population in the United States.
Thus far, that plan has largely focused on aliens with criminal arrests or convictions. For example, the White House reports that of the nearly 40,000 aliens taken into custody during the first 50 days of the current administration, 75% were accused or convicted criminals.
But immigration laws require the removal of all aliens here illegally, not just the least sympathetic. They are making a mockery of our rules, and avoiding the necessary vetting for asylum seekers.
3 He injured around a dozen people in the attack.
@BHflyer5 via Storyful
Soliman is presumed innocent until proven guilty, but if he's responsible for this attack, his actions harken back to another Egyptian overstay, Hesham Hedayet, who murdered two and wounded three others during a July 4, 2002, attack at the El Al counter at Los Angeles International Airport.
It's reported Soliman 'filed a claim with US Citizenship and Immigration Services' — likely asylum — and if true it's yet another similarity to Hedayet. Hedayet was denied asylum, but was never deported. Two years later, his wife won the fraud-riddled 'visa lottery,' allowing him to stay and carry out his attack.
We can't know who the next alien criminal or terrorist will be — which is why Trump and Homan must follow through on their deportation promises.
Andrew Arthur is the fellow in law and policy at the Center for Immigration Studies.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Voters wanted immigration enforcement, but not like this
Voters wanted immigration enforcement, but not like this

Los Angeles Times

time17 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Voters wanted immigration enforcement, but not like this

Many voters elected President Trump to end border chaos. Illegal immigration remains low, but voters' opinions of his immigration policies as a whole have soured. The reason is that they view Trump's actions away from the border as just more chaos. Americans aren't against enforcement. But not like this. So what's the root problem — and what's the real fix? The public's perception of chaos stems from the fact that Trump's policies appear arbitrary. Under President Biden, no one knew why people were getting into the country. Now no one knows why people are getting thrown out. Under Biden, people came illegally or chaotically. Now people are being deported illegally or chaotically. The public cares about order in both directions. America shouldn't be doomed to oscillate between two types of chaos. Instead, we need to reembrace the antidote for chaos: the rule of law. In popular speech, the 'rule of law' often just means following whatever the government says. But our nation's founders meant something else entirely. For them, the rule of law was the opposite of the 'rule of men' — which leaves government dictates, and the fate of residents, to the leaders' whims in the moment. The founders saw the rule of law as general predictable rules publicly known to and applicable to all. As James Madison wrote, 'Law is defined to be a rule of action; but how can that be a rule, which is little known, and less fixed?' For Madison, the hallmark of the rule of man was 'instability' (i.e. chaos). The separation of powers provided the Madisonian cure. 'The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands,' he said, 'may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny' because 'the life and liberty of the subject would be exposed to arbitrary control.' Arbitrariness is just chaos by another name. During Biden's term, much of the border chaos traces to the fact that immigrants never really knew what the rule was. On paper, it was illegal to cross between ports and legal to cross at them. In reality, at least from 2021 to 2023, ports were mostly closed, and about half of the illegal crossers were allowed to stay. Moreover, the actual determination of who got in and who got tossed was made by agents at the border, not based on asylum statutes passed by Congress or any other known rule. This was the rule of man, not the rule of law, and the chaotic results were readily apparent. Unfortunately, the chaos has not dissipated — it's only moved locations: from the border to the interior. The basic framework of Trump's interior enforcement is that it is whimsical and arbitrary. It is not about 'merit,' not about public safety threats, not even about people here illegally or about 'noncitizens,' as Trump is seeking to strip U.S. citizenship from people and remove U.S. citizenship for many U.S.-born children.. There's no articulable rule. Consider that Trump is arresting highly educated, lawful immigrant students for op-eds written long ago. Setting aside the 1st Amendment, the founders would be — or actually were — equally aghast at the 'subjecting of men to punishment for things which, when they were done, were breaches of no law, and the practice of arbitrary imprisonments.' The rule of man is back, and it's as chaotic as ever. Trump has empowered agents to strip immigrants of lawful status and immediately deport them. They are even arresting lawful immigrants based on secret criteria (like forbidden tattoos) and sending them without due process to a foreign prison. Judge. Jury. Executioner. R.I.P. Madison's definition of tyranny. All this is unnecessary. Restoring the rule of law can end the chaos. That starts with clear, consistent and predictable rules. The immigration rules were, before Trump, notoriously known as 'second only to the Internal Revenue Code in complexity.' The policies rapidly change from administration to administration and even from month to month. The U.S. needs straightforward, transparent policies on immigration. When the government accuses someone of being in violation of the law, clear rules would enable rapid implementation in accordance with due process. This enforcement would naturally channel people into legal ways to enter and live in the United States. Once someone is granted a legal way to enter, that decision should not be reopened — absent some significant new facts. America can end the immigration chaos. This vision of an immigration policy animated by the rule of law is achievable, but no one in government has focused on achieving it. David J. Bier is the director of immigration studies at the Cato Institute.

