logo
‘He checked all the boxes.' Pope Leo XIV overcame a liability — being American.

‘He checked all the boxes.' Pope Leo XIV overcame a liability — being American.

Boston Globe09-05-2025
Advertisement
He knew, and was one of, the voting cardinals in the church's powerful bureaucracy, but he put liberals at ease with his strong support for Francis' arguably greatest change, which sought to make the church's decision-making process more bottom-up and closer to the faithful.
In uncertain times, he ran a global religious group, the Order of St. Augustine, that required a sophisticated understanding of the world. His deep theological formation may have put conservatives worried about doctrine at ease. At age 69, the new pope is the ideal age for a papal candidate.
The major strike against him was his American nationality, a deal breaker in decades past because it was seen as being too closely aligned with the world's dominant super power. But in a world order that has changed significantly and in a church that increasingly sees beyond nationality, that apparently turned out not to matter to the 133 cardinals voting in the Sistine Chapel.
Advertisement
'He checked all the boxes,' said John Allen, a veteran Vatican analyst and author of the book 'Conclave.' He added, 'Geography and nationality stopped being a voting issue.'
American Catholics across the political spectrum are citing Leo's choice of name as a sign that he may advance their interests.
'By picking the name Leo XIV, he shows he is committed to the social teaching of the church,' said Thomas J. Reese, a Jesuit priest and veteran Vatican analyst.
More conservative Catholics see a different implication. 'He takes his name from a pope who stood firmly against the negative culture of moral relativism,' said Ashley McGuire, senior fellow with the Catholic Association.
After a dozen years of Francis' shaking up the church, the College of Cardinals apparently wanted to keep moving in Francis' direction but with fewer detours and crashes. They chose a mild-mannered pastor, moderate in tone but resolute in his defense of doctrine, one with deep Roman experience and governing chops.
'We have to look together how to be a missionary church, building bridges, dialogue, always open to receiving with open arms for everyone, like this square, open to all, to all who need our charity, our presence, dialogue, love,' Pope Leo said in Italian from the balcony of St. Peter's Basilica in his maiden address Thursday as the leader of the world's 1.4 billion Roman Catholics.
Only hours after his election, it was impossible to know how Leo would govern. But his first words, and the name he took, gave some clues. The Vatican said his name echoed the previous Leo, a pope in the late 1800s who helped establish the church's Catholic social justice tradition. He also name-checked Francis, saying, 'Thank you, Pope Francis!' and prompting an outburst of applause from the crowd below.
Advertisement
He said the word 'synodality,' which means little or nothing to secular ears but which inside the church spoke volumes about his intention to carry out Francis' vision for a church that rules less from on high in Rome than by consulting its faithful, bringing bishops and lay people, including women, together to make the big decisions.
And he spoke about peace and being close to those who suffered, reflecting his pastoral sense, but also reverted to Vatican tradition by appearing on the balcony in a vestment that Francis had shed.
While the Americans in the crowd rejoiced at the naming of one of their own -- 'USA! USA!' some chanted -- and received congratulations from the Italians who seemed bewildered by the unfamiliar face on the balcony, supporters of Francis expressed a sigh of relief.
The front-runner to succeed Francis had been the church's secretary of state, Pietro Parolin, who, while an experienced diplomat with a distinguished career in the church, did not have pastoral experience. In the weeks and days leading up to the conclave, critics of Parolin, including Italian cardinals, spoke admiringly of other candidates, including Prevost, suggesting that Parolin's support was softer than expected.
But when the white smoke billowed from the chimney over the Sistine Chapel on the second day of voting, many liberals worried that it meant the voters had coalesced around Parolin, a bureaucrat they feared would suck out all the fresh air Francis had breathed into the church.
Advertisement
Parolin did emerge on the balcony, but still cloaked in cardinal red. He smiled easily, a background figure to a new pope who liberals believed would protect Francis' legacy.
In October, Prevost sounded much like Francis when he told Vatican News that a 'bishop is not supposed to be a little prince sitting in his kingdom, but rather called authentically to be humble, to be close to the people he serves, to walk with them and to suffer with them.'
Vatican analysts expect Leo to clearly stick up for migrants, the poor and those exploited by great powers, though perhaps less provocatively than Francis did. He is viewed as pastoral, and so open to listening to the concerns of a wide variety of Catholics. But, at least for now, he is seen as less than likely to make changes to church teaching on issues like the ordination of women as deacons, birth control and the status of gay men in the church.
Alberto Melloni, a church historian, said that while Leo was clearly in Francis' mold on his vision of a church moving closer to the people and being governed more from the bottom-up, on hot-button social issues, 'he kept his hands free.'
Not entirely. In a 2012 address to bishops, he lamented that Western news media and popular culture fostered 'sympathy for beliefs and practices that are at odds with the gospel.' He cited the 'homosexual lifestyle' and 'alternative families comprised of same-sex partners and their adopted children.'
But as Francis showed, people change when they become pope: He was considered a conservative cardinal in his native Argentina.
Advertisement
In a 2023 interview with Catholic News Service, Leo, then a cardinal, stressed that clerics respond to problems in their parishes by reflecting on their oath to 'live and work in communion with the Holy Father.'
That is now him.
This article originally appeared in
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MAGA Rep Says Dead People Personally Told Him They Voted Fraudulently
MAGA Rep Says Dead People Personally Told Him They Voted Fraudulently

