Guy Barnett will hand down his first state budget amid challenging times for his party
It's not the ideal setting for Treasurer Guy Barnett's first state budget.
After watching the Liberals lose all their Tasmanian Lower House seats at this month's federal election, new EMRS polling released on Monday showed the state Liberal Party slumping below Labor in the polls for the first time since 2009.
The government's woes were further compounded on Saturday night, with a poor showing at the Legislative Council elections.
The Liberals look set to lose one of their four Upper House seats, with election experts forecasting independent Casey Hiscutt is on track to defeat Liberal Stephen Parry in Montgomery and claim the seat his mother Leonie held for the Liberals since 2013.
The Liberals also fell flat in Nelson, where candidate Marcus Vermey has failed to win a single booth off independent Meg Webb, including in the traditional Liberal heartland of Sandy Bay.
Ms Webb has so far attracted a whopping 52 per cent of the primary vote, with Mr Vermey well back on 34.1 per cent.
Political analyst Kevin Bonham says the result shows the issues with the party's brand aren't confined to the federal election, like frontbencher Felix Ellis tried to suggest this week.
"There just seems to be no appetite for voters to elect more government members to the Legislative Council," he said.
"Voters want the government to be scrutinised."
But Dr Bonham says there's no shame in the Liberals, represented by former senator Stephen Parry, losing the seat of Montgomery.
Mr Hiscutt leads Mr Parry by 2.47 per cent on primary votes, with Dr Bonham projecting him to extend that lead when preferences are counted on Thursday.
"They [the Liberals] won that seat in 2013 and that was a time when the Liberal brand was soaring high and there was massive resentment to the Labor-Green coalition government in that area of the state.
"So it was a smart move for Leonie Hiscutt to run as a Liberal even though previous Hiscutts had been independents.
"But at the moment it was not a smart move — if Casey Hiscutt had run as Liberal, someone would have come out and out flanked him as an independent, so he's done the clever thing here."
Casey Hiscutt's great uncles Desmond and Hugh Hiscutt were previously members of the Legislative Council in the 1980s and 1990s.
Whatever the reason, the Liberals' likely defeat in Montgomery makes things even tougher for the government.
The six major party MLCs are outnumbered by eight independents and Green Cassy O'Connor.
The Liberals, with just three MLCs — ministers Nick Duigan, Kerry Vincent and Jo Palmer — need the support of five other MLCs to pass legislation.
That means either five crossbenchers, or Labor and three independents.
It makes it harder for a government already frustrated by the Upper House not passing some of its legislation, like its push to allow certain development applications to bypass local councils.
The government will need to display some great negotiation skills to get controversial plans, like its special legislation allowing the Macquarie Point stadium to be built, through the Upper House.
Getting three independents to join the Labor Party in supporting the stadium won't be an easy task.
The government already had its hands full getting two of Tania Rattray, Bec Thomas, Dean Harriss and Ruth Forrest to support the legislation.
Now it'll also have to woo Mr Hiscutt, who says he supports the stadium but wants to scrutinise the legislation before guaranteeing he'll vote for it.
The recent blows for the Liberal Party make Mr Barnett's first budget even more important.
It needs some good PR to get the public back onside.
But that's not an easy task when the state is on track to reach almost $10 billion of debt by 2027-28, and doesn't yet have a concrete date to return to surplus.
None of that makes it easy to deliver the kind of big funding injections that put smiles on the faces of Tasmanians.
At a press conference on Sunday announcing another year of record health expenditure, Mr Barnett said the budget would contain a "very clear pathway to surplus", but refused to answer whether the document would forecast one being achieved in the next four years.
And, crucially, he refused to rule out making some calls that will stir up public opposition, like accelerating public sector spending cuts, or unveiling plans to sell state-owned companies.
Here's a snippet from the press conference:
Journalist: When will we see [economist] Saul Eslake's report into government business enterprises?
Mr Barnett: I'll have more to say about that later this week
Journalist: So is that your budget day surprise, you're selling assets?
Mr Barnett: Let's be very clear in terms of the budget. We're very focused on building a better Tasmania now and for the future, investing in the things that matter for Tasmanians like health; today is an excellent example of that, we've got record funding in health. I'm very excited and looking forward to budget day and I'll have more to say on Thursday.
