The Irish Times view on the local property tax: homeowners can pay a bit more
Looking at the decisions made so far, and the debates that have led to them, one thing is clear. There remains a huge reluctance in Ireland to tax residential property. Strangely, the strongest critics of the tax are those further to the left, including Sinn Féin and People before Profit/Solidarity. Housing is by the far the main source of wealth held by Irish people, but these parties object at every turn to raising tax on it.
Too many councillors are still refusing to even collect the baseline level of the tax and are thus leaving less cash for their councils to spend. Councillors in Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown, which has the most expensive house prices in the State, voted to continue the maximum reduction of 15 per cent from the baseline level set for the tax. This costs the council €10 million in annual income.
South Dublin County Council – where a reduction of 15 per cent from the baseline had been in place – voted to reduce this to 7.5 per cent, though the resulting increase in bills will be tiny in most cases. The decision in Fingal is to reduce the charge by 5 per cent, compared to 7.5 per cent previously. Outside Dublin, councils in Carlow and Wicklow both voted to maintain charges slightly above the baseline – arguing that this underpins important services for the public.
READ MORE
As well as opposition from many on the left to the tax, in some council – such as Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown – Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil councillors have supported cuts in bills. At a time when councils are scrambling for cash, this smacks of populism. True, bills may increase for some next year anyhow due to a reform of the tax announced by Minister for Finance, Paschal Donohoe. But the additional amounts to be paid will be small for most households. And surely those with properties of €1 million or more can be asked to pay a bit extra?
In most cases council management clearly spell out to councillors the implications of their LPT decisions. That many still vote to undermine the funding of local services must be dispiriting for those who actually have to deliver them.
At a national level, it is clear that there is no political appetite to increase LPT as a source of revenue, which would be a welcome widening of a very narrow tax base. The reform programme which will apply from next year was cautious and the tax will remain a small contributor to the exchequer. This means that when more tax is needed in the years ahead – as it will be – it will be income taxpayers who will again be hit.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
20 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Where does the EU-US tariff deal leave Ireland?
It is rare there is more consensus than division between Government and Opposition on the implications of a big policy moment. The domestic political response to the announcement of the deal that would allow the US impose a 15 per cent tariff on exports from the EU was markedly glum on both sides of the house. The Government was unable to muster anything more than a subdued acknowledgment it would 'bring clarity and predictability'. Coalition leaders have been saying for many months that tariffs are not good for anyone, so the confirmation that EU Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and US president Donald Trump had agreed a 15 per cent level was hardly something to be welcomed. 'We will now study the details of what has been agreed, including its implications for businesses exporting from Ireland to the US, and for different sectors operating here,' Taoiseach Micheál Martin said in his initial reaction. READ MORE Minister for Enterprise Peter Burke, speaking on RTÉ's Morning Ireland, did not specifically disagree with the earlier assessment of Ibec director general Danny McCoy that it was a capitulation. He said the EU was four days away from 30 per cent tariffs and the possibility of a prolonged trade war, which he warned would have been far more significant. That said, he did not shy away from the challenges the tariff would present for the Irish economy, not least the State's substantial exports to the US. On Monday, politicians on both sides of the House were still looking for clarity on the finer details of the deal. On the face of it, the Irish whiskey industry will find itself facing a higher tariff than its Scottish competitors (the UK has a 10 per cent tariff) though it might possibly benefit from carveouts announced for aircraft, chemicals and agri-food. The other key question for Ireland revolves around pharmaceuticals and if that sector (which is the main component of Irish exports to the US) will be subject to tariffs, or will face additional ones. Despite Mr Trump saying negotiations on pharmaceuticals would be separate, Ms von der Leyen indicated it was part of the agreement. Sinn Féin's enterprise spokeswoman, Rose Conway-Walsh, said the deal was 'nothing to be celebrated'. She also said she was very concerned about the lack of differential between North and South, and its repercussions for both economies and for supply chains. 'It is very obvious that there is a need for a package for business and for exporters,' she said. 'We have to protect jobs. We cannot have people losing their jobs.' The Labour spokesman on enterprise, George Lawlor, said a revised summer economic statement was needed as the one published this month was predicated on tariff levels of 10 per cent. 'We face uncertainty as to what's going to happen in the pharma sector. We also face uncertainty as to what's going to happen with the drinks industry. 'There's no doubt it's going to have serious implications. I think there was a prediction of some 45,000 jobs that would have a cloud hanging over them with a 10 per cent tariff. So with a 15 per cent tariff, that can only be a bad deal for Ireland.' Opposition figures pointed to what they said was the inherent weakness of the EU as a political bloc. Mr Lawlor said the US emerging with zero tariffs plus side deals seemed 'ludicrous' to him. 'The notion that we come away from this in a much worse position than when we went in is something that has to be seriously examined.' Edgar Morgenroth, professor of economics at DCU, said the deal did not give certainty. He referred to a deal Mr Trump did with Canada during his first term that he subsequently unpicked. 'Nothing is certain with this guy, except if you give him something, he will come back for more. So the whole strategy of going and negotiating was just stupid,' he said. He also criticised the lack of political cohesion within the EU. 'In Germany they worry about the German car makers. In Ireland, we had the whiskey makers. 'Every country sees itself like a country, and never sees the power of the bloc, and it means we are an easy target because you can kind of divide and conquer,' Prof Morgenroth said. In a worse-case scenario, if US multinationals reduced their presence in Ireland (as a result of Mr Trump's policies), and if there was also a change in the treatment of intellectual property (both big drivers of corporation tax), this would undoubtedly lead to a substantial 'fiscal shock' for Ireland, he said.
