Changes to taxi fare costs likely to go ahead in Glasgow
It would see the minimum charge flag fall rise from £4.40 to £4.50 and the soiling charge lifted from £46 to £47.50.
The changes will now be open to representations, which would be reported back to the committee. Some trade representatives disagreed with the review's findings that insurance costs have decreased, saying drivers are reporting rises.
At a licensing meeting on Wednesday, the trade pushed for a more detailed 'bottom-up' review to be carried out.
Cllr Alex Wilson, SNP, the licensing committee chairman, said: 'A bottom-up review would be a great thing for us going forward, certainly there are more changes to the dynamics of what is happening out there.
READ MORE: Glasgow's new tourist tax approved - here's how much visitors will be charged
'I think we need to find out exactly how that is going to impact the trade.'
The review of the taxi fare scales has been carried out by Dr James Cooper. Changes were recommended after the review concluded the 'costs of operating a tax in Glasgow, the production costs, have increased'.
Under the plans, the flag fall distance and time would change from 889 yards to 880 yards and 167 seconds to 165 seconds. Each additional increment is set to change from a distance not exceeding 179 yards to a distance not exceeding 174 yards and the time changed from 38 seconds to 37 seconds.
However, the distance and time charge would remain at an increment of 30p. The additional charge for hires after 9pm and before 6am is expected to remain at £1.50 and the extra charge for hires between 9pm on December 24 and 6am on December 27 and 9pm on December 31 and 6am on January 3 is to stay at £2.70.
Glasgow Taxi Owners Federation wants to see extra charges for additional passengers, beyond two, and an increased night charge of £2 rather than £1.50 to 'encourage night working'.
It also proposed an alternative tariff which it said would be cheaper for customers. Dr Cooper said there was 'certainly a point of discussion around the structure of the tariff' which could be covered by a bottom-up review in future.
READ MORE: Group of 'neo-Nazis' kicked out of full council meeting
Glasgow Taxis said it had carried out work around demand and usage in the city and would like an opportunity to produce its evidence.
Dr Cooper's report had noted that 'insurance costs have declined over the period of review' but this 'follows a significant increase in the previous period'.
A representative from Unite the union was unable to attend the meeting, but, in a submission to the committee, it stated members had been surveyed and 'not one has reported a reduction' in insurance costs, with an average increase of around 8% instead.
The union also said radio dispatch costs have increased, and high new vehicle costs, plus the removal of some grants, are 'creating financial barriers'.
It added the 'council list of approved vehicles needs to be reviewed, as the dependence on local suppliers is preventing competitiveness, as more cost-effective vehicles are now available across the UK'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
STV News
3 hours ago
- STV News
£800m to be spent on dualling less than a third of A9
More than £800 million will be spent on the A9 dualling project before a third of it is completed, critics have claimed. To date, the SNP has spent over £520m on the A9 dualling project, with a further £300m planned by April 2027, according to figures obtained through Freedom of Information requests. The SNP first committed to fully dualling the A9 between Perth and Inverness in 2011, with a completion date set for 2025. Ministers scrapped that target in December 2023, admitting the dualling would be delayed by a decade. So far, only two of the 11 sections on the A9 between Perth and Inverness have been completed: Kincraig to Dalraddy and Luncarty to Pass of Birnam. The Tomatin to Moy section has only recently entered construction and was planned for 2027, but is now not expected until spring 2028. The other eight sections remain in planning, design, or procurement stages. One year after awarding the contract for the Tomatin to Moy stretch, Scotland's transport secretary visited the site on Monday to meet with workers. Fiona Hyslop said work is 'progressing well' and defended the updated timescales rollout. She said the work is on target and added that drivers will already see improvements as changes are made to the A9. '[The staged dualling approach] is a practical way of making sure we can get delivery of 50% of A9 dualled for 2030, 85% by 2033, and completion of 100% by 2035,' Hyslop said. 