Jim Chalmers backs 1.2 million Housing Accords goal, says Australia needs ‘ambition' to solve housing crisis
Partially unredacted files released to the ABC through a Freedom of Information request showed Treasury warning that the National Housing Accords would 'not be met,' and suggested a review of Housing Australia, the national housing agency.
While Labor has committed to building 1.2 million well-located homes in the five years to June 30, 2029, the target is already 55,300 homes behind following its first year of operation.
Recent data compiled by the Institute of Public Affairs has also revealed that in the decade between 2014 to 2024, the time it took to build a freestanding home had increased 50 per cent, from 8.5 months to 12.7 months.
In the same period the cost of building materials had also soared by 53 per cent.
Despite the slow start, Mr Chalmers backed Labor's ability to reach the target, adding that he was 'pretty relaxed' about the accidental FOI slip.
'Under current trajectories, we would fall short. But that doesn't mean that between now and over the course of the next four years, that we can't consider ways and work with the states and territories and others, local governments and others, on ways to build more homes,' he told reporters on Monday.
While he acknowledged the government needs to 'do more' and 'do better' to reach the 1.2 million figure, he said the ambition was warranted given that housing is one of the 'defining challenges in our economy'.
'It's not the worst thing from time to time for it to be understood in the broader community that this will be a difficult target to meet,' he said.
'But if we all do our bit, we all play our part, as the Commonwealth has been willing to play, then we can build the homes that people desperately need.'
Acting Coalition housing spokesman James Paterson said the advice from Treasury has 'confirmed what Australians already know'.
'Labor will fail to build the 1.2 million new homes they promised,' he said.
'Under the former Coalition Government, Australia built an average of 190,000 new homes per year. Under Labor, that figure has dropped to barely 170,000. To meet their own housing target, Labor needs to build 250,000 new homes annually.
'Instead of building housing, Labor are obsessed with building housing bureaucracies.'
Housing Minister Clare O'Neil has previously vowed to cut red tape and regulation to supercharge the number of homes coming onto the market.
Like Mr Chalmers, she said the Productivity Roundtable in August would help identify ways to improve planning policy.
'It's just too hard to build a house in this country because we're not innovating enough and because we don't have the workforce we need,' she told the ABC earlier this month.
'So, the roundtable in August is going to be a really important opportunity for me and other people in this sector to come forward and say we need to make some big decisions about how we are going to shift those dynamics so we can get better housing outcomes for Australians.'
Sharing more details of the highly-anticipated talks in August, Mr Chalmers said business leaders, unions and regulators would be asked to focus on resilience, productivity and sustainability across the three days.
RBA governor Michele Bullock will speak on the first day of talks, while Productivity Commissioner Danielle Wood and Treasury Secretary Jenny Wilkinson will respectively take charge of days three and four.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Australian
2 hours ago
- The Australian
AI elephant in the boardroom: future workforce is here
There's an elephant in the boardroom. It's not politely waiting for your digital transformation strategy. It's already reshaping how work gets done, who does it, and what 'a job' even means. That elephant is artificial intelligence. While most leaders are fixated on generative tools and productivity boosts, few are confronting the deeper workforce transformation under way. AI is not just a technology shift. It's a workforce reckoning and for many leadership teams, it's still sitting in the too-hard basket. But the future has already arrived. The apprentice model is breaking Our traditional model of career development — learning by doing, gradually gaining experience and judgment — is under threat. Junior roles are often the first to be automated. In law, AI now summarises case law and drafts contracts, work previously done by graduates. In accounting and consulting, it automates reconciliations, analysis, and reporting. If AI does the 'doing,' how do emerging professionals learn? We continue to prepare workers for roles that may soon be obsolete, while under-investing in the capabilities humans will need most in an AI-enabled world: judgment, adaptability, ethical reasoning, creativity and critical thinking. These skills are essential to critique, shape and responsibly integrate AI into our world. Dr Kellie Nuttall is AI Institute Leader at Deloitte Australia Without redesign, we risk a generation of leaders who've never developed the judgment to lead. Doctors, for example, may become passive interpreters of AI diagnostics, unable to navigate the complex decisions patient care demands. This shift isn't limited to medicine or law. Even some of the world's leading AI companies are hiring fewer traditional tech grads. Why? Because the skillset that matters most in an agentic AI world isn't just code — it's systems thinking, strategic reasoning, and the ability to work across disciplines. It's many AIs per role — not one per person A single AI agent may not replace a human job, but a team of agents working together can come close. For example, a marketing co-ordinator role could be handled by five AI agents managing copywriting, campaign scheduling, data reporting, customer segmentation, and workflow orchestration. In finance, AI agents could process sales end-to-end — validating transactions, recording them in accounts, reconciling data, monitoring compliance, and generating reports. We might start the journey with one human worker replaced by a digital one, but behind that 'one' will be an ecosystem of agents. Suddenly, the whole notion of traditional organisational structures needs to be rethought entirely. 