EU, Macron urge Niger junta to free ex-president
BRUSSELS : The EU and French President Emmanuel Macron on Saturday urged Niger's ruling junta to release ousted president Mohamed Bazoum, two years to the day the army detained him.
Bazoum has been held, along with his wife Hadiza, in a wing of the presidential palace, and according to his lawyers, he has not left the building in that time.
The 27-member bloc said in a statement it welcomed the recent release of some political prisoners but 'regretted' the continued detention of Bazoum, 65, and others.
'The EU calls again for the release of these people who are being held for political reasons,' said the statement from Kaja Kallas, the bloc's top diplomat.
Macron also called for Bazoum's release in a separate statement Saturday.
'Today, my thoughts are with Mohamed Bazoum, arbitrarily held for two years after the putsch which drove him from office as president of Niger,' Macron wrote on Facebook.
'I am also thinking of his wife Hadiza, who is held with him and his loved ones. I add my voice to all those calling for his release,' he added.
Months after the coup, the junta said it intended to put Bazoum on trial, accusing him of treason and of 'plotting against the security and authority of the state'.
If he was convicted of treason, he could face the death penalty, say his lawyers.
In June last year, Niger's state court, set up by the regime, lifted Bazoum's presidential immunity, which could open the path to a trial.
To date, however, no case has been opened against the former president, who was elected in 2021 and has not resigned.
'The EU remains available for a frank, honest, and structured dialogue with the Nigerien authorities based on mutual respect and shared interests,' the EU statement said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
19 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Buddhist monk, father and son among 13 dead in Myanmar junta air strike on ruby town
YANGON, Aug 3 —- A Myanmar junta air strike on a rebel-occupied ruby mining hub killed 13 people on Saturday, according to a resident and a spokesperson for an armed opposition group. Civil war has consumed Myanmar since the military seized power in a 2021 coup, sparking resistance from pro-democracy guerrillas who found common cause with long-active ethnic armed groups. Their scattered forces initially struggled to make headway, but a combined offensive starting in late 2023 seized swathes of territory, including the town of Mogok – the centre of the ruby trade. Myanmar is rich in precious stones and rare earth elements coveted by all factions and sold off, mostly to neighbouring China, to boost war chests. A junta spokesperson could not be reached for comment. However, a local who declined to be named for security reasons said the strike took place around 08:15 am (0145 GMT), killing seven instantly, with six dying later of their wounds. He said among the dead were a Buddhist monk collecting alms and a father and son who were riding the same motorbike. 'A car passing through the area was hit, too,' he added. 'Seven people were wounded, including the driver.' A spokeswoman for the Ta'ang National Liberation Army, which has occupied Mogok since last summer, matched that death toll, but gave a figure of 14 wounded. 'It was in the morning time when the airstrike hit a public area,' said spokeswoman Lway Yay Oo. 'There were a lot of people walking in the street, therefore a lot of people were killed.' The military was initially backfooted by the rebels' combined offensive, but has enacted conscription to boost its ranks. Its troops recently retook several key settlements in central Myanmar, including the gold mining hub of Thabeikkyin, which it seized late last month after a year-long battle. The junta on Thursday ended the state of emergency it had declared after toppling the government of Aung San Suu Kyi more than four years ago, and has touted elections in December as an off-ramp for the conflict. However, with Suu Kyi still jailed, opposition groups, including ousted lawmakers, are boycotting the poll. A UN expert in June described the exercise as a 'fraud' designed to legitimise the junta's continued rule. — AFP
The Star
21 hours ago
- The Star
Enabling genocide in Gaza
A mourner carrying the body of a victim killed by Israeli bombardment on the Mawasi area of Khan Yunis, during the funeral outside Nasser Medical Complex in Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza Strip. — AFP A BRIEF pause in small portions of the targeted territory before the death knell sounds again. That's what Israeli concessions of a temporary 10-hour gap in its daily genocidal endeavours amount to. Far too few trucks delivering lifesaving aid are being permitted through the Zionist barriers, and the Jordanian/Emirati airdrops are seen as both grossly inadequate and somewhat risky. This past week, Israeli organisations B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights both belatedly acknowledged the ongoing genocide. This matters. A small but growing number of Israeli citizens, both Arab and Jewish, have been protesting against the atrocities being committed in their name. But, like the aid that is being allowed to go through, they are little more than a drop in the ocean. Much the same could be said about the Western allies that decry Israel's egregious actions without taking any measures to halt them. France's impending recognition of a Palestinian state has been greeted with horror by Israel and the United States, but wonders why Emmanuel Macron left it until the UN convenes in September. After all, more than 140 UN member states recognise a Palestinian state since 1988. Much of Europe has been reticent, however, despite the knowledge that it would not make much difference. Europe was instrumental in backing the Zionist project nearly 80 years ago, when a new colonial-settler state was established even as previous ones were beginning to be dismantled. There was a degree of absurdity in the notion that the recompense for the Nazi-led Holocaust lay in occupying Palestinian land, and that murdering or driving out many of its inhabitants was the obvious means of achieving this objective. But its sponsors have always forgiven