Op-ed: I've been in education more than 50 years. Indiana must help parents afford pre-K
As a longtime educator, I say it's time for our state to rethink its approach to early childhood education. Studies show the benefits of preschool follow students throughout their entire lives.
I witnessed the positives of pre-K during my 35 years in the classroom. My students with some form of early education had higher literacy scores and a better grasp of their letters. They had a deeper understanding of classroom expectations, sharing with their peers and participating in group work.
This followed my students into their teenage years – children who attended preschool are 11% more likely to graduate from high school. They're also more likely to attend college.
I believe many parents want the best for their children, but they simply can't afford it. The average cost of pre-K for one child is roughly $300 to $430 per week. Our lower-income families can apply for assistance.
However, Indiana is slashing the On My Way Pre-K program by 60% next school year. Only 2,500 of our young kids will have the opportunity to receive assistance for a robust early education. Those children who are enrolled will only receive $148 per week, which won't cover the entire cost. This will affect the availability of preschool for our less fortunate children, who are not responsible for their economic situation.
I remember when Indiana first started working to expand early education in 1986 with the First Steps program. I helped create First Steps because studies showed early intervention was extremely beneficial for toddlers with developmental delays. It took the state legislature about 30 years to reach the same conclusion on pre-K.
In 2014, Indiana launched OMWPK, but we haven't truly addressed the rising cost of early childhood education in the past decade. It's past time for Indiana to act on the ballooning cost of pre-K and child care.
As a seasoned legislator, I believe there's a simple solution: a pre-K tax credit. If Indiana won't invest in a statewide pre-K program, we should put the money back in families' pockets.
A credit would help cover the cost by providing $2,000 to $3,000 for families making less than $75,000 a year. Some states also give businesses a tax credit, encouraging them to help the parents they employ with the costs of pre-K or child care. Across the U.S., 26 states provide a tax credit to cover the costs of preschool or day care. It's time for Indiana to join this cohort.
All children deserve the same educational opportunities regardless of their families' wealth.
Sheila Klinker (D-Lafayette) is an Indiana state representative.
This article originally appeared on Lafayette Journal & Courier: Op-ed: It's time for Indiana to help parents afford pre-K
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14-07-2025
- Yahoo
Dem media group sounds alarm on slow investment: ‘We need help'
As Republicans closed in on passing Donald Trump's spending bill, the leader of a prominent partisan Democratic news organization sent out an urgent plea to donors. In an email earlier this month to top donors and other Democrats obtained by Semafor, Courier Newsroom founder Tara McGowan said that the organization was running low on the funds it needed to sufficiently push out content about the spending bill, which included cuts to Medicaid and food stamps, and increases in immigration enforcement and defense spending, among other provisions. McGowan said the organization had published over 500 stories around the bill across 11 different Courier-owned outlets. But she said they were not breaking through, and after the organization's worst fundraising quarters in six years, Courier needed more funds to promote the articles across social media. 'The problem isn't the volume of the stories we are publishing — it is that without funding, we can't get these stories in front of more of the audiences we need to be reaching to increase awareness and opposition,' she said. 'We currently do not have any funding to boost our coverage of this bill to news-avoidant Americans who are not already subscribing to our newsrooms, and no new funding to increase our subscriber bases in critical competitive districts and states.' She continued: 'As a deep believer in the need for our movement to invest in year-round, always-on media infrastructure, I hate asking for rapid response funding, but this is a crisis moment and year-round media efforts like ours are still not getting the resourcing we need to be as effective as we can be.' She said if given the resources, Courier could provide 'scalable boosted news and/or targeted subscriber acquisition program using our coverage of this bill within hours,' and said the organization could also promote pieces reaching in districts where Republican members are opposed to Medicaid cuts and reckless spending. 