Family Sues Tesla Over Deadly Model S Crash
According to Reuters, the three people who were killed in the crash were David Dryerman (54), his wife Michele (54), and their daughter Brooke (17). Max Dryerman, the older brother of Brooke, is also a plaintiff but was not in the car at the time of the crash.
The Dryerman family were on the way back from a music festival on September 14 when the incident occurred. The electric sedan veered off the road before hitting a sign, a guardrail, and a concrete bridge support. According to the complaint, issues with the car's design resulted in it leaving its lane, and the automatic emergency braking system did not activate. All three family members were said to be buckled up at the time.
"Thousands of Tesla drivers have relied on Tesla's ADAS technology as though it were capable of safe, fully autonomous self-driving with minor software updates when in fact it is incapable of safely handling a variety of routine roadway scenarios without driver input," the complaint said via Pace Monitor(subscription required).
Furthermore, the crash was blamed on the car's "defective and unreasonably dangerous design."
Related: Hands-Free Showdown: BlueCruise, Super Cruise, Autopilot. Which One Owns the Highway?
Every new Tesla still functions most safely with an attentive driver behind the wheel, something the EV giant itself has emphasized. However, language used by Elon Musk and by the brand in marketing its tech have conflicted with this.
The complaint specifically mentioned a statement by Musk in 2016, when he said Autopilot was "probably better" than human drivers. Furthermore, the full suite of driver aids has been referred to as Full Self-Driving by Tesla for years, despite the cars not being capable of self-driving in every single scenario. Currently, you can still order what is called Full Self-Driving on a Model S, but Tesla has added the word "Supervised" to the suite's name. "Your car will be able to drive itself almost anywhere with minimal driver intervention," says a current statement on the brand's site.
Related: Tesla is responsible for more fatal accidents than any other carmaker - the reason why may surprise you
It's easy to see how this messaging can still be poorly interpreted by some drivers, and an analysis by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) indicated that there was a "critical safety gap between drivers' expectations of the L2 system's operating capabilities and the system's true capabilities."
This analysis specifically focused on Tesla models produced between the 2012 and 2023 model years. Following pressure from the NHTSA, Tesla agreed to recall over two million cars in late 2023 to include new safeguards for the Autopilot system. However, the car involved in this case is a 2024 model, so it's clear that there is still work to be done, assuming that the car's tech is the main cause of the unfortunate crash.
Both the plaintiffs' lawyers and Musk himself have not yet commented on the Dryerman case.
Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla Is in the S&P 500: 4 Things That Means for Investors in 2025
Tesla (TSLA) stock has had its up and downs of late, but it's certainly been up over time. Tesla is part of the S&P 500; the index most analysts use to measure the overall market. Explore More: Consider This: What does Tesla's presence on the S&P 500 mean for investors in 2025? Here's what you need to know. Tesla Is Number 9 on the S&P 500 As the name implies, there are 500 stocks on the S&P 500. Tesla is number nine on this list, which means it carries more weight on the index than 98% of the companies on the list, per Slickcharts. Find Out: Tesla Makes Up Nearly 2% of the Index The S&P 500 is a weighted index, with the larger companies higher on the list and comprising a larger percentage of the overall metric. In the case of Tesla, its stock makes up 1.82% of the total S&P 500 index. Tech Stocks Dominate The top 10 stocks in the S&P 500, which make up 38% of the index, are nearly all tech or tech-adjacent stocks. They are Nvidia, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Meta, Broadcom, Alphabet (Class A), Alphabet (Class C), Tesla and Berkshire Hathaway. This Can All Add Up to Volatility The S&P 500 is a bellwether for the general market, so it is expected to have some volatility. But the heavy concentration of tech stocks could mean extra volatility, especially as tariffs take effect and companies are incented to move manufacturing to the U.S. Tesla, for example, is up 68% in the past year but down 20% year to date, as of Aug. 7, 2025, according to Yahoo! Finance. Its 52-week range is $192.04 to $488.54 — a very wide spread, particularly for a company of its size. What Is the S&P 500? The S&P500 consists of 500 of the largest U.S. stocks, weighted by market capitalization. This means that the largest companies are represented by a larger percentage than smaller companies. Nvidia is the largest company in the S&P 500 and represents 7.72% of the total