
India refutes Trumps claim it stopped buying Russia oil
India's foreign ministry has rejected US President Donald Trump's claim that New Delhi has halted purchases of Russian oil.
The Indian government is unaware of any specific developments regarding Indian oil companies pausing Russian imports, the ministry stated, noting that the country's energy purchases are guided by market dynamics and national interests.
"The government is committed to prioritizing the welfare of Indian consumers. Our energy purchases will be based on price, availability and market conditions," the ministry added.
The remarks came hours after Trump claimed India had stopped purchasing Russian oil. "I understand that India is no longer going to be buying oil from Russia. That's what I heard, I don't know if that's right or not. That is a good step. We will see what happens," he told reporters in Washington, DC.
Washington on Thursday imposed a 25% tariff on goods imported from India, as well as an additional penalty for purchasing crude oil and military equipment from Russia.
Trump and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio criticized India for continuing to import the discounted oil despite Western sanctions, claiming New Delhi was "helping to sustain the Russian war effort."
RubiocalledIndia's energy trade with Russia "most certainly a point of irritation" in Washington's relationship with New Delhi.
India's position has long been that its energy trade is guided by its national interest and the need to sustain the rapid economic growth of its 1.4 billion people.
New Delhi officials have on many occasions stated that by ramping up purchases of Russian oil despite enormous pressure from the West, India has helped global markets avoid sharp increases in crude prices.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Global News
2 minutes ago
- Global News
Trump again claims Jimmy Kimmel, Jimmy Fallon are ‘next' to be cancelled
U.S. President Donald Trump is doubling down on his claims that late-night hosts Jimmy Kimmel and Jimmy Fallon are 'next' to lose their shows following the cancellation of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. During a press conference at the White House on Wednesday, Real America's Voice reporter Brian Glenn asked Trump about reports that radio host Howard Stern may part ways with Sirius XM after his contract expires in the fall. Glenn went on to ask if the 'hate Trump' comedy was losing popularity with American audiences. In his response, Trump used the example of the recent cancellation of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert and added that he believes Kimmel and Fallon are next. 'Well, it hasn't worked,' Trump replied. 'And it hasn't worked, really, for a long time, and I would say pretty much from the beginning. Colbert has no talent. I mean, I could take anybody here. I could go outside in the beautiful streets and pick a couple of people that do just as well or better. They'd get higher ratings than he did. He's got no talent.' Story continues below advertisement 'Fallon has no talent. Kimmel has no talent. They're next. They're going to be going. I hear they're going to be going. I don't know, but I would imagine because they'd get—you know, Colbert has better ratings than Kimmel or Fallon.' 4:57 White House Anger Over Political Satires/Late Night Talk Shows Trump made a similar statement on Truth Social after Colbert's show was cancelled last month. He criticized Kimmel and claimed he has 'absolutely NO TALENT' while warning that his show, Jimmy Kimmel Live!, is next on the chopping block. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'The word is, and it's a strong word at that, Jimmy Kimmel is NEXT to go in the untalented Late Night Sweepstakes, and shortly thereafter, Fallon will be gone,' Trump wrote on Truth Social on July 22. 'These are people with absolutely NO TALENT, who were paid Millions of Dollars for, in all cases, destroying what used to be GREAT Television. It's really good to see them go, and I hope I played a major part in it!' Story continues below advertisement Kimmel responded by sharing a screenshot of Trump's post on Instagram with the caption: 'I'm hearing you're next. Or maybe it's just another wonderful secret' — a reference to a Wall Street Journal report, published July 17, that claimed Trump had written the phrase to Jeffrey Epstein in a letter for his 50th birthday in 2003. Trump went on to make another claim about the late-night hosts and the cancellation of Colbert's show last week. In a post on Truth Social on July 29, Trump said 'everybody' thinks he was 'solely responsible' for the end of the late-night talk show but that the rumours are 'not true!' Story continues below advertisement 'Everybody is saying that I was solely responsible for the firing of Stephen Colbert from CBS, 'Late Night,'' Trump wrote. 'That is not true! The reason he was fired was a pure lack of TALENT, and the fact that this deficiency was costing CBS $50 Million Dollars a year in losses — And it was only going to get WORSE!' Trump went on to claim that 'an even less talented Jimmy Kimmel' will be 'next up' to lose his job, followed by 'a weak, and very insecure, Jimmy Fallon.' 'The only real question is, who will go first? Show Biz and Television is a very simple business. If you get Ratings, you can say or do anything. If you don't, you always become a victim,' Trump wrote. 'Colbert became a victim to himself, the other two will follow.' Kimmel responded to Trump's post by sharing a screenshot of it on Instagram and writing, 'I know you're busy Sharpie-ing the Epstein files, but this seems like a weird way to tell people to watch Matt Damon and Ken Jennings on an all-new Who Wants to Be a Millionaire tomorrow night at 8|7c on @ABC.' Story continues below advertisement Colbert hasn't responded to Trump's latest claim that he wasn't 'solely responsible' for the end of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert but he did share some choice words for Trump during an opening monologue on the show last month. The late-night host read Trump's post celebrating the decision to cancel the show on Truth Social on July 18, in which he wrote, 'I absolutely love that Colbert got fired. His talent was even less than his ratings.' Colbert said into the 'Eloquence Cam': 'How dare you, sir? Would an untalented man be able to compose the following satirical witticism? Go f— yourself.'


