
‘I spend £260 a month on a gym membership – and I don't regret it'
For Generation Z, paying for a gym membership is not just a priority, it's a necessity. More than a quarter of people aged between 18 and 24 consider it so, according to research published by the credit rating service Intuit Credit Karma.
Britain's young adults have been trading in nights out for early morning workouts – a preference that also sees them lambasted as the reason behind clubs closing and pubs losing profits.
While gym membership in the UK is up across all generations – with a record 11.5 million adults now belonging to a gym, up 1.6 million from 2022 – the boom has been driven by younger people, according to a report from UK Active, a fitness trade body.
'For me, working out is number one priority,' says Fareedah Shardow, 24, who spends around £250 a month on fitness classes. When it comes to investing in their health and fitness, Gen Z are spending big and not regretting a thing.
In 2019, Owen Willis, now 23, was working a low-paid entry-level job in marketing. His office was located in Canary Wharf and one morning he noticed a new gym had opened in the area. At the time, Willis was trying to get into fitness.
He was a member at PureGym, which cost £20 per month, but he didn't really enjoy the experience of working out there. After taking a tour of the brand new Third Space location, he was instantly lured by the soft lighting and luxurious smell pumped into every room. He decided to upgrade and pay for the £190 a month membership.
Despite the membership eating up 15pc of his annual salary, for Willis the pay-off was immediate.
'When I started spending that much money, I actually committed to my fitness,' he says. His mindset shifted too: 'I'm investing in my fitness journey, rather than just paying for a gym membership.'
Within five months, Willis had lost five stone. 'I'm spending this much money. I have to go and work my ass off to make it worth it,' he says.
Now, Willis' life fits around the gym. He goes every day, sometimes more than once per day. 'I started working out the cost per visit,' he says. 'It's so expensive to just go three times a week. That's like £30 a visit.'
Over the years his membership has increased to £262, which he works out to average around £9 each visit (if he goes frequently enough).
When the price of his membership first went up, Willis cancelled to try out a cheaper gym. 'It just didn't have the little luxuries,' he explains. 'The towels were old and scratchy, whereas the towels at Third Space are soft and fluffy.' He quickly came running back.
In order to budget for his membership he cuts costs in other areas, mainly eating out and drinking. Instead he will socialise by taking a workout class with friends rather than going out for expensive dinners.
He also chooses to cycle to work rather than taking the Tube. 'I could spend £200 a month on the Tube,' he adds. 'That's the whole membership covered if I just cycle.'
People are often shocked when Willis tells them how much he spends each month on his gym membership. 'If you break it down, I actually think it's pretty cheap,' he says. 'People pay £35 to go to Pilates, £20 to go to yoga, £15 to go to a spin class ... They're actually probably spending the same, if not more, than me but just spreading it across different classes.'
'I'd rather spend £35 on a workout class than on cocktails'
Shardow was looking for some more structure in her workouts than her current gym membership was offering.
'I need someone to tell me what to do,' she says. After trying out a few studios on Classpass, she fell in love with The Proud Project pilates studio and signed up for a £75 monthly membership, which is discounted as she is an ambassador.
The membership includes eight classes a month, but Shardow likes to work out at least six times a week. To supplement her membership, Shardow shops around for introductory offers at other studios to make her money stretch further. These range from £30 to £50 for a three-class pack. 'I always feel like it's better value for money and hopefully – if I actually like the class – I'll come back,' says the marketing assistant.
She also spends £69 a month on a Classpass membership, where she will switch between pilates, barre, spin and strength training classes at different studios. This brings Shardow's total spend each month to around £250 on her workouts.
For Shardow, spending on fitness is an investment in her future self, something she is willing to budget for. She saves money which she would've spent on alcohol and going on expensive nights out. 'I have just transferred that money to working out,' she says. 'I'd rather spend £35 on a workout class than on two cocktails.'
Despite her budgeting, spending this amount is only possible as Shardow is able to save by living at her family home in London. The money she saves on rent is put directly towards her workouts. 'The first thing out of my salary is always my phone bill and then my memberships,' she says.
When she does eventually move out, Shardow admits she will have to be more strategic with how much she spends on gym classes, but she's confident that working out will remain a top priority for her budget.
'I've spent over £3k in preparation for an Ironman triathlon'
Daisy, 27, a civil servant based in London, has always been into fitness. As a runner, however, working out has never cost her much money. That all changed this year when she signed up for her first Ironman triathlon.
The feat, which involves a 2.6-mile open water swim, a 112-mile cycle and a 26.2-mile run, requires a lot of investment of both time and money. Daisy paid the £700 entry fee, purchased a bike on sale for £1,500 via her company's cycle to work scheme (which she is now paying off in monthly instalments), bought new trainers that cost £250 and her first wetsuit and trisuit, each costing over £100.
After sorting her kit, Daisy invested in a training plan for £110. And, as part of her training, she also signed up for a half Ironman and a marathon, which came with entry costs of £270 and £170 respectively. To have somewhere to train, she also spends £40 a month on a gym membership and £40 a month for a summer pass to a Lido in London.
The race isn't until August, but so far it has cost her upwards of £3,000 – and there's more to spend yet.
