logo
It's Just Over For ‘Marathon'

It's Just Over For ‘Marathon'

Forbes19-05-2025

Marathon
I've tried to put this off for a while now, giving Marathon the benefit of the doubt in terms of fixing what ails it, and maybe snagging an audience that's large enough to make it at least sustainable.
But no, it's over. I can't dispute this anymore. This has probably always been true, but the events of the past week have cemented it. I will get into the livestream and plagiarism and all that later, but this is a long, long list of what's gone wrong in the past, what's currently going wrong, and a future that does not look any brighter.
The entire idea of this game was a mistake. Bungie has said that this came from a bunch of them playing Tarkov a while ago, and I heard that among that group, it was one 'good old boy' in leadership who pushed to make this Bungie's biggest non-Destiny project, and hopefully the birth (well, rebirth) of a strong IP for the studio, now under Sony which assumed it would produce another hit like this.
The game attempts to split the difference between casual players who may be new to extraction shooters and existing, hardcore extraction players it would like to pilfer from games like Tarkov. It will do neither.
You are never going to make an extraction shooter that is casual enough, because the concept of being able to lose your loot, potentially your entire vault if you go on bad runs, is exhausting as you try to give the game and genre a chance. Add onto that losing all that gear and all the upgrades you've gotten in a season no matter what, and that may be how this genre is, but it's just not going to be attractive to many players that have not already played this genre.
FEATURED | Frase ByForbes™
Unscramble The Anagram To Reveal The Phrase
Pinpoint By Linkedin
Guess The Category
Queens By Linkedin
Crown Each Region
Crossclimb By Linkedin
Unlock A Trivia Ladder
It's probably even worse on the hardcore player end, with Tarkov players scoffing at how 'easy' they've made Marathon, everything from gear looting to time-to-kill to double revives on combat. I've seen almost no established extraction shooter players that are eager to jump over to Marathon for anything but a trial run based on what they've seen and played.
Marathon
And what we've seen and played is the next point. Neither are good. Either you've been an outside observer watching gameplay trailers and Twitch streams, or you got into the Closed Alpha and played for yourself.
The game feels uninspired. Shooting is…fine, but considering this is Bungie, a studio that gave us some of the best-feeling shooters of all time, this is not close to comparing to that. It feels like a slower version of Apex Legends with maybe one teamfight per round, and in between, battling with UESC bots (which I do think can actually be fun in some instances).
The idea that this is an extraction shooter that should use a hero model has not landed well at all. It seems woefully unbalanced with full invisibility and wallhacks and things that should just not be in this genre. And it destroys the idea of making a fully custom character like other games, something most players like. It feels like a solution where a problem did not exist. An experiment to make the game stand out, but it's just made it worse.
None of this was helped that at the exact same time, Marathon's Alpha was interrupted by an ARK Raiders Alpha, a much more traditional extraction shooter and a much better one, by all accounts. More polished, more fun, more expected features found in extraction shooters. All you have to do is look at the fact that ARK Raiders' playercount went up every single day of its Alpha where Marathon's almost always went down. By the end, it was sub-20% of what it started with. Twitch viewers were even worse, going from 150,000 at launch as big streamers tried it, crashing to 1-3,000 a few days later near the end, where big chunks of that might even be one or two Destiny streamers alone.
Marathon
It's not just how the game currently feels and plays, it's what it's apparently planning for the future. This was half the problem with the recent livestream where sure, the vibes were bad with the recent plagiarism from the start, but hearing game director Joe Ziegler and others talk about it, the constant refrain was 'we're looking about that, we're thinking about that.' The bulk of the talk was about minor balance changes. Shield health, backpack spawns, stack size, faction differentiation. Asked to name the biggest issue they found coming out of the Alpha, Ziegler rattled off a list of impossibly small issues. Hugely requested things like proximity chat and Solos were handwaved away and relegated to some possible future plan.
It is absolutely insane that Bungie has not taken to heart the feedback about how this game feels to play Solo. It feels like the only way to play is stacked with friends on comms, as playing with randoms is at best a coinflip whether it's awful or fine. Going in Solo and skulking around like a rat avoiding all combat is boring as hell.
