Britain's warehouses must be ready to store weaponry, says former Cold War soldier
Andrew Coombs heads up Sirius Real Estate and served in the Territorial Army (TA) during the Cold War. He said his company is factoring military storage into all its investment decisions in the face of Russian aggression, which has triggered a surge in defence spending across the UK and EU.
Germany has has pledged to ramp up its debt to fund €900bn (£750bn) in defence spending over the next decade, while Sir Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister, has also vowed to increase Britain's military budget to 2.5pc of GDP.
Mr Coombs said this will mean more money flowing into the UK to be spent on defence companies and equipment. Defence suppliers are enjoying a boom in demand, with Babcock securing a £1bn contract extension with the British Army on Wednesday, and Avon Technologies announcing a deal to supply Ukraine's military with gas masks.
He added: 'Whatever market you're in, whether you're in catering or you're BAE Systems, you won't be able to ignore €900bn of spending.
'If you own industrial and warehousing space, what you're going to find is a very small amount of that €900bn is going to end up being spent on storage and logistics in the UK.
'No matter what it is, spare parts for drones or ration packs that feed soldiers in the field, or spare kit. All of this stuff's got to be moved and stored.
'Defence logistics is not just pieces of metal, it's people with electronics, boots, respirators, canisters that need to be replaced on the respirators. The logistics are huge.'
Mr Coombs joined the TA aged 17 and was posted briefly to Berlin in 1982 during the Cold War. He joined the Grenadier Guards a year later, going on to serve in Central America and Northern Ireland, returning to the TA in 1987.
He left as platoon sergeant in 1992 and worked as a consultant before joining Sirius in 2010, growing the business to become a £1.3bn company owning business parks across Britain and Germany.
'The property industry isn't really awake to this'
Mr Coombs said more carmakers will likely switch from automotive manufacturing to defence, after Volkswagen expressed its willingness earlier this month to build military equipment for the German army.
Mr Coombs said: 'The property industry generally isn't really awake to this. I'm very surprised by that.'
For Mr Coombs, Europe's efforts to rearm will also mean the British Army will need to deploy more troops to Germany and Poland. That would mean reclaiming many of the properties it has given up.
He said: 'The British Army used to have accommodation, exercise and training areas in Germany when the Army of the Rhine existed. They sold all those when we pulled out.
'We're going to need those back again, because we're going to need to put British troops into both Germany and Poland. Even if you put them in Poland, you need your logistics and supply lines back in Germany.'
Earlier this month, Sirius bought Chalcroft Business Park, a former ammunition depot near Southampton, for £40.5m. It is currently occupied, but Mr Coombs said the reasons for buying the site included its ability to store heavy military equipment and that it is connected to the port, giving the location a tactical advantage.
The landlord also owns Vantage Business Point, a former Royal Air Force station that later housed the headquarters of Xerox. Beyond Britain, Sirius has spent millions on buying business and industrial parks in Dresden in the past year.
Mr Coombs added: 'Everything we are spending money on at the moment, we're asking the question – in a defence logistics situation, how useful would this be? And if the answer is not very useful at all, we're hesitating. If the answer is very useful, then we're moving forward.
'We're not predicating our decisions on this, but we're not walking through this with our eyes closed.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
a few seconds ago
- BBC News
UK trade envoy resigns over Northern Cyprus visit
Labour MP Afzal Khan has resigned as the UK's trade envoy to Turkey following criticism of his visit last week to the self-declared Turkish Republic of Northern territory isn't recognised by the UK government as Turkish troops have occupied Cyprus' northern third since the 1974 Khan, the MP for Manchester Rusholme, also met with Turkish-Cypriot leader Ersin Tatar - a move which the Cypriot government described as "absolutely condemnable and unacceptable".Mr Khan told the BBC he paid for the trip himself and was visiting his nephew, alongside receiving an honorary degree from an academic institution. In a letter to the Prime Minister today, Mr Khan said he felt it was "best to stand down at this time so not to distract from the hard work the government is doing to secure the best possible trade deals for this country".But he insisted his visit had been "in a personal capacity during the parliamentary recess" and was "unrelated" to his role as a trade also suggested that 20 British parliamentarians had visited northern Cyprus without attracting similar shadow foreign minister Wendy Morton welcomed the resignation, but said Sir Keir Starmer should have sacked Mr Khan Priti Patel, the shadow foreign secretary, also called for the MP's resignation earlier this week. Christos Karaolis, President of the National Federation of Cypriots in the UK, said that Mr Khan's position "was clearly untenable following his deeply inappropriate and unacceptable visit to occupied northern Cyprus".A Government spokesperson confirmed Mr Khan has left his position as Trade Envoy to the Republic of Türkiye.