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

MAGA Rep Says Dead People Personally Told Him They Voted Fraudulently

Republican lawmakers are apparently consorting with the dead in their search for a justifiable reason to nix mail-in ballots. Speaking with Fox Business Tuesday, Representative Jeff Van Drew claimed that he had spoken with 'large numbers' of deceased people who had received the voter ballots. 'There were multiple mail-in ballots sent to the same person. Sometimes people would have multiple ballots sent to different addresses,' Van Drew said. 'Other times, people who are passed away—these are real people I spoke to, large numbers of them, and it's indicative of what happened around the country,' the New Jersey lawmaker claimed. Since he lost the 2020 election, Donald Trump and his allies have obsessed over contrived claims of voter fraud—a statistical nonissue in U.S. elections. For instance, a statewide audit out of Georgia, the epicenter of Trump's baseless theory, revealed in September that just 20 noncitizens out of 8.2 million residents existed on the state's voter roll, just 0.00024 percent of the state's voting population. Out of those 20, only nine participated in elections years ago, before ID was required as a part of the voter verification process. The other 11 individuals were registered but never actually voted, according to Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. Critics argue that restrictions on the front end of the electoral process—such as one-day voting and requiring day-of voter ID, which Trump has tried but failed to implement—would minimize voter turnout and limit American democracy's ability to represent its constituents. This would especially be true in high-density areas like the nation's biggest cities, where those stipulations would significantly drain resources (i.e., the number of volunteers required) and require more time to process, potentially leading to more delays, which Republicans could weaponize to further restrict voter access. The MAGA party's continued focus on the nativist nonissue belies the fact that it is, of course, already illegal and impossible for noncitizens to vote in U.S. elections. Attacking mail-in voting has not proved popular for Republican lawmakers, however. A heated exchange over the tool at a Casper, Wyoming, town hall Monday resulted in an irate crowd practically screaming at Representative Harriet Hageman, who claimed that mail-in ballots are not 'foundational tools' of democratic elections.

Gov. Newsom reacts to Bed Bath & Beyond's refusal to open stores in California
Gov. Newsom reacts to Bed Bath & Beyond's refusal to open stores in California

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Gov. Newsom reacts to Bed Bath & Beyond's refusal to open stores in California

