
Pet dogs have ‘extensive and multifarious' impact on environment, new research finds
Dogs have 'extensive and multifarious' environmental impacts, disturbing wildlife, polluting waterways and contributing to carbon emissions, new research has found.
An Australian review of existing studies has argued that 'the environmental impact of owned dogs is far greater, more insidious, and more concerning than is generally recognised'.
While the environmental impact of cats is well known, the comparative effect of pet dogs has been poorly acknowledged, the researchers said.
The review, published in the journal Pacific Conservation Biology, highlighted the impacts of the world's 'commonest large carnivore' in killing and disturbing native wildlife, particularly shore birds.
In Australia, attacks by unrestrained dogs on little penguins in Tasmania may contribute to colony collapse, modelling suggests, while a study of animals taken to the Australia Zoo wildlife hospital found that mortality was highest after dog attacks, which was the second most common reason for admission after car strikes.
In the US, studies have found that deer, foxes and bobcats were less active in or avoid wilderness areas where dogs were allowed, while other research shows that insecticides from flea and tick medications kill aquatic invertebrates when they wash off into waterways. Dog faeces can also leave scent traces and affect soil chemistry and plant growth.
The carbon footprint of pets is also significant. A 2020 study found the dry pet food industry had an environmental footprint of around twice the land area of the UK, with greenhouse gas emissions – 56 to 151 Mt CO2 – equivalent to the 60th highest-emitting country.
The review's lead author, Prof Bill Bateman of Curtin University, said the research did not intend to be 'censorious' but aimed to raise awareness of the environmental impacts of man's best friend, with whom humans' domestic relationship dates back several millennia.
'To a certain extent we give a free pass to dogs because they are so important to us … not just as working dogs but also as companions,' he said, pointing to the 'huge benefits' dogs had on their owners' mental and physical health. He also noted that dogs played vital roles in conservation work, such as in wildlife detection.
'Although we've pointed out these issues with dogs in natural environments … there is that other balancing side, which is that people will probably go out and really enjoy the environment around them – and perhaps feel more protective about it – because they're out there walking their dog in it.'
Angelika von Sanden, a trauma therapist and the author of Sit Stay Grow: How Dogs Can Help You Worry Less and Walk into a Better Future, said she had observed that for many clients the companionship of a dog was often 'literally the only reason to survive, to get up, to still keep going'.
'It gives them a reason to get up, a reason to get out, a reason to move around and be in contact a little bit with the world outside,' she said.
'Dog owners can get a bad name if they are not aware of the surroundings they are in and of other people around them,' she noted.
In the review, the researchers attributed the extent of the environmental impacts to the sheer number of dogs globally, as well as 'the lax or uninformed behaviour of dog owners'.
A simple way to mitigate against the worst impacts was to keep dogs leashed in areas where restrictions apply and to maintain a buffer distance from nesting or roosting shorebirds, the paper suggested.
'A lot of what we're talking about can be ameliorated by owners' behaviour,' Bateman said, pointing out that low compliance with leash laws was a problem.
'Maybe, in some parts of the world, we actually need to consider some slightly more robust laws,' Bateman said, suggesting that dog exclusion zones may be more suitable in some areas.
Bateman also raised sustainable dog food as an option to reduce a pet's environmental paw print, noting however that 'more sustainable dog food tends to cost more than the cheap dog food that we buy which has a higher carbon footprint'.
'If nothing else, pick up your own dog shit,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
Fossil discovery suggests sauropods didn't chew their food
Scientists say they've made an interesting discovery about one of the largest dinosaurs that ever roamed Earth.A team of experts took a closer look at the fossilised stomach contents of a 95-million-year-old sauropod - nicknamed found that the dino ate leaves from tall conifer trees as well as smaller seed ferns and flowering research also suggests that the sauropod barely chewed its meals due to the size of the pieces of food inside its body. What did scientists discover? The group of scientists, lead by Curtin University in Australia, decided to study the fossilised stomach contents of a sauropod that was originally found in 2017 in the Australian state of dinosaur, a species called Diamantinasaurus matildae, was nicknamed Judy by made this discovery unique, was that Judy's stomach contents had been well preserved, revealing for the first time in detail what it team's research found that the dinos snacked on a variety of plants from various heights above the ground, and that this helped their long-term researcher Dr Stephen Poropat explained: "We also confirmed that sauropods were bulk-feeders – a method still used by herbivorous reptiles and birds today. "This means they would not have chewed their food, instead swallowing it whole and letting their digestive system do the rest of the work," he said. Therefore, sauropods would have relied on fermentation in its guts to process the food it Poropat added that food could have stayed in the dinosaur's digestive system for "up to two weeks" and that discovering what sauropods ate is critical to understanding their "impact on Earth's ecosystems" throughout that time.