Because the game ignores Solos, that means you need to convince two friends to buy it, likely at an upcoming $40 price point. It is too late in development to switch to free-to-play, not that this genre is built for that anyway, but painfully few people have played this game and thought it was worth that price. Without a delay, at launch, it will have two more heroes and 1-2 more maps and that's it. It's a tiny amount of content for that price, on top of a game that as of yet, is not very fun for most players.
Now we arrive at the massive controversy of art theft, the revelation that a supposed ex-Bungie artist outright stole a large amount of art from ANTIREAL, an artist with a portfolio extremely similar to Marathon's vibes. And we're not talking 'inspired by,' these pieces of art are 1:1 rips to the point where Bungie has to audit its entire game to see how many of these there might be. During the livestream they couldn't even show the game because it was being ripped apart internally for this process.
The Marathon comparison
The narrative spread as players realized that a number of Bungie artists, including Art Director Joseph Cross, followed ANTIREAL for years. It's likely true that Marathon's overall style came from any number of sources from years or decades past, though this fact + the direct lifting from ANTIREAL exploded into theorizing that this was a larger problem (on my end too, for a time). But even if the entire 'soul' of Marathon wasn't taken from one artist, art director Joe Cross and members of his team allowed this massive portfolio of plagiarism to make it through from being stolen allegedly five years ago to being plastered all over the current build of the game. Mass incompetence.
This has slit the throat of Marathon. The one thing Marathon had going for it was its unique art style and cool vibes, and now it will be impossible to bring that up without the plagiarism being referenced. Memes were instantly born during the apology portion of the livestream including 'PLAGIARISM WILL MAKE ME GOD' and a renaming of Marathon to 'ART Raiders.' That's going to stick forever.
There is no escaping this now. Not that vibes were good before, but they are dismal now with Marathon a laughing stock after this happened or even worse, outright anger that this was allowed to take place in the game, and players refusing to play and support the game as a result.
Marathon will not fundamentally change enough to be attractive to most players. Community sentiment will not change enough to turn things around on that end. A delay does not significantly change any of this, but it may be the only option.
It would be impressively stupid to actually release this game in four months given both these recent events and that we're only seeing a small amount of new content and some balance and visual polishing for launch. But you simply cannot cancel this game at this point after 5+ years of work, even if it should have died ages ago. Sony alone would never allow that.
A delay is the only real option but I don't think it changes enough to be useful. It will create distance from the current awfulness, but I have seen nothing to indicate this is going to be some transformative rebirth. The core concept of a hero shooter extraction game will not change. It will not erase the plagiarism that happened.
Marathon
I've previously said that Marathon will not be Concord 2.0. While I still technically believe that, it's more a matter of just how brutally this will fail, not whether it will fail at all. I do not expect it to get 700 concurrent Steam players like Concord, nor be scrapped in two weeks by Sony. But it will not do well. That is set in stone right now barring some sort of miracle from the heavens.
This will hurt Bungie and its actual healthy child, Destiny. There will be layoffs. There will be Sony takeover of leadership as they bail out with millions in vested cash. The only thing I don't believe will happen is the complete dissolution of Bungie as that would be a bridge too far in terms of Sony being embarrassed a storied brand has collapsed under its tenure, one they paid $3.6 billion for. And I also think it would be a horrible look to immediately kill another game like they did with Concord, and Marathon will be given some time to fix and improve things. I don't think any amount of time will be enough.
I realize this is an utterly brutal article. It's the longest one I've written in ages. But at this point there is no doubt the writing is on the wall and it is disingenuous to ignore that. I will continue to cover the game. If good things happen, I will write about that. If bad things keep happening, I will write about that. But I think it's overwhelmingly bad things from here.
Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, Bluesky and Instagram.
Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republican lawmakers stand firm against Musk's 'Kill the Bill' assault on Trump's agenda
Republican lawmakers stand firm against Musk's 'Kill the Bill' assault on Trump's agenda

