
Buy now, pay later is taking over the world. Good
Such purchases are often the subject of derision. Paying for lunch in instalments is, to some, consumerism at its most ludicrous. Others see something darker: lending that skirts the edge of mainstream finance, preying on precarious borrowers.
Neither mockery nor anxiety have dented the industry's growth, however. Worldpay, a payments firm, suggests that BNPL accounted for $342bn in spending around the world last year, up from just over $2bn a decade earlier. Older financial firms, such as JPMorgan Chase and PayPal, have entered the market, just as BNPL companies are taking on tasks that were previously left to banks. The opportunity for BNPL in business-to-business loans—a fragmented, old-school market—may be even larger than that for consumers. And a new market is emerging for portfolios of BNPL debt, which are securitised and bought up, often by asset managers.
The idea of a loan at the point of sale is an old one. In 1856 Isaac Singer and Edward Clark, an entrepreneurial duo, began selling sewing machines in instalments, with great success. The modern industry operates in a similar manner. When a customer buys a product for $100, they can pay in stages. The BNPL lender—perhaps Klarna, a Swedish company, or Affirm, a large American provider—pays the merchant upfront, in exchange for a cut of, say, $3. This works for retailers, since it boosts sales. Customers with access to loans spend at least 20% more relative to those without access, even as the sticker price stays the same. The customer pays back the sum over time, often six weeks, in four instalments and with zero interest.
Despite the industry's recent success, there is reason to think it is still in the foothills. Fewer than 2% of Bank of America customers born before 1965 have an outstanding BNPL payment, compared with 10% of the bank's Millennial and Generation Z clients. As younger cohorts come to account for more consumer spending, the market should grow. In countries where BNPL has been around longer, it contributes to more sales: over one in five of those made online in Sweden, against less than one in sixteen in America. Local and regional firms are popping up to offer the service: Addi in Colombia, Atome in Singapore, Tamara in Saudi Arabia.
As the industry grows, the borders between BNPL and mainstream finance are blurring. Klarna, an early mover, has been a bank in Europe since 2017. Sebastian Siemiatkowski, the company's co-founder and boss, says he wants it to become a digital financial assistant enabled by artificial intelligence. Affirm launched a debit card two years ago, and has seen uptake soar of late: the firm now reports almost 2m cardholders. Customers can use the cards in shops, either to pay in full or in instalments, bringing a financing method synonymous with e-commerce into the real world. In the past two years, both the BNPL giants have been integrated into Apple's and Google's digital wallets.
Established financial firms are moving in the opposite direction. PayPal began offering BNPL services in 2020, capitalising on its strong relationships with merchants. Last year the payments giant processed $33bn in BNPL spending; an amount it says is growing at about 20% a year. Several banks now allow customers to split larger payments into smaller chunks after purchases. And Klarna's recent deals with payments firms such as Adyen, JPMorgan Payments and Stripe mean that its services are now provided to millions of merchants.
Several fast-growing startups hope to disrupt trade credit, a vast market in which suppliers lend money to firms that buy their products. American companies alone report about $4.9trn in trade payables, money owed to other firms for supplies purchased on credit. The market is about four times the size of the $1.2trn in balances on American credit cards. It is also antiquated and ripe for innovation. Suppliers doing the lending are forced to manually assess whether each of their clients are creditworthy, with little information to go on, and chase buyers for payments.
Matthias Knecht, co-founder of Billie, a firm specialising in business-to-business BNPL loans, suggests that such lending is roughly 15 years behind the consumer market. Richard Thornton, co-founder of Hokodo, another startup, believes that the potential impact on business spending is greater than with consumers owing to the limited alternatives available to young firms. He says that when small companies gain access to BNPL lending baskets grow by around 40% on average.
For BNPL providers, expanding their lending operations as fast as possible means keeping a light balance-sheet. The idea of burrito-securitised bonds may be the subject of mockery, but the relatively opaque market for BNPL portfolios is booming. Asset managers and private investment firms that are snapping up the debt believe they have found an appetising asset class in which underlying assets mature quickly. In October, Elliott Advisors, a British affiliate of a mammoth hedge fund, purchased Klarna's $39bn British loan portfolio. In 2023 KKR, a private-markets giant, agreed to buy as much as $44bn in BNPL debt from PayPal in 2023. Affirm has issued around $12bn in asset-backed securities. One BNPL insider calls the market 'a feeding frenzy", where there is not enough debt to satisfy demand.
