logo
NYT Connections April 22, 2025 answers and hints: Solve today's puzzle #681 with full word groups, clues, and winning strategy

NYT Connections April 22, 2025 answers and hints: Solve today's puzzle #681 with full word groups, clues, and winning strategy

Time of India22-04-2025

NYT Connections Hints and Answers for April 22, 2025: Today's Puzzle #681 Decoded -
The
NYT Connections
puzzle for April 22, 2025, is creating quite the buzz, and it's easy to see why. Puzzle #681 looks deceptively simple with just 16 words, but as any fan knows, it can get tricky real fast. Whether you're trying to group studio tools or spotting things you've slipped on before, this one tests your attention to detail. Don't worry though—we've got you covered with helpful hints, category breakdowns, and the full set of answers to guide you through today's grid.
What is NYT Connections and how does it actually work?
Connections
is a daily word game launched by
The New York Times
in 2023. Every day, you're given a 4x4 grid—16 words in total. Your job? Group them into four sets of four based on a common connection. These links could be anything: similar meanings, wordplay, pop culture, or even something subtle like function or feel.
Let's say you spot 'Paint,' 'Clay,' 'Wheel,' and 'Kiln'—those could all be items you'd find in a pottery studio. Select all four, hit submit, and boom—you've got one group locked in. You keep doing that until all four groups are solved.
But here's the twist—you only get four wrong guesses. So, it's less about speed and more about spotting those hidden links.
Stuck on today's puzzle? here are the hints for april 22
If Puzzle #681 has you scratching your head, you're not alone. Today's puzzle mixes physical textures, artistic tools, natural forces, and even project cancellations. Here are the clue-based hints to help you crack it:
Live Events
Yellow category
: Think about how you'd
end
something quickly.
Green category
: Common in a creative studio, especially where clay is involved.
Blue category
: All about that slick, slippery feeling.
Purple category
: Think nature—what naturally gives off heat?
Let's break them down further with real examples.
What are the actual NYT Connections categories for april 22?
Here are the official categories for today's Connections puzzle (#681), according to
The New York Times
:
Yellow (Cancel, as a project)
: AXE, CUT, DROP, SCRAP
Green (Seen in a pottery studio)
: CLAY, GLAZE, KILN, WHEEL
Blue (Things that are slippery)
: BANANA PEEL, EEL, GREASE, ICE
Purple (Natural producers of heat)
: FIRE, LIGHTNING, SUN, VOLCANO
Each group follows a tight theme, and once you spot the pattern, the rest clicks into place. For example, 'Banana Peel' and 'Grease' immediately bring that slick image to mind—perfect for the 'slippery' category.
How can you get better at playing NYT Connections?
If you're new to the
Connections
game or find yourself struggling, you're not alone. A few smart strategies can seriously boost your solving skills:
Start with the obvious words
: Words like 'Banana Peel' or 'Fire' tend to pop out with strong imagery. Use those to find your first connection.
Use the shuffle button
: Sometimes, a new layout makes hidden patterns easier to spot. Don't skip the shuffle—it can unlock your brain in a weirdly helpful way.
Watch your guesses
: Remember, you only get four mistakes. So don't rush. Think a bit before hitting submit.
Look for word groups with strong verbs or nouns
: Project management terms like 'cut' and 'scrap' often appear together. It's all about pattern recognition.
What's next after april 22's Connections puzzle?
If you didn't get today's puzzle on the first try, that's totally okay.
Connections
is a game of patience and practice. And with a new grid every single day, there's always a fresh challenge waiting for you tomorrow. We'll be back with the next batch of hints and answers to help you stay on top of your game.
So, keep those guesses sharp, shuffle wisely, and keep coming back for daily breakdowns of each Connections puzzle. Trust us, your brain will thank you.
FAQs:
Q1: What are the answers for NYT Connections April 22, 2025?
A1: The answers are grouped into canceling terms, pottery tools, slippery things, and natural heat sources.
Q2: How do you solve NYT Connections puzzles easily?
A2: Look for simple word patterns, use the shuffle button, and guess carefully.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Blake Lively vs Justin Baldoni: Actress REACTS to Judge throwing out $400 million lawsuit; says 'Will stand for every woman's right to have a voice'
Blake Lively vs Justin Baldoni: Actress REACTS to Judge throwing out $400 million lawsuit; says 'Will stand for every woman's right to have a voice'

Time of India

time42 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Blake Lively vs Justin Baldoni: Actress REACTS to Judge throwing out $400 million lawsuit; says 'Will stand for every woman's right to have a voice'