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Republican lawmakers stand firm against Musk's 'Kill the Bill' assault on Trump's agenda

The Big, Beautiful Bill became the big, throbbing migraine for Congressional Republicans this week. That's thanks to the big, ugly brawl between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk. It started Tuesday with a hangup between Congressional Republicans and Musk over the Big, Beautiful Bill. Musk characterized it as a "disgusting abomination." He then turned on all 215 House Republicans who voted yes on the bill last month. "You know you did wrong," declared Musk. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., tried to call Musk to foam the political flames. Musk Says Trump Would Have Lost 2024 Election Without Him As 'Big Beautiful Bill' Feud Continues Read On The Fox News App "I called Elon last night. He didn't answer. "But I hope to talk to him today," said Johnson. Surely the world's richest man would have the bandwidth for the Speaker of the House. But the hangup was only starting. Rather than returning the Speaker's call, Musk returned political fire. Not by phone. But on his own communication platform. Elon Musk Warpath Against Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Rattles House Gop On X, Musk posted an iconic picture of Uma Thurman in a yellow jumpsuit, wielding a sword from a Quentin Tarantino movie poster. "KILL the Bill," read Musk's caption. Reach out and touch someone? How about reach out and call your senator or representative? Musk's influence – and rapid pivot – frightened Congressional Republicans. "To say that it's a problem or that it has created a bigger challenge for us, is true," said House Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington," R-Tex. "He's got a big voice. He's got a big audience. And more importantly, it's a credible voice. But he's wrong on this issue." Still, Republicans weren't budging as Musk demanded lawmakers craft a new piece of legislation. "Elon, look," said an exasperated Johnson. "We don't have time for a brand new bill." Elon Musk Posts 'Kill Bill' Meme In Latest Push To Nix Trump's Big Beautiful Bill The Speaker added that Congressional Republicans "can't go back to the drawing board and we shouldn't." The political contretemps started simmering as Republicans quickly became incensed with Musk. "Give us some productive feedback that we can operate on. I can't operate on platitudes," said Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., of Musk's vague criticism about the size of the legislation and deficit spending. Rep. Warren Davidson, R-Ohio, is one of the two House Republicans who voted no on the Big, Beautiful Bill last month. "Part of the goal with Musk and conservatives like me that have had reservations about the bill is make it better," said Davidson. "The disappointing thing is this bill does grow deficits in this Congress." Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., was the other House GOPer who voted nay. He says Musk learned how Congress operates the hard way. David Marcus: Musk Vs. Maga On Big, Beautiful Bill, But Gop Needs Both "Trust was misplaced. And so I think he has a right to be upset with our leadership," said Massie. But Democrats suddenly made strange bedfellows with Musk. They viewed Musk's opposition as an opportunity to help them sidetrack the legislation. "He's not my cup of tea, to put it mildly. But Republicans are already listening to him," said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., of Musk. But at least one Democrat called out his colleagues for their inconsistency with Musk. "We've been dumping all over Musk and vandalizing Teslas," said Sen. John Fetterman, D-Penn. "And now suddenly, now we might be more back into him." This all came as the Trump Administration asked Congress to chip away at spending. Budget Director Russ Vought sent lawmakers a $9.4 billion "rescissions" request. This measure asks that lawmakers claw back money it already