Toronto Star
2 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
Putin hopes to travel overseas to meet Trump despite arrest warrant for war crimes
THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — Vladimir Putin may be traveling abroad next week — for potentially pivotal talks with U.S. President Donald Trump — despite the Russian leader facing an International Criminal Court arrest warrant. Putin is wanted by the court on a warrant dating back to March 2023 for alleged involvement in the abduction of children from Ukraine during the conflict triggered by Moscow's invasion of its neighbor.

2 minutes ago
After walkbacks and confusion, U.S. tariffs kick in for dozens of countries
Just after midnight, goods from more than 60 countries and the European Union became subject to tariff rates of 10 per cent or higher. Products from the European Union, Japan and South Korea are taxed at 15 per cent, while imports from Taiwan, Vietnam and Bangladesh are taxed at 20 per cent. Trump also expects the European Union, Japan and South Korea to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in the U.S. I think the growth is going to be unprecedented, Trump said Wednesday afternoon. He added that the U.S. was taking in hundreds of billions of dollars in tariffs, but he couldn't provide a specific figure for revenues because we don't even know what the final number is regarding tariff rates. Canada and the U.S. have not come to renewed terms after a Trump-imposed deadline of Aug. 1, resulting in a 35 per cent import tax on some Canadian goods. The rate applies to goods not covered by the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA), which governs trade between the three countries. In addition to generalized tariffs, Trump has also threatened sector-specific duties. Import taxes are still coming on pharmaceutical drugs and Trump announced this week 100 per cent tariffs on computer chips. That could leave the U.S. economy in a place of suspended animation as it awaits the impact. Trump, including just before midnight on social media (new window) , has complained that countries, including allies, have taken advantage of the United States in trade over the years. But in the case of Canada and Mexico, it was Trump who signed off on CUSMA in his first term. LISTEN l CBC Politics reporter Aaron Wherry on Carney's tariff tightrope (new window) Effects expected to play out over months Trump has promoted the tariffs as a way to reduce the persistent U.S. trade deficit, although many economists believe that indicator alone does not signify economic weakness. There are signs of self-inflicted wounds for the U.S. economy as a result of Trump's plans, which recovered from the height of the coronavirus pandemic in stronger fashion than other G7 countries, albeit with similar inflationary pressures. Importers in general purchased more goods before tariffs have gone into full effect. As a result, the $582.7 US billion trade imbalance for the first half of the year was 38 per cent higher than in 2024. Total construction spending has dropped 2.9 per cent over the past year, and the factory jobs promised by Trump have so far resulted in job losses. A less productive economy requires fewer workers, said John Silvia, CEO of Dynamic Economic Strategy, in an analysis note. But there is more, the higher tariff prices lower workers' real wages. The economy has become less productive, and firms cannot pay the same real wages as before. Actions have consequences. The president's use of a 1977 law to declare an economic emergency to impose the tariffs is under challenge — and potentially headed to the Supreme Court. The impending ruling from last week's hearing before a U.S. appeals court could cause Trump to find other legal justifications if judges say he exceeded his authority. Still, the stock market has been solid during the recent tariff drama, with the S&P 500 index climbing more than 25 per cent from its April low. The market's rebound and the income tax cuts in Trump's tax and spending measures signed into law on July 4 have given the White House confidence that economic growth is bound to accelerate in the coming months. The ultimate transformations of the tariffs could play out over months, if not years. Many economists say the risk is that the American economy is steadily eroded rather than collapsing instantly. We all want it to be made for television where it's this explosion — it's not like that, said Brad Jensen, a professor at Georgetown University. It's going to be fine sand in the gears and slow things down. Even people who worked with Trump during his first term are skeptical that things will go smoothly for the economy, such as Paul Ryan, the former Republican House speaker. There's no sort of rationale for this other than the president wanting to raise tariffs based upon his whims, his opinions, Ryan told CNBC on Wednesday. I think choppy waters are ahead, because I think they're going to have some legal challenges. Slapdash process The lead-up to Thursday fit the slapdash nature of Trump's tariffs, which have been variously rolled out, walked back, delayed, increased, imposed by letter and frantically renegotiated. Trump has heralded frameworks to a deal, with few specific details available so far in my cases. India, for example, saw Trump on Wednesday announce an additional 25 per cent tariffs to be imposed effective Aug. 28, for its buying of Russian oil since the outbreak of war in Ukraine, bringing its total import taxes to 50 per cent. Absorbing this sudden cost escalation is simply not viable. Margins are already thin, S.C. Ralhan, president of the Federation of Indian Export Organizations, said in a statement. WATCH l 'Deep fog': Business plans affected by tariff uncertainty: India and the U.S. have had five rounds of negotiations on a bilateral trade agreement but haven't been able to clinch one so far, straining what had been a chummy relationship between the countries in Trump's first term. The process has been so muddled that officials for key trade partners were unclear at the start of the week whether the tariffs would begin Thursday or Friday. The language of the July 31 order to delay the start of tariffs from Aug. 1 said the higher tax rates would start in seven days. On Wednesday morning, Kevin Hassett, director of the White House National Economic Council, was asked if the new tariffs began at midnight Thursday, and he said reporters should check with the U.S. Trade Representative's Office. With files from CBC News