Meet J-36, China's 6th-Generation fighter jet: Capable of dropping heavy bombs, long-range covert strike and...
New Delhi: Pictures of the massive 'J-36' stealth fighter developed by China's Chengdu Aircraft Corporation (CAC) emerged on Chinese social media, offering a glimpse into its advanced design. Referred to as the JH-XX, the aircraft is believed to be part of a new generation of long-range, strike-capable platforms being tested by the People's Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF).
The leaked pictures showcase a distinctive canopy design and, notably, a side-by-side seating arrangement and three open ventral weapons bays are visible in this fighter plane. It is important to note that despite the visual evidence, the exact role of the J-36 within China's military doctrine remains unclear. According to some analysts, the J-36 could serve as an air superiority fighter, while others suggest it is intended as a deep-penetration strategic bomber. Here are some of the key features of J-36 stealth fighter: According to the images available online, J-36 stealth fighter is likely to have a side-by-side two-seat cockpit.
The J-36 appears larger than the J-20, suggesting it's not just a fighter jet but also capable of acting as a strategic nuclear bomber.
The picture available on the social media reveals that the outline of the dual canopy and a dorsal air intake designed to feed the aircraft's central engine.
Reflections on the cockpit glass suggest large Head-Up Displays (HUDs) in front of both seats.
China is likely developing the J-36 as a multi-role deep penetration platform, meaning it can drop heavy bombs while operating like a fighter.
The J-36 is believed to possess very long-range covert strike capability, similar to America's NGAD platform.
According to the reports, there are three engines present in the aircraft. This is possibly the same model used in the J-20 stealth fighter. The presence of three engines supports the notion of a heavier payload and longer range, essential for strategic strike missions across contested environments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
36 minutes ago
- Mint
How Trump's trade war is supercharging fast fashion industry
Sydney, When US President Donald Trump introduced sweeping new tariffs on Chinese imports the goal was to bring manufacturing back to American soil and protect local jobs. However, this process of re-shoring is complex and requires years of investment and planning – far too slow for the world of ultra-fast fashion, where brands are used to reacting in weeks, not years. Many clothing companies started to move production out of China during Trump's first term. They relocated to countries such as Vietnam and Cambodia when the initial China-specific tariffs hit. This trend accelerated with the newer 'reciprocal' tariffs. Instead of re-shoring production, many fashion brands are simply sourcing from whichever country offers the lowest total cost after tariffs. The result? The ultra-fast fashion machine adapted quickly and became even more exploitative. From Guangzhou to your wardrobe in days Platforms such as Shein and Temu built their success by offering trend-driven clothing at shockingly low prices. A USD 5 dress or USD 3 top might seem like a bargain, but those prices hide a lot. Much of Shein's production takes place in the so-called 'Shein village' in Guangzhou, China, where workers often sew for 12–14 hours a day under poor conditions to keep pace with the demand for new items. When the US cracked down on Chinese imports, the intention was to make American-made goods more competitive. This included raising the tariff on Chinese goods as high as 145 per cent , and closing the 'de minimis' loophole, which had allowed imports under USD 800 to enter tariff-free. But these tariffs did not halt ultra-fast fashion. They just rerouted production to countries with lower tariffs and even lower labour costs. The Philippines, with a comparatively low tariff rate of 17 per cent, emerged as a surprising alternative. However, the country can't provide the industrial scale and infrastructure to match what China can offer. So why does Australia matter? Much of the cheap fashion previously bound for the US is now flooding other markets, including Australia. Australia still allows most low-value imports to enter tax-free, and platforms such as Shein and Temu have taken full advantage. Australian consumers are among the most frequent Shein and Temu buyers per capita globally. Just 3 per cent of clothing is made in Australia and most labels rely on offshore manufacturing. This makes Australia an ideal target market for ultra-fast fashion imports. We have high purchasing power, lenient import rules and strong demand for low-cost style, especially due to the cost-of-living crisis. The hidden costs of cheap clothes The environmental impact of fast fashion is well known. However, amid the chaos of Trump's tariff announcements, far less attention has been paid to how these policies – together with the retreat from climate commitments – worsen environmental harms, including those linked to fast fashion. The irony is that the tariffs meant to protect American workers have, in some cases, worsened conditions for workers elsewhere. Meanwhile, consumers in Australia now benefit from faster delivery of even cheaper goods as Temu, Shein and others have improved their shipping capabilities to Australia. Australian consumers send more than 200,000 tonnes of clothing to landfill each year. But the deeper problem is structural. The entire business model is built on exploitation and environmental damage. Factory workers bear the brunt of cost-cutting. In the race to stay competitive, many manufacturers reduce wages and overlook hazardous working conditions. Will ethical fashion ever compete? Fixing these problems will require a global rethink of how fashion operates. Governments have a role in regulating disclosures about supply chains and enforcing