Reuters
a few seconds ago
- Reuters
Trump-Putin summit yields no deal on ending war in Ukraine
ANCHORAGE, Alaska, Aug 15 (Reuters) - A highly anticipated summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday yielded no agreement to resolve or pause Moscow's war in Ukraine, despite both leaders describing the talks in Alaska as productive. During a brief appearance before the media following the nearly three-hour talks, the two leaders said they had made progress on unspecified issues. But they offered no details and took no questions, with the normally loquacious Trump ignoring shouted questions from reporters. "There were many, many points that we agreed on. I would say a couple of big ones that we haven't quite got there, but we've made some headway," Trump said, standing in front of a backdrop that read, "Pursuing Peace." "There's no deal until there's a deal," he added. The talks did not initially appear to have produced meaningful steps toward a ceasefire in the deadliest conflict in Europe in 80 years - or toward a subsequent meeting between Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, both goals Trump had set ahead of the summit. Putin said he expected Ukraine and its European allies to accept the results of the U.S.-Russia negotiation constructively and not try to "disrupt the emerging progress." "I expect that today's agreements will become a reference point, not only for solving the Ukrainian problem, but will also launch the restoration of business-like, pragmatic relations between Russia and the United States," Putin said. But Putin also repeated Moscow's long-held position that what Russia claims to be the "root causes" of the conflict must be eliminated to reach a long-term peace, a sign he remains resistant to a ceasefire. As the two leaders were talking, the war raged on, with most eastern Ukrainian regions under air raid alerts. Governors of Russia's Rostov and Bryansk regions reported that some of their territories were under Ukrainian drone attacks. Zelenskiy has ruled out formally handing Moscow any territory and is also seeking a security guarantee backed by the United States. Trump said he would call Zelenskiy and NATO leaders to update them on the Alaska talks. There was no immediate reaction from Kyiv to the summit. Ukraine's opposition lawmaker Oleksiy Honcharenko said on the Telegram messaging app, "It seems Putin has bought himself more time. No ceasefire or de-escalation has been agreed upon." Czech Foreign Minister Jan Lipavsky said in a statement that he welcomed Trump's efforts but doubted Putin's interest in a deal. "If Putin were serious about negotiating peace, he would not have been attacking Ukraine all day today," he said. The anticlimactic end to the closely watched summit was in stark contrast to the pomp and circumstance with which it began. When Putin arrived at an Air Force base in Alaska, a red carpet awaited him, where Trump greeted Putin warmly as U.S. military aircraft flew overhead. For Putin, the summit - the first between him and a U.S. president since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 - was already a big win, regardless of its outcome. He can portray the meeting as evidence that years of Western attempts to isolate Russia have unravelled and that Moscow is retaking its rightful place at the high table of international diplomacy. Trump hopes a truce in the 3-1/2-year-old war that Putin started will bring peace to the region as well as bolster his credentials as a global peacemaker worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize. Putin is wanted by the International Criminal Court, accused of the war crime of deporting hundreds of children from Ukraine. Russia denies the allegations, and the Kremlin has dismissed the ICC warrant as null and void. Russia and the United States are not members of the court. Both Moscow and Kyiv deny targeting civilians in the war. But thousands of civilians have died in the conflict, the vast majority Ukrainian, and the war has killed or injured well over a million people from both sides. Trump and Putin, along with top foreign-policy aides, conferred in a room at an Air Force base in Anchorage, Alaska in their first meeting since 2019. Zelenskiy, who was not invited to the summit, and his European allies had feared Trump might sell out Ukraine by essentially freezing the conflict and recognizing - if only informally - Russian control over one-fifth of Ukraine. Trump had sought to assuage