'New jobs will emerge' is not a strategy We often hear that, like the Industrial Revolution, new roles will appear. That may be true. But what are they? Who will be qualified for them? How will people be trained to do them? And what's our plan to ensure they're accessible beyond the digitally elite? This isn't just a technology conversation — it's a leadership one. The companies gaining ground aren't just investing in tools. They're empowering business leaders to challenge long-held assumptions, redesign jobs, and reimagine how value is created. If you're serious about leading through this transformation, start by scenario planning for radically different futures, including one where digital labour represents potentially more than 30 per cent of your workforce. The best way to assess your level of preparedness is to ask what your plan is if your current organisational design no longer serves you or what leadership and team structure looks like when AI agents are your middle managers. You might also think about how you could protect and enhance human judgment in the areas where it matters most and how your revenue model will adapt in this new landscape. Once that's accomplished you should look to build a human capability roadmap. Shift your focus from training people to compete with AI to helping them augment it. Invest in creativity, emotional intelligence, complex decision-making, systems thinking – the skills machines can't replicate. Simultaneously, to keep up with the pace of change, you need to go beyond using AI in fragmented ways. Don't just pilot tech — prototype the future of work. Embed AI agents into real workflows. Learn where they shine, where they fail, and what it takes to scale. And don't forget to use AI personally so you truly understand what you're dealing with. Learning by doing is the only way to stay ahead. The AI elephant isn't looming in the distance. It's already sitting at the boardroom table, quietly rewriting your workforce strategy. The organisations that thrive next won't be the ones who talk about AI. They'll be the ones who act with urgency, clarity and imagination. Because if you're not actively reshaping your workforce for this new reality, you're not leading into the future. You're watching it unfold without you. Dr Kellie Nuttall is AI Institute Leader at Deloitte Australia. Stephen Gustafson is CFO Program Leader at Deloitte Australia. - Disclaimer This publication contains general information only and Deloitte is not, by means of this publication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified professional adviser. Deloitte shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person who relies on this publication. About Deloitte Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee ('DTTL'), its network of member firms, and their related entities. DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. Please see to learn more. Copyright © 2025 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. -

The Australian
2 hours ago
- The Australian
AI in the finance function: usage grows on the path to scale
CFOs at Australian corporations are seeing a rapid pick-up in the use of AI at their organisations and in their finance functions but are still working towards implementing the technology at scale as they juggle competing priorities. According to Deloitte's most recent biannual CFO Sentiment Report – which featured responses from more than 60 large company CFOs – AI use in the finance function has more than doubled to 64 per cent since the end of 2024 , narrowing the gap between it and the broader organisational adoption rate, which sits at 83 per cent. It is a remarkable adoption rate considering AI really has only been commercially available for around two years – and this might explain the maturity of organisations' AI strategies. Three-quarters of respondent CFOs said their organisations' AI strategies are in either the 'early' or 'somewhat developed' stages. It goes without saying that having a top-down approach, where AI is coordinated in a strategic way across both the finance function and the whole business can lead to bigger benefits and profitability. Deloitte's most recent State of Generative AI in the Enterprise report found the organisations who invested big and fast in AI transformation ended up with increased efficiency and product capabilities, translating into pricing advantages and market growth. Those who took a bit longer to invest in Gen AI are now struggling to catch up. It can be hard to see AI investment through to implementation without those guiding top-down strategies both across the business and within the finance function. What's preventing these strategies from developing? At the moment, CFOs point to factors including competing priorities, investment costs, skills shortages and privacy