&w=3840&q=100)
Israel warns Iran's Supreme leader will end up like Saddam Hussein: How did the Iraqi dictator die?
Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz has warned Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei 'of a fate similar to Saddam Hussein'. The Iraqi dictator ruled the country with an iron fist for nearly three decades. He was executed in 2006 following his capture by the US forces. But why was America after him? read more
Israel has warned Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei 'of a fate similar to Saddam Hussein' — the late Iraqi dictator. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz made the remarks on Tuesday (June 17) during a meeting with Israeli military and security service commanders.
'I warn the Iranian dictator against continuing to commit war crimes and launch missiles toward Israeli civilians,' he said, as per a statement from his office. 'He should remember what happened to the dictator in the neighbouring country to Iran who took the same path against Israel.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Katz's comments come amid mounting tensions between Israel and Iran . The West Asian countries have launched strikes and counterstrikes against each other for six days now.
But who was Saddam Hussein and what fate did he meet? We will explain.
Who was Saddam Hussein?
Saddam Hussein ruled Iraq for nearly 30 years. Born into a poor family in the al-Awja village outside Tikrit, 150 km north of Baghdad, in 1937, he went on to join an uprising against pro-British royalist rulers at the age of 19.
As a member of the Baath Party, Saddam participated in a botched assassination attempt against Iraq's military ruler, General Abd al-Karim Qasim, in October 1959.
Saddam, who was wounded in the attempt, fled – first to Syria and then to Egypt.
He returned to Baghdad after the Baath Party returned to power in a military coup in February 1963.
However, nine months later, the party was ousted and Saddam was imprisoned. He was made the deputy secretary-general of the Baath party while in jail.
In July 1968, the party toppled the rule of President Abdul-Rahman Aref in a coup. Saddam helped install his cousin, Ahmed Hassan al-Bakr, as Iraq's president.
After serving as his cousin's vice president, Saddam replaced al-Bakr to become Iraq's president in 1979.
He ruled the country with an iron fist, suppressing anyone who opposed him. While most of the public lived in poverty, Saddam had a taste for luxury and built over 20 lavish palaces throughout Iraq.
To win public support, he provided universal healthcare, free university education, and equal rights for women, as per PBS.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Saddam Hussein rose through the ranks to become the leader of the Baath party. File Photo/AFP
Saddam launched a war against Iran in September 1980. However, it evolved into a war of attrition that lasted eight years. The two countries agreed to a ceasefire in 1988, ending the fighting.
In March 1988, Iraqi forces carried out a chemical attack on the Iraqi Kurdish town of Halabja, killing about 5,000 people.
Under Saddam's leadership, Iraq invaded neighbouring Kuwait on August 2, 1990. His occupation of Iraq led to a global trade embargo against Iraq.
In January 1991, the United States-led forces launched the Gulf War, targeting Iraq and occupied Kuwait with air strikes. Iraq fired missiles at Israel during the conflict, which ended six weeks later. The US forced Iraqi forces out of Kuwait.
Saddam was elected unopposed as Iraq's president in October 1995. Eight years later, the US launched a war against Iraq to collapse the dictator's government.
How Saddam Hussein met his end
In March 2003, the US forces invaded Iraq to destroy the 'Iraqi weapons of mass destruction' and end Saddam Hussein's rule, claiming the Iraqi dictator had links with al-Qaeda.
The US-led forces swept into Baghdad in April. As Saddam's rule crumbled, Iraqi civilians and US soldiers pulled down a statue of the Iraqi president in the capital's Firdos Square.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
On July 22, the US troops killed Saddam's two sons – Uday and Qusay – in a gun battle in the northern city of Mosul. However, Saddam continued to remain in hiding.
After nine months on the run, the former Iraqi dictator was captured on December 13, 2003. The US soldiers found him hiding in a six-to-eight-foot deep hole, or 'spider hole,' at a farmhouse nearly 15 km outside his hometown of Tikrit.
The pictures of his capture showed the once 'dapper' man with an unkempt, bushy beard and dishevelled hair. Despite being armed, Saddam did not resist his arrest by the US forces.
Saddam Hussein is filmed after his capture in this footage released December 14, 2003. File Photo/Reuters
In October 2005, the former Iraqi dictator's trial began. Saddam was charged with crimes against humanity for the killing of about 150 people in the Shiite Muslim town of Dujail, Iraq, in 1982. He pleaded not guilty.
Another trial on charges of war crimes against Saddam in the 1988 'Anfal' campaign against Iraqi Kurds began in August 2006. The campaign had led to the killing of 100,000 Kurds. The Iraqi High Criminal Court charged the former president with genocide.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In November, Saddam was sentenced to death by hanging for the 1982 Dujail massacre. An appellate chamber of the Iraqi High Tribunal upheld his death sentence.
On December 30, 2006, Saddam, clutching a Quran, was hanged.
In 2023, former Iraqi Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi claimed that Saddam's body was 'disposed of' in an area between his home and that of Nouri al-Maliki, the Iraqi PM at the time of the former dictator's death, in Baghdad's fortified Green Zone.
