logo
Stop trusting your smartwatch stress score right now, new research says it often gets your mood completely wrong

Stop trusting your smartwatch stress score right now, new research says it often gets your mood completely wrong

Hindustan Times5 days ago
Smartwatches promise a quick read on your day: heart rate, sleep, stress, and a nudge to breathe when things spike. A new peer reviewed study suggests one of those signals may be far less reliable than users think. When it comes to stress, consumer wearables can confuse excitement for strain and flag you as overworked when you are simply having fun. Smartwatches can label excitement as stress. Sleep hours are more reliable, but how rested remains hard to read from a wrist.(Unsplash)
What the study actually found
Researchers tracked 800 young adults wearing Garmin Vivosmart 4 bands for three months. They compared the devices' stress, fatigue, and sleep scores with how participants said they felt in the moment. The headline result was blunt. On stress, there was 'basically zero' correlation with self reported feelings, according to lead author Eiko Fried of Leiden University. He noted that his own watch has labelled him stressed at the gym and during a friend's wedding, situations where elevated heart rate and arousal are normal but not negative. The point is not that wearables are useless. It is that they measure physiology, not context. A pulse spike can mean anxiety, excitement, caffeine, or a sprint for the bus, and the algorithm does not always know which is which.
Fatigue tracking did a little better, though still short of a clinical read. Sleep tracking was the strongest of the three, particularly for time in bed. About two thirds of participants saw a clear match between nights they felt good and nights the watch logged roughly two extra hours of sleep. Even there, the devices were better at counting hours than judging how rested someone felt. That makes sense for consumer sensors that infer sleep stages from movement and heart rate rather than EEG.
How to use these scores without overreacting
Treat stress metrics as a rough guide, not a diagnosis. A spike can be a useful prompt to take a break, drink water, or step outside. It is not proof that your workload is toxic or that you need to overhaul your life. If your watch regularly cries stress during workouts, social events, or after coffee, consider adjusting alert thresholds or turning off real time stress tiles to avoid alert fatigue. Use trends over weeks, not moment by moment swings, and pair the numbers with a quick check in: How do you feel right now?
Sleep remains the most practical signal for daily decisions. If longer nights line up with better mornings, let that guide your bedtime. For fatigue, look at multi day patterns rather than single day dips. And remember the researchers' caution: these are consumer devices, not medical tools. They can help you notice patterns. They cannot read your mind or your mood with clinical accuracy.
The hope is that studies like this will steer better models that factor in context and multi sensor data for early mental health screening. Until then, keep what works, step counts, sleep duration, heart rate trends, and keep stress scores in their lane as a lightweight prompt, not a verdict. The study was published in the Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science .
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stop trusting your smartwatch stress score right now, new research says it often gets your mood completely wrong
Stop trusting your smartwatch stress score right now, new research says it often gets your mood completely wrong

Hindustan Times

time5 days ago

  • Hindustan Times

Stop trusting your smartwatch stress score right now, new research says it often gets your mood completely wrong

Smartwatches promise a quick read on your day: heart rate, sleep, stress, and a nudge to breathe when things spike. A new peer reviewed study suggests one of those signals may be far less reliable than users think. When it comes to stress, consumer wearables can confuse excitement for strain and flag you as overworked when you are simply having fun. Smartwatches can label excitement as stress. Sleep hours are more reliable, but how rested remains hard to read from a wrist.(Unsplash) What the study actually found Researchers tracked 800 young adults wearing Garmin Vivosmart 4 bands for three months. They compared the devices' stress, fatigue, and sleep scores with how participants said they felt in the moment. The headline result was blunt. On stress, there was 'basically zero' correlation with self reported feelings, according to lead author Eiko Fried of Leiden University. He noted that his own watch has labelled him stressed at the gym and during a friend's wedding, situations where elevated heart rate and arousal are normal but not negative. The point is not that wearables are useless. It is that they measure physiology, not context. A pulse spike can mean anxiety, excitement, caffeine, or a sprint for the bus, and the algorithm does not always know which is which. Fatigue tracking did a little better, though still short of a clinical read. Sleep tracking was the strongest of the three, particularly for time in bed. About two thirds of participants saw a clear match between nights they felt good and nights the watch logged roughly two extra hours of sleep. Even there, the devices were better at counting hours than judging how rested someone felt. That makes sense for consumer sensors that infer sleep stages from movement and heart rate rather than EEG. How to use these scores without overreacting Treat stress metrics as a rough guide, not a diagnosis. A spike can be a useful prompt to take a break, drink water, or step outside. It is not proof that your workload is toxic or that you need to overhaul your life. If your watch regularly cries stress during workouts, social events, or after coffee, consider adjusting alert thresholds or turning off real time stress tiles to avoid alert fatigue. Use trends over weeks, not moment by moment swings, and pair the numbers with a quick check in: How do you feel right now? Sleep remains the most practical signal for daily decisions. If longer nights line up with better mornings, let that guide your bedtime. For fatigue, look at multi day patterns rather than single day dips. And remember the researchers' caution: these are consumer devices, not medical tools. They can help you notice patterns. They cannot read your mind or your mood with clinical accuracy. The hope is that studies like this will steer better models that factor in context and multi sensor data for early mental health screening. Until then, keep what works, step counts, sleep duration, heart rate trends, and keep stress scores in their lane as a lightweight prompt, not a verdict. The study was published in the Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science .