LOS ANGELES – Bed Bath & Beyond announced that its comeback will not include locations in the largest state in the nation. Marcus Lemonis, Bed Bath & Beyond Executive Chairman said in a statement issued Aug. 20 that the company will not open a brick-and-mortar location in California. Lemonis said that the state, home to over 39 million people, will be served solely through delivery. "We're taking a stand because it's time for common sense," the statement reads. "Businesses deserve the chance to succeed. Employees deserve jobs that last. And customers deserve fair prices. California's system delivers the opposite." The company is attempting to make a comeback after filing for bankruptcy and closing all its stores in 2023. It reopened its first Bed Bath & Beyond Home near Nashville on Aug. 8. "After their bankruptcy and closure of every store, like most Americans, we thought Bed, Bath & Beyond no longer existed," California Gov. Gavin Newsom's press office said in response to the announcement on X. "We wish them well in their efforts to become relevant again as they try to open a 2nd store." Lemonis replied to a post from the governor's personal X account proposing pro-business reforms for the state. "We will target opening 300 small to midsize neighborhood stores thru our Kirklands investment," Lemonsis wrote. "You are a smart man and I know the post below is out of frustration." California critic claims Bed Bath & Beyond decision 'isn't about politics' In the statement, Lemonis claimed that the decision "isn't about politics." However, the statement repeatedly attacked regulatory policies passed in the state. "California has created one of the most overregulated, expensive, and risky environments for businesses in America," Lemonis wrote. In a Feb. 5 appearance on Fox Business, Lemonis called a California law requiring corporations with revenues of more than $1 billion to report their greenhouse gas emissions a "crazy law." 83387715007 Lemonis also fought San Joaquin County when Camping World, for whom Lemonis serves as CEO, installed an oversized flag pole to fly an American flag without proper permits – county officials told the Los Angeles Times in 2024. "Camping World has a habit of installing flagpoles that are quite large in size, but they do it without pulling permits," San Joaquin County Supervisor Tom Patti told the Times. "This is a self-inflicted issue, but as a business owner and someone who understands marketing, it's brilliant." The Times reported that the flag in front of the location in the Northern California town of French Camp had been taken down from the 130-foot flagpole during the permitting process for an undisclosed amount of time. Lemonis told Sacramento Fox affiliate FOX40 that he ordered the store to fly the flag again in August 2024 saying, "If we felt like we were putting people in danger or causing any issues with air traffic, which would absolutely not be okay, then I wouldn't do it." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: California won't have any Bed Bath & Beyond stores. Find out why. Solve the daily Crossword

With moves on West Bank and Gaza City, Israel defies global outcry
With moves on West Bank and Gaza City, Israel defies global outcry

