Overdoses, brawls and court battles: Will state take over chaotic L.A. juvenile halls?
But lessons at Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall were interrupted on a Friday in early April when three teenagers suffered what county officials later confirmed were drug overdoses. One collapsed in front of his classmates and two others passed out in their rooms, according to multiple sources who requested anonymity to discuss the ongoing investigation.
The L.A. County Probation Department, which oversees Los Padrinos, said three youths were hospitalized on April 10 because of overdoses from an unspecified drug. The day before, the sources familiar with the investigation said, probation officers found a large quantity of Xanax inside the Downey facility, where most of the approximately 270 detainees are 18 or younger.
The emergency was the latest in a years-long series of fiascoes within L.A. County's juvenile halls — all of which have unfolded under the watchful eye of the California attorney general's office.
Four years after the state's Department of Justice entered into a settlement to improve conditions in L.A. County's juvenile halls, frustrations are hitting a boiling point. The Probation Department has shown no signs of progress, prompting calls for Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta to intervene.
Bonta declined an interview request, but said in a written statement to The Times that the Probation Department is headed toward the "end of the line."
Bonta said he is preparing "to take steps" to ask a court to place the Probation Department in receivership, essentially wrestling away control of the agency from the leaders who have failed to implement reforms.
"The current situation at Los Angeles County juvenile halls — and particularly at Los Padrinos — is unacceptable," Bonta said. "Los Angeles County continues to fail to implement the court-ordered reforms necessary to protect the health, safety, and well-being of the kids under their care."
Already shut down once, Los Padrinos was reopened in July 2023 after the state forced the closure of two other dysfunctional facilities, leaving the county with few alternatives to house young people with pending criminal cases. Barry J. Nidorf Hall in Sylmar is home to the county's Secure Youth Treatment Facility but otherwise remains under a state shutdown order, and the county also operates a number of lower-security juvenile camps.
Recent years have seen a riot at Los Padrinos, a fatal fentanyl overdose at Nidorf, and continued reports of abuse and excessive force across the system. Probation officers now refuse to come to work, citing chaotic and dangerous conditions. Last month, 30 officers were indicted for arranging what Bonta termed "gladiator fights" between youths at Los Padrinos.
Bonta's critics say he has ample cause to take further action. The L.A. County inspector general's office has published six reports showing the Probation Department is failing to meet the terms of the state oversight agreement, including instances in which officers and officials were caught lying about violent incidents in the halls.
'When we issued our first report that said zero percent compliance, I hoped that the next report would show an effort to change. It didn't. I don't expect this entity to change outside meaningful outside force," said Inspector General Max Huntsman. 'If Bonta doesn't, then who can? Who will?"
The California Board of State and Community Corrections ordered Los Padrinos shut down in December, but Probation Department Chief Guillermo Viera Rosa refused to comply, a move supported by the county Board of Supervisors.
Despite pressure on Bonta to step in and take legal action to close the hall, Los Padrinos continued operating in violation of state rules until April 18, when a judge ordered the Probation Department to begin depopulating Los Padrinos based on a legal challenge from the L.A. County public defender's office.
If or when Los Padrinos will once again sit vacant — and what will happen to the kids held there — remains uncertain.
A Probation Department spokeswoman, Vicky Waters, said a 25-person team is focused on achieving compliance with the state settlement.
Asked about Bonta's suggestion of a potential state takeover, Waters said the agency welcomes "continued dialogue with the attorney general and his office, the monitor, our stakeholders and the public to ensure that this process leads to meaningful transformation."
Those who spend time in L.A.'s juvenile halls welcomed the possibility of Bonta stepping up — but also questioned why it took so long.
'There's certainly been no evidence in the history of the entire L.A. County Probation Department that they are going to fix themselves," said veteran defense attorney Jerod Gunsberg.
The California attorney general's office began investigating L.A. County's juvenile halls in 2018 and found probation officers were using pepper spray excessively, failing to provide proper programming, and detaining youths in solitary confinement in their rooms for far too long.
In 2019, Los Padrinos was shut down for the first time, because of a dwindling population of juveniles jailed in L.A. County and a scandal that ended with six officers charged with child abuse for the way they used chemical spray. All were later acquitted.
In 2021, the state and county reached an agreement aimed at drastically improving conditions.
But force incidents in the halls were still up about 6% as of June 2024, according to a Times analysis of data contained in inspector general's office reports. The number of grievances filed by youths about conditions in the halls doubled from 2021 to 2024, according to Probation Department records.
The department was supposed to capture 90% of all force incidents in the halls on camera, but the inspector general found that mark was repeatedly missed. Some watchdog reports said officers delayed paperwork for months — and in some instances were caught lying about their justification for using violence.
One probation officer claimed they had to use pepper spray — which both the state and Board of Supervisors have tried to ban — to subdue a youth who was attacking them. Video, however, showed the boy turning away from an officer, fists unclenched, when he was sprayed in the face.