Your smartwatch may be lying about your stress levels, study finds
Your smartwatch may be lying about your stress levels, study finds

Indian Express

time5 days ago

  • Indian Express

Your smartwatch may be lying about your stress levels, study finds

Millions of people use smartwatches to track their stress levels, but a new study seems to be casting a shadow of doubt on the data gathered by wearables. A recent study published by the American Psychological Association suggests that there is no connection between device records and how a person feels. The study is about 'Associations between ecological momentary assessment and passive sensor data in a large student sample'. It suggests that self-reported stress levels and data that is acquired by wearable technology, which includes smartwatches, can be useful if the user is aware of its restrictions. The researchers used a Garmin Vivosmart 4 activity tracker to monitor the stress levels of 800 young adults for a time span of 3 months. Where the participants were asked to score how stressed, tired, or sleepy they were four times a day. Eiko Fried, co-author of the research, said that the results were hardly surprising. Garmin Vivosmart 4 usually monitors heart rate, which is not related to one's emotional state. Heart rate usually rises during sexual arousal as much as it does during anger. This demonstrated that the watches were not providing any valuable information about the user's emotional state. When the researchers compared the data, they found little connection between the numbers from the smartwatches and what people felt. Out of all 800 participants, not a single person had a 'stress score' on their tracker that matched their true feelings. For a quarter of the group, their smartwatches showed the exact opposite of what they were experiencing, for example, telling them they were relaxed when they felt anxious, and vice versa. They also looked into how reliable Garmin's 'body battery' feature is, which is supposed to measure physical tiredness. The results showed a slightly stronger link between this data and what people felt, but it wasn't strong enough to be meaningful. The researchers believe that the body battery score is calculated by combining pulse and activity levels. Furthermore, while the devices were good at tracking how long people slept, they weren't good at telling how rested someone felt upon waking up. Fried noted that this raises important questions about what wearable data can really tell us about our mental health. Nevertheless, researchers believe this kind of sleep data could help developers create a warning system for depression, alerting users to a potential episode so they can take preventive action.

KCHR's ‘Cosmos Malabaricus Summer School' from August 11
KCHR's ‘Cosmos Malabaricus Summer School' from August 11

The Hindu

time05-08-2025

  • The Hindu

KCHR's ‘Cosmos Malabaricus Summer School' from August 11

The Kerala Council for Historical Research (KCHR) will organise the 'Cosmos Malabaricus Summer School' in collaboration with Leiden University here from August 11 to 14. The event will explore Malabar's history, heritage, and Dutch archival sources. It will be held at Gama Heritage Residency, Fort Kochi. The programme emerged from the Cosmos Malabaricus (CosMa) project, aimed at decoding, translating, and contextualising Dutch archival materials related to 17th–18th century Kerala, according to a release. Noted scholars such as Jos Gommans, Lennart Bes, Lekshmi Subramanyam, and Mahmood Kooria will lead thematic sessions. The event will also host discussions on Dutch language learning and the challenges and opportunities in translating primary sources. The programme will feature archival workshops, cartographic field work, and academic and heritage roundtable sessions, it said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store