As per Al Jazeera, al-Kadhimi said in an interview with Arabic daily Asharq Al-Awsat, 'I disapproved of the act [of disposing his body next to his home], but I saw a group of guards, and I asked them to stay away from the body out of respect for the dead.'
'Yes, it [Saddam's body] was brought [outside al-Maliki's house],' said al-Kadhimi. 'Al-Maliki ordered its handover to one of the sheikhs of al-Nada tribe, Saddam Hussein's tribe, and so it was collected from the Green Zone.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
He added, '[Saddam] was buried in Tikrit. After 2012, when [the area] came under the control of ISIS (ISIL), the body was dug up and moved to a secret location no one knows to this day. The graves of his children were also tampered with.'
Despite the US' claims, weapons of mass destruction were never found in Iraq.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
30 killed in alleged Israeli gunfire near aid site in Gaza
Gaza's civil defence agency said 30 people were killed by Israeli fire in the Palestinian territory on Wednesday, including 11 who were seeking aid. The war sparked by Hamas's October 2023 attack on Israel has ravaged the Gaza Strip, with severe shortages of food, fuel and clean water. Civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal told AFP that 11 people were killed and more than 100 wounded "after the occupation forces opened fire and launched several shells... at thousands of citizens" who had gathered to queue for food in central Gaza. The army told AFP it was looking into the incident reported by the civil defence agency. In early March, Israel imposed a total aid blockade on Gaza amid deadlock in truce negotiations, only partially easing restrictions in late May. Since then, chaotic scenes and a string of deadly shootings have occurred near areas where Palestinians have gathered in hope of receiving aid. The civil defence agency said another 19 people were killed in three Israeli strikes on Wednesday, which it said targeted houses and a tent for displaced people. Israeli restrictions on media in the Gaza Strip and difficulties in accessing some areas mean AFP is unable to independently verify the tolls and details provided by the civil defence agency. The UN humanitarian office OCHA said on Monday that its partners "continue to warn of the risk of famine in Gaza, amid catastrophic levels of acute food insecurity". The civil defence agency reported that at least 53 people were killed on Tuesday, as they gathered near an aid centre in the southern city of Khan Yunis hoping to receive flour. The Israeli military told AFP regarding one of Wednesday's attacks that its troops were "operating to dismantle Hamas military capabilities". It said it was "looking into" the other reported attacks. After Israel eased its blockade, the US- and Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) began distributing aid in late May, but its operations have been marred by chaotic scenes and dozens of deaths. In a statement on Tuesday, the organisation said that "to date, not a single incident has occurred at or in the surrounding vicinity of GHF sites nor has an incident occurred during our operating hours". UN agencies and major aid groups have refused to cooperate with the foundation over concerns it was designed to cater to Israeli military objectives. The Hamas attack which triggered the war resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, according to Israeli official figures. The Gaza health ministry said on Wednesday that 5,334 people have been killed since Israel resumed major operations in the territory on March 18, ending a two-month truce. The overall death toll in Gaza since the war broke out has reached 55,637 people, according to the health ministry.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
28 minutes ago
- Business Standard
'I don't care what she said': Trump on Tulsi Gabbard's Iran nukes claim
US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (local time) publicly rejected the assessment of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard regarding Iran's nuclear program. Speaking to reporters while returning from the G7 summit in Canada, Trump contradicted Gabbard's testimony to Congress that Iran is not currently pursuing nuclear weapons. Instead, he sided with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has consistently claimed that Iran is inching closer to nuclear capability, justifying Israel's airstrikes on Iranian positions. When asked how close Iran was to developing a nuclear bomb, Trump responded, 'Very close.' Reporters also pointed out Gabbard's earlier statement to Congress in March this year, where she said US intelligence agencies believed Iran had not restarted its nuclear weapons program. To this, Trump replied, 'I don't care what she said. I think they were very close to having one.' This marks the first time in his second term that Trump has directly challenged Gabbard's view on Iran's nuclear intentions. Ongoing tensions with US intelligence Trump has a long history of clashing with intelligence officials. During his first term, he repeatedly cast doubt on agency findings — including the widely accepted conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help his campaign. At one point, he even sided with Russian President Vladimir Putin's denials over US intelligence assessments during a summit in Helsinki. Intelligence agencies differ on Iran threat Meanwhile, Director Gabbard's position remains unchanged, according to a Reuters report. Her office maintains that US intelligence believes Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has not given orders to restart a nuclear weapons program. Iran, for its part, continues to deny any intent to develop nuclear arms. It insists that its uranium enrichment activities are for peaceful, civilian use. According to Gabbard's briefing to Congress, even if Iran decided to restart its weapons program today, it would still need up to three years to develop a nuclear warhead capable of targeting other nations. On the other hand, Netanyahu, who has long warned about Iran's nuclear ambitions, welcomed Trump's stance. He has argued that pre-emptive Israeli action is necessary to prevent Iran from reaching weapons-grade nuclear capability.