'If we can raise $2M this week, we can reach 6 Million under-reached Americans across battleground states now through the next four weeks or the final votes on this bill — through boosting our news through targeted ads and through our network of local, trusted creators in our states.'McGowan's email reflects the attitude that has often made her the focus of Republican attacks and suspicion from nonpartisan journalists. Courier is open about its partisan lens and its funding from Democratic donors. But the fundraising email does not make the point that money is needed to power meaningful journalism — rather, it's to accomplish a political end. The email also emphasizes Courier's continued reliance on a tactic that has been at the center of Democratic digital debates. Courier continues to regularly spend money promoting its articles and content in social feeds, which garners more eyeballs and audiences. But some skeptics say the practice disincentivizes the need to create content that could reach those same audiences organically. Still, McGowan's funding difficulties reflect an experience that many in Democratic circles have had: Donors have been much slower to get back into national politics. The slowing pace of funding reflects a confluence of factors. Some donors continue to feel bitter about the massive amounts of money spent by Vice President Kamala Harris' campaign and the Biden/Harris aligned super PAC Future Forward. Others are more hesitant to face off against an aggressive federal government and a vindictive president looking to inflict pain on his political enemies. And the money that is flowing is being sent to groups who've been targeted by the administration directly. This presents a problem for progressive organizations hoping to redefine the party's media strategy. Activists have been gathering regularly in places like DC, Texas, Utah, Southern California and elsewhere to discuss how Democrats and progressives lost cultural influence and how they can regain momentum. Semafor noted in February, for example, that a collection of activists and progressive media organizations met with donor advisors at the offices of the Laurene Powell Jobs-backed Emerson Collective to discuss ways in which the party could build digital infrastructure and reach new audiences. But the sluggish giving environment has slowed some of these efforts, as new organizations have struggled to raise money and existing orgs haven't been able to expand. Articles like a May New York Times story that laid out some acronym-heavy efforts to reach men through media haven't necessarily helped. Part of McGowan's pitch to donors is that the collapse of traditional print media in much of the country has created a news vacuum that progressive organizations need to fill. 'If we have collectively learned anything from Democrats' loss last year, please let it be that we cannot rely on the traditional media, or traditional ad spending, to educate and mobilize Americans to vote and protest in line with their own values and livelihoods,' she said in the a response to Semafor's inquiry about the fundraising plea, McGowan said the organization had a 'diversified revenue strategy and a solid baseline level of support at Courier,' and had grown its audience significantly, adding 1.4 million followers on TikTok this year, and had 2 million active subscribers across its 11 products. McGowan said while there is 'more energy and philanthropic interest in investing in year-round communications infrastructure and emerging media projects than we have previously seen on the left, that has not yet translated into meaningful investments for many proven, fast-growing, values-driven media organizations that reach non-elite Americans with news that impacts them.' She continued: 'A culture change moment is happening right now in pro-democracy and civic philanthropy — sectors that are used to making cyclical investments in communications and media to increase voter education about what's happening in Washington — but we fear that evolution to see communications funding as a proactive and long-term investment is still moving too slowly.'
