Moves to ban ‘exploitative' unpaid internships a step closer
The Government said internships offered young people invaluable experience as they build their careers, but added that when they were unpaid or paid below the national minimum wage, they created barriers to equal opportunity based on where people live, how old they are, or their social background.
Unpaid internships are already largely banned under current law, when they are not part of an educational or training course, but ministers said they wanted to strengthen protections by gathering more evidence on how unpaid internships affect young people, and how businesses use them to assess candidates.
Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said: 'Every young person deserves the chance to build their career through quality work experience, but good employers are still being undercut by those exploiting interns by illegally asking them to work for free.
'Our Plan for Change seeks to break down barriers to opportunity, which is why we will strengthen protections for younger workers so that internships are accessible to everyone, ensuring they have the foundations to build a strong and successful career.'
Employment Rights Minister Justin Madders said: 'Internships provide a strong platform from which to build a career, allowing young people to learn new skills and giving employers a pipeline of future talent to hire from to grow their business.
'Employers should not be taking advantage of the opportunities on offer by not paying their interns.
'This move will help us crack down on those not following the rules, so that the next generation of interns are able to gain that crucial experience whilst earning a fair wage.'
Nick Harrison, chief executive of the Sutton Trust, said: 'Taking action on internships with low or no pay is absolutely the right thing to do.
'We've found that 61% of internships undertaken by recent graduates were unpaid or underpaid, effectively excluding those who can't rely on financial support from family.
'Employers will benefit from the wider pool of talent available to them, and three quarters of employers told us a ban wouldn't impact the number of opportunities they provide.
'Today's announcement marks a significant step in the right direction.'
The call for evidence will run for 12 weeks.
Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner said: 'Unpaid internships lock working-class kids out of jobs and opportunities, depriving them of the chance others take for granted.
'Young people trying to get started in their career are missing out on their dream jobs because they simply cannot afford to work for nothing.
'That's why we are taking action, and this call for evidence is the first step in delivering proper fairness and opportunity to young workers. We want to hear about people's experiences so we can build the evidence and act on this issue, creating the change that is needed.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
UK promised ‘biggest overhaul of water regulation in a generation'
Environment Secretary Steve Reed is initiating 'the biggest overhaul of water regulation in a generation' amid growing anger at poor service, spiralling bills and the pollution of Britain's waterways. The reforms include establishing a new water ombudsman with legal powers to resolve consumer disputes. The government pledges to halve river pollution by 2030 and eliminate it completely by 2035. A key recommendation of the reform is expected to be the scrapping of Ofwat and the creation of a new regulator. This overhaul will involve a £104 billion investment to rebuild the country's crumbling sewage pipes.
The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Monday briefing: How the two-year effort to keep the Afghanistan data breach secret fell apart
Good morning. It has been described as the worst data breach in British history. A British defence official sent an email in 2022 containing the names and details of more than 18,700 people in Afghanistan who had applied for asylum under the Afghan citizens resettlement scheme; but somehow, some of the information on the spreadsheet was later leaked on a Facebook group. The Afghan people named in that spreadsheet became immediate and obvious targets for reprisals by the Taliban, and so the British government scrambled to resettle 900 individuals affected, along with 3,600 family members. While the resettlement route is now closed, the government has promised to honour 600 invitations already made to any named person still in Afghanistan and their immediate family. The cost of the whole operation is expected to reach £850m. Amid the shocking details of this scandal, what is perhaps most extraordinary is that, until last week, the majority of the British public had no idea that it had happened. We were not legally allowed to know about the leak, or to know that thousands of Afghans who worked with British forces were put at risk, or to know that thousands were resettled in the UK. This continued for two years because of an unprecedented superinjunction – the longest in British history. To understand the lengths the government went to cover up the crisis and the impact this will have on public