'We've looked into every option, this is the best option. From now on, you're going to start seeing work at the north of the A9 as well as the south of the A9.' Shadow transport secretary Sue Webber argued that the SNP's ongoing failure to dual the lifeline road is a 'national shame' and urged SNP ministers to apologise to Scots for wasting this 'eye-watering' amount of money while no progress has been made. 'They've managed to squander £800 million of taxpayers' money and still not even a third of the A9 is dualled,' she said. 'As costs soar and progress stalls, more and more lives are being lost on the A9. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
The Herald Scotland
8 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Unspun: Scotland's Defence bill & the independence debate
Defence is one of the main issues at the heart of Scotland's constitutional debate and a row over the price tag attached to it has become a political battleground. For decades, warships built in Glasgow, nuclear weapons on the Clyde and RAF jets patrolling the skies have symbolised Scotland's significant role in UK defence. And as the 'UK's defence hub', Scotland has naturally seen the political discourse surrounding the topic play out vividly. The most recent Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland (GERS) report, published last week, has reignited the debate. The Scottish Government says Scotland contributes £2.1 billion a year towards defence, based on its share of the UK population. Shona Robison argues that GERS allocates Scotland a 'population share' of reserved UK spending rather than accounting for real expenditure. Yet, the Secretary of State for Scotland, Labour's Ian Murray, describes the Scottish Government £2.1 billion figure as 'wholly misleading' and has said it 'fundamentally misrepresents how the defence of our nation works'. Westminster points to official GERS figures that allocate a much higher £5.1 billion when nuclear submarines, overseas operations, and procurement are included. Economists from the Fraser of Allander Institute suggest the Scottish Government £2.1 billion figure comes from a Ministry of Defence report which only covers transactions with UK-based companies, excluding overseas purchases or research and development that may benefit the sector. For the SNP, the lower figure helps bolster the case that Scotland could fund its own defence force while still investing more in areas such as health, education, and welfare. For Unionists, the £5.1bn estimate underlines the scale of protection provided by being part of the UK, and the challenge of replicating it in an independent state. As with so much in Scotland's constitutional debate, the fight is not really about statistics. It is about competing visions of sovereignty, security, and national priorities. The defence debate is also about livelihoods. Thousands of jobs are tied to the UK's nuclear deterrent at Faslane and Coulport and the MOD contracts sustain Scotland's naval construction industry. At RAF Lossiemouth, secure and well-paid employment supports many in a rural area. Then there's the planned £250 million redevelopment of Faslane which could create even more jobs. An independent Scotland could not guarantee the same scale of investment, at least in the short term. Supporters of independence argue jobs could be redirected into conventional defence forces and shipbuilding for Scotland's own navy. However, critics warn of potential economic shock if UK contracts were lost. READ MORE FROM UNSPUN: Opposition parties accuse the SNP of 'cooking the books,' using a narrow calculation to make independence look more affordable. The SNP counters that Westminster deliberately inflates costs to portray Scotland as dependent. Either way, the row highlights a recurring problem: independence cannot be debated without first agreeing on what the numbers actually mean. As long as two different sets of figures circulate, both sides can claim victory for their own arguments. Defence is about more than money. It is about identity, alliances, and Scotland's place in the world. Would Scots accept higher taxes to maintain a credible military? Could an independent Scotland sit in NATO while rejecting nuclear weapons? These are not abstract questions. They will shape the arguments going into the 2026 Holyrood election. And just as the independence referendum in 2014 was shaped by doubts over currency and oil, the next debate may well turn on the price tag of defence.