such concerns on Friday ahead of the talks, saying he would let Ukraine decide on any possible territorial concessions. "I'm not here to negotiate for Ukraine, I'm here to get them at a table," he said. Asked what would make the meeting a success, he told reporters: "I want to see a ceasefire rapidly ... I'm not going to be happy if it's not today ... I want the killing to stop." The meeting also included U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio; Trump's special envoy to Russia, Steve Witkoff; Russian foreign policy aide Yury Ushakov; and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. Trump, who once said he would end Russia's war in Ukraine within 24 hours, conceded on Thursday it had proven a tougher task than he had expected. He had said if Friday's talks went well, quickly arranging a second, three-way summit with Zelenskiy would be more important than his encounter with Putin. Zelenskiy said ahead of Friday's summit that the meeting should open the way for a "just peace" and three-way talks that included him, but added that Russia was continuing to wage war. "It's time to end the war, and the necessary steps must be taken by Russia. We are counting on America," Zelenskiy wrote on Telegram.
Reuters
a few seconds ago
- Reuters
Highlights of Putin statement after summit with Trump
ANCHORAGE, Alaska, Aug 15 (Reuters) - Following are key quotes from Russian President Vladimir Putin's statement after meeting U.S. President Donald Trump in Alaska on Friday. Translation by Reuters. As is known, Russian-American summits have not been held for more than four years. This is a long time. The past period was very difficult for bilateral relations. And, let's be honest, they have slid to the lowest point since the Cold War. And this is not good for our countries, or the world as a whole. Obviously, sooner or later, it was necessary to correct the situation, to move from confrontation to dialogue. And in this regard, a personal meeting of the heads of the two states was really overdue... As you well know and understand, one of the central issues has become the situation around Ukraine. We see the desire of the U.S. administration and President Trump personally to facilitate the resolution of the Ukrainian conflict, his desire to delve into the essence and understand its origins. I have said more than once that for Russia the events in Ukraine are associated with fundamental threats to our national security. Moreover, we have always considered and consider the Ukrainian people, I have said this many times, brotherly, no matter how strange that may sound in today's conditions. We have the same roots and everything that is happening for us is a tragedy and a great pain. Therefore, our country is sincerely interested in putting an end to this. But at the same time, we are convinced that in order for the Ukrainian settlement to be sustainable and long-term, all the root causes of the crisis must be eliminated... All of Russia's legitimate concerns must be taken into account, and a fair balance in the security sphere in Europe and the world as a whole must be restored. I agree with President Trump — he spoke about this today — that Ukraine's security must, without a doubt, be ensured. We are ready to work on this. I would like to hope that the understanding we have reached will allow us to get closer to that goal and open the way to peace in Ukraine. We expect that Kyiv and the European capitals will perceive all of this in a constructive manner and will not create any obstacles. That they will not attempt to disrupt the emerging progress through provocation or behind-the-scenes intrigue. It is obvious that Russian-American business and investment partnership has enormous potential. Russia and the United States have something to offer each other in trade, energy, the digital sphere, high tech and space exploration. Cooperation in the Arctic, resumption of interregional contacts, including between our Far East and the American West Coast, also seem relevant... I expect that today's agreements will become a reference point not only for solving the Ukrainian problem, but will also launch the restoration of business-like, pragmatic relations between Russia and the United States. Overall we have established very good business-like and trusting contact with President Trump. And I have every reason to believe that by moving along this path, we can - the quicker the better - reach an end to the conflict in Ukraine.