'I've tried to spread it out, so this month I'll buy one expensive thing, and then the next something else,' she explains. Just yesterday, she spent £80 on an electric bike pump. 'I'm trying to do one thing at a time, just so it's not so painful on the bank account.'
Due to the cost of her training, Daisy has cut back on social plans that involve eating out and drinking. She also has prioritised her races over holidays this year. 'Rather than spending £300 to £400 on a holiday, I've spent it on fitness.'
Cutting back on socialising has been necessary to save money, but Daisy also simply doesn't have the time.
During the week she cycles 15km each way to and from work. Some days she will also fit in a swim in the morning before work and then either strength train at the gym or run in the evening. Saturday is her long cycle day, often totalling four or five hours, while Sunday is her long run day, taking up about two hours. Some weeks, Daisy will have one rest day. Others she won't have any.
'I was kind of prepared before starting that it would cost a lot of money and take up a lot of time,' says Daisy. However, for her, the price is worth it. 'It's something I enjoy and it's where all of my focus is going,' she adds.
'Before, I did enjoy going out and drinking but I feel like I've done that for however many years now. It's quite nice to have a different sort of routine.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
How to save £180 by switching banks this summer according to finance expert
A finance expert has shared her top tips on how to earn £180 by switching banks. Appearing on BBC Morning Live on Tuesday (23 June), Laura Pomfre revealed the top three banks you should consider switching to this summer if you want a bit of extra cash hassle-free. Santander Edge offers £180 for new members switching bank accounts, with First Direct 1st Account coming in a close second giving people who sign up to bank with them £175. TSB Spend and Save gives £100 for a switch, and new customers can also take out £15 cash back a month for six months.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
First-time buyers and retirees ‘could gain from possible mortgage rule changes'
First-time buyers, people borrowing into retirement and those who are self-employed could benefit from possible changes to mortgage rules, as the City regulator kicks off a 'public conversation' into the future of the market. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has launched a discussion paper on the potential benefits and risks that changing rules could see. The paper highlights parts of the market where changes could help support wider access to sustainable home ownership as well as economic growth, and where allowing more flexibility could make it easier for lenders to tailor their products to customers' needs. David Geale, executive director for payments and digital finance at the FCA, told the PA news agency: 'We're starting a public conversation on the future of the mortgage market, to see what we can do to help consumers navigate their financial lives and to support growth. 'So it's very much at that discussion end of: Here are some thoughts, where should we be on the spectrum of balancing risk versus opportunity?' He added: 'The areas we've opened up for discussion I think will benefit a wide group of people. 'But we are particularly looking at some of the constraints we see around people who are self-employed, people with volatile or unpredictable incomes, people maybe in vulnerable circumstances, who may be a good mortgage risk from a lending perspective, but the rules may be too rigid to allow lenders to look at them a bit more holistically.' Mr Geale said: 'It's looking at people for whom society has evolved in terms of the ways that they're paid and the ways that they live.' He said that the FCA is looking at whether there is more that can be done to help first-time buyers, people who are long-term renters with aspirations to get into the housing market, as well as people in later life who may have significant equity in their home but who 'may be income-constrained'. Mr Geale later added: 'What we're saying is we think there are perhaps better ways of assessing who is a good mortgage borrower. So, for example, if you've been paying rent on a regular basis, had no problem paying your rent, and a mortgage would actually be cheaper, well, could we be more explicit about the ability to take that into account?' He said the FCA will take what comes out of the discussion paper and 'reflect on that as feedback and then decide which areas we actually think we may need to change the rules, if at all'. Mr Geale described the discussion paper as 'an exciting way into' the debate about finding the right balance. He added: 'We are aiming to do this quickly, we are not hanging around. We have already acted in some places where we think there was room to do that.' The regulator's data shows that in 2024, more than two-thirds (68%) of first-time buyers borrowed for terms of 30 years or longer. The paper said: 'Many people's patterns of employment in the UK are now very different to those of earlier generations. There is more use of short-term contracting, zero-hours contracts and more people are self-employed.' The regulator wants to hear feedback on what further changes are needed to support mortgage access for those who are self-employed or with volatile income, both for home purchase and in later in life. The FCA is also seeking opinions on whether the stress test for mortgages should be changed. The stress test requires lenders to consider the potential impact of likely future changes to interest rates, to help make sure a borrower can afford their mortgage. Firms were made responsible for setting their stress rate, but the paper suggested a central stress rate could be set, with a forecasting model updated at regular intervals. However, there could be some drawbacks to this suggestion, including firms losing flexibility to adapt their test to different products, the paper said. The document also put a spotlight on homeowners increasingly needing to access their housing wealth to help fund them through retirement. It said that with 38% of working-age people projected to be under-saving for retirement, 'access to mortgages could be key to helping people achieve their financial goals in later life'. Many lenders will now accept earned income up to the age of 75 in their affordability assessments. But the paper said that some products tailored to older borrowers can generally be more expensive than standard mortgages – and older people may not know about the full range of options available to them. The FCA said it wants to help ensure its rules are