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Oil, Ukraine, and a lesson from Syria: Why Russia is hesitant to help ally Iran as Israel rains missiles
Photo/Agencies Just a decade ago, the world watched as Russia made a bold and high-stakes intervention in Syria. In 2015, when Bashar al-Assad's regime stood on the brink of collapse, Russian fighter jets streaked across Syrian skies. That intervention not only saved Assad, at least temporarily, but also projected Moscow's re-emergence as a power with teeth in the Middle East. Fast forward to 2025, and the scene today looks very different. Iran, one of Russia's closest regional allies, is now under sustained attack from Israel. Over the past several days, Israeli strikes have hit Iranian missile facilities and suspected nuclear sites. And yet, the Kremlin's response has been muted, even passive. While Moscow has issued the usual statements of concern and condemnation, it has shown no inclination to get involved militarily. This marks a sharp departure from the Syria playbook and reflects a significant recalibration of Russia's Middle East policy. A war too far: Ukraine saps Russia's will to fight for Iran At the heart of Russia's caution is its war in Ukraine. The ongoing conflict, Europe's biggest since World War II, is now in its third year, and has consumed much of Russia's military capacity. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch xu hướng AUD/USD? IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Nikita Smagin, an expert on Russia-Iran relations, summed it up clearly: "Russia, when it comes to Iran, must weigh the possibility of a clash with Israel and the United States, so saving Iran is obviously not worth it," Smagin was quoted as saying by the New York Times . In other words, the Kremlin has neither the resources nor the appetite for another major military adventure, especially one that risks confrontation with two formidable powers. Russia is also treading carefully because of its relationships with the Gulf monarchies—countries like Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar. These states, while wary of Israeli escalation, are deeply uncomfortable with a stronger Iran. Russia has worked hard to develop economic and energy partnerships with the Gulf, and intervening on Iran's behalf could jeopardize those ties. There is also the recent memory of Syria itself. Although Russia initially managed to keep Assad in power through its intervention, the regime ultimately collapsed in December 2024. The collapse of Assad's regimemarked a painful and costly failure for the Kremlin. Years of military investment, political capital, and international pushback ended in defeat. Half a year later, Moscow is still picking up the pieces—and that experience weighs heavily on how it views the Iranian situation today. There's no doubt that the collapse of Iran's regime—which now appears to be an Israeli objective—would represent another major loss for Russia's network of alliances in the region. It would join Iraq, Libya, and Syria on the growing list of countries where Moscow has seen its influence unravel. And yet, the Kremlin does not appear panicked. In fact, the current conflict may be playing into its hands in a different way. Mediator in the Middle East Unlike during the Syria crisis, where Russia had to use force to assert its presence, this time it is leveraging its position as a potential mediator. Vladimir Putin is currently the only major global leader with open lines to all three key players in this crisis: Iran, Israel, and the United States. That fact alone gives Russia significant diplomatic leverage. A report by CNN highlighted how Putin is already using that leverage behind the scenes. "In a recent call to the White House, Putin reminded President Donald Trump how Russia has been a long-time US ally when it comes to the Iranian nuclear issue – a heavy hint that he is open to being one again." The White House, CNN added, appears receptive to this possibility. "If it comes to some form of behind-the-scenes diplomacy, Russia is more likely to play a role between Iran and the United States — Israel's interest in negotiations is not apparent," Fyodor Lukyanov, head of the Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, a think tank that advises the Kremlin, was quoted as saying in a report by the Bloomberg. Putin's mediation efforts have already begun. The Russian president has reached out to both Iranian and Israeli leaders, offering to help de-escalate the situation. From Moscow's perspective, being the indispensable broker is a way to exert influence while avoiding the risks that military intervention would entail. Chaos pays This broker role also aligns with Russia's long-term economic interests. Tensions in the Middle East often lead to higher oil prices, something that benefits the Kremlin, which continues to rely heavily on energy exports to sustain its war in Ukraine. "While the oil price is high, Russia can get billions of dollars, potentially tens of billions of dollars in additional revenue, and this is always useful," Sergei Markov, a Kremlin-connected political analyst was quoted as saying by The Washington Post. By remaining diplomatically engaged but militarily uninvolved, Russia is preserving its influence in the region while quietly profiting from the instability. What we are seeing, then, is not a retreat by Russia, but a strategic pivot. In the past, influence in the Middle East meant projecting hard power—troops, jets, bases. Today, the Kremlin seems to believe it can do more with less. It is using the crisis not to save Iran in the traditional sense, but to reframe itself as the essential power for dialogue and de-escalation. Still, this approach carries risks. If Iran's regime does fall, Russia will lose one of its few remaining allies in the region. Already, its footholds in Iraq, Libya, and Syria have receded, and Iran's fall would deepen that trend. That could further isolate Moscow at a time when it is already under pressure from Western sanctions and a grinding war in Ukraine. But for now, the Kremlin appears to be betting that it can keep a foot in the door diplomatically, even as its military stays home.