The county's inspector general cited the Los Padrinos "gladiator fights" that were caught on security footage as another example of brazen misconduct in the face of state oversight.
'The things that they will do in full view of cameras is particularly disturbing," Huntsman said.
Michael Dempsey, the court-appointed monitor enforcing the settlement, said he could not comment, citing a confidentiality agreement.
In his first public report released earlier last month, Dempsey raised concerns that the department's improvements have been "slow and inconsistent," and said conditions are worsening.
He wrote that staffing issues continue to be a core problem, with the department "backfilling" juvenile hall jobs with adult probation officers who usually interact with violent adult felons on the streets and do not want to work with kids. The department also continues to fail to give youths access to proper programming, education or services, which Dempsey wrote leaves kids idle, bored and frustrated.
"The facilities have become much more dangerous for staff and the youth," Dempsey wrote in his April report. "The Monitor's review of the data provides evidence that both facilities are experiencing high rates of incidents of violence, use of force, major disturbances, and the use of illicit drugs."
Sean Garcia-Leys, a former member of the county's probation oversight commission, said on one visit last year he found kids pacing around listless with nothing to do. He recalled one group with a football, not playing catch but hurling it as hard as possible at each other. On another visit, he said he found air conditioners broken in the summer heat and shower drains backed up with foul odors emitting from the floor.
Garcia-Leys believes the conditions are affecting youths' mental health and making them more likely to engage in violence.
'You see these same kids in different environments, and they don't attack staff. Like, literally the same kids," he said.
Huntsman, the inspector general, said there are plenty of additional steps Bonta could take after four years of noncompliance, including trying to have county officials held in contempt of court.
"Like every other political person, he's counting the votes, and takes action based on votes,' Huntsman said of Bonta, who is up for reelection next year.
Bonta says he has not stood entirely on the sidelines. In addition to filing criminal charges in the gladiator fights case, the attorney general's office noted it has filed several motions with the judge overseeing the settlement trying to cajole reform.
But none of those filings have levied penalties on the county or probation leaders, records show. And without a top-down overhaul, Probation Department critics fear nothing will change.
One probation official — who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of reprisal — said they repeatedly raised alarms that youths were not receiving the proper amount of schooling in the halls.
'I made sure to report everything up the chain and every time I did, nothing happened within the department. Nothing happened externally either," the official said. "The attorney general? Never did anything.'
Viera Rosa, the probation chief, declined an interview request.
Records obtained by The Times show he has taken steps to limit contacts between his staff and state officials. When he took office in 2023, a departmentwide email ordered staff to stop contacting the attorney general's office directly over the settlement.
While some in the office took the message as an attempt to stifle negative reports to oversight officials, Waters, the department spokeswoman, said the email was simply meant to "centralize communications" with the California Department of Justice.
In the five months since the state found Los Padrinos "unsuitable" to house youth, the facility has continued to be the sight of disturbing incidents.
In addition to the recent spate of overdoses, a teen was stabbed during class at Los Padrinos in March. Multiple sources told The Times the youth was stabbed in the eye; Waters said only that the teen suffered "non-life-threatening injuries."
According to a March court filing, a 19-year-old held at Los Padrinos claimed he was sexually abused by a Department of Mental Health employee during multiple counseling sessions over the past year. Both the Probation Department and DMH declined to comment.
The teen's lawyer described the encounters in a notice of claim, which is a precursor to a lawsuit, as "consensual," but incarcerated people cannot legally consent to sex with government employees or guards.
The Probation Department says three-quarters of teens housed at Los Padrinos were arrested for violent crimes. Advocates have called on the department to move youths to camps or place them in community-based "step down" programs, akin to halfway houses.
Despite constantly criticizing the Probation Department's handling of the halls, all five members of the L.A. County Board of Supervisors supported Viera Rosa's refusal to close Los Padrinos last year. In statements to The Times, each of the board's members defended that decision, saying it was the best of bad options.
"It is clear to me that just moving these young people to another facility in L.A. County would not solve the long-standing issues and will only create more problems," Supervisor Janice Hahn said in a statement. "The possibility that these kids might be transferred outside of the county would be hugely disruptive and would force their families to travel across the state or across the country to visit them."
Another hearing on the judge's order to empty out Los Padrinos is set for mid-May.
That order was the result of a legal challenge filed by L.A. County Public Defender Ricardo Garcia, who said Bonta's oversight of the settlement has been "insufficient" and described the continued housing of youth at Los Padrinos as "grossly negligent."
"If you or I or anybody treated their child in that way, that child would be taken away and placed somewhere safe," he said.