Some difficult questions linger over the industry, which has ballooned over the past decade—a period without a prolonged downturn. Chief among them is whether it is facilitating risky borrowing by consumers living beyond their means.
Customers undoubtedly have lower incomes than those using credit cards. And there have been worrying snippets of news. Klarna's consumer-credit losses rose by 17% year-on-year in the first quarter of this year. Research by the Federal Reserve suggests that the proportion of BNPL users who have made a late payment has climbed from 15% in 2021 to 24% in 2024.
All the same, default rates remain markedly lower than other forms of consumer credit. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), a regulator, notes that default rates for BNPL loans were about 2% between 2019 and 2022, compared with 10% for credit-card debt held by similar borrowers. Although Klarna's credit losses have grown in the past year, so have its balances. The company's overall default rate is lower than the industry norm.
Could a growing pile of distressed consumer debt be hidden from view, beyond the sight of banks and policymakers? Some lenders worry about loan-stacking (borrowing from multiple sources at once). Such doubling up can cause a downwards spiral, with consumers taking on more and more loans in order to pay off earlier ones. Yet other research by the CFPB offers reassurance. It finds that measures of financial distress—such as revolving debt on credit cards or extra charges on credit-card loans—do not rise after BNPL use. Nor are BNPL users more likely to borrow from other sources in the 18 months after agreeing to pay for something in instalments.
In June, FICO, America's main provider of consumer-credit scores, announced it would begin providing scores based on borrowers' BNPL histories. Julie May, an executive at FICO, notes a surprising finding from its year-long study with data from Affirm: for the most frequent borrowers, credit scores were improved or unchanged when BNPL loans are included. Research in Scandinavia finds similarly positive results. Christine Laudenbach of Goethe University Frankfurt and co-authors recently looked at 1m loan applications to an unnamed Nordic bank that makes use of BNPL data. Clients with a history of BNPL use, as well as a strong repayment history, were able to borrow at an average interest rate of 1.4 percentage points below the level suggested by their credit ratings.
The final verdict on BNPL will come only in a severe downturn. But although its users are young, and many are new to borrowing, there are reasons for optimism. As the new form of finance becomes increasingly mainstream, it looks safer and more useful than its critics argue. Buy that burrito, and don't let anyone judge you.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
15 minutes ago
- Indian Express
US to initially impose ‘small tariff' on pharma imports, Trump says
President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that the United States would initially place a 'small tariff' on pharmaceutical imports before hiking it to 150% within 18 months and eventually to 250% in an effort to boost domestic production. 'In one year, one and a half years maximum, it's going to go to 150% and then it's going to go to 250% because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country,' Trump told CNBC in an interview. He did not specify the initial tariff rate on pharmaceuticals. Trump said last month that pharmaceutical tariffs could reach as high as 200%. He said in February that sectoral tariffs on pharmaceuticals and semiconductor chips would start at '25% or higher,' rising substantially over the course of a year. Trump said on Tuesday that he plans to announce tariffs on semiconductors and chips in the 'next week or so,' but gave no further details. The United States has been conducting a national security review of the pharmaceutical sector, and the industry has been preparing for possible sector-specific tariffs. The administration has not announced when the results of that probe will be released. Several drugmakers have pledged multibillion-dollar investments in U.S. manufacturing as Trump threatens import tariffs, with AstraZeneca recently committing $50 billion to expand its American operations. PhRMA, the main lobbying group for the industry, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A framework agreement between the United States and the EU sets out that tariffs on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors are currently zero, but if the United States raises tariffs following its import investigation, they will be capped at 15%.