concerns. Almost half of the CFOs surveyed described 'competing priorities' as the biggest barrier to AI adoption in their company specifically. This was followed by 'talent resources and capabilities' and 'sufficient depth of understanding of AI technology' at 34 and 31 per cent respectively. Stephen Gustafson is CFO Program Leader at Deloitte Australia Interestingly, all three of these top barriers to AI deployment slightly decreased in their relevance for CFOs over the last six months. Comparatively, 'privacy and security issues' grew by 13 percentage points over the same period, reflecting growing global concerns about data governance and rising cyber threats. The challenges CFOs face with implementing firm-wide AI strategies may be influencing the way they view risk. For example, 'technology implementation and digital disruption' jumped 12 percentage points in its perceived risk level for CFOs over the last six months, up to 48 per cent. CFOs' growing concerns around AI privacy and security could also suggest they increasingly recognise what's at stake: Deloitte's State of Generative AI in the Enterprise report highlights that organisations risk losing 20 to 56 per cent of their market cap following a negative trust-related event. Ironically, it also found that the erosion of trust in AI is leading to an increased demand for personal customer service and human interaction, which could be another factor to consider in the development of a mature AI strategy. Elsewhere, the global business landscape continues to be demanding, with compressed margins, weak profitability, and many businesses reluctant to pass on additional price increases to consumers already faced with cost-of-living pressures. In the face of this, cost control and operational efficiency are top of mind for CFOs, with 80 per cent saying it's a high priority for their organisation. However, the report also suggests CFOs may be taking a growth-enabling perspective on cost management. Rather than viewing cost-cutting as a short-term, defensive strategy, they are aligning cost initiatives with strategic goals to encourage longer-term growth and efficiency improvements. This has encouraged CFOs to make strategic choices about how to allocate limited resources for the greatest impact. It also implies they could be re-aligning their budgets to further invest in AI deployment or development. Clearly, business leaders are aware of the need to invest in transformation and technology to boost productivity, and AI is front of mind. But as it becomes more powerful and pervasive, there's growing pressure to deploy it responsibly, securely, and officially. The pace of AI adoption has been remarkable, but with the technology so far mostly contained to growing pockets of use, its full potential – in the finance function and beyond - remain to be seen. Once organisations overcome these barriers to scale (and they will) to execute deployment in accordance with a top-down strategy, the technology's productivity benefits will become truly visible. Stephen Gustafson is CFO Program Leader at Deloitte Australia. - Disclaimer This publication contains general information only and Deloitte is not, by means of this publication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified professional adviser. Deloitte shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person who relies on this publication. About Deloitte Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee ('DTTL'), its network of member firms, and their related entities. DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. Please see to learn more. Copyright © 2025 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. -


West Australian
5 hours ago
- West Australian
Mark Latham denies abuse claims made by former partner Nathalie Matthews
Former Labor leader turned One Nation firebrand Mark Latham has been accused by a former partner of forcing her into degrading sexual acts as part of an application for a domestic violence order. The allegations, first reported by The Australian on Monday night , were made by Latham's former long-term partner and Liberal Party member Nathalie Matthews. Both The Australian and The Sydney Morning Herald reported the complaints had been detailed in documents filed with the NSW Local Court. Both mastheads reported Matthews as claiming Latham had engaged in a 'sustained pattern' of abuse, alleging he had pressured her into having sex with other people and driven his car at her. Latham took to X on Monday night to deny the allegations, which he called 'false and ridiculous'. 'The Australian newspaper has published a story based on allegations from Nathalie Matthews which are comically false and ridiculous,' he wrote. 'I have scores of documents to show that and will rely upon them to defend myself. As the old saying goes, Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. 'The story says that Matthews went to the police and they did not do anything. They certainly haven't contacted me. 'In the current environment, that says a lot. She told me in April she had been to police seeking an AVO against another man and complained that they did nothing.' Latham become leader of the Australian Labor Party in 2003, losing the following year's federal election to John Howard. He resigned from Labor in 2005 and after a number of controversial incidents joined Pauline Hanson's One Nation party as its NSW state leader in 2018. Less than a year ago he was forced to pay NSW MP Alex Greenwich $140,000 over a series of homophobic tweets.