Journalist : So how many assets are you going to sell?
Mr Barnett: I'm looking forward to budget day on Thursday.
The press conference seemed to point to a budget that could contain some tough love, right at a time when the government needs an easy sell the most.
No pressure, Mr Barnett.
And it all comes at a time when the government's task of getting the public back onside is set to get even tougher, with its draft stadium legislation set to go out for public consultation in the next week.
After EMRS polling showed the Liberals losing the most support in the state's north and north-west, being seen to be ramming through a project that polling says is deeply unpopular there will be pretty tough to sell to the public.
And that could make the task of convincing Tasmanians to elect them to a fifth straight term in office at the 2028 state election that little bit tougher than it's already looking.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
41 minutes ago
- ABC News
Flood-hit NSW residents say insurance unaffordable as premiums skyrocket
Glen Schmidt and Cindy West did everything they could to prepare when they heard flooding was expected to hit their town on the NSW Mid North Coast. But despite their efforts, floodwater surged through their Wingham home, rising to 1.6 metres. "I [did] everything possible — made over 150 sandbags, put bilge pumps in, the water was just so high," Mr Schmidt said. With the water now gone, the couple face the daunting task of cleaning up the damage without the support of insurance. They bought the property two years ago, with flood insurance which they claimed at the time cost just over $2,000. "But the insurance prices now just skyrocketed to $28,000, we just couldn't afford it for the following years," Mr Schmidt said. Ms West said most homeowners in the region wanted insurance but few could afford it. "How can you find $28,000 to insure your property," she said. Craig and Debbie Emerton, who run a dairy farm in the small village of Croki, said last week's floods had left their property in "total devastation". Mr Emerton said it was the worst flood they had experienced. "I've been through the 1978 flood, which only had 100 millimetres of water in the house, then (in) the 2021 flood we had 200 millimetres in the house, and this was around 900 millimetres in the house," he said. The couple have been struggling to regroup. "(We) haven't been able to produce any quality milk for a week now, weren't able to milk the cows for four days," Mr Emerton said. The couple lost about 50 cattle, predominantly calves, when the flood swept through the town last week. Five cattle were found in neighbours' paddocks, but 27 were still unaccounted for. "It breaks your heart, they are just not cattle to us — they are something closer to children," Mr Emerton said. Mr Emerton, a fifth-generation farmer, has been working the land with his wife for 35 years. But after the damage to their property and farm, they are considering moving to higher ground. "We don't want to but it looks like we are going to probably be forced to," Mr Emerton said. "We can't deal with this again." Like many of their neighbours around the Manning River, the couple were not insured. "As residents in a flood plain, the premiums are so high so the majority of people can't afford them," Mr Emerton said. Insurance Council of Australia CEO Andrew Hall said the rise in premiums was due to a range of issues. "We've had record events, record claim numbers and, on top of that, building inflation has been around 40 per cent in three years alone," he said. He said about 6,000 insurance claims have already been lodged, and it was growing by a thousand each day. "What we do need to do is have a conversation with the federal and state governments about a flood-defence fund," he said. The Insurance Council of Australia put forward a proposal to the Albanese government before the last federal election for a $30 billion flood-defence fund over 10 years. "There are around 220,000 homes in high-risk flood areas that need to be better protected," he said. Mr Hall said the Insurance Council of Australia was calling on the government to "put the money on the table". "Give these communities options that they can work through, whether it's a flood levee, house raising, waterproofing or, in worst case scenarios, buybacks," he said. Mr Schmidt said a flood-defence fund would be greatly welcomed and "they would 100 per cent accept a buyback scheme". However, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese recently said buybacks were unavailable. "He hasn't even been down our street — our street was one of the hardest hit streets here in Wingham," Mr Schmidt said. The federal government announced a one-off, $1,000 payment for residents of nine areas who had significant property damage or had lost a loved one. "A thousand dollars is better than nothing, but when you have nothing, it doesn't go very far," Ms West said.