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
California leads coalition suing Trump administration over SNAP data
This story was originally published on Grocery Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Grocery Dive newsletter. Dive Brief: The office of California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced Monday that it is suing the USDA, arguing that the agency is illegally demanding that states provide personal and sensitive information about millions of SNAP participants. California is leading a coalition of attorneys general from 20 states and Washington, D.C., in filing the lawsuit. The lawsuit, which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, claims that President Donald Trump's administration is trying to collect unrelated, protected data to fuel mass deportation efforts and says that the USDA has threatened to pull funding from states that do not comply with the data request. Dive Insight: The lawsuit comes after Bonta led a coalition of 14 attorneys general earlier this month criticizing the USDA's demand in May that states turn over information about SNAP participants. In the May letter, the USDA said it was trying to eliminate 'information silos' within the SNAP program, citing a recent executive order focused on stopping waste, fraud and abuse, according to the lawsuit. 'USDA claimed the agency would use this data to 'ensure program integrity,' including by verifying the eligibility of recipients, even though Congress has delegated that task to the States,' the lawsuit says. The USDA directed states to provide personally identifiable information, including names, dates of birth, personal addresses, Social Security numbers and the total amount of benefits received for all SNAP applicants and recipients since January 2020, according to the lawsuit. While the USDA says it wants this information to improve the SNAP program, the lawsuit claims that this request is part of 'a number of similar moves by federal agencies to obtain and disclose highly sensitive [personally identifiable information], not for program purposes, but for the creation of a surveillance system to advance the President's agenda, including by facilitating the President's mass deportation efforts.' The agency threatened to take action against states that didn't comply, such as potentially pulling SNAP funding, in the May letter and again in July, the lawsuit claims. 'Any delay in that funding could be catastrophic for the State and the residents who rely on SNAP to meet their basic nutritional needs,' the lawsuit says. The USDA said in early July that it wants states to provide the data no later than July 30 — just days after the July 23 deadline for public comments on the proposed action. The lawsuit said this quick turnaround made clear that the 'USDA had no intention of modifying the proposed data collection based on any public comments it received.' A USDA spokesperson told Grocery Dive the agency does not comment on pending litigation. The state attorneys general argue that the USDA's actions violate state and federal privacy and security laws, including the Privacy Act. Bonta and the coalition also argue that the USDA has failed to meet the public comment requirements for this type of action and exceeded the agency's statutory authority. The coalition is asking the court to declare the Trump administration's demands unlawful and seeking an injunction to block the USDA from initiating noncompliance procedures. Editor's note: This story has been updated with input from the USDA. Recommended Reading SNAP to drive growth in consumables throughout 2025: report


CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
Former NBA star Gilbert Arenas arrested in connection with illegal high-stakes poker games
BasketballFacebookTweetLink Follow Former NBA star Gilbert Arenas was arrested Wednesday and is accused by the Department of Justice of being a part of a high-stakes illegal gambling ring that ran out of one of his California homes. Arenas, 43, is facing a federal indictment on a count of conspiracy to operate an illegal gambling business, one count of operating an illegal gambling business and one count of making false statements to federal investigators. According to the Justice Department, Arenas rented out an Encino, California, mansion to host illegal poker games. If convicted, Arenas faces up to five years in prison on each charge. Arenas is a former three-time All-Star who played 11 seasons in the NBA, most notably with the Washington Wizards. In more recent years, he's become a popular podcast host on 'Gil's Arena,' in which he and other former players discuss basketball. According to the indictment filed by prosecutors in Los Angeles, Arenas directed Arthur Kats, 51, to stage the games. Kats would then prepare the home and collect rent from the other individuals accused of being involved in the scheme – Yevgeni Gershman, who the department describes as a 'suspected organized crime figure from Israel'; Evgenni Tourevski; Allan Austria; Yarin Cohen; and Ievgen Krachun – would then manage the illegal gambling being done at the home, according to the indictment. All the other defendants face charges of one count of conspiracy to operate an illegal gambling business and one count of operating an illegal gambling business. No lawyers for Arenas or the other defendants were listed in court documents on Wednesday afternoon. Justice Department investigators accused Arenas' co-defendants of collecting money off each prize pot, inviting people to play in the games, hiring young women to 'serve drinks, provide massages and offer companionship' to the people playing the games and then collecting a portion of what the women earned from their work. According to the indictment, investigators obtained text messages between Arenas and Kats that show the two planning to host alleged illegal poker games at the mansion and even came up with poker tables that bore Arenas' name and image. The two also discussed financial matters and payments over text messages, according to the indictment. The text messages cited in the indictment show the defendants scheduling the alleged illegal gambling nights, financial matters, recruiting women and dealers to work at the house, recruiting security and other matters, according to prosecutors. The indictment says Arenas sent text messages asking about money collected at the games, complaining about players being intoxicated and trying to find hosts for the gambling nights. The home used for the alleged illegal gambling nights was raided in the early hours of July 20, 2022, with US Department of Homeland Security investigators seizing money that was found in the master bedroom of the home. The former Washington Wizard attempted to get that money back by filing a petition with the US Customs and Border Protection. Prosecutors say Arenas falsely told them he was not involved in the gambling that was taking place at the home. 'In fact, as defendant Arenas then knew, defendant Arenas had knowingly provided gambling equipment at the Gable House to be used to host an illegal poker game on July 19, 2022, had knowingly rented out the Gable House to be used to host the illegal poker game on July 19, 2022, and was collecting rent from the hosts for operating an illegal poker game at the Gable House on July 19, 2022,' the indictment states. One of the defendants faces additional accusations. Gershman is charged with entering into a sham marriage with Valintina Cojocari and the two of them face three additional charges: one count of conspiracy to commit marriage fraud, marriage fraud and making a false statement on an immigration document. Prosecutors allege Gershman paid Cojocari for her participation in the marriage. According to prosecutors, they both submitted false information on immigration forms.