A federal judge on Monday, dismissed actor and director 's $400 million lawsuit against , marking a significant development in the contentious legal battle surrounding their film It Ends With Us. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now In the wake of the ruling, Lively issued a powerful statement reaffirming her commitment to women's rights and the fight against retaliatory lawsuits. Taking to her Instagram stories, Blake wrote, 'Last week, I stood proudly alongside 19 organizations united in defending women's rights to speak up for their safety. Like so many others, I've felt the pain of a retaliatory lawsuit, including the manufactured shame that tries to break us. While the suit against me was defeated, so many don't have the resources to fight back. I'm more resolved than ever to continue to stand for every woman's right to have a voice in protecting themselves, including their safety, their integrity, their dignity and their story. There are protections out there. Check out some of the incredible organizations below for resources and information. With love and gratitude for the many who stood by me, many of you I know. Many of you I don't. But I will never stop appreciating or advocating for you.' The lawsuit stemmed from Lively's December 2024 filing accusing Baldoni of sexual harassment during the production of their romantic drama. Baldoni and his production company, Wayfarer Studios, countersued in January for $400 million, alleging defamation, extortion, and loss of creative control. However, US District Court Judge Lewis Liman ruled that the director's defamation claims could not proceed because allegations made in a lawsuit are exempt from libel claims. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now He also ruled that the director's claims that Lively stole creative control of the film didn't count as extortion under California law. Furthermore, Liman found that Wayfarer Studios did not provide sufficient evidence that Lively was contractually obligated to promote the film or approve marketing materials. Baldoni's legal team can revise the lawsuit if they want to pursue different claims related to whether Lively breached a contract, the judge said. Lively's attorneys, Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb, welcomed the ruling and indicated that they would now seek attorneys' fees and additional damages. 'We look forward to the next round,' they said in a joint statement. Meanwhile, a spokesperson for The New York Times, which had reported on the legal dispute, expressed gratitude for the court's recognition of the press's role. 'The court recognized that the law is designed to protect just that sort of journalism,' said spokesperson Charlie Stadtlander. The case has garnered significant public attention, not only due to the high-profile nature of the parties involved—including Lively's husband, actor Ryan Reynolds—but also because of the broader conversation around women's rights in the entertainment industry.

Judge dismisses Justin Baldoni's $400 million defamation case against Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds
Judge dismisses Justin Baldoni's $400 million defamation case against Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds

Mint

time5 hours ago

  • Mint

Judge dismisses Justin Baldoni's $400 million defamation case against Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds

A U.S. federal judge has dismissed actor and filmmaker Justin Baldoni's $400 million defamation lawsuit against actress Blake Lively and her husband, actor Ryan Reynolds. The court found that Lively's accusations of sexual harassment were legally protected under litigation privilege and therefore immune from defamation claims. The ruling, delivered on Monday by Judge Lewis J. Liman, also dismissed related claims of extortion and contractual interference brought by Baldoni. However, the judge allowed Baldoni to refile certain allegations related to interference with contracts. Lively's legal team welcomed the decision, calling it a 'total victory.' In a statement, they said, 'Today's opinion is a total victory and a complete vindication for Blake Lively, along with those that Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer Parties dragged into their retaliatory lawsuit, including Ryan Reynolds, Leslie Sloane and The New York Times. As we have said from day one, this '$400 million' lawsuit was a sham, and the Court saw right through it.' They also confirmed plans to seek attorneys' fees, treble damages, and punitive damages against Baldoni and others involved in what they described as 'abusive litigation.' Lively had previously filed a federal lawsuit accusing Baldoni and the producers of 'It Ends With Us' of sexual harassment and retaliation. She alleged that the defendants began a smear campaign against her after she raised concerns about working conditions on the film's set. Baldoni's suit had claimed that Lively, Reynolds, their publicist, and 'The New York Times' conspired to ruin his career with false allegations. But the court ruled that the initial complaints, made to the California Civil Rights Department and shared with the press, were protected by legal privilege.

Judge dismisses Justin Baldoni's $400 million defamation lawsuit against Blake Lively
Judge dismisses Justin Baldoni's $400 million defamation lawsuit against Blake Lively

India Today

time5 hours ago

  • India Today

Judge dismisses Justin Baldoni's $400 million defamation lawsuit against Blake Lively

In a significant legal setback, actor and director Justin Baldoni's high-profile lawsuits against actress Blake Lively, her husband Ryan Reynolds, their publicist Leslie Sloane, and The New York Times have been dismissed by a US judge. The lawsuits, which sought $400 million and $250 million respectively, centered on claims of extortion, defamation, and reputational reported by Reuters, on June 9, Judge Lewis J. Liman granted motions to dismiss the complaints filed by Baldoni and his production company, Wayfarer Studios. In the ruling, the judge stated that Baldoni's team had not adequately proven the defendants acted with "actual malice" or had reason to doubt the truth of their statements — a key requirement in defamation Liman explained that although Lively's remarks were made in a formal complaint and therefore legally privileged, the other claims against Reynolds, Sloane, and The New York Times were not adequately founded in law. Nevertheless, Baldoni's legal team has been given until June 23 to amend and resubmit certain claims involving contract interference and violation of the implied covenant of good to People, the court case stems from Lively's 2024 complaint of sexual harassment against Baldoni during filming for It Ends With Us, allegations he has denied. Following Lively's complaint, Baldoni filed a defamation counterclaim, alleging that she misrepresented the facts and ruined his this ruling dismisses Baldoni's claims, the broader legal battle continues. A trial involving Lively and Baldoni is scheduled for March 2026, where both parties are expected to testify."It Ends With Us" garnered mixed reviews, but grossed more than $351 million worldwide, according to Box Office Watch

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store