Israel's deadly excesses. Token gestures have never made much of a difference, and the French vow of eventual recognition falls pretty much in the same category, while exposing the even more blatant hypocrisy of nations such as Australia and the United Kingdom, which occasionally spell out their horror at Israeli actions without offering to take any steps that just might interrupt the genocide. Ceasing to supply Israel with the means of perpetrating its deadly designs could be an initial step, but would even that make much difference as long as the US wholeheartedly backs its chief Middle Eastern protégé? Even Donald Trump's concession this week that 'those children look very hungry ... that's real starvation stuff', is meaningless unless the US stops facilitating the genocide. The so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation it has sponsored has served as a means of mass murder. There is little prospect of a reversal. Images of emaciated children from Gaza that echo the horrific visions of Auschwitz survivors are here to stay. Holocaust scholars such as Omer Bartov have left no doubt where they stand today, even if it took them long to recognise what seemed obvious in the immediate aftermath of Oct 7, 2023, when Hamas and its associates broke out of Gaza and faced little resistance in committing crimes that initially went uncontested, but eventually unleashed a genocide by those who had faltered in defending their kibbutzim, partly because they focused on backing the Zionist offenders in the West Bank. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is not expected to pronounce its verdict on whether Israel is committing genocide until late 2027 or early 2028, ie, after the killing is done and the ethnic cleansing is complete. What would be the point of that, beyond an acknowledgment that history will not absolve Isra¬el's collaborators? Its enablers range across the globe, but the Middle East stands out as a particularly egregious transgressor. And while India is one of the few nations in the Global South that deplorably stands solidly behind Israel's genocidal intentions, Pakistan is on the same page as Israel in proposing a Nobel Peace Prize for the US president. Pakistan was among the 30 or so nations represented in Bogotá this month at a conference intended to halt the genocide, alongside the likes of Qatar, Oman, Iraq, Lebanon and Turkey. Colombia and South Africa, though, have been the leading lights of the initiative. A few decades ago, India might have fit into that category. Once it stood out as a staunch defender of Palestinian rights, but today it prefers the Zionist narrative. What the future might hold for Palestine is uncertain, but any notion of resurrecting a two-state solution that was buried long ago by Israel and its western backers is absurd. A Palestinian-free Gaza Riviera along the lines proposed by Trump and backed by much of the genocidal Netanyahu cabinet might prove unachievable, but tens of thousands of lives could be lost in the process, long before the ICJ musters up the courage to acknowledge what is thus far this century's worst crime against humanity. — Dawn/Asia News Network
The Star
a day ago
- The Star
Suhakam welcomes Farah Nini Dusuki as chief Children's Commissioner
KUALA LUMPUR: The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) has welcomed the designation of Dr Farah Nini Dusuki as chief Children Commissioner until the end of her term as Human Rights Commissioner on March 8, 2026. In a statement on Saturday (Aug 2), Suhakam also welcomed the appointments of three new Human Rights Commissioners, Dr Mohd Al Adib Samuri, Dr Zufar Yadi Brendan Abdullah and Melissa Mohd Akhir, effective June 28 this year. Mohd Al Adib and Zufar Yadi have also been designated as children commissioners. All appointments and designations were made by Yang di-Pertuan Agong on the advice of the Prime Minister under Sections 5 and 6A of the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia Act 1999 (Act 597), reflecting the government's ongoing commitment to strengthening the protection and promotion of children's rights in Malaysia. "Suhakam is confident that the experience, expertise, and unwavering dedication of the new Commissioners will enhance the Commission's efforts to safeguard the rights and well-being of all children, including those who are undocumented and in conflict with the law," the statement read. Farah Nini, appointed as Suhakam Commissioner on March 8, 2023, is a respected academician at the Faculty of Law, University of Malaya, with over 32 years of experience in child rights and human rights. She holds a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in child law from Cardiff University and has worked extensively with government agencies and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) on legal reforms, complaint mechanisms, and public advocacy related to critical children's issues. According to the statement, Mohd Al Adib, a scholar at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, focuses on child rights within the Islamic legal framework, collaborating with ministries, the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), and civil society on issues such as child marriage and the rights of refugee children. Zufar Yadi, with nearly four decades of experience, is active in social development and child-focused volunteer initiatives in Sarawak. Melissa Mohd Akhir, a child rights expert with regional experience, previously served as a Deputy Public Prosecutor and was involved in drafting child protection laws. She now focuses on access to justice and advocacy work. Suhakam said it looked forward to working collaboratively to build an inclusive and child-centred Malaysia, in line with the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and the Child Act 2001 and reaffirmed its commitment to ensuring that every child in the country is protected, heard and allowed to thrive. "Suhakam hopes that these appointments and designations will support and enhance institutional responses to key child rights issues, particularly in ensuring access to quality education, robust child protection mechanisms, and a just and rehabilitative juvenile justice system," it said. – Bernama