Daily Mirror
04-06-2025
- Daily Mirror
Ultra rare 'Harbinger of Doom' fish washes up on popular tourist beach
A rare oarfish or 'doomsday fish' was found on a beach in Australia by a dog walker - and according to legend, the deep-sea species appearing on land is a very bad omen A fish claimed to be a sign of impending natural disaster has washed up on a beach in Australia. An oarfish - sometimes called the 'doomsday fish' - was found on Ocean Beach on Tasmania's west coast on Monday. The deep-sea creature lives thousands of feet below the surface of the ocean, and so is rarely seen by humans. In Japanese mythology, its appearance is seen as a bad omen, foretelling the later appearance of dangerous sea serpents or tsunamis. But Sybil Robertson, who was walking her dog along the beach when she spotted the nine-foot oarfish, said she was not aware of the apparent significance of her find at first. She was first alerted to its presence by a sea eagle, a bird of prey, which had taken interest in the washed-up creature. Ms Robertson, a resident of nearby Strahan, told the ABC: "I was watching a sea eagle flying around and I noticed it was coming down onto the beach and I thought, 'That's unusual, I don't often see them land on the beach. "I could see it was a long fish but I had no idea what kind of fish" "As I got closer, I could see the beautiful colouring around its head and the markings on it were fabulous." She snapped a few photos at the scene before later sharing them to a social media group called Citizen Scientists of Tasmania, where commenters identified it as an oarfish. Authorities were then contacted, and were urged to act quickly before more birds decided to feast on the fish. Samples were then collected and sent off to the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), an Australian government research agency. Earlier this year, the oarfish's unexpected appearance on a beach in the Canary Islands s parked a social media frenzy, attracting hundreds of thousands of likes and comments. Many referred to the Japanese folk legend of 'ryūgū no tsukai', which claims that the fish dwell beneath Japan's islands, only surfacing as an immediate portent of major earthquakes. Some even claim they surfaced shortly before the devastating 2011 quake, which left nearly 20,000 people dead. Voicing their fears after the Canary Islands sighting, one Instagram user commented: "Something bad is going to happen." Another wrote: "Usually, it means that an earthquake is coming when it appears to the surface of the water." And someone else penned: "Put that back and run, may be a tsunami coming." Despite the persistent myths surrounding the oarfish, a 2019 study by Japanese researchers said there was no evidence of any link between sightings of the species on land and tectonic activity.


Time Out
02-06-2025
- Time Out
Can we see the Aurora Australis lights from Sydney and NSW?
Here in NSW, we're lucky enough to have some dazzling natural wonders on our doorstep. But the one that everyone's been talking about – the magical natural light show known as Aurora Australis – is rarely as visible here in NSW as it is in other Australian states. Over the weekend, a bunch of Aurora Australis sightings were reported in South Australia and Tassie – here's what we know. Can you see the Aurora Australis from NSW? The Aurora Australis – the light rings that appear in the sky above the South Pole, also known as the Southern Lights – are most commonly sighted during March and September when the Earth's magnetic field is best orientated to interact with the solar wind. Over the past few days, some Aussies were treated to a late display – with a geomagnetic storm making the lights visible from Tasmania and parts of South Australia. While last year a huge geomagnetic storm ignited the Southern Lights in such a way that they were visible from NSW, this recent storm hasn't had the same effect, with no recent sightings reported from NSW. What is the Aurora Australis? Auroras are caused by "solar wind", electrically charged particles that stream from the Sun towards Earth at super high speeds (up to 2,000 kilometres/second). Most of the particles are stopped by Earth's magnetic field, but some of them manage to travel down the magnetic field lines at the South Pole and North Pole, and when they mix with atmospheric gases, they create a colourful light display in the dark. In the Southern Hemisphere, this phenomenon is called the Aurora Australis, while in the Northern Hemisphere it's the Aurora Borealis. How to see the Aurora Australis in NSW If and when there is a chance of a Southern Lights sighting, your best bet of spotting the lights is by finding a south-facing spot without light pollution. You've got more chances of being able to avoid light pollution in regional NSW than in Sydney, but here's our guide to the best spots for stargazing in and near Sydney. A bright aurora display generally lasts around one to three hours, and is typically brightest between the hours of 10pm and 2am. The BOM issues Aurora watch notices when an Aurora is likely to be visible – so keep an eye out here if you're keen to catch a glimpse.