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Pauline Hanson's daughter Lee Hanson vows political comeback after failed Senate tilt
The daughter of One Nation leader Pauline Hanson and failed senate contender Lee Hanson has vowed to return to politics after she just missed out on a Senate spot. After weeks of counting, the Australian Electoral Commission confirmed the six senate vacancies were won by Labor's Carol Brown and Richard Dowling, Greens senator Nick McKim, Liberal senators Claire Chandler and Richard Colbeck, as well as firebrand senator Jacqui Lambie. Despite early fears that Ms Hanson could topple Senator Lambie, the first-time contender came in seventh and fell short of a seat. Speaking to NewsWire on Wednesday, Ms Hanson said that despite only running a four-week campaign, she was able to amass a 'phenomenal' amount of support, and vowed a return to politics. 'I'm only getting started … There's such a need for effective change and adequate representation in parliament,' she said. 'I've got three years now to campaign if I choose to run in the next federal election … I'll continue to work with them regardless, and do what I can to support them regardless of holding a federal position or not.' Ms Hanson, who resigned from a senior role with Hydro Tasmania to run in the federal election, wouldn't rule out becoming a political staffer for One Nation, stating she was 'keeping all options open'. 'I don't know what the future is going to hold now. They're all decisions I'll need to make over the coming weeks and months,' she said. Ms Hanson said her four-week campaign had revealed people had several 'misconceptions' about One Nation, specially that the party was only 'Queensland relevant'. 'We do look at localised issues and advocate for localised issues as well as common national stances as well,' she said. 'The ones that typically do get a run in the media are immigration and things ... but if you look at the solutions and the policy offerings of One Nation, they're far (reaching).' She also accused media of pitting her against Senator Lambie, stating comments from Senator Hanson stating that she wants 'to see her (Senator Lambie) gone' were made through her mother's 'own working experience with Jacqui in the Senate'. 'That's the spin that they (the media) pushed … even though it was never (part of) any agenda or any message I tried to put out in any way, shape or form,' she said. While Ms Hanson said she had never had any contact with or spoken to Senator Lambie, she wished her well and called on her to '(listen) to the 'feedback she's received through the election period'. 'I did hear that many Tasmanians did not feel that Jacqui was representing them adequately, and those who did vote for me wanted a change,' she said. 'There's number of reasons why they didn't feel she was representing them, I know, specifically in the salmon industry.' Following confirmation of the Senate result, Senator Lambie, who has previously said this six-year term would be her last, vowed to fight for Tasmanian people 'doing it tough'. 'Interest rates are coming down and that's good, but for many Tasmanian families it will barely touch the sides,' she said. 'I want to ensure the recommendations from the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide are implemented properly and that they make a real difference to the lives of veterans and their families.' Following the federal election, Labor now holds four of the 12 Tasmanian Senate positions, while the Liberals have four. The Greens hold two seats, with the remaining spots held by independent Tammy Tyrell and Senator Lambie.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Freedom and authority in the Catholic Church: Pope Leo XIV's ecclesiological manifesto — housed in the library of Sydney University - ABC Religion & Ethics
In 2002, a scholar at the University of Sydney made a request to Fisher Library for what then seemed to be an unremarkable dissertation. Entitled 'The Office and Authority of the Local Prior in the Order of Saint Augustine', the dissertation was published in 1987 as part of a doctoral degree in Canon Law at the Pontifical College of St. Thomas Aquinas (Angelicum) in Rome. In the September of the year before the request, its author, Fr Robert Francis Prevost, an Augustinian friar hailing from Chicago, had been elected Prior General of his order after years of pastoral work in Peru, so his views on the order's governance would have been topical. Fisher Library had the foresight to procure a copy that has now resurfaced after its author's unexpected election as Pope Leo XIV. This precious volume — now in the Rare Books and Special Collections of Fisher Library — is the only copy of the thesis located in the southern hemisphere and one of only a handful of copies worldwide. Unlike previous popes, whose elections were preceded by widely diffused writings, this thesis is the only significant work published by the pope prior to his election. Thus, it gives us crucial insights into the pope's vision for the church and its leadership. Meeting the challenges of the modern age From its opening pages, this thesis explores the challenges that modernity poses for the Catholic Church. While Prevost recognises that the church cannot embrace all modern values, he is not antagonistic towards them. As the world has changed, so the church must adapt. Old notions of authority and obedience are no longer sustainable in an age defined by human subjectivity — which he terms 'personalism' in