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

With moves on West Bank and Gaza City, Israel defies global outcry

The idea of a Palestinian state 'is being erased from the table,' Bezalel Smotrich, the hard-line finance minister, declared after the government approved a settlement project of 3,400 housing units in the heart of the occupied West Bank. Advertisement 'Every town, every neighborhood, every housing unit is another nail in the coffin of this dangerous idea,' Smotrich said Wednesday. At the same time, the Israeli military said it was advancing plans to take over Gaza City, with troops already on the city's outskirts and tents being moved into the southern Gaza Strip for displaced people. An additional 50,000 reservists would be told to report for duty in September, while troops have already obtained 'operational control' over 75 percent of the Gaza Strip, the military said in statements. The United Nations has put that number closer to 90 percent. The military 'has begun the next phase of the war,' said Brigadier General Effie Defrin, the Israeli military's chief spokesperson. The looming assault aims to prevent Hamas — which led the deadly Oct. 7, 2023, onslaught on southern Israel that started the war — from regrouping and planning future attacks, an Israeli military official, who requested anonymity in line with military protocol, told journalists at a briefing Wednesday. Advertisement About 1,200 people were killed and around 250 others kidnapped during the 2023 assault. After nearly two years of Israel's retaliatory war against Hamas, the Gaza Strip has been largely leveled and parts of it have been brought to the brink of famine. More than 60,000 Palestinians have been killed, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, which does not distinguish between combatants and civilians. For Netanyahu, 'it doesn't matter if these steps — the war in Gaza and the quasi-annexation in the West Bank — would damage Israel's relations with the Arab world,' said Michael Milshtein, an Israeli analyst and former military intelligence officer. He said both developments also showed that Netanyahu believes he can continue to depend on American support, even as Arab and European nations sharply condemn Israel's actions. World leaders quickly condemned the announcements on Gaza City. 'The military offensive in Gaza that Israel is preparing can only lead to disaster for both peoples and risks plunging the entire region into a cycle of permanent war,' President Emmanuel Macron of France said on social media. France is among a growing number of countries that, frustrated with Israel's war in Gaza, have declared in recent months that they will recognize a Palestinian state at the annual UN General Assembly in September. While the United States has for years endorsed a so-called two-state solution, it has blocked recent efforts to recognize full Palestinian statehood under current conditions. Advertisement Prospects for a functional Palestinian state have been dim for years, and its boundaries have never been clear. Netanyahu has not publicly shared his position on the new ceasefire proposal, which Hamas has accepted and was announced this week by Qatari and Egyptian mediators. But a statement that his office released Wednesday night seemed to signal that the military operation was soon to begin. Smotrich has led a pressure campaign by hard-liners who have threatened to quit Netanyahu's coalition, and potentially bring down his government, if the proposed ceasefire deal was pursued. Orit Strock, a minister in Netanyahu's government and a member of the far-right Religious Zionism party, warned the prime minister in a radio interview about accepting a deal that did not defeat Hamas and put 'the value of returning the hostages above the national interest.' 'This will push the country into a horrible abyss,' Strock told Army Radio. 'So it is very possible that we will say we will not be prepared to lend our hand to the government.' The new proposal has been described as a 'partial deal' that would not immediately release all hostages and would postpone discussions about ending the war, including the issue of disarming Hamas. As many as 20 hostages are still believed to be alive, according to Israeli authorities. The bodies of 30 others, they say, are being held in Gaza. Many Israelis fear that Hamas will kill the remaining hostages if the military operation goes forward. The Israeli official who briefed journalists Wednesday described the military operation as 'gradual, precise, and targeted,' saying it would extend into areas of Gaza City where Israeli soldiers had not previously been during the war. Advertisement The city and its surrounding neighborhoods remain a stronghold for Hamas fighters and the militants' government, the official said. Two other Israeli military officials said the operation would unfold in parts. First, troops would encircle Gaza City while allowing the population to move south, passing through checkpoints to prevent Palestinian militants from escaping. Then, the troops would move in with force. The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss operational details. Ahmed Saleh, 45, said Israeli troops were sending remote-controlled vehicles packed with explosives to blow up buildings, block by block, in the Zeitoun neighborhood near where he lives in Gaza City. 'I hear the big explosions all the time; they are getting closer,' said Saleh, adding that he would try to stay in his home for as long as possible. If he is forced to leave, Saleh said, he would head west to a beachfront, where he previously lived in a tent while waiting for the violence to ebb. Although worried that Israeli forces will close escape routes to the west, Saleh said he will not move to southern Gaza, as Israel is demanding of displaced residents. 'There are no services there at all, but most importantly, there is no room left for newcomers in the south,' he said. 'I know no one there and have no more money to pay for that trip.' As the international community has focused on the devastating war in Gaza, the Israeli government has barreled ahead with settlement construction in the West Bank. The project that was given final approval Wednesday, known as East One, or E1, was delayed for more than two decades. While the United States had pressured Israel to reject settlement expansion, the Trump administration has been far less critical of settlements than most of the international community, which generally considers them to be illegal and obstacles to Israeli-Palestinian peace. Advertisement About 500,000 Israeli settlers and about 3 million Palestinians live in the West Bank. Israeli authorities have advanced plans for more than 20,000 housing units as of late July, already the highest tally in years, according to Peace Now, an Israeli settlement watchdog. That has been accompanied by a campaign of brazen attacks by Jewish extremists on Palestinian communities. On Wednesday, Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi cited a 'completely inhumane reality that the Israeli aggression has created in Gaza.' He also accused Israel of taking 'illegal measures that continue to undermine the two-state solution and kill all prospects for peace in the region.' The Israeli military official said the new operation will also expand humanitarian aid in southern Gaza, where displaced people are being told to move. That will include opening new aid distribution sites, ensuring there is no fighting near them and opening new routes for trucks to safely bring in more supplies. This article originally appeared in

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store