index. The S&P 500 is broadly used as an indicator for the stock market overall, and, by extension, the health of the U.S. economy. While the Dow Jones Industrial Average (commonly referred to as 'the Dow' or even 'the market') is often what news outlets report on, that index consists of just 30 stocks. The S&P 500 represents more companies and therefore may be a better barometer for the health of the market. The S&P 500 isn't always the same 500 companies. Companies can be added and removed, based on decisions by the experts at the S&P Dow Jones Indices. These decisions are made four times a year. To be included in the S&P 500, a company must have a market capitalization of at least $22.7 billion in the most recent quarter, according to Charles Schwab. It must have been profitable for at least the last four quarters. It must be based in the United States, and its stock must be traded on an approved U.S. stock exchange. When it was announced that Tesla would be added to the S&P 500 in 2020, its shares gained 60% from the time the announcement was made until it was actually included the following month. A company's shares will often spike when it is added to the index, if for no other reason than that such stocks are included in many index funds that seek to mirror the performance of the S&P 500 itself. Tesla remains profitable despite its recent sales declines. At its July earnings call, the company reported that profits declined for the third quarter in a row, The New York Times reported. If the company were to report a quarterly loss, it would risk being removed from the S&P 500. The inclusion of Tesla on the S&P 500 is certainly justified, given the company's success. Whether it remains there will depend on the company's ability to continue to record profitable results. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 9 Downsizing Tips for the Middle Class To Save on Monthly Expenses 10 Unreliable SUVs To Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on Tesla Is in the S&P 500: 4 Things That Means for Investors in 2025 Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla drivers can pursue class action over self-driving claims, judge rules
By Jonathan Stempel (Reuters) -Tesla must face a certified class action by California drivers who said Elon Musk misled them for eight years about the self-driving capabilities of his company's electric vehicles. U.S. District Judge Rita Lin said the common question of whether Tesla lacked sensors to achieve high-level autonomy plus its inability to "demonstrate a long-distance autonomous drive with any of its vehicles" justified group lawsuits by two sets of drivers who bought its Full Self-Driving technology package. In her decision on Monday, the San Francisco-based judge also said thousands of people likely saw Tesla's claim in the "Autopilot" section of its website from October 2016 to August 2024 that its vehicles contained hardware for full self-driving. Tesla made a similar claim in a blog post, newsletter and quarterly earnings call, as did Musk at a 2016 press conference. "While these channels alone may not ordinarily be enough to establish class-wide exposure for a traditional car manufacturer, Tesla's distinctive advertising strategy warrants a departure from the typical approach," Lin wrote. Tesla does not use mass advertising or independent dealers, and Lin said it was reasonable to infer that class members interested in Full Self-Driving technology went to Tesla's website to get information. Lawyers for Tesla did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Tuesday. The Austin, Texas-based company had said it was unreasonable to assume all class members saw the challenged statements, and there was no common proof the statements were material. Class actions can allow larger recoveries at lower cost than if plaintiffs were forced to sue individually. The California classes include drivers who bought the Full Self-Driving package from May 19, 2017, to July 31, 2024, and opted out of Tesla's arbitration agreement, and drivers who bought the package from October 20, 2016, to May 19, 2017. Lin refused to certify a class of drivers who bought Tesla's Enhanced Autopilot package because its "core product qualities" did not require full self-driving functionality, making Tesla's alleged false statements immaterial to purchasing decisions. Federal officials have examined whether Tesla's full self- driving software is safe. The software is also a key component of Tesla's robotaxis. The case is In re Tesla Advanced Driver Assistance Systems Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 22-05240. Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen.
CNBC
18 minutes ago
- CNBC
William Blair's Jed Dorsheimer: Tesla's robotaxi could eventually pull ahead of competition
Jed Dorsheimer, William Blair analyst, joins CNBC's 'Squawk on the Street' to discuss a new research note about Tesla's robotaxi capabilities, whether robotaxi could be a new catalyst for the company, and much more.