not creating a barrier to innovative products. As an example, equity release products allowing borrowers to draw down on a monthly basis, rather than in a lump sum, may be a cost-effective option for some people who do not have a reliable income in retirement, the paper suggested. Other discussion points in the wide-ranging paper include whether the regulator should intervene to support the take-up of long-term fixed-rate mortgages; whether a rent-based affordability assessment would be a responsible basis to assess a consumer's ability to repay a prospective mortgage; and whether the regulator should take further steps to support part interest-only and part capital repayment ('part and part') mortgages. The regulator wants to hear feedback on whether changes to interest-only mortgage provisions could help first-time buyers. It also wants to know whether more could be done to support survivors of economic abuse who are in a joint mortgage with their abuser. The FCA is also looking at whether there are any regulatory interventions to the mortgage market that could help with addressing climate change challenges. There are around 8.96 million regulated mortgages across the UK and 3.6 million renting households who aim to buy a home in the future, according to the FCA. Lending rules were toughened following the 2008 financial crisis. The FCA said this has led to a more resilient market, with fewer borrowers in arrears and more than 99% of mortgages originated since 2014 being on track. The discussion paper added: 'However, this more cautious approach may also have unduly restricted consumer access to the market. As house prices have grown much faster than wages, home ownership has become an increasingly challenging aspiration for many – particularly those without financial support from family. 'Increasing numbers of consumers are finding it hard to meet affordability criteria, access a mortgage and consequently own a home.' The regulator said that while it may amend its rules in future, oversight and monitoring of the market and the Consumer Duty, which requires firms to put consumers at the heart of what they do, will continue to be central to its approach. It said it will continue to hold firms to high standards and closely monitor trends. Those with an interest in the paper will include mortgage lenders, intermediaries, trade bodies, consumer groups, homeowners and people aiming to become homeowners, the regulator said. Feedback will close on September 19. The regulator said it will focus on how consumers and the market are protected before recommending any rule changes. Matt Smith, Rightmove's mortgage expert, said: 'It's really promising that the regulator is opening up these discussions and continuing to look at targeted regulatory changes that could help people in different circumstances to borrow what they need to buy a home. 'We particularly welcome the potential to help more first-time buyers that can afford it to borrow more responsibly, and have access to sustainable home ownership.' He added: 'There are also some significant regional differences in property prices to be mindful of in discussions about enabling people to borrow more, with the gap between average earnings and property prices more stretched in the south of England than the north of England, Scotland and Wales. 'The desire to support more people in achieving their home ownership aspirations needs to be balanced against the potential risks of allowing people to borrow more, so that mortgage lending continues to be responsible. 'This balance is complex and is why we welcome the FCA's approach to open up a wide-ranging discussion on what is right.' Charles Roe, director of mortgages at UK Finance, said: 'We welcome the FCA's discussion paper on the future of the UK's mortgage market, and its recognition that changes to current regulations are needed to support sustainable home ownership to stimulate economic growth. 'Whilst mortgage firms will always lend responsibly, we look forward to working with our members to identify ways the FCA could amend its rules to help more individuals get on to, and move up or down, the housing ladder.'


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Pension funds told to back UK companies or face a tax raid in the autumn Budget
British pension funds have been urged to back UK companies – or risk a punishing tax raid in the Budget this autumn. Government figures show 20 per cent of a typical workplace pension pot is invested in the UK – down from 50 per cent a decade ago – with 8 per cent in equities. Much of the rest of the money is invested overseas, including in big US funds with exposure to tech companies such as Amazon, Microsoft and Nvidia. The lack of investment by pension funds in the UK has been identified as one of the reasons why the stock market is struggling. Former pensions minister Baroness Altmann urged fund managers to put more money into UK stocks – or see tax reliefs hacked away by the Chancellor in a desperate attempt to raise revenues. That would be a devastating blow to millions of workers who can save for their retirements tax free. Abandoning Britain: Government figures show just 20% of a typical workplace pension pot is invested in the UK – down from 50% a decade ago – with 8% in equities Speculation is mounting that Rachel Reeves will target tax breaks on pensions in this autumn's Budget to help fill a gaping black hole in the nation's finances. 'Obviously these reliefs are under threat if things carry on as they are,' said Altmann, adding that 25 per cent of new pensions contributions each year should be invested in Britain. She said: 'I don't understand why our pension funds think it is perfectly fine to take billions of pounds of taxpayer money and do nothing to benefit the UK economy with it. 'It seems to me that asking for just a quarter of the new money to be invested in our great British businesses and growth assets is not exactly unreasonable. 'If pension fund managers, however, don't believe Britain can deliver decent returns, they can invest more than 75 per cent abroad, but won't receive money from taxpayers.' Last week it emerged Scottish Widows is reducing the allocation to London-listed shares in its highest growth portfolio from 12 per cent to 3 per cent. A report by the Government in November found only around 20 per cent of savings in workplace defined contribution pension schemes is invested in the UK. The report found that this compared with domestic holdings of 22 per cent in Canadian schemes, 42 per cent in New Zealand and 45 per cent in Australia. The lack of UK money going into British stocks has been identified as a reason why so many London-listed companies are undervalued.