labour standards. Brands need to take responsibility for the conditions in their factories, whether directly owned or outsourced. Transparency is essential. Alternatives to fast fashion are gaining traction. Clothing rentals are emerging as a promising business model that help build a more circular fashion economy. Charity-run op shops have long been a sustainable source of second-hand clothing. Australia's new Seamless scheme seeks to make fashion brands responsible for the full life of the clothes they sell. The aim is to help people buy, wear and recycle clothes in a more sustainable way. Consumers also matter. If we continue to expect clothes to cost less than a cup of coffee, change will be slow. Recognising that a USD 5 t-shirt has hidden costs, borne by people on the factory floor and the environment, is a first step. Some ethical brands are already showing a better way and offer clothes made under fairer conditions and with sustainable materials. These clothes are not as cheap or fast, but they represent a more conscious alternative especially for consumers concerned about synthetic fibres, toxic chemicals and environmental harm. Trump reshuffled the deck, but did not change the game Trump's trade rules aim to re-balance global trade in favour of American industry, yet have cost companies more than USD 34 billion in lost sales and higher costs. This cost will eventually fall on US consumers. In ultra-fast fashion, it mostly exposed how fragile and exploitative the system already was. Today, brands such as Shein and Temu are thriving in Australia. But unless we address the systemic inequalities in fashion production and rethink the incentives that drive this market, the true cost of cheap clothing will continue to be paid by those least able to afford it. PY PY This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Meta set to throw billions at startup that leads AI data market
Three months after the Chinese artificial intelligence developer DeepSeek upended the tech world with a model that rivaled America's best, a 28-year-old AI executive named Alexandr Wang came to Capitol Hill to tell policymakers what they needed to do to maintain US US, Wang said at the April hearing, needs to establish a 'national AI data reserve,' supply enough power for data centers and avoid an onerous patchwork of state-level rules. Lawmakers welcomed his feedback. 'It's good to see you again here in Washington,' Republican Representative Neal Dunn of Florida said. 'You're becoming a regular up here.' Wang, the chief executive officer of Scale AI, may not be a household name in the same way OpenAI's Sam Altman has become. But he and his company have gained significant influence in tech and policy circles in recent years. Scale uses an army of contractors to label the data that tech firms such as Meta Platforms Inc. and OpenAI use to train and improve their AI models, and helps companies make custom AI applications. Increasingly, it's enlisting PhDs, nurses and other experts with advanced degrees to help develop more sophisticated models, according to a person familiar with the matter. Put simply: The three pillars of AI are chips, talent and data. And Scale is a dominant player in the last of the startup's stature is set to grow even more. Meta is in talks to make a multibillion-dollar investment in Scale, Bloomberg News reported over the weekend. The financing may exceed $10 billion in value, making it one of the largest private company funding events of all time. The startup was valued at about $14 billion in 2024, as part of a funding round that included backing from many ways, Scale's rise mirrors that of OpenAI. Both companies were founded roughly a decade ago and bet that the industry was then on the cusp of what Wang called an 'inflection point of AI.' Their CEOs, who are friends and briefly lived together, are both adept networkers and have served as faces of the AI sector before Congress. And OpenAI, too, has been on the receiving end of an 11-figure investment from a large tech firm. Scale's trajectory has shaped, and been shaped by, the AI boom that OpenAI unleashed. In its early years, Scale focused more on labeling images of cars, traffic lights and street signs to help train the models used to build self-driving cars. But it has since helped to annotate and curate the massive amounts of text data needed to build the so-called large language models that power chatbots like ChatGPT. These models learn by drawing patterns from the data and their respective labels. At times, that work has made Scale a lightning rod for criticisms about the unseen workforce in places such as Kenya and the Philippines that supports AI development. Scale has faced scrutiny for relying on thousands of contractors overseas who were paid relatively little to weed through reams of online data, with some saying they have suffered psychological trauma from the content they're asked to review. In a 2019 interview with Bloomberg, Wang said the company's contract workers earn 'good' pay — 'in the 60th to 70th percentile of wages in their geography.'Scale AI spokesperson Joe Osborne noted that the U.S. Department of Labor recently dropped an investigation into the company's compliance with fair labor business has evolved. More tech firms have begun to experiment with using synthetic, AI-generated data to train AI systems, potentially reducing the need for some of the services Scale historically provided. However, the leading AI labs are also struggling to get enough high-quality training data to build more advanced AI systems that are capable of fielding complex tasks as well as, or better than, meet that need, Scale has increasingly turned to better-paid contractors with graduate degrees to improve AI systems. These experts participate in a process known as reinforcement learning, which rewards a system for correct answers and punishes it for incorrect experts who work with Scale are tasked with constructing tricky problems – tests, essentially – for the models to solve, according to a person familiar with the matter who asked not to be named because the information is private. As of early 2025, 12% of the company's pool of contributors who work on the process of improving these models had a PhD in fields such as molecular biology and more than 40% had a master's degree, law degree or MBA in their field, the person of this process is aimed at companies that want to use AI for medical and legal applications, the person said. One area of focus, for example, is getting AI models to better answer questions regarding tax law, which can differ greatly from country to country and even state to like those are driving significant growth for the company. Scale generated about $870 million in revenue in 2024 and expects $2 billion in revenue this year, Bloomberg News reported in April. Scale has seen demand for its network of experts increase in the wake of DeepSeek, the person familiar with the matter said, as more companies invest in models that mimic human reasoning and carry out more complicated has also deepened its relationship with the US government through defense deals. Wang, a China hawk, has cozied up to lawmakers on the hill who are concerned about China's ascendance in AI. And Michael Kratsios, a former executive at Scale, is now one of President Donald Trump's top tech aides, helping to steer US policy on AI. For Meta, partnering more deeply with Scale may simultaneously help it keep pace with AI rivals like Google and OpenAI, and also help it build deeper ties with the US government at a time when it's pushing more into defense tech. For Scale, a tie-up with Meta offers a powerful and deep-pocketed ally. It would also be a fitting full-circle moment for Wang. Shortly after launching Scale, Wang said he was asked by one venture capitalist when he knew he wanted to build a startup. In response, Wang said he 'rattled off some silly answer about being inspired by The Social Network,' the film about the founding of Facebook.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
US and China to hold trade talks in London focusing on export controls
In the second round of trade talks today in London, the United States and China are set to be focussed on export controls regarding critical technologies and rare earths instead of tariffs. read more US President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping are seen during an engagement on the sidelines of the G20 Summit in Osaka, Japan, in 2019. (Photo: Reuters) The United States and China will hold second round of trade talks in London on Monday. The focus is going to be on export controls instead of tariffs. In recent weeks, both the countries have sought to choke the other's access to critical supply chain elements that they dominate. While the Donald Trump administration has sought to restrict China's access to semiconductors, jet engines, and certain chemicals and machinery, China has restricted the supply of rare earths, which are critical to manufacture virtually everything from cars to fighter planes and electronic chips. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Both the United States and China have accused the other of violating the trade truce reached last month. On May 12, the United States and China reached a truce and agreed to reduce tariffs by 115 per cent for 90 days so talks could continue. However, within days, the Trump administration tightened export controls regarding semiconductors. China responded by not relaxing rare earths' supplies that were halted in April. While Trump has said that China has 'totally' violated the truce and that Chinese leader Xi Jinping 'extremely hard' to make a deal with, China claimed that the United States had 'severely violated the common understandings reached in Geneva'. US-China trade talks to now focus on export controls Unlike the first round of talks in Switzerland's Geneva, the second round of talks in London will be focussed on export controls. The new focus comes as China's s stoppage rare earths supplies has threatened to bring manufacturing units in the United States and elsewhere, including India, to a halt, particularly in sectors like automobiles. This would be a major blow to Trump, who has championed revitalising the US manufacturing industry. The US delegation will be led by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent but will also include Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. The inclusion of Lutnick, who was not part of talks in Geneva and oversees the US export control regime, reinforces the understanding that talks will be focussed on export controls instead of tariffs. The Chinese delegation will be led by He Lifeng, the vice premier for economic policy who also led the delegations in Geneva. While American negotiators are expected to press for China to relax curbs on the export of rare earths, Chinese officials are expected to press for the removal of US curbs on China's access to semiconductors, jet engines, and other critical technologies, according to Wall Street Journal. There are signs that the two sides may be headed towards achieving an understanding that makes way for an off-ramp. Even though they have accused each other of violating the spirit of talks, Trump said ahead of Monday's talks that conversations with China 'very far advanced' and described a phone call with Xi last week as 'very good' and said 'there should no longer be any questions respecting the complexity of rare-earth products'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In what is seen as a goodwill gesture, China on Saturday said it had granted a number of export licences related rare earths. 'Up until the phone call, both sides were spiraling toward uncontrolled supply-chain warfare. I think the administration played this card to get China to re-engage and back off the magnet restrictions,' Jimmy Goodrich, a China and technology expert and senior adviser to Rand, told Journal.