Scotsman
15 hours ago
- Scotsman
SNP government faces £36m black hole over refusal to copy Westminster benefits crackdown
PA Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Scotland's benefits agency could force a £36 million black hole in public finances over the SNP's refusal to follow Westminster's benefits crackdown. MPs are currently considering new legislation that would claw back debts incurred by fraud or overpaid welfare claims. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad However, social justice cabinet secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville has refused to back the move by UK Labour as it is not in line with the ethos of the more 'dignified' Social Security Scotland (SSS). As the Scottish Government has insisted on diverging from the Westminster plans, the SNP administration will need to transfer the debts to SSS and rapidly develop a debt recovery scheme or write off the £36m owed. This has caused consternation among MSPs concerned about the strain on Scottish finances when the government is still operating under emergency spending controls introduced last year. Under plans outlined in the proposed new Public Authorities (Fraud, Debt and Recovery) Bill, the DWP would have powers to retrieve owed money directly from a person's bank account. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad If they were without sufficient funds, the DWP could then impose sanctions such as applying to the court for the temporary suspension of their driving licence. The dispute is detailed in letters acquired by The Scotsman from the DWP under freedom of information legislation. Identical requests for information were lodged with both the Scottish Government and the UK Government. However, while the DWP handed over letters from Mr Weston to Ms Somerville, the Scottish Government chose to entirely redact the contents of all correspondence from the SNP cabinet secretary to her Westminster counterpart. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Scottish Government did not respond to a question about the refusal to provide the requested information. In the letters provided to The Scotsman by the DWP, it is made clear that Ms Somerville does not approve of introducing these debt recovery powers in Scotland. In correspondence from Andrew Weston, the UK minister for the DWP, from May and June this year it is explained to Ms Somerville that the DWP will no longer be able to recover debts on behalf of Social Security Scotland when a current arrangement comes to an end in spring 2026. Another letter details that 4000 current debts could be pursued using the new legislative powers and then around 1500 debts each year in the coming years. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad When the plans were first announced in January this year, they were described by Labour as 'the biggest fraud crackdown in a generation' targeted at 'benefits cheats'. Mr Weston writes: 'This flow of new cases will decline as the Scottish Government continues to roll out its own benefit system and DWP does not administer benefits on your behalf.' He goes on to say that the 'continued recovery of debt under a separate system is not cost effective, even if this was limited to the recovery of debts already in repayment.' The MP adds that the DWP will not be able to continue to recover debts under any new long-term agreement or extensions to the current agreement between governments. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The debt recovery situation is also expected to have a knock-on effect on benefits claimants. Those who currently have stable repayment arrangements with the DWP are now in limbo waiting for news of the SNP's plans. Scottish Conservative shadow cabinet secretary for social security Alexander Stewart MSP criticised the Scottish Government's 'secrecy' and said its debt recovery position 'defies belief'. 'No wonder Scotland has a ballooning and unaffordable benefits bill when the SNP Government won't even try to recoup money fraudulently claimed or overpaid,' he said. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'This is taxpayers' cash that has been handed out in error. It defies belief that Shirley Anne Sommerville has no desire to get any of this money back. It's an insult to hard-working, over-taxed Scots. 'It's clear the SNP has no plan or even desire to rein in Scotland's soaring welfare bill. 'The abject lack of transparency from the social justice secretary over her correspondence with her Westminster counterpart is also depressingly predictable from an SNP government addicted to secrecy.' In one letter from May, Mr Weston thanks Ms Somerville for an in-person meeting and says there are 'several complex challenges' involved in her requests for separate legislation - or 'carve outs' - for Scotland. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The MP attempts to reassure the cabinet secretary that measures in the legislation would be used only as a 'last resort'. With other devolved benefits, the DWP transfers information about claimants to SSS. In order for SSS to take on debt recovery, it would require the cases to be transferred between agencies as well as resource debt enforcement. The Scottish Government pays the DWP for the exchange of information under the partially-devolved system. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In December last year, flawed information sharing between the two organisations led to nearly 40,000 Scots missing out on the newly devolved winter heating payment. The oversight came to light as a result of 'urgent number crunching' by the Scottish Government after the introduction of emergency spending controls across government departments. A Scottish Government spokeswoman said Scottish Ministers can seek debt recovery through the civil court process 'where an individual does not voluntarily repay and is no longer in receipt of benefit'. However, the most recent update from Social Security Scotland says the organisation does not yet have the provisions in place to be able to recover debt through the sheriff courts. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Its debt management strategy from 2023 lays out that the agency tries, where possible, to make voluntary arrangements to recover debt. Speaking to Holyrood's finance committee in January this year, SSS chief executive David Wallace said money that was overpaid would not be reclaimed where the benefit recipient could not have reasonably known they were being paid too much. He added: 'We have the powers to enforce deduction from on-going benefits, but we have not yet used them.' 'The Scottish social security system is focused on treating people with fairness, dignity and respect,' the government spokeswoman added. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Scottish Ministers have been clear they cannot support UK Government proposals to take powers to recover directly from an individual's bank accounts without requiring a court order, or to potentially suspend driving licences.' The spokeswoman said there is 'no hole in the Scottish Budget' but did not elaborate on where the money would be found to write off the £36m in fraud and overpayments. She added: 'Given both governments could not find an agreement on this issue, the Scottish Government is looking at what steps now need to be taken in the devolved social security system. There is therefore no impact on the Scottish Budget.'