Yahoo
02-07-2025
- Yahoo
Purdue says students in 'low enrollment programs' will not be affected mid-degree
WEST LAFAYETTE, IN — Purdue University officials said in a release Tuesday that students enrolled in programs that fall into "low enrollment" standards under Indiana's new Public Law 213 will not be affected mid-degree. Purdue's release followed questions surrounding what would happen to students currently enrolled in majors facing potential elimination and faculty who specialize in those subjects. Public Law 213, born out of House Bill 1001 in the 2025 legislative session setting Indiana's state budget, states that academic programs must meet a three-year average number of students who graduate from the program in order to automatically continue. That threshold is 10 students for an associate's degree program, 15 students for a bachelor's degree program, seven students for a master's degree program, or three students for a doctorate degree program. The university said in the release it has received only a "preliminary (and now outdated) list" of low-conferred degree programs from the state of Indiana and is told to expect an updated version later this summer. "Any potential decisions would follow in accordance with that future list by the end of the 2025-26 academic year. Lists recently shared by the media are not accurate," the release said. Through data provided by Purdue University to the U.S. Department of Education from 2021 to 2023, at least 48 majors were identified by the Journal & Courier to fall into the "low enrollment program" threshold. In an email provided to the Journal & Courier, Joel Ebarb, executive associate dean of the College of Liberal Arts, sent to CLA department heads a list of bachelor's, master's and doctorate programs that do not meet the new state requirements. Ebarb said in the email that a plan for each degree must be provided to the Indiana Commission for Higher Education to preserve the program, but that not all degree programs will be preserved, and some could possibly consolidate with other programs. "Please note: we cannot save and/or defend each of these credentials," Ebarb said in the email. "If there was ever a time you wished to suspend/expire a program, this is it." Of the degrees at risk listed in the email, 17 were bachelor's programs, 10 were master's programs and two were doctorate programs. The state of Indiana allows its public universities to complete the existing commitment to all currently enrolled and incoming students, the university release said. Degree programs "are not expired," the release explained, until current students have completed their studies. "There are multiple options of potential decisions, one of which is merging multiple low-enrollment programs into one program," the release said. "Merging programs will not impact student opportunities: Any merging of existing programs into or under larger degree programs and Classification of Instructional Programs codes will not reduce student opportunities. In fact, historically and currently there are many cases where multiple majors reside in one degree program." Jillian Ellison is a reporter for the Journal & Courier. She can be reached via email at jellison@ This article originally appeared on Lafayette Journal & Courier: Purdue: 'Low enrollment program' students will not be affected mid-degree
Yahoo
24-06-2025
- Yahoo
Op-ed: I've been in education more than 50 years. Indiana must help parents afford pre-K
There's a misconception that preschool is only finger painting, play time or snacks. It doesn't help that Indiana treats pre-K as unnecessary, ranking among the bottom in the nation for enrollment. As a longtime educator, I say it's time for our state to rethink its approach to early childhood education. Studies show the benefits of preschool follow students throughout their entire lives. I witnessed the positives of pre-K during my 35 years in the classroom. My students with some form of early education had higher literacy scores and a better grasp of their letters. They had a deeper understanding of classroom expectations, sharing with their peers and participating in group work. This followed my students into their teenage years – children who attended preschool are 11% more likely to graduate from high school. They're also more likely to attend college. I believe many parents want the best for their children, but they simply can't afford it. The average cost of pre-K for one child is roughly $300 to $430 per week. Our lower-income families can apply for assistance. However, Indiana is slashing the On My Way Pre-K program by 60% next school year. Only 2,500 of our young kids will have the opportunity to receive assistance for a robust early education. Those children who are enrolled will only receive $148 per week, which won't cover the entire cost. This will affect the availability of preschool for our less fortunate children, who are not responsible for their economic situation. I remember when Indiana first started working to expand early education in 1986 with the First Steps program. I helped create First Steps because studies showed early intervention was extremely beneficial for toddlers with developmental delays. It took the state legislature about 30 years to reach the same conclusion on pre-K. In 2014, Indiana launched OMWPK, but we haven't truly addressed the rising cost of early childhood education in the past decade. It's past time for Indiana to act on the ballooning cost of pre-K and child care. As a seasoned legislator, I believe there's a simple solution: a pre-K tax credit. If Indiana won't invest in a statewide pre-K program, we should put the money back in families' pockets. A credit would help cover the cost by providing $2,000 to $3,000 for families making less than $75,000 a year. Some states also give businesses a tax credit, encouraging them to help the parents they employ with the costs of pre-K or child care. Across the U.S., 26 states provide a tax credit to cover the costs of preschool or day care. It's time for Indiana to join this cohort. All children deserve the same educational opportunities regardless of their families' wealth. Sheila Klinker (D-Lafayette) is an Indiana state representative. This article originally appeared on Lafayette Journal & Courier: Op-ed: It's time for Indiana to help parents afford pre-K