trust, I spoke to the Guardian's defence editor Dan Sabbagh That's after the headlines. Health | The NHS is facing an 'absolutely shocking' £27bn bill for maternity failings in England, after a series of hospital scandals, resulting in hundreds of babies and women dying or suffering life-altering conditions, triggered a record level of legal claims. Middle East | Pope Leo XIV has condemned the 'barbarity' of the war in Gaza and the 'indiscriminate use of force' as Gaza's health ministry said at least 85 Palestinians had been killed queueing for food. UK news | More than four decades after the violent policing at Orgreave during the miners' strike and a failed prosecution criticised as a police 'frame up', the government has established an inquiry into the scandal. Protest | Four people were arrested on suspicion of terrorism offences during a pro-Palestine protest in Liverpool city centre on Sunday afternoon, police said. Merseyside police said material in support of campaign group Palestine Action was reportedly seen in the possession of a small number of protesters. UK weather | Half a month's rainfall could hit the UK in the next 24 hours, the Met Office has said. Yellow weather warnings for rain and thunderstorms were in place in Northern Ireland, Scotland and the north and south-west of England until 10pm on Sunday, with more warnings coming into force in other areas on Monday. The previous Conservative government became aware of the leak 18 months after the incident – in August 2023 – after the spreadsheet was published on Facebook. The government then took action to get the post removed, but journalists became quickly aware of the breach, prompting the government to take an extraordinary court injunction to stop the data leak going public. The judge went further, granting the government a superinjunction, a mechanism which prevents disclosure of the very existence of the injunction itself. It's worth noting why this was granted: there are real and founded fears that the Afghans on that list would face retaliation from the Taliban for working with British forces. Yet there are also significant questions to be asked about the length of the injunction, and its scale ('against the whole world'): was it about protecting vulnerable Afghans? Or was it about protecting the British government from scandal? Legal campaigners have condemned the superinjunction for using national security to provide legal cover for what they argue is a political crisis. The legal injunction came into force in September 2023, and 'the Tories let it run,' Dan Sabbagh tells me. 'The timeline shows they wanted it hushed until after the election. Mr Justice Chamberlain rules twice to maintain the injunction, then a third time says, 'no, it's too big'. That's around May 2024. The election is called around then, but the government appeals and delays it past the election.' Dan spoke of his astonishment that a leak of such a serious nature was covered up for years. 'And then on top of that, a remedial scheme was cooked up over a succession of cabinet meetings, expanding in size, costing more and more money. So a real, massive commitment was being agreed in order to conceal the fact of the error. And all this was kept secret from the press, from parliament, and ultimately the public.' The impact on Afghans There has been a great deal of scrutiny on the secrecy and the impact this will have on the public. I'll get into that with Dan later, because first I want to take the time to highlight the people in Afghanistan whose lives have been devastated by this leak. 'People have previously spoken about the western involvement in Afghanistan, the catastrophic withdrawal and the thousands of people who built their lives around the western presence who had all that taken away. But it's important to know that nowhere near enough of those people were helped. Some of them are still in hiding, some of them have been killed. There's genuine worry about their safety under the Taliban,' Dan said. One Afghan who worked as an interpreter told the Guardian 'it felt like my blood had turned to ice' when he found out his name was leaked. He hasn't been able to bring himself to tell his family of the nightmare they have been engulfed in. Other members of his family are in hiding, some have been killed. Another interpreter simply said: 'The Taliban has been actively hunting down those who worked with UK forces. I am ashamed that I put my children's lives at risk for a foreign power.' The thousands of Afghans who have not been evacuated to Britain are not expected to receive any compensation, according to a report by The Times. Dan was keen to add that Labour have since shut down the scheme that was launched to resettle applicants affected by the leak. 'They've also shut down the other two Afghan schemes. So now there's no legal route to come to the UK from Afghanistan. When Afghans do come, they generally get asylum, so we might see more of them in Calais.' Soldiers and spies named The spreadsheet had a 'key notes' column near the name of every Afghan applicant, providing extra information. This included things such as: 'worked with British military,' 'was Afghan special forces,' 'case expedited,' or even 'secretary of state says no', Dan told me. Sometimes, entries named specific UK figures vouching for people. That's how the names of more than 100 officials and soldiers, as well as a handful of MI6 officers, also got out. 