The Wire
an hour ago
- The Wire
Trump Considering Hiking 25% Tariff on India ‘Very Substantially' in Next 24 Hours
He also said that New Delhi's ostensible offer to lower its tariffs to zero is 'not good enough' if it keeps buying Russian oil. New Delhi: US President Donald Trump has reiterated his intention to levy a tariff on Indian goods 'very substantially' higher than the 25% he announced last week, repeating his stance that he is unhappy with India's purchases of Russian oil even as Moscow continues its war with Ukraine. In an interview to CNBC Television on Tuesday (August 5), Trump also claimed that while New Delhi has agreed to charge 'zero tariffs' on American goods, its offer is 'not good enough' as long as it continues to buy oil from Russia. A day prior, Trump had said he would 'substantially raise' his 25% tariff on India – scheduled to go into effect on Thursday – because it was 'not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil' but selling much of this 'on the Open Market for big profits', drawing a rejoinder from the Ministry of External Affairs , which pointed to Washington as well as the EU's continuing economic links with Moscow. Speaking to CNBC, Trump said on Tuesday that he was considering raising his 25% tariff on India 'very substantially over the next 24 hours' because of its purchases of Russian oil. 'So we settled on 25%, but I think I'm gonna raise that very substantially over the next 24 hours, because they're buying Russian oil, they're fuelling the war machine. And if they're going to do that, then I'm not going to be very happy,' he told the channel. Adding that India's tariffs on the US were too high, the president continued: 'Now I will say this. India went from the highest tariffs ever–they will give us zero tariffs … But that's not good enough, because of what they're doing with oil.' Trump on July 30 announced that India would pay a 25% tariff as well as a yet-undisclosed 'penalty' for buying energy and military equipment from Russia. This levy was to kick off two days later, but the executive order Trump signed deferred the date of its implementation to August 7. In a post on his Truth Social platform on Monday, Trump blamed India for not caring 'how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine', adding that because of its dealings with Moscow he would be 'substantially raising the tariff paid by India to the USA'. New Delhi, which had stuck to its cautious approach to the issue when Trump announced the tariff and also went on to call India's economy 'dead', responded by accusing Washington and Brussels of 'targeting' India in an 'unjustified and unreasonable' manner. Charging the US with 'actively encouraging' its imports of Russian oil shortly after Moscow's invasion of Ukraine in early 2022, the Ministry of External Affairs pointed to the US as well as the EU's continuing trade with Russia in various sectors after the latter's invasion began. 'In this background, the targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable. Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security,' it said in a statement. Citing the US's trade deficit with India as well as the latter's high tariffs, Trump had unveiled a 26% 'reciprocal' tariff on India earlier this year but deferred it pending the completion of negotiations over a trade deal. Talks pursuant to that deal are ongoing but New Delhi's resistance to opening up its dairy and agricultural sector to America is reportedly a sticking point. There is no sign of a deal yet even as Trump has claimed on more than one occasion that India has agreed to lower its tariffs. Bilateral ties have also taken a hit amid Trump's repeated claims – consistently denied by India – that he mediated a ceasefire to the Indo-Pakistani military conflict in May by using trade with the two countries as leverage. The perception of a tilt towards Pakistan was reinforced when Trump hosted a luncheon for Pakistan's army chief , Field Marshal Asim Munir, and more recently taunted India after finalising a trade deal with Islamabad that includes the development of its 'massive' oil reserves. Meanwhile, India since 2022 has emerged as a top buyer of Russian crude oil – which has come under heavy sanctions from the US and its allies. Russia now accounts for nearly 40% of India's oil imports, while Delhi is currently Moscow's second-largest buyer after China. The tariffs have also cast a cloud over the two sides' burgeoning defence partnership. This article went live on August fifth, two thousand twenty five, at fifty-nine minutes past nine at night. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Thailand approves $600 million deal for Swedish fighter jets
Thailand approved the purchase of four Swedish-made Gripen fighter jets on Tuesday (August 5, 2025), the air force said, a week after reaching a ceasefire in deadly border clashes with Cambodia. The $600 million agreement for the Saab JAS 39 Gripens was first announced in June as part of a long-term plan to modernise the air force's combat capabilities. During five days of clashes with Cambodia that left more than 40 people dead, Thailand used its fleet of F-16s to strike military targets across the border. It was the deadliest border fighting between the two countries in decades. "The Cabinet has approved the purchase of JAS 39 Saab Gripen to strengthen the Royal Thai Air Force and protect Thailand's sovereignty," the air force said on its official Facebook page. A procurement committee began deliberations in August last year, concluding a 10-month review that favoured the Scandinavian-made jets over American F-16s. The kingdom already operates 11 older Gripens, as well as dozens of F-16s acquired in the 1980s. The country's total defence budget stands at 200 billion baht ($6 billion), which includes allocations for the army, navy and air force.