New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
DOJ teases details about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell testimony they want released
The Department of Justice revealed Tuesday that there were only two witnesses to testify to the grand juries that indicted Jeffrey Epstein and his madam, Ghislaine Maxwell, on sex trafficking charges. The revelation was made in a late-night filing that urged a Manhattan judge to unseal the transcripts and release the documents to the public, given the 'abundant public interest' after it was announced that a review of the cases determined there was no Epstein client list. 4 Lawyers with the Justice Department Tuesday teased details about the grand jury transcripts from Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell's criminal cases that they want released. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Depa Federal prosecutors said in the filing that the grand jury met in June and July of 2019 in Epstein's case — and only one witness testified, an FBI agent. In Maxwell's case, the grand jury met in June and July of 2020, and again in March 2021, with the same FBI agent taking the witness stand in addition to an NYPD detective who worked in the FBI's Child Exploitation and Human Trafficking Task Force also testified. However, even if the judge agrees to the transcripts getting released, it would still only represent a small fraction of the mountain of Epstein-related investigative materials that the DOJ and FBI have — which the feds have said amounts to over 300 gigabytes. Many of Epstein's victims — whose accounts were told to the grand jury by the agent and cop — ultimately testified at the 2021 trial that ended in Maxwell's conviction and some have also laid out their claims in lawsuits, the court documents said. The feds said they are 'sensitive' to the risk of releasing identifying information about victims and third parties, which 'is why the government proposes redacting the transcripts before releasing them.' 4 Epstein's right-hand-women, Ghislaine Maxwell, was later convicted for helping him groom young women for his abuse. All except for one of the victims mentioned in the grand jury transcripts have been notified about the transcripts potentially coming out, the court docs said. While grand jury proceedings are customarily kept secret, exceptions can be made. The DOJ argues that the public interest and 'the magnitude and abhorrence of Epstein's crimes' weigh in favor of the documents getting released. In early July, the DOJ issued a letter announcing that they'd wrapped up their review of Epstein evidence and that there wasn't an Epstein client list, sparking a fresh wave of public fascination and outrage. 4 Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence for helping Epstein procure girls so he could sexually abuse them. US District Court for the Southern District of New York/AFP via Getty Images In the letter, they specified they'd reviewed over 300 gigabytes of investigative materials related to the 66-year-old multi-millionaire hedge fund manager. The records include a full list of the fruits of the raids on Epstein's Manhattan, Palm Beach and Virgin Islands mansions. The DOJ has refused to divulge any of that information or provide any further details beyond a July statement saying that there is 'no basis' to disclose any of the Epstein files, which also include sick sex videos involving children. US Attorney General Pam Bondi, who heads the DOJ, had previously claimed that she would release juicy details in the files and boasted that they were 'sitting on my desk right now' in a February interview with Fox News. Meanwhile, DOJ officials in May told President Trump that his name was among those mentioned in the files, the Wall Street Journal reported. 4 Maxwell has been seeking to overturn her conviction on appeal. REUTERS It was unclear in what context Trump's name was mentioned, but Trump and Epstein were friendly throughout the 1990s into the early 2000s. Trump said Tuesday that he cut ties with the convicted sex offender after Epstein used his Mar-a-Lago club spa as a hunting ground for young women. The disgraced financier 'stole people that worked for me,' Trump told reporters. Last week, West Palm Beach US District Judge Robin Rosenberg denied the DOJ's similar bid to have grand jury transcripts released from Epstein's criminal case in which he was granted a controversial sweetheart plea deal after admitting to child prostitution charges in Florida in 2008. He was sentenced to 18 months in prison, but only served 13 months and was allowed out on work release for much of the time. Epstein was charged in Manhattan in a child sex-trafficking case in 2019 and killed himself a month later while he was awaiting trial in a Lower Manhattan lock-up. Maxwell's lawyers didn't immediately return a request for comment Wednesday morning.