a tacit nod to the ethics of Pope John Paul II: Values have changed, there is a new understanding of the dignity of each person, and a new age of personalism has been born. Obedience as blind submission to the will of another is no longer accepted, and authority at all levels has been challenged, with claims that promote the values of human liberty and democracy but do not accept or understand the Church's standpoint on authority and obedience. As Prevost reminds us, this emphasis on freedom resonates with the opposition to authority expressed in the gospels. But for there to be true freedom, there must be authority, and this authority is established by Jesus himself: Authority is placed at the service of the good of others, this is true; not, however, because and in as much as it is derived from the community, but because it is received from above for governing and judging, originating in a positive intervention on the part of the Lord. From this premise, the future pope introduces the main theme of his thesis — namely, an exploration of the juridical authority and responsibilities of the local prior in the Augustinian order following the reforms of the Second Vatican Council. Every page is imbued with the spirit of the Council, and indeed the three apostolic duties ( munera ) described in Lumen Gentium , the Dogmatic Constitution of the Church produced by the Council, provide the structural glue for how Prevost articulates the responsibilities of the local prior: munus docendi (duty to teach), munus sanctificandi (the duty to sanctify) and munus regendi (the duty to govern). A theology of listening For Robert Prevost, the local prior is one of the most important authority figures in the Augustinian order despite his limited jurisdiction. This is because the decisions of the local prior have the greatest consequences for how Augustinian life is concretely experienced in actual communities. To a certain degree, Prevost's emphasis on local leadership anticipates Pope Francis's vision of a synodal church that listens to the voices of peripheries. Indeed, some of Pope Leo's first pronouncements after his election reflect his desire to build on Pope Francis's vision. But Prevost's thesis reveals that these statements were made not out of political convenience, but are the result of decades of sustained theological reflection. The source of the future pope's 'theology of listening' is Augustine's understanding of authentic Christian community: Theologically, an Augustinian community is an attempt to reconstitute the conditions of the first Christian community as described in the Acts of the Apostles and as adopted by Augustine in his Rule. In this community, authority is service, and that service is rendered within a context of listening to what the Spirit is saying in His people so that His projects can be carried out freely and willingly. The Prior then is called to listen, so that together they can discern and implement what the Spirit inspires. This theology of listening as the Spirit welds the group into community provides a framework within which the Chapter's authority can be understood. As progressive this might sound, Prevost counterintuitively situates this theology of listening within an institutional understanding of power. On numerous occasions, he reiterates the point that a superior's authority is 'is received from God' through the ministry of the church. He relates that this power, following the Jesuit theologian Francisco Suárez (1548–1617), had been previously understood as a potestas dominativa (dominative power) that was grounded on natural law — like parental authority over children. According to this view, the local prior's power does not derive from Christ but is 'born radically from the will of those who profess the vow of obedience and who donate themselves to the religious institute with the promise and obligation to obey according to its Rule'. Paradoxically, the contractual account of authority used in the Tridentine Church might seem to us more in tune with secular modern individualism, but the future pope rejects this, arguing instead that a local prior's authority is jurisdictional ( potestas iurisdictionis ) and is ultimately derived from the church, which approves the foundation of a religious institute and its constitutions. He concludes, again following Lumen Gentium , that this authority must be considered a divinely bestowed gift or charism that is ministered through the church. This rare copy of Robert Prevost's doctoral dissertation is the only copy of the thesis located in the southern hemisphere and one of only a handful of copies worldwide. (Credit: University of Sydney Library, RB 5487.2) Thus, Fr Robert Prevost's emphasis on grassroots leadership, while reminiscent of Pope Francis's insistence on 'a shepherd that smells of his flock', is founded on a much more institutional ecclesiology. This also transpires in Prevost's meticulous reflections on the procedures and constitutional norms which the local prior must follow in governance. If the vision articulated in Prevost's doctoral thesis plays out, his pontificate will most likely be more predictable and steadier than that of Pope Francis, even as it builds on his predecessor's legacy. I suspect that this is precisely what the cardinal electors wanted when they voted for him. Daniel Canaris is Lecturer in Italian Studies at the University of Sydney. He is an intellectual historian who specialises in intercultural exchange in the early modern period.