For the evicted congregation, Touro Synagogue was never just a building
For the evicted congregation, Touro Synagogue was never just a building

Boston Globe

time18 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

For the evicted congregation, Touro Synagogue was never just a building

Eight years later, my daughter led a service for her bat mitzvah in front of the ark as a stream of sunlight illuminated this significant moment. Surrounded by family, friends and congregants, my husband and I blessed our daughter, longing for her future well-being. On that day, I understood how deeply the building had woven itself into my own family history and connected us to the shared Jewish experiences of previous generations. Since April, our services have taken place without any of the splendor of this historic home. After Advertisement Our eviction wasn't a surprise but no less disgraceful. Two congregations have laid claim to Touro — my congregation, which has operated there for more than a century, and Congregation Shearith Israel, which supported Touro's founding from its home in New York City. It is beyond comprehension to understand how a congregation so far removed, geographically and relationally, could make such a consequential decision about a place they have never truly known, all the while removing the very soul that existed there. The ruling leaves our thriving Jewish congregation ripped from its roots. Though we have been a responsible tenant, we have also been Touro's beating heart, sustaining it spiritually, financially, and communally through generations of devotion and presence. No matter It's true that the soul of Touro, and of Jeshuat Israel, was never in its bricks. It was, and is, in the people. But the soul, however, like congregants, is interconnected with a physical space to dwell in, to act through, to make meaning tangible. Many of the 100-plus members have known this much longer than I have. Rita, now 92 years old, as a young woman courted her husband, Aaron, from the Touro balcony and later became both the first female congregant and the first woman to serve as CJI president in 1999. Advertisement Yaakov, following five generations of celebrations and milestones on both sides of his family at Touro Synagogue, is to have his bar mitzvah this year on the heels of his father and great ancestors. Having been embraced by this community, I have seen firsthand how much it means to the Jews of Newport: I know the young girls who chanted Torah for the first time at Touro last year. I know their grandparents who wiped tears from their eyes as they watched. I know the pride of Mr. Josephson and Mrs. Davis who told our children stories from their own childhoods. I know the dedication of Ron, our security guard. I know our rabbi who, since he arrived, has been integrating traditions of our Spanish-Portuguese origins into our Jewish practices. And I know the heartbreak we all feel now. A Jewish concept explains that the soul, the neshama, is not just the engine of life; it also embodies its meaning and purpose and it uses the physical body to fulfill this mission. This partnership of spiritual and physical is essential. In the same vein, there exists a bond between a building of worship and its congregation. When congregations relocate for their own practical or spiritual purposes, breaking that bond can be generative. But ripping the bond apart without a congregation's consent creates a spiritual dislocation and a profound disruption of wholeness. I wish that my fellow New Yorkers who brought this lawsuit could know for themselves what it means to be Jewish in Newport. It's not passive. It's not inherited without effort. It's personal. It requires presence. It requires each of us to actively sustain a community that is small but mighty, rich in heart and history. And that we have. CJI has faithfully preserved both this historic building and the vibrant community within it, with unwavering dedication and care. Advertisement The tragedy lies in the belief that this new situation serves the collective Jews of Newport. As Jeshuat Israel meets across the street, at the historic Levi Gale House with windows that directly overlook Touro, it weighs heavily to think of the unnecessary action that led to this schism between Jews and a grueling legal process that reduced a centuries-old relationship and a web of historical documents into a simplified landlord-tenant framework. Yes, we have been invited to CSI's Touro services. But it is a profound insult to our legacy and current membership to have been given an ultimatum to accept that in order to keep using the space that has sustained us, we must allow the operations of our community to be dictated by outsiders. We remain a functioning community with places to worship, programs to run, and members to support. We will continue to do what we've always done: sustain Jewish life, in and around Newport County, with heart, dignity, and the deep, enduring knowledge that our legacy is not something that can be taken; only lived. A building does not define a Jewish community, but to deny that our spiritual spaces embody memory, spirit, and identity is to erase what makes them sacred. Let this moment be recorded for what it is — a profound loss of a living bond. Molly R. Goldman is a member of Congregation Jeshuat Israel.

Trump directs DOJ, White House counsel to investigate Biden's mental state in office

time18 minutes ago

Trump directs DOJ, White House counsel to investigate Biden's mental state in office

President Donald Trump ordered Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate whether former President Joe Biden's administration sought to conspire to cover up his mental state while in office, prompting a response from Biden. "Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency," Biden said in a statement. "I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false." The move by the White House represents a significant escalation from the White House, as it is a directive to the Justice Department to formally investigate. It goes beyond the review into Biden's last-minute pardons before leaving office Biden responded to Trump's memo to Bondi and the Department of Justice, calling an investigation "nothing more than a mere distraction" and defending his decision-making ability. In a statement he says any suggestion he was not in control is "ridiculous and false." "This is nothing more than a distraction by Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans who are working to push disastrous legislation that would cut essential programs like Medicaid and raise costs on American families, all to pay for tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy and big corporations," Biden said in a statement sent to ABC News. The president directed the U.S.'s top law enforcement official, in coordination with his White House counsel, to investigate "the circumstances surrounding Biden's supposed execution of numerous executive actions during his final years in office," according to a statement from the White House.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store