'We couldn't report that until [Thursday] due to residual restrictions. There was another hearing in front of Mr Justice Chamberlain who said, 'I'm now going to hear all this in public.' But the Ministry of Defence immediately wanted an hour in closed session to talk about national security,' Dan said. How useful is this information about British forces and intelligence for Britain's enemies? 'The British state really doesn't like the names of secret service or informants coming out,' he said. The scale of the secrecy While leaks and data breaches are not uncommon, this scandal that followed is unparalleled in its scope. 'The unprecedented bit is the secrecy. The superinjunction to cover up what was initially just a mistake, though potentially dangerous, yes. But then, the extraordinary secrecy, the massive policy response that was also secret, which was kept from parliament, the press and public. It's absolutely unprecedented,' Dan said. Dan told me that much of the decision to keep this a secret was taken by the Conservatives. Ben Wallace was defence secretary until the end of August 2023, and his only role was to seek the injunction. Grant Shapps was in that role through the period of the cover-up and in charge when the superinjunction was being fought, then expanded. Other ministers, such as deputy prime minister Oliver Dowden and armed forces minister James Heappey, also knew, Dan said. The only Labour figures who knew before the election were then shadow defence secretary John Healey and speaker of the House of Commons Lindsay Hoyle, both subject to the superinjunction. Due to the severity of the legal threat, Healey did not tell his party leader Keir Starmer about it. When Labour won the election, they rolled the scheme and injunction for six months, then commissioned a review in January 2025. So what's happened since? Former Tory government ministers, such as Grant Shapps, have since defended the use of the superinjunction, while Keir Starmer said former Conservative ministers have 'serious questions to answer' over the breach. It's hard to properly digest the impact this could have on public trust, Dan added. 'If you believe there's a deep state out there working against the public's interest, this is your proof. And it touches on migration, which is the most politically toxic issue of the moment.' Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Rowena Mason and Ben Quinn have a cracking report on Reform's 'scattergun campaign' to turn a Tory big beast or two to the cause. Speaking to insiders, they hear how the party has designs on nabbing a Jacob Rees-Mogg, Suella Braverman … or even a Liz Truss. Charlie Lindlar, acting deputy editor, newsletters The power over the planet is wielded by a small number of autocratic states, writes the Guardian's environment editor Fiona Harvey, and their actions, or lack thereof, could determine whether the world succeeds in limiting catastrophic climate change. Aamna Superfoods instinctively feel like one of those things you have to a special shop for. But not so, says Rachel Dixon, in this much-needed piece digging into 17 'overlooked' superfoods, including, apparently, tomatoes? Charlie Can a relationship survive if one partner suddenly goes 'woo-woo'; think, tarot cards, astrology. Well, yes, writes Emma Beddington, but only up to a point. Something my husband can attest to. Aamna Back on the food and drink theme, Elle Hunt went in search of this year's 'drink of the summer' and thinks she's found it. It's not a spicy paloma, nor this godless thing called a BuzzBall, but, she reckons, a Finnish gin concoction. Charlie Golf | Scottie Scheffler had all the time in the world to celebrate his latest major title. Sunday's British Open was never in doubt as golf's number 1 player delivered another dominant performance to win his second major this year and grab the third leg of the career grand slam. Football | England have condemned the 'online poison' of racist abuse directed at the defender Jess Carter during the European Championship in Switzerland and said they will stop taking a knee before matches because 'football needs to find another way to tackle racism'. Football | West Ham have completed the signing of the free agent Kyle Walker‑Peters, whose Southampton contract expired this summer. The former Tottenham full-back joins Graham Potter to continue the Hammers' summer business, which has been slow going so far. The Guardian has 'Revealed: £27bn bill for failings in England's mother and baby care'. The Financial Times leads with 'Downing Street faces forced retreat in Apple encryption battle with US'. The Telegraph says 'Farage: I'll build more jails to clean up streets'. The Times reports 'Reeves set to defy left over call for wealth tax'. The Mail has 'BMA's war chest to fund doctors' strikes'. The Sun leads with 'Fears over Gazza dash to A&E'. Finally, the Mirror reports on racist abuse suffered by England Lioness Jess Carter with 'We stand with