The Irish Sun
an hour ago
- The Irish Sun
Shock moment Garda ‘shoves' Danny Healy-Rae in front of All-Ireland final crowd as Kerry TD vows to complain
KERRY TD Danny Healy-Rae has vowed to make a formal complaint after he was "shoved" by a garda in Dublin City before the All-Ireland final. The 71-year-old politician was preparing to support his home county at the Advertisement 4 Danny Healy-Rae was entertaining Kerry supporters before he was 'pushed' Credit: Social Media Collect 4 The Garda appeared to push Mr Healy-Rae in the video Credit: Social Media Collect A video shows Mr Healy-Rae entertaining A uniformed But, as Deputy Healy-Rae walks by the officer, the garda appears to The crowd reacts by booing the garda and Mr Healy-Rae - who was wearing a hat and lanyard - turns to talk with the garda before walking away. Advertisement READ MORE IRISH NEWS Speaking to The Irish Examiner, Healy-Rae claimed the garda also "effed and blinded" at him during the alleged incident and vowed to make a formal complaint about the "isolated" event. He said: "I don't know what happened. I was walking here, minding my own business and the next thing this garda shoved me. 'He needs to be brought to account for it." Healy-Rae told how he has a lot of respect for An Garda Siochana and acknowledged they have a "tough job", claiming that what happened to him yesterday afternoon was a "very, very isolated incident". Advertisement Most read in Irish News And the Deputy told how he had been inundated with comments from other Kerry fans who saw the incident or footage of it. Taoiseach accuses Kerry TD Danny Healy-Rae of 'making up' quote during heated Dail row Footage of the incident was caught on camera yesterday and has since gone viral - being reposted across multiple pages and being viewed hundreds of thousands of times. An said it does not comment on unverified social media content . A spokesperson said: "An Garda Siochana does not comment on unverified social media content. Advertisement FANS' PAIN & GAIN " Any person who wishes to report the conduct of a member of An Garda Síochána can do so by contacting Fiosr u." In the match, Healy-Rae's home county of Kerry secured their as they Some 82,300 fans from Donegal and Kerry travelled from the furthest reaches of the country to make it to the match in Croke Park. Kerry's star man lit up with 0-9, as Joe O'Connor's stunning goal capped a Advertisement Meanwhile deflated Donegal boss Jim McGuinness - and cursed their mistakes as Kerry fired FIVE two-pointers to their none. He said: 'We are a wee bit raw. We didn't perform, Kerry did perform. That's the bottom line. "They started very early in the game and they got a foothold in the game." 4 Danny claimed the garda 'effed and blinded' at him during the alleged incident Credit: Social Media Collect Advertisement 4 Danny Healy-Rae has vowed to file a complaint following the alleged 'pushing' Credit: Alamy
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
British-Irish Relations in the Twenty-First Century: A strong examination of the Belfast Agreement's legacy and the impact of Brexit
British-Irish Relations in the Twenty-First Century, The Good Friday Agreement, Brexit and the Totality of Relations Author : Etain Tannam ISBN-13 : 978-0198807988 Publisher : Oxford University Press Guideline Price : £99 The Belfast Agreement of 1998 between the British and Irish governments and political parties in Northern Ireland has brought peace to the island and is now a settled part of Ireland's political architecture. Yet this extraordinary achievement failed to reconcile ethno-political identities in the North or stabilise government there. That is mainly because its imaginative three-stranded approach, inspired by John Hume and encompassing shared governing in Northern Ireland, North-South co-operation and institutionalised relations between Ireland and the United Kingdom, has been neglected and underused by these governments and parties. That is the thrust of this meticulous, closely-argued study of the agreement and its subsequent evolution. It first examines the content, differing interpretations and major criticisms of the agreement, showing clearly how the various players had contrasting motivations in reaching it. The two governments prioritised peace and stability, the unionists wanted to lock Northern Ireland into the UK, while nationalists and republicans saw a peaceful path to Irish unity. Critics say its consociational powersharing structure locks in sectarianism while its multiple veto points inhibit emergent political change. The Brexit shock plus political and demographic change put a potentially united Ireland on the agenda Subsequent chapters examine how Brexit's resurrection of state sovereignty from 2016 undermined the agreement's powersharing dimensions all round, dramatising these conflicting interpretations. The European element of the agreement was understated yet essential to its functioning. That showed up in North-South and East-West terms – Strands 2 and 3 of the agreement – as the book goes on to demonstrate. British-Irish relations reached their lowest ebb during negotiation of the EU withdrawal deal and the Northern Ireland Protocol with the Conservatives. They are now being ambitiously repaired with the new Labour government. The book argues strongly and persuasively that Hume's three-stranded vision should continue to inspire North-South and East-West relations and that the institutional architecture agreed in 1998 has been underused. Taoiseach Micheál Martin's Shared Island initiative and the current Dublin-London reset are happening more alongside than through the North South Ministerial Council and the British-Irish Intergovernmental Council. Such institutions suit the smaller state. Tannam shows how political disagreements and pragmatic diplomacy have undermined that insight. This matters because the Brexit shock plus political and demographic change put a potentially united Ireland on the agenda. If that happens the agreement's minority guarantees and institutions would still be available – and required.