allocated. "$9.4 billion is a teardrop in the ocean," said Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C. "If we can't get this now, then God help us on getting the true deficit numbers down." The rescissions plan targeted foreign aid and public broadcasting. "You've sent us a rescission package worth $9 billion that goes after Big Bird and Cookie Monster," lamented Rep. Mark Pocan, D-Wisc., at a hearing with Vought. White House Stands By Tax Bill After Musk Calls It A 'Disgusting Abomination' The Congressional Budget Office analysis of the Big, Beautiful Bill found that it adds $2.3 trillion to the deficit over a decade. But Republicans say those figures are wrong. The CBO also issued an analysis – specific to President Trump's tariffs. The CBO projects a $3 trillion decrease in deficits over the next decade because of the tariffs. The CBO cannot evaluate the tariffs under the One Big, Beautiful Bill – because, well, they're not part of the legislation. But, proponents of the One Big Beautiful Bill say that measure, coupled with the tariffs, decreases deficits by $500 billion over the next decade. Some Republicans believe that the CBO estimate about the deficit is what set off Musk. "I think their assumptions are wrong. We have long complained about it," said Johnson. But remember, this is the CONGRESSIONAL Budget Office. And REPUBLICANS run Congress. "Why are you not getting the numbers that you want?" asked yours truly of the Speaker. "They use a different scoring," replied Johnson. "Would you consider a rescission for the CBO in the legislative branch appropriations bill?" I followed up. "I would," answered Johnson. But the CBO is the least of Johnson's worries as the battle between the president and Musk went supernova on Thursday. "What is the message you need to hear from him to make sure you are on the same page?" I asked Johnson of Musk – who still hadn't connected. "I just want to answer any questions Elon has and make sure he fully understands this is not a spending program," said Johnson. "Do you think he just misperceives this?" I inquired. "I do," said Johnson. Senate Republicans who are noes on the bill applauded Musk's staunch opposition to the One Big, Beautiful Bill. "We both seem to be on the same wavelength and that we're very, very skeptical," said Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. On Thursday afternoon, Musk argued that President Trump would have lost the White House and Democrats would control the House and Senate were it not for the $280 million he poured into the 2024 campaign. "He obviously played a positive role," said Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., another no on the bill. "He helped spend that much money. He attracted a lot of people." But Democrats weren't so sure of Musk's political rainmaking. "It's just crocodile tears that are being shed by Elon Musk," said Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass. Democrats saw the breakup coming between the president and Musk. "It's a divorce that was predictable, if not inevitable," said Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn. Some Senate Republicans claimed they weren't worried about Musk torching the bill – and even President Trump – on X. They believed the president wielded an inherent advantage over Musk in the ultimate "Twitter" cage match. "President Trump has the biggest platform on Earth," said Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio. It's too early to tell if Musk's incineration of the One Big, Beautiful Bill will hamper efforts to pass the legislation – especially with tight vote margins in the House and Senate. "It's not helpful," conceded Mike Johnson. "But I don't think it's changed the trajectory in any way." But Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., said Republicans stand at an unenviable crossroads. "They have a choice of going against Trump or Musk," said article source: Republican lawmakers stand firm against Musk's 'Kill the Bill' assault on Trump's agenda