Jess'. Has Elon Musk built a Nazi chatbot? Is the extreme output of X's AI chatbot Grok shifting the political dial? Chris Stokel-Walker reports. Sign up for Inside Saturday to see more of Edith Pritchett's cartoons, the best Saturday magazine content and an exclusive look behind the scenes A bit of good news to remind you that the world's not all bad Rachel Reeves is the first female chancellor of the exchequer, but she is far from alone. As the Guardian's economics editor Heather Stewart notes, the commanding heights of economic policymaking in the UK are becoming much less male. The Institute for Government's director is Hannah White, its chief economist, Gemma Tetlow, and the new director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies is Helen Miller. The Resolution Foundation is now run by Ruth Curtice, a former Treasury economist. Rain Newton-Smith, another economist, has the task of repairing the CBI's scandal-rocked reputation as its director general. Two of the four deputy governors of the Bank of England are women, too – as are the leaders of a string of powerful trades unions. 'This female takeover has been a quiet and matter-of-fact one,' Stewart writes, 'but it marks a significant change, very noticeable upon returning to covering the field, after a few years away.' Sign up here for a weekly roundup of The Upside, sent to you every Sunday And finally, the Guardian's puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Quick crossword Cryptic crossword Wordiply
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Allegations of slave labour and a tsunami of waste: The dark side of Labour's solar energy crusade
Stroll down the average residential street and you're likely to see at least one or two houses with solar panels gleaming darkly on their roofs. Some 1.5 million UK homes now have them installed, according to government data, and the number is growing. As we move away from fossil fuels, as part of the Government's net zero initiatives, solar is likely to play a key part in the transition. Under plans to be published this autumn, almost all new homes will be fitted with solar power, unleashing what Ed Miliband has called a 'rooftop revolution'. One that could save householders hundreds of pounds off their energy bills, we are promised. 'So many people just don't understand why this doesn't already happen,' the Energy Secretary said last month when announcing the proposed changes. Yet uncomfortable questions hang over almost every stage of the process of switching to solar, which currently receive relatively little attention. From the manufacture of a solar panel to the end of its operational life, ethical and – ironically – environmental considerations are often overlooked in the rush to do the right thing, some warn. Complications include everything from forced labour in the supply chain to a lack of recycling capacity, representing a dark side to solar that often goes unaddressed. The problems begin right from the point at which the materials for the panels are made. Polysilicon, a type of silicon produced from small silicon crystals extracted from quartzite rock, is a key component. Between a third and half of the world's supply is estimated to come from the resource-rich Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR) of China – where it is made using coal-based energy. 'Polysilicon [and] solar panels are not produced sustainably in the Uyghur region,' says Yalkun Uluyol, the China researcher at Human Rights Watch. 'That's why [it's] cheap and therefore creates unfair trade practice. For customers hoping to protect the environment, and aiming for a better transition [to green energy], it's coming at the cost of the environment and human rights elsewhere.' The potentially unsustainable production behind our sustainable future isn't the only problem with the world's reliance on Xinjiang-sourced polysilicon. Reports that it is made using state-sponsored forced labour involving Xinjiang's Uyghur Muslims have also posed a dilemma for countries trying to scale up their solar energy use. Many of the factories employing 'supposedly free' citizens in the XUAR are 'surrounded by razor-wire fences, iron gates and security cameras and are monitored by police or additional security', according to 2021 research by Sheffield Hallam University. This applied to factories generally in the region (and therefore implicated various end products), the report suggested. But by 2020, four of the six highest-capacity polysilicon producers were companies with significant manufacturing bases in the north-western XUAR – and all 'utilise state-sponsored labour transfers, the end products of which are sold into the international solar module market', the authors of Sheffield Hallam's In Broad Daylight report wrote. State-imposed labour transfer programmes involve 'indoctrination and other forms of human rights abuses,' Uluyol says. The Chinese authorities have denied that such coercion is involved in obtaining polysilicon, saying they are tackling separatism and Islamist militancy in the XUAR. Although Western governments have been aware of the situation for some time, action has been slow. In March this year, ministers in Britain rejected an amendment to a bill that would have prevented Great British Energy from spending money on solar panels where there was 'credible evidence of modern slavery' in the supply chains. By April, following a U-turn, the Government's plans were changed, to prevent the publicly-owned clean energy company from using solar panels linked to alleged Chinese slave labour. In the US, the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act was signed into law in 2021. 