Whistleblower Act amended, govt mulls future edits to broaden protection
While Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) M Kulasegaran did not specifically detail the other platforms being considered by the government, the Act has come under scrutiny after a whistleblower who went to the media was denied protection.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
9 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Police probe effigy resembling PM brought to Pas-led rally
KUALA LUMPUR: Police have launched an investigation into an effigy resembling the Prime Minister that was allegedly brought by participants during the Pas-led rally held last Saturday. Acting city police chief Mohamed Usuf Jan Mohamad said the case is being investigated by the Classified Criminal Investigation Unit (USTJ) of Bukit Aman's Criminal Investigation Department. He said the investigation is being conducted under Section 41 of the Sedition Act, Section 504 of the Penal Code, and Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998. "As we said earlier, if there are any offences committed under any Act, we will take appropriate action. "Police received four reports in connection with the rally. One case, involving the effigy resembling the Prime Minister, is being handled by USTJ, while the remaining three reports have been referred to the Civil Aviation Authority of Malaysia as they involve the use of drones," he told a press conference today. He said drones were not permitted to be flown during the rally. Meanwhile, he confirmed that police have not received any reports regarding alleged distribution of extremist leaflets during the gathering. "As of now, no reports have been received. If any are lodged, we will investigate," he said. Last Saturday, police reported that about 18,000 people attended the rally at Dataran Merdeka, which proceeded peacefully.
New Straits Times
11 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Dewan Rakyat passes Poisons Act amendments to broaden enforcement powers, definitions
KUALA LUMPUR: The Poisons (Amendment) Bill 2025, which seeks to broaden the definitions of enforcement authority and premises, has passed its third reading in the Dewan Rakyat. The bill was tabled for its first reading in the lower house of Parliament on Tuesday. The proposed amendments revise four clauses under the Poisons Act 1952 (Act 366), with the primary objective of expanding the definitions of "enforcement authority" and "premises." Notably, the amendment to Section 2 of the Act updates the definition of "authorised officer" to include police officers of any rank, as well as individuals appointed by the Health Minister under Section 31A. Previously, only police officers holding a rank of Inspector or higher qualified as authorised officers. The bill also broadens the definition of "premises" to include any land, building or part of any building, as well as any installation or structure on land, offshore or otherwise and whether movable or immovable, to apply to the entire act. The amendment also includes a new section 31A to empower the Health Minister to appoint any person as an authorised officer under Act 366.
Malaysiakini
14 hours ago
- Malaysiakini
Vape bans: Slippery slope for legal governance
LETTER | In July 2024, the High Court ruled that the Kedah state government's move to ban gaming licences, effectively shutting down Sports Toto operations in the state, was unconstitutional. The court found that state authorities had overstepped their powers by refusing to renew licences issued under federal law, thereby infringing on the rights of a legally licensed business and violating the Federal Constitution. This landmark ruling is more than just a win for the gaming industry; it underscores a critical principle: state governments cannot override federal law at will. Yet just months later, we are seeing the same pattern emerge again, this time with the vape industry. Kedah has announced it will no longer renew licences for vape-related businesses, with the goal of a complete ban by 2026. Other states such as Pahang, Terengganu and Perlis are following suit. This trend raises urgent questions about the balance of power in our federal system. What started with gaming licences is now extending to vape. Tomorrow, will it be food and beverages? Or wellness and lifestyle services? If states are allowed to selectively shut down federally regulated sectors, Malaysia risks descending into legal fragmentation, where trade and commerce depend more on local politics than national law. Act 852: A necessary legal anchor Rather than allowing states to adopt unilateral bans, the federal government must focus on fully enforcing Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Act 2024 (Act 852) across the country. Act 852 was passed after years of consultation and debate. It represents a balanced and structured approach to regulating smoking and vaping products, protecting youth, ensuring product safety, and reducing public health risks while allowing regulated access to adults. Its successful enforcement is not just a health issue; it is a legal imperative. If states are allowed to disregard it through political or moralistic motivations, the Act's legitimacy will be compromised. From a legal standpoint, only a consistent, centralised framework can ensure that public health regulations are enforced uniformly, fairly, and in accordance with constitutional principles. Legal uncertainty hurts rule of law, public confidence One of the hallmarks of a sound legal system is predictability. Businesses, consumers, and civil society should be able to rely on a stable set of laws and policies. When that stability is undermined by states choosing to selectively ban certain industries, it weakens the rule of law and opens the door for selective enforcement, politicisation of trade, and judicial overload from legal disputes. This also affects the very communities the bans claim to protect. Instead of driving behaviour change, bans often push products into illicit channels, where there is no age restriction, no safety oversight, and no taxation. This undermines the public health objectives of Act 852 and increases enforcement burdens. The way forward: Uphold the law, not politicise it The lesson from the Sports Toto ruling is clear: state governments do not have the authority to override federal laws with blanket bans. Vape should not be the next legal battleground. The federal government must assert the supremacy of laws passed by Parliament and ensure that public health policies are governed by national interest, not fragmented by state agendas. Act 852 provides the legal tools to regulate the vape industry effectively. What's needed now is not more bans but better enforcement. Malaysia must decide whether it wants to be governed by clear laws or discretionary bans. The answer will determine whether our legal system continues to uphold constitutional order or gives way to a patchwork of conflicting state policies. The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.