Fatal shooting of Jonathan Joss uncovers neighborhood feud, sparks police controversy
Fatal shooting of Jonathan Joss uncovers neighborhood feud, sparks police controversy

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Fatal shooting of Jonathan Joss uncovers neighborhood feud, sparks police controversy

The Brief Jonathan Joss, voice actor for John Redcorn on King of the Hill, was fatally shot outside his San Antonio home. A neighbor has been arrested and charged with murder, but police are facing scrutiny for initially dismissing the possibility of a hate crime. Investigators are now probing a long-standing neighborhood feud and a prior house fire involving Joss, to determine if they are connected to his murder. SAN ANTONIO, Texas - The Hollywood actor was shot and killed outside his San Antonio home last weekend. The San Antonio Police Department did make an arrest in the case, but they've also stepped right into a PR scandal. Perhaps best known as the voice behind John Redcorn on the hit TV show King of the Hill, actor Jonathan Joss was fatally gunned down outside his home, at the age of 69 on Sunday. Almost immediately, police arrested a neighbor, 56-year-old Sigfredo Ceja Alvarez, and charged him with murder. Investigators never revealed what linked him to the crime, but court records show Alvarez did bond out and is currently on house arrest. What they're saying San Antonio Police Chief William McManus initially said there was no reason to believe a hate crime had occurred but has since walked that statement back. "Shouldn't have done it. It was way too soon before we had any real information and I will own that and simply say again that we simply shouldn't have that," said McManus. "We understand that many in the LBGTQ Plus community are feeling anxious and concerned. A lot of it has to do with that premature statement that we released, and again, I own that." The victim's husband told officers that Alvarez yelled homophobic slurs at them, before opening fire. Dig deeper Neighbors told police that Alvarez and Joss had a longstanding neighborhood feud over reasons yet to be revealed. "There's also concern about the circumstances surrounding that death and the history in the neighborhood leading up to that," said McManus. On Thursday, alliance members held a community meeting with police leaders to dispel some of the rumors and myths that the case has generated. "We feel it's important to be able to bridge the gap and just get to a truth everybody can understand," said Secretary of PRIDE San Antonio, James Poindexter. According to detectives, Joss's home burned down several months ago. Now the big question is, are the fire and the murder connected? Police are sorting through the extensive logs in their quest for clues. "There are approximately 70 calls over the past two years involving various neighborhood type disturbances. Sometimes he was the caller. Other times, the neighbors were calling on him," said McManus. "Our homicide detectives are continuing to pursue every lead in this case to ensure that we understand the full picture of what led up to the senseless murder of Mr. Joss." What's next When asked by a reporter at today's news conference whether Joss was targeted because of his sexual orientation, Chief McManus said they're still "looking into that." The Source Information in the article is provided by the San Antonio Police Department.

Exclusive Harvey Weinstein interview: 'I acted immorally,' he tells Rosanna Scotto
Exclusive Harvey Weinstein interview: 'I acted immorally,' he tells Rosanna Scotto

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Exclusive Harvey Weinstein interview: 'I acted immorally,' he tells Rosanna Scotto

The Brief Harvey Weinstein spoke exclusively to Rosanna Scotto over the phone from Bellevue Hospital, discussing his decision not to testify in his retrial, his feelings of regret, and much more. Weinstein did not testify in his retrial or previous trials, including his 2020 Manhattan trial where he was sentenced to 23 years, a conviction later overturned. Rosanna's full interview with Harvey Weinstein will air starting at 7 a.m. on Good Day New York on Friday NEW YORK - Convicted sex offender and former Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein spoke exclusively to Good Day New York's Rosanna Scotto as he anxiously awaits a verdict in his New York sex crimes retrial. In this exclusive interview, Weinstein spoke to Rosanna over the phone from Manhattan's Bellevue Hospital, where he's been held through the trial. They discuss his decision not to testify, the notion that he is the poster boy for the #MeToo movement, what he has to say to his A-List accusers and much more. The backstory He did not testify in his defense in this retrial - or in his 2020 trial in Manhattan, where he was sentenced to 23 years in prison for sex crimes. New York's highest court overturned his conviction last year, a stunning reversal of a landmark #MeToo case. He also did not take the stand in his sex assault trial in Los Angeles, where he was found guilty in 2022. That verdict still stands. What they're saying During their interview, Weinstein admitted that he is nervous as the jury deliberates. When asked if he had any regrets, here's what he had to say. "I have regrets that I - from my family - through this, that I put my wife through this, that I acted immorally. I put so many friends through this and hurt people … that were close to me, by the way, by actions that were stupid. But never illegal, never criminal, never anything," he told Rosanna. The other side FOX 5 NY has reached out to victims for comment… Dig deeper Rosanna's full interview with Harvey Weinstein will air starting at 7 a.m. on Good Day New York on Friday. You can watch live in the media player below, The full interview will also be available on our FOX LOCAL app. The Source This article uses information from Harvey Weinstein's interview with Rosanna Scotto along with background from previous FOX 5 NY news reports and the Associated Press. FOX 5 NY has also reached out to accusers for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store