'Some countries are implementing forced labour regulations but it's not enough, as supply chains tainted with forced labour are shifting to the jurisdictions with no or weak regulation,' says Uluyol. 'The green transition should not come at the cost of crimes against humanity. And it should be green not just for the UK but for the globe.' If legislation is slowly moving in the right direction on human rights, it still leaves a potentially enormous problem at the other end of a solar panel's life: namely, what happens when it's no longer in use. The panels don't last forever – they last about 25 to 30 years. By the early 2030s, an estimated eight million worldwide will be reaching the end of their life, creating what has been called a tsunami of solar panel waste. Some of the earlier models are already reaching the end of their working lives now. 'Manufacturers are responsible for making sure they're recycled properly but it's very difficult,' says Jane Richardson, head of sustainability at Waste Experts, a waste management firm. The solar panel recycling industry in Britain is extremely limited, with few places currently offering the service. The panels are classed as electronic waste, so can't legally be dumped in landfill – but this is sometimes where they end up nonetheless. 'There are some that just go to landfill as people try and save money,' says Richardson. 'Landfill is the cheapest option.' A lot of e-waste is, alternatively, shipped abroad and 'not processed correctly,' she says. 'A lot ends up in Africa and Asia.' Britain isn't ready to recycle the volume of solar panels it will need to in the near future, she believes, and major investment will be required to build the necessary facilities. While others point out that the amount of solar panel waste expected in the coming years is still dwarfed by the waste generated by fossil fuel energy, that doesn't mean it isn't an issue. 'It's a problem that's going to appear [and] it's going to be huge,' says Chris Sansom, prof of concentrating solar power at the University of Derby. 'Clearly as the numbers [of solar panels reaching the end of their lives] increase, they are going to pile up and that's going to be pretty visible.' And while most of the component materials can be reused – the glass, the metal, the silicon – the panels haven't actually been designed for easy recycling, he says. 'If you were to ask any of us scientists and engineers to redesign them for recycling, we could do that, but they're [currently] built for low cost, not recycling.' Then there's the question of where we put our solar farms. A train journey through Britain now quite often takes you past once-green fields entirely given over to them. Quite apart from the 'nimby' arguments against them, questions remain over the carbon impact of these sites, Prof Sansom points out. 'If you've got a green field, it's absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and very often I don't think that gets considered,' he says. 'If you cover [fields] with panels, you're virtually killing off the grass and the soil underneath and stopping it from absorbing CO2.' Pouring public money into solar farms has not always gone smoothly either. In Essex, bankrupt Thurrock Council sold off its last 53 solar farms last year, having been left with about £1.4bn of debt following a string of failed investments. Last month, the Serious Fraud Office announced it had launched an investigation into a company that sold a bond investment scheme linked to solar farms, into which the council had invested millions. None of this amounts to a conclusive argument against solar energy per se, but it does highlight the trade-offs involved and the possible pitfalls of rushing into this evolving market. The likelihood is that, as the solar energy industry matures, many of these issues will be resolved. Waste industry insiders are reasonably confident that recycling facilities can be scaled up to handle the tidal wave of e-waste soon to come crashing upon us.. But it is argued that we should be clear-eyed about the true cost of the new rush for solar. 'I think we fool ourselves sometimes,' says Prof Sansom. 'If you ignore that the panels have a carbon footprint when they arrive in the UK, you can… appear very green. But that's cheating because you're not considering the embedded carbon that's gone into making the panel in China in the first place.' At the same time, you could end up convincing yourself that you shouldn't transition to renewables at all. 'You have to make the investment somewhere to decarbonise the grid or you won't get anywhere,' Sansom says. 'But you have to be careful, when you're moving things around the world